As far as I know he never stole anything, but he ADVOCATED the theft of content. Can't you imagine how that made those who made their livings off said content feel? As others have mentioned, he didn't do any business or other socializing here but seemed to show up for the sole purpose of spouting his drivel. Additionally he clings to his misguided interpretation of 'fair use' fervently despite being told how wrong he is on numerous occasions. All in all, he brought whatever happens upon himself.

For the record, I don't think you and him are the same person. His ramblings made my head hurt, and you obviously have some command of cognitively linking one sentence to the next.

Not sure why you would make that association, honestly. I haven't defended anyone's right to anything that aren't given to them by law, I'm just saying you might want to read up on the fair use exemption because it can affect your content.

I think your sole purpose posting here is to deflect attention from the real issue. Now fuck off!

.

This is more or less what I've seen. His opinions aren't popular and go against what most people believe in. I've said a few times, I don't agree that his version of "fair use" is compatible with US law, but it might actually be compatible with Canadian law in certain circumstances (II doubt those circumstances apply to anyone posting on GFY). Also, a LOT of people who are posting (including GG) don't appear to understand what copyright and fair use legislation actually provides, and its frustrating trying to make a point based in legislation with someone who is only reacting to their emotional response to what they think the law should be. Some of the things GG said really are legit based on US law; others, not so much.

I also agree that he seemed mostly like a one-topic kind of poster, although there were some exceptions.

What I don't agree with is that his opinions or advocacy was a tangible detriment to anyone's ability to make a living, and I don't agree that people going after his job is a fair response to an unpopular opinion. We can disagree on that, and I won't tattle on you.

No, the real issue is that people don't understand copyright laws in different countries (and most don't understand them in the US either) and are making uneducated statements about them anyway.

PS - It might be easier to add "fuck off" to your sig so you don't have to keep typing it. I'd much rather you brought some substance to the discussion instead though.

So start a fucking new thread.

.

Memo to you: No one gives the smallest ratfuck what you think.

Just FYI, hope that helps you understand.

That's fine, I extend that courtesy to you as well.

No, this is actually the topic of this thread.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Get a clue.


.

The difference being that I already know that, you seem to be laboring under the delusion that this isn't the case or trolling on a 2 month old account. I suppose you're bumping the thread with his personal information in it and compounding the harm to him so either way it's not all useless :thumbsup

Ok, this is my chance to get some insight into tthe mind of L-Pink: What do you think this thread is about?

This thread is about taunting content/property owners just like the last 5 years of GG's posts. Everyone knows that but you.

.

Nah I'm just not an advocate for spreading misinformation, or for getting people fired for bullshit reasons... And my account is 4 months old for the calendar-impaired. For what its worth, it does seem like the posting of that information and the related firestorm is a ban-able offense (gfy rules #9 and #10, link at the bottom of the page), but GFY mods don't seem to mind.

Kind of like my ex-wife, projecting your personal reality doesn't change the real world. This thread was about a foreign website asking for recuperation of costs associated with an invalid copyright takedown request, and wrongly presenting that as the only means of having content removed.

I'm pretty confident Gideon has not been fired. I would guess if people really did contact his employer they told him to get off this board and try to get the links to their site pulled and he can stay. He scrambled, got the links pulled and now is gone.

That's not WHY it was posted. You remain clueless. G'night.

.

I hope this is the case, For the record, I wouldn't have much of an issue with running him off the board, deleting his posts, or whatever. Its a privately owned web site with commercial purposes, and commercial speech is not protected by the first amendment. It would show a level of intolerance that seems to be expected on GFY, but such is the internet.

Not sure I'm going to get into a metaphysical read-between-the-lines i-know-what-you're-thinking type of discussion, I loaned my divining crystals at a friend's house so I can only see the actual content.

WTF? I'm amazed that anyone is defending him if that is indeed from GG's website. :disgust

ADG

Was this actually confirmed as coming from GG? I looked for any sort of confirmation and didn't find anything. I will say that its kind of odd that people would say he isn't in porn and at the same time that he runs kiddie porn sites. Numerous times in this thread it has been pointed out that GG is not in the industry. Can we get a consensus on this?

Take the hint.

I also enjoy talking in third person... carry on.

Wouldn't hurt my feelings too much to get kicked off, I wasted too much time on here today as it is. Thanks for the support though! :thumbsup

well done uniquemkt i thought we were down a fucking idiot but apparently not :1orglaugh

http://i.qkme.me/eno.jpg

I believe that you meant to say, "Beaner enjoys talking in the third person... carry on." :fart

ADG

Are you going to point out something I said that was incorrect, or are you just on your period and need to lash out?

Good catch.

1. Those are two differnt things. Those that do that are not part of this industry as far as at least I am concerned.

2. Watch the fucking terms you use in your posts. You will see the ban hammer come down quick.

.

The rules are pretty clear on #2 there, and I believe I was well within the rules. People claiming he was involved in that material, however, are in clear violation of rule #7, link at the bottom of the page.

And #1 might be a technicality, but I'll accept it. Still wondering if there was any confirmation on that, as it would have been grounds for immediate banning per that rule #7, and a much more efficient method of getting rid of him.

Robbie is a grown man still acting like a child. His old bald ass plays rock star any chance he gets.

Notice he's ALWAYS in these GG threads even though he has him on ignore. Makes no sense to me.

6 pages of the same people calling him a content thief when the guy has said ANYTHING about stealing content. EVER.

I'd like to see someone prove it.

I have asked in this thread as well as the previous one for an example of him doing more than advocating his opinion, so far nobody has come up with anything. I really think he's just made people mad with his opinions (and some of his information is incorrect with respect to US copyright laws, a lot of it was spot on though).

They can't because he hasn't. He's said all along...your content is being stolen, you can't stop it...I have the means to help you monetize that. But people hear torrents and only think one thing...content being stolen. And with that they jump all over him, simply because they don't like what he has to say. They'll even dispute all facts when presented with them, just because they come from GG.

But yeah...like I said. The same few people ALWAYS in the threads posting a ton of shit wasting their time for no reason.

He upset the wrong pack of dogs, now GG complaining he got bit.

I'm not talking about forms, I'm talking about a host anywhere in the world asking $50 or any amount to remove content after receiving a DMCA. That was the question in the title of this thread.



Makes you wonder. All the shit that gets posted on this board and hardly anything every gets hahahahahahaha, other than a few racial slurs and things like the names of Manwin's previous owners and GGs company.

Maybe there was a reason GG was permitted to post here all this time. One thing is for sure, the admins jumped fast and high to ban the name once the company was listed.



Nothing to prove. If you advocate it, it's the same thing as doing it yourself. And you can bet your ass that someone who is in such support of piracy is an avid pirate.

Just change the topic to something else and it makes more sense. Say... rape. If you support the rape of women, talk about it non stop, and post every news story where someone doesn't go to jail due to a legal snafu after raping someone, you are cut from the same cloth as the rapist.

Someone who is so blatantly pro-piracy has no place in any industry, or within any group of people, who own intellectual property. Period.

Why not head over to the die hard Catholic message boards and make your case every 30 minutes for why abortion should not only be legal, but is not actually abortion at all if you get one while hanging upside down with your eyes closed. They would chew his ass up there too, and rightfully so.

GG doesn't belong HERE. He can go stroke his opinions on whatever pirate boards there are. Posting here with his nonsense insults everyone honest businessman who owns content.

And to be frank, you sound a lot like him and suddenly are posting out of the blue, post after post, just like him, after he stopped. Probably just a coincidence. :thumbsup

It is important to note that the site in question was not asking for $50 to process a single DMCA notice. The site was requiring $50 PER URL removed.

So according to this:
http://www.google.com/transparencyre...ains/h33t.com/

The site in question would require nearly $600,000 from copyright holders to simply operate their site legally.

Anyone who can't see through the scumbag stance of that piracy site is fucking retarded.

:2 cents:

it didn't

X-UIDL: 1054926873.5378_0.mx03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net,S=14 22
Received: (qmail 5267 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 19:14:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 66.186.79.107) ([66.186.79.107])

as i have already pointed out and proven

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=18983994&postcount=106

Please stop spreading this deliberate misrepresentation.

Accusing someone of distributing kiddie porn is very serious.

Yikes. :Oh crap

Yet there is no recourse for the person who loaded the infringed content. That is indeed a scum bag stance. I'm sure they have their hands in a lot of pirate sites.

So jacquesweb.com (the part you omitted) is not your website?

Baad me milte hain,

ADG

It was a post on gfy from 06-06-2003 - jacquesweb.com IS gg's site. For those who cant or dont wish to click and view the original post from 2003 here it as it appeared in its entirety:

-----------------------------------------------------------------
06-06-2003, 01:25 PM
Tala
Fucked if I know
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Do you have a flag?
Posts: 23,380

Anybody else get the newest cp spam??
Status: U
X-UIDL: 1054926873.5378_0.mx03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net,S=14 22
Received: (qmail 5267 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 19:14:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 66.186.79.107) ([66.186.79.107])
(envelope-sender <[email protected]>)
by mx03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.5) with SMTP
for <MY EMAIL ADDRESS>; 6 Jun 2003 19:14:32 -0000
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 09:35:34 GMT
From: Gomes Fasikop <[email protected]>
To: MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: NEW LOLITAS SITES !
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
tests=none
version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

From: Gomes Fasikop
Date: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:14:32 PM
To: MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Subject: NEW LOLITAS SITES !

Hi, dear drochers...
I found most HOT and semi-legal site in world!

Enter Here

There are many lolitas photos never seen before
More than 30 nude childrens...

Enter Here

It's one site from 1000's which
we'll send you in next monthes!

NO REMOVAL LINK!
OUR SITE IS NOT SPAM!!! .
---------------------------------------------------------------------



Do with it what you will. Perhaps someone might find out who the host for this sombitch is?
__________________

ICQ: 11120676 | Google: mindcrime | Skype: suitemindcrime|E-Mail: mindcrime AT gmail.com|PR girl with great writing skills for hire!!!! Contact me to work for YOU!|TECHIEMEDIA? 24/7 support from some of the best techs in the biz. Tell Jim that I sent you.

That says it all.

So can you tell us why someone who works for a software company is so pro piracy? And please your whole stance has been pro.

Were you posting from work?

If so did the boss know or were you doing it when you should of been working?

I employed people and found two of them, a programmer and our make up girl and assistant shooter. Were constantly texting each other, while they sat in the same office. And the programmer was downloading and uploading pirated material on my computers.

I fired them on the spot. They were stealing money from me.

This is why we must fight piracy.

http://www.google.com/transparencyre...ains/h33t.com/

By any means we can. Just make it so hard for sites to operate because they have to spend so much taking the pirated content down.

Interesting, because a site owned by the same Aaron Jacques (whom owned and registered jacquesweb.com) was ordered forfeited by an Arbitration Panel in 2007, since Mr Jacques was using the Barbie children's toy trademark to redirect people to porn sites:

Complete text here: http://www.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/1024381.htm


To summarize, Gideon...er, Mr Jacques' defense (the owner of jacquesweb.com) was that "(Mattel?s) United States trademark registrations are irrelevant because Respondent is a Canadian resident. Respondent further argues that the BARBIE mark is generic."

Typical Gallbladder style to believe he can pick and choose which laws to follow, and the attitude that he can decide that other people's trademarks and intellectual property are generic and use them to profit from however he wishes. :error

The arbitration panel ruled against Aaron Jacques and stripped him of his domain since they felt that he acted in bad faith and abused the popular children's toy brand trademark to drive traffic to porn sites. :disgust

Great corporate citizen. :upsidedow

I can see why companies like Akira Systems would want to be disassociated with such a lowlife, if it turns out to indeed be the same person.

Gideon still hasn't quite given us a straight answer about that either...well, at least he is finally getting the attention from the industry that he has so desperately craved for years. :upsidedow

:2 cents:

ADG

If I were a GFY Mod, and GG = Aaron Jaques, I would pin this to Mr. Fair Use's (GideonGallery's) sig:

Yup, Gideon sure is a real expert on Fair Use. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I hope he didn't get a patent/trademark/copyright for posting in bold and in CAPS to emphasize his points. :upsidedow :winkwink:

ADG

nice find ADG :winkwink:

We have an address match - it is the infamous gg :1orglaugh

That post proves what we always suspected. The guy has no qualms stealing other people's property.

IMO his employers are well shot of him.

The more we dig the shittier it gets. This guy is a douche bag.