Robbie is a grown man still acting like a child. His old bald ass plays rock star any chance he gets.

Notice he's ALWAYS in these GG threads even though he has him on ignore. Makes no sense to me.

6 pages of the same people calling him a content thief when the guy has said ANYTHING about stealing content. EVER.

I'd like to see someone prove it.

I have asked in this thread as well as the previous one for an example of him doing more than advocating his opinion, so far nobody has come up with anything. I really think he's just made people mad with his opinions (and some of his information is incorrect with respect to US copyright laws, a lot of it was spot on though).

They can't because he hasn't. He's said all along...your content is being stolen, you can't stop it...I have the means to help you monetize that. But people hear torrents and only think one thing...content being stolen. And with that they jump all over him, simply because they don't like what he has to say. They'll even dispute all facts when presented with them, just because they come from GG.

But yeah...like I said. The same few people ALWAYS in the threads posting a ton of shit wasting their time for no reason.

He upset the wrong pack of dogs, now GG complaining he got bit.

I'm not talking about forms, I'm talking about a host anywhere in the world asking $50 or any amount to remove content after receiving a DMCA. That was the question in the title of this thread.



Makes you wonder. All the shit that gets posted on this board and hardly anything every gets hahahahahahaha, other than a few racial slurs and things like the names of Manwin's previous owners and GGs company.

Maybe there was a reason GG was permitted to post here all this time. One thing is for sure, the admins jumped fast and high to ban the name once the company was listed.



Nothing to prove. If you advocate it, it's the same thing as doing it yourself. And you can bet your ass that someone who is in such support of piracy is an avid pirate.

Just change the topic to something else and it makes more sense. Say... rape. If you support the rape of women, talk about it non stop, and post every news story where someone doesn't go to jail due to a legal snafu after raping someone, you are cut from the same cloth as the rapist.

Someone who is so blatantly pro-piracy has no place in any industry, or within any group of people, who own intellectual property. Period.

Why not head over to the die hard Catholic message boards and make your case every 30 minutes for why abortion should not only be legal, but is not actually abortion at all if you get one while hanging upside down with your eyes closed. They would chew his ass up there too, and rightfully so.

GG doesn't belong HERE. He can go stroke his opinions on whatever pirate boards there are. Posting here with his nonsense insults everyone honest businessman who owns content.

And to be frank, you sound a lot like him and suddenly are posting out of the blue, post after post, just like him, after he stopped. Probably just a coincidence. :thumbsup

It is important to note that the site in question was not asking for $50 to process a single DMCA notice. The site was requiring $50 PER URL removed.

So according to this:
http://www.google.com/transparencyre...ains/h33t.com/

The site in question would require nearly $600,000 from copyright holders to simply operate their site legally.

Anyone who can't see through the scumbag stance of that piracy site is fucking retarded.

:2 cents:

it didn't

X-UIDL: 1054926873.5378_0.mx03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net,S=14 22
Received: (qmail 5267 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 19:14:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 66.186.79.107) ([66.186.79.107])

as i have already pointed out and proven

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=18983994&postcount=106

Please stop spreading this deliberate misrepresentation.

Accusing someone of distributing kiddie porn is very serious.

Yikes. :Oh crap

Yet there is no recourse for the person who loaded the infringed content. That is indeed a scum bag stance. I'm sure they have their hands in a lot of pirate sites.

So jacquesweb.com (the part you omitted) is not your website?

Baad me milte hain,

ADG

It was a post on gfy from 06-06-2003 - jacquesweb.com IS gg's site. For those who cant or dont wish to click and view the original post from 2003 here it as it appeared in its entirety:

-----------------------------------------------------------------
06-06-2003, 01:25 PM
Tala
Fucked if I know
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Do you have a flag?
Posts: 23,380

Anybody else get the newest cp spam??
Status: U
X-UIDL: 1054926873.5378_0.mx03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net,S=14 22
Received: (qmail 5267 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 19:14:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 66.186.79.107) ([66.186.79.107])
(envelope-sender <[email protected]>)
by mx03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.5) with SMTP
for <MY EMAIL ADDRESS>; 6 Jun 2003 19:14:32 -0000
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 09:35:34 GMT
From: Gomes Fasikop <[email protected]>
To: MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: NEW LOLITAS SITES !
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
tests=none
version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

From: Gomes Fasikop
Date: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:14:32 PM
To: MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Subject: NEW LOLITAS SITES !

Hi, dear drochers...
I found most HOT and semi-legal site in world!

Enter Here

There are many lolitas photos never seen before
More than 30 nude childrens...

Enter Here

It's one site from 1000's which
we'll send you in next monthes!

NO REMOVAL LINK!
OUR SITE IS NOT SPAM!!! .
---------------------------------------------------------------------



Do with it what you will. Perhaps someone might find out who the host for this sombitch is?
__________________

ICQ: 11120676 | Google: mindcrime | Skype: suitemindcrime|E-Mail: mindcrime AT gmail.com|PR girl with great writing skills for hire!!!! Contact me to work for YOU!|TECHIEMEDIA? 24/7 support from some of the best techs in the biz. Tell Jim that I sent you.

That says it all.

So can you tell us why someone who works for a software company is so pro piracy? And please your whole stance has been pro.

Were you posting from work?

If so did the boss know or were you doing it when you should of been working?

I employed people and found two of them, a programmer and our make up girl and assistant shooter. Were constantly texting each other, while they sat in the same office. And the programmer was downloading and uploading pirated material on my computers.

I fired them on the spot. They were stealing money from me.

This is why we must fight piracy.

http://www.google.com/transparencyre...ains/h33t.com/

By any means we can. Just make it so hard for sites to operate because they have to spend so much taking the pirated content down.

Interesting, because a site owned by the same Aaron Jacques (whom owned and registered jacquesweb.com) was ordered forfeited by an Arbitration Panel in 2007, since Mr Jacques was using the Barbie children's toy trademark to redirect people to porn sites:

Complete text here: http://www.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/1024381.htm


To summarize, Gideon...er, Mr Jacques' defense (the owner of jacquesweb.com) was that "(Mattel?s) United States trademark registrations are irrelevant because Respondent is a Canadian resident. Respondent further argues that the BARBIE mark is generic."

Typical Gallbladder style to believe he can pick and choose which laws to follow, and the attitude that he can decide that other people's trademarks and intellectual property are generic and use them to profit from however he wishes. :error

The arbitration panel ruled against Aaron Jacques and stripped him of his domain since they felt that he acted in bad faith and abused the popular children's toy brand trademark to drive traffic to porn sites. :disgust

Great corporate citizen. :upsidedow

I can see why companies like Akira Systems would want to be disassociated with such a lowlife, if it turns out to indeed be the same person.

Gideon still hasn't quite given us a straight answer about that either...well, at least he is finally getting the attention from the industry that he has so desperately craved for years. :upsidedow

:2 cents:

ADG

If I were a GFY Mod, and GG = Aaron Jaques, I would pin this to Mr. Fair Use's (GideonGallery's) sig:

Yup, Gideon sure is a real expert on Fair Use. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I hope he didn't get a patent/trademark/copyright for posting in bold and in CAPS to emphasize his points. :upsidedow :winkwink:

ADG

nice find ADG :winkwink:

We have an address match - it is the infamous gg :1orglaugh

That post proves what we always suspected. The guy has no qualms stealing other people's property.

IMO his employers are well shot of him.

The more we dig the shittier it gets. This guy is a douche bag.

I have asked these two to deliver enough popcorn for this thread
http://www.blogcdn.com/blog.moviefon...27ak080510.jpg

Bump for Gideon "Fair Use" Gallery:

I need to get some sleep and focus on more positive things tomorrow... :)

ADG

Ha someone just made a small joke about Gideon.
Saying if Gideon was a bank robber, he would hang out a police station all day long telling anyone who would listen, how robbing banks is ok. A little bank robbery should be allowed he would tell the cops..lol

So is theft of other people's property. :2 cents:

So... let me get this straight. You lost your domain to Mattel because you were using their BARBIE logo to redirect kids to porn sites, but you claim you have nothing to do with spamming lolita sites? :1orglaugh Whatever.

Mattel, Inc. v. Aaron Jacques

You are a piece of work. :2 cents:

GG if you want to blame someone, look in the mirror. You simply fucked with the wrong crowd for too long and got a kick out of it. If there are any more skeletons in your closet, be sure this lot will find them and expose you. We even have your home address.

gideon logic...

buy brazzers membership, copy everything for 30$, set up own web site, "time-shift" "format-shift" everything to own website, claim "fair use", make $$, AND charge 50$ for DMCA processing :1orglaugh

thats like charging a whore 50$ for letting her suck your dick :1orglaugh

waybackmachine shows redirect from lennybarbie.com to gideongallery.com :winkwink:

http://web.archive.org/web/200409251...nnybarbie.com/

1. it was a domain dispute for lennybarbie.com not a logo (seriously stop twisting the facts)-- the name of a pornstar btw.
2. I did not claim it was generic i pointed to the unanimous 8-0 canadian supreme court decision against mattel explicitly ruling that use of the name barbie as a prenom/surnom (first or last name was not a violation of their trademark) and it fact a generic use of the term
http://www.sexypornstars.net/dispute/supremecourt.pdf
3. the lawyer misrepresented Renaissance Hotel Holdings, Inc. v. Renaissance Cochin, FA 932344 (Nat. Arb. Forum Apr. 23, 2007) which only justifies accepting a foreign registered trademark for consideration under another country to justify completely ignoring the supreme court decision when he should done exactly what the previous arbitrator did in the referring case (accept the american registration and determine validity by Canadian law)

4. and then claiming i didn't present any evidence(ie represent the porn star lenny barbie) to argue i was in default. btw if you ask around on this board you will find out that pornstar changed her name because of a dispute with mattel (they gave up i believe because they didn't know about the supreme court decision) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanny_Barby

Unfortunately because of the blanket immunity granted for "accidental" violations of the law that there is nothing i could do to get the domain back cost effectively.

Never let the facts get int he way of a good lynching.

from gideongallery.com Dec 15, 2004

"The Rules for Posting to Gideon Gallery.
You must own or have license to use the content provided in your galleries. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PUBLIC DOMAIN ADULT CONTENT."

appears gideon"fair use"gallery has undergone a dramatic transformation :1orglaugh

So you were fucked by the lawyer ?

I think they call that the Shawshank defense.....

:)

What about the cp spam? And don't say it was altered. The post about it was months before you even joined gfy and was received by a number of people that also commented in the original thread.

Sick fuck!

.

do neither of you guys understand the difference between the header information which tells you where the message came from

and the reply to address that you get to manually fill in with whatever you want.

why do you think i posted the header information that he specifically cut off when he was making the bogus claim.

Amazing that gideongallery keeps bumping this thread as himself and uniquemkt

If he had just left everything alone this would have all died down. Instead he is bringing MORE of his shady life out in the open by continuing to piss people off.

I will try to help you ONE more time gideongallery. Just stop posting. Go away and live your shitty life. Be happy and enjoy life. Everytime you post here you just bring yourself one step closer to ruin because of your own actions and words over the last few years.

Let me get this right ... He posted a thread about cp spam months before you even joined gfy, making a bogus claim against someone that at the time wasn't even here? Have I got that right or are you still just full of shit?

.

06-06-2003

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=140529

gideon join date Aug 2003


So he altered this before you even joined just to frame you? And other guys in the thread got the same spam?

.

he out time shifted gideon by two months