Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome
(Post 18958050)
So why would a 30% visible watermark diagonally across a scanned document fail verification? You can still clearly make out all letters and digits and it prevents an unscrupulous employee from using that scan for nefarious reasons (like opening a merchant account as someone else suggested).
Security goes both ways. Will you provide me with the full name of anyone who has access to my ID? Doubtful. You're the face of Paxum and we only know you as Ruth B. You even avoid using your name on your professional Facebook profile. Why is using your name in financial services a bad thing? I can tell you the full name of the managers at my Bank of America. It's on their cards.
|
If you wanted to know about our security policies all you had to do was ask. We do a background check on everyone that's hired. Furthermore, our employees never start in a position where they have access to documents. Only the ones that meet certain criteria can eventually be in such a position over time. We leave no stone unturned when it comes to confidentiality.
Also, very few employees have access to documents. We have a dedicated team that does the account commissioning, and we keep logs in order to know who viewed which document at which time. A hardware key is required to access documents, so they cannot be viewed remotely; it can only be done on site. The computers are monitored and any way of exporting data is blocked; only certain functionalities are enabled, and web service restricted to a need-to-use basis.
Everybody must follow these procedures. These procedures are also audited ON-SITE by FINTRAC and Mastercard and our banking partners, and we have never had a problem. If there was an obvious data breach like the ones you suggest could happen, our license would have been revoked a long time ago, and due to the strict privacy laws of Canada, there would likely be legal issues as well. This is simply NOT the case because we comply with ALL procedures and regulations.
Lastly, the requirements we have are passed down to us. We are fully aware of the fact that we are strict about everything, and if it hadn't been this way, we'd probably have more accounts than we do, some people are scared or simply give up. We wish it were different, and we are looking for ways to relax the requirements, but as long as it's not officially approved, we won't risk allowing accounts that we know will not pass an external KYC test. we're playing by the rules, and that's not getting us any love, but we don't really have a choice. We've never had any issue in that department, and though we know we'd open more accounts if we bent the rules, we are sticking with our principles.
As far as the names of our managers go, you can contact us at shows (which we regularly attend), or set up a meeting, or even drop in at the new Montreal office. We'd be glad to welcome you. :thumbsup
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultEUhost
(Post 18959049)
What's also quite lame is that when you verify a business bank account on a business Paxum account by supplying all sorts of documents, each time you make a wire withdrawal they have to verify it again (i don't know what they do exactly but it does take 1 to 3 days before the wire is actually sent out).
|
Leon, this is not how our system works. I'm leaving you a message on ICQ to get more details so this can be looked into. As u-Bob says, all wires are issued immediately from Paxum so there should be no additional delays such as you describe.