GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   the SECRET to making successful XGF content (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1065926)

Mutt 04-25-2012 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyRob (Post 18908169)
And I don't? :winkwink:

doh! yes you do shoot good ex-gf - i see it all over :thumbsup

BareBacked 04-25-2012 06:57 PM

really great work and spot on . The samples you posted look totally real

looky_lou 04-25-2012 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 18909171)
Do you suggest making only "self shot" style in this case? Or mix it up with "boyfriend shot"?

Also what if its done as you say but no nude photos (just underwear)? Would that still sell, just for less money, like 150$ non exclusive x 10 times or it won't sell nearly as good?

I don't know for sure. I am just throwing out my opinion.

I would mix it up with boyfriend shot and self shot. Personally I prefer self shot, primarily mirror with the phone visible in the shot. Maybe hit up a few thrift shops and pick up several different mirrors to shoot with. It doesn't all have to be in the bathroom or dresser mirror.

I think that non-nude would probably sell, but you open yourself to more markets if you have both. I want to see the provocative clothing, bikini, bra and panties with a little flashing and nip and pussy slips, etc. But I also want the full nude and masturbation if possible. The difference in model cost is minimal between non-nude and full nude, but you open your options being able to sell both.

From the affiliate side of things, I don't see many sites that have consistently good, legal GF or self shot content. I know there is a need for this content, so I assume there is a market for it if done correctly.

epitome 04-25-2012 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18908615)
Sorry if my pointing out most of you can't afford to invest in your businesses upsets you. You see I come from a business where investing in what we did was normal.

Met Art and a host of other top sites didn't get where they are today without a lot of investment.

Anyway sharing advice like Nina is, isn't the cleverest business model. Now you're asking her to walk you through her process. How about she just finds them for you and sends them straight to you. :upsidedow

epitome will you tell that to the judge when you're in court for publishing CP?

Nine, go ask a lawyer, don't listen to people on a board when it comes to your freedom.

Thanks for your wrong advice again, Paul.

Counsel is sought before a project, not if there is a problem.

Proactively seeking legal advice is investing in your business and you suggest should be done.

So much for having me on ignore, huh?

Also, are you implying that I publish CP? Time to email Theo and Eric for another time out for you.

epitome 04-25-2012 10:17 PM

The irony is that one reason amateur self-shot is so popular these days is because people are tired of the sterile cookie cutter porn people like Markham produced.

Some of the best selling sites these days are amateur. Paul can't grasp that you can spend a $100 or so on a self-shot set you buy from the model exclusive and can sell more memberships than a $2,000 scene shot in a studio.

Paul Markham 04-26-2012 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18908988)
My point is very valid. It just hasn't sunk in yet what is happening around you. I'm a producer too and I too used to make a lot of money via other methods, so I know first hand that this is a hard pill to swallow. But the sooner you do, the faster you will get caught up with the times and making money again.

Making money paying a model and shooting scenes for a few hundred bucks for a good Ex Gf scene. :1orglaugh

Quote:

You can count on two hands the companies who will pay top dollar for glam these days. However, you can't count the number of people and companies who will pay a few hundred bucks for some good GF content.
Yes and those up there are making money.

Quote:

So you can spend a ton in production and hope to sell it to someone who may or may not be buying, or you can spend very little on production (acquiring content) and sell it for a smaller amount to many others who ARE buying. It's 2012, where do you think the money is? Unless you have a full time gig with Manwin, it's in cheaper content sold at lower prices.
Yes the business has changed, it5's now all about pennies for content.

Quote:

"Amateur" is massivly in and like it or not, it's only getting bigger.
On the consumer side or the supplier side?

Quote:

The FB girls are not selling it to end users. They are selling it to a middle man.
Agreed, that's how most shooters made enough to retire on.

Quote:

You can sell it just as much as anyone else sells theirs and pay no more or no less for it. You have a whole country full of untapped hotties over there to poach.
Yes, give me a price and requirements and I will see if it's cost effective. Situation is Madalton who still works isn't bothering with it. However new girs here are thin in the ground. they don't want to do sex scenes that will be seen by the world for a few hundred bucks.

Quote:

Yet, they are not doing it. Perhaps holding out for those big $3000+ gigs that don't come anymore?
which is why I decided to retire on the money I made for the $3,000+ gigs that used to come.

Quote:

All I'm saying is, stop knocking it and try making money with it. You don't have anything else to do, and you obviously have the sales skills to sell to magazines, so I know you can sell content to webmasters, even if they are cheap. I'd be doing the same thing if I didn't have my own sites that kept me busy.
Because of the profit margin.

I appreciate what you're saying. The business has changed tremendously. It's now dominated by people working in one/two man bands. With little money to invest and only able to work at the bottom of the ladder. The reason is they simply don't have the budgets to climb up to the level where Met Art and a lot more can operate. So they get into niches anyone can get into and it seems a lot do. This means the demand for their version of it is low. This has never changed in porn. It was true in 1980 and true today.

I'm knocking not just Nina but all the Ex Gf site owners and their attitude that we can't shoot it. We're bright enough to give girls a camera and tell them to do it themselves. Or find a good looking guy with charm to shoot girls as a BF would. There are others here who can go onto the Czech sections of FB and look for girls, or Polish, Hungarian, Rumanian, etc. Do they?

Maybe they do, I have no idea. Or maybe the price dictates the site owners have to do it themselves. As there's not enough money to pay a middle man. If there is enough, there's the solution. Instead of them trawling English speaking social networks they get others in less costly place to trawl locally.

Quote:

Originally Posted by homegrownmof (Post 18909049)
********** i recall meeting, it was at the Venetian. But i never wanted your Astral Blue content- i wanted the girls. And it would have taken me forever to do what DWB posted above- explain how you need to take "Paul Markham" out of the picture and just make it about the amateur girls.

************ i do recall you giving me the same lecture about how much $$ you can make by selling to mags. Same shit different year.

No we came down to San Diego and you and someone else took me and my wife out to lunch to buy my Astral Blue content. I wasn't selling at the price you were offering. Probably because I could make more money then selling to others. That's the nature of business.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 18909085)
Who would buy ex gf non exclusive for 300$ ?

No one, otherwise there would be a deluge of people shooting sets for $3,000. Because anyone can shoot what Ex Gf needs. Or get a person to shoot it who isn't pro.

Paul Markham 04-26-2012 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by looky_lou (Post 18909163)
1 model hired for the day = 6-10 photo sets of 100-200 pics each, plus 2-4 teasing and or masturbation videos 10-20 min in length.

Cost to produce in the US = $300.00 - $500.00 for the model + your time.

Tell her to bring all of her own club dresses, heels, bikinis, bras, panties, worn out jeans, dildos, bongs, etc. Maybe she could even bring her own cat of dog along with its food bowl :)

Use you own iPhone. Go to the mall and buy 10 different fake designer and humorous cases for your phone and change them up throughout the shoot with each outfit.

Ideal is to find a nice average model with a really hair bush that is willing to shave it. Shoot some sets with the full bush. Then give her a shorter, well trimmed look for a few sets. Buzz it to a landing strip for a few sets. Finish up with a set of the actual shaving and then a few sets fully shaved.

If you can't sell this for $300.00 non-exclusive 10 times. Quit! But, if shot and done properly, this should be no problem.

No one will pay $300 for that non exclusive. If they would, they would be cherry picking suppliers.

Buyers paying $3,000 for an exclusive scene for anything but top notch are inundated with suppliers. so would Ex Gf sites paying $300 for non exclusive. Content shooters would all be doing it instead of shooting decent work for a lot less. It's one of ROI.

You would need to change locations a few time with new girls.

MaDalton 04-26-2012 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18909549)
Situation is Madalton who still works isn't bothering with it. However new girs here are thin in the ground. they don't want to do sex scenes that will be seen by the world for a few hundred bucks.

i am not bothering with what? contacting girls on facebook? no, i dont do that, indeed. But our exGF content has made us VERY good money.

Paul Markham 04-26-2012 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 18909591)
i am not bothering with what? contacting girls on facebook? no, i dont do that, indeed. But our exGF content has made us VERY good money.

So has mine and continues to. My point was that many could and would be doing it if there was decent money in it. You can shoot an Ex Gf set as part of a day's work and a bonus on top. How many times a month do you devote to shooting nothing but Ex Gf and would you if it paid well enough?

Moffat, so you asked me for access to the Astral Blue girls in Vegas. So who was going to shoot them? As in the mid 90s they couldn't shoot themselves, especially on a mobile phone. :1orglaugh

When we met in Vegas I would of been in Czech and had all the Astral Blue content stored in boxes on RAW tapes and wasn't using it. Also the girls I shot for Astral Blue would of been 5-15 years older. Probably some would of been Mums. :winkwink:

Maybe you were asking me to shoot Amateur content here in Czech and I was telling you that there were better paying markets. I like everyone worked for the best price I could get.

You were probably confusing me with another shooter who was telling you your prices were high enough. Mind you, that could of been me. :winkwink:


Changing times.
I realise better then most that the industry has changed.

Matyko 04-26-2012 02:14 AM

Paul M : you annoy the fuck out of this forum. You spend too much time on this board and crap your very smart remarks in every fucking thread. Its really, really annoying. Fatfoo was annoying too, but at least he had a STYLE and was able to make ppl smile. You Can Not.

Paul Markham 04-26-2012 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 18909647)
Paul M : you annoy the fuck out of this forum. You spend too much time on this board and crap your very smart remarks in every fucking thread. Its really, really annoying. Fatfoo was annoying too, but at least he had a STYLE and was able to make ppl smile. You Can Not.

Then put me on ignore. :thumbsup

And don't reply to me, that's really dumb.

ninavain 04-26-2012 07:28 AM

I wished you'd put me on ignore, because with all your babbling...you still have no fucking clue...

yuu.design 04-26-2012 07:34 AM

good advices

ninavain 04-26-2012 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yuu (Post 18909958)
good advices

thank you

epitome 04-26-2012 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18909724)
Then put me on ignore. :thumbsup

And don't reply to me, that's really dumb.

Kettle, meet pot.

ninavain 04-27-2012 09:05 PM

:thumbsup:thumbsup
Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 18909647)
Paul M : you annoy the fuck out of this forum. You spend too much time on this board and crap your very smart remarks in every fucking thread. Its really, really annoying. Fatfoo was annoying too, but at least he had a STYLE and was able to make ppl smile. You Can Not.


ninavain 05-05-2012 03:29 PM

:thumbsup
Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 18909445)
The irony is that one reason amateur self-shot is so popular these days is because people are tired of the sterile cookie cutter porn people like Markham produced.

Some of the best selling sites these days are amateur. Paul can't grasp that you can spend a $100 or so on a self-shot set you buy from the model exclusive and can sell more memberships than a $2,000 scene shot in a studio.


Paul Markham 05-06-2012 02:03 AM

Quote:

The irony is that one reason amateur self-shot is so popular these days is because people are tired of the sterile cookie cutter porn people like Markham produced.

Some of the best selling sites these days are amateur. Paul can't grasp that you can spend a $100 or so on a self-shot set you buy from the model exclusive and can sell more memberships than a $2,000 scene shot in a studio.
Which is why so many sponsors are moving towards the better end. :thumbsup

Maybe Epitome would like to name these great sites and then compare them to sites that can afford to spend $2,000 and up on a scene.

I'm not denying amateur is a very popular niche, that's saturated with sites and free content. It's like teen sites in that respect.

Yes getting any niche perfectly right will convert. I recently saw a great scene with 2 girls in a bath and a BF shooting them, then one girl which I think was the GF gave the BF a BJ, while the other girl shot it. It went through to real sex.

Great scene and it will convert and a site full of this content will retain.

And it can't be bought for $100.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc