GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Mike South, you playing games now? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071577)

papill0n 06-18-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTK (Post 19011971)
Another thread derailed by Paul Markham and Those Who Can't Resist Replying to Him.

Though I'm sure Fabian appreciates it...

paul is 100% a selfish cunt. everything is about paul

CamTata 06-18-2012 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 19011988)
I miss good bbq but I don't miss Ol' Miss.:thumbsup

Ole Miss never brought me any smiles but bbq always does
Eastern Europe is a far cry away - but I have found suitable substitutes for many things southern, including grits! :)

papill0n 06-18-2012 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19011994)

I could be asking him questions that he can't answer, refuses to answer or simply gets wrong.

Like how much office space he has in Montreal


you must be out of your fucking mind :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

this dearnaged fool never shuts up about manwin office space :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

yeah paul youve got manwin pinned based on your guess of their office space :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

you stupid stupid fuck :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

alf6300 06-18-2012 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19011994)
I could ask him how many floors they occupy in that Montreal building. He doesn't know.

I could ask him what happened to the 9 figure sum he announced to the tame audience at the seminar. He doesn't answer that one.

I could ask him where the money came from rather than just a Wall Street investor. He didn't answer that one either.

I could ask him how he raised $100 million to buy MW. He ignores that one as well or gives bullshit answers.

It is not so hard to imagine that a private investor prefers to stay quiet about his interest in an adult business.

A few years ago some VCs went long ways even to avoid publicity about their dating businesses investments.

Also, MW is a private company and as such has no obligation to publicly answer such questions.

I'm not in business with them, just stating the obvious.

Far-L 06-18-2012 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19011996)
Far-L is wrong that I'd take a job from Manwin.....Come on dude you know me way better than that....I mean I guess everyone has a price but I cant imagine manwin offering me enough to sell my blog to them and I would not work for them, period.

And Far-L is right about being southern, he indeed has the most rebel roots of anyone around, google State Line Gang, thats his relatives....

Course that doesn't mean his high falutin' education didn't cause him to misjudge his brethren in relation to my selling out to Manwin.

So easy there Far-l and dont be holdin yer breath til I sign that Manwin employment contract
ya might turn blue and assume room temperature....

I knew that comment would get your dander up. I was just testing whether or not I could hear your rebel yell from here. :winkwink:

In your case, I agree, you wouldn't stop being a critic, but you aren't a fool either and you would go where the money is and I know that from experience working with you. Don't take it as a criticism, I am just calling a spade a spade, and I don't mean that in the derogatory slang sense either.

mikesouth 06-18-2012 01:50 PM

Like I said I prolly have a price but I can assure you its way beyond what Manwin would pay, making a business decision between two decent companies is one thing, selling out to someone I consider to be 99% evil is something else entirely.


And no offense taken man you know I love you guys.

In a way Fabian could blame you for my being in porn ;)

mikesouth 06-18-2012 01:52 PM

Camtata was banned for posting Fabians well known address?

wow

signupdamnit 06-18-2012 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19012095)
Camtata was banned for posting Fabians well known address?

wow

Was the address ever on any Whois data?

Paul Markham 06-18-2012 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alf6300 (Post 19012026)
It is not so hard to imagine that a private investor prefers to stay quiet about his interest in an adult business.

A few years ago some VCs went long ways even to avoid publicity about their dating businesses investments.

Also, MW is a private company and as such has no obligation to publicly answer such questions.

I'm not in business with them, just stating the obvious.

Agreed. Still a lot more questions left unanswered. The 9 figure investment is the strangest one recently. Seems it's over 6 months now and that money's burning a hole in someone's bank of FT was BSing us. Go figure.

The offices they list and the 700 staff they state. Has anyone ever knocked on their doors and looked to see what's there? Montreal, Hamburg, Luxemburg, London, Los Angeles, Nicosia.

No this bunch wouldn't do that, they prefer poking fun at me for pointing out FT's failings.

Captain Kawaii 06-18-2012 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 19011903)
You need to be a better student of history. You obviously must have missed a few classes.

Jobs is infamous for walking through HP and stealing ideas for the original Mac.

Keep licking Jobs' dead shriveled nuts and go back to your blah, blah, blahing.

The ironic thing I have to point out... if Nathan offered you a job or Mike South or 99% of the haters a paycheck then you would all be whistling a different tune. Been around long enough to see that happen time and time again. :2 cents:

So keep pretending you are all the Great Don Quixote and hold your lances high as you tilt against windmills, slay paper tigers, and save a ho or mo', brave and fearless hater-trolls; hope your grand idealistic petulant indignant furor is never tested by anything more daunting than a few brazen keyboard warriors!

Yeah. Gone are the days of building a fortune from blood, sweat and tears...if those days ever existed except in the movies. Ask politicians, movie stars and people like zuckerberg, jobs and fabian..you have to walk over a lot of bodies, dead or alive to get what you want.
i'm from the "other south". south of broad, charleston, sc. we have a fair amount of experience stepping over dead bodies. lol.

theking 06-18-2012 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19011994)
You should study history a bit more. He gave me $3,000 to shoot a scene and I still was criticising him. Unlike those giving PH free videos to attract traffic they can sell ad space off, I'm not for sale.

Still Sandro is spot on.



I could be asking him questions that he can't answer, refuses to answer or simply gets wrong.

Like how much office space he has in Montreal to house the 300 people MW boast to having? A question he was clueless about and I followed up someone else's question he should of known. The toilets. He didn't have a clue, he would know if he had been there. Unless he never uses them.

I could ask him how many floors they occupy in that Montreal building. He doesn't know.

I could ask him what happened to the 9 figure sum he announced to the tame audience at the seminar. He doesn't answer that one.

I could ask him where the money came from rather than just a Wall Street investor. He didn't answer that one either.

I could ask him how he raised $100 million to buy MW. He ignores that one as well or gives bullshit answers.

I could keep saying the company is a mystery that no one has any real clue about.

I could review 2 of his sites and pull to pieces some of the scenes as crap.

I could tell him he should be producing much better content that what they do on the sites I saw. He listened to me there or was already doing it and wasn't telling anyone.

But it's tough with the brown noses and idiots who only know to sling stupid insults at me rather than him.

For the record I know, like everyone else, why PH has pirated videos in. It's legal if they follow DMCA rules and it's business. The porn industry is dog eat mice by any means possible. Attacking the pirated videos on PH is stupid, we know the answer to that one.

Carry on side tracking with his clothing and how many toilets. That's the level of so many.

There just is not any end to your clueless babble...now is there...you silly pathetic old man?

Paul Markham 06-18-2012 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19012088)
Like I said I prolly have a price but I can assure you its way beyond what Manwin would pay, making a business decision between two decent companies is one thing, selling out to someone I consider to be 99% evil is something else entirely.

I guess I would as well. Not that he would ever offer us enough to compete with what we were getting.

Mutt 06-18-2012 02:09 PM

Nathan why not do the right thing on the tubes Manwin owns and close off user submissions completely? You haven't made enough?

Show some leadership and use that war chest to launch lawsuits against the file sharing sites that reward affiliates for stealing and uploading Manwin content along with the rest of ours?

It's not in Manwin's long term interests either to keep teaching an entire generation of porn consumers that porn is free and paying for it is for old geezers and losers.

JOKER 06-18-2012 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 19012143)
Nathan why not do the right thing on the tubes Manwin owns and close off user submissions completely? You haven't made enough?

Show some leadership and use that war chest to launch lawsuits against the file sharing sites that reward affiliates for stealing and uploading Manwin content along with the rest of ours?

It's not in Manwin's long term interests either to keep teaching an entire generation of porn consumers that porn is free and paying for it is for old geezers and losers.

How awkward would that be if Manwin headed by Nathan would make most of the modern internet's free porn go away over night and users would have little choice than to either pay for porn or to use way too complicated and illegal methods to get their "free porn" ?

Imagine the awkwardness if people had to realize that all this time this was actually the planned "end-goal" (what an inappropriate but fitting word to use, sorry) that Manwin was steering towards to and we'd all make money hand over fist again?

Imagine that - crazy, I know right?
But how does one say, hope dies last. :2 cents:

mikesouth 06-18-2012 02:16 PM

Fabian shut off user submissions...HA! thatll happen about the time little Fabians are flying outta my ass on wings....Look how quiet he suddenly got....come Fabian what happened?

Looks like your alligator mouth overloaded your hummingbird ass huh?

Barefootsies 06-18-2012 02:19 PM

Quote:

CamTata
So Fucking Banned

Far-L 06-18-2012 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii (Post 19012115)
Yeah. Gone are the days of building a fortune from blood, sweat and tears...if those days ever existed except in the movies. Ask politicians, movie stars and people like zuckerberg, jobs and fabian..you have to walk over a lot of bodies, dead or alive to get what you want.
i'm from the "other south". south of broad, charleston, sc. we have a fair amount of experience stepping over dead bodies. lol.

Ok, now you done gone and made me want to quote some Robert Hunter...

"Brown Eyed Women"

Gone are the days when the ox fall down
Take up the yoke and plow the fields around
Gone are the days when the ladies said, "Please
Gentle Jack Jones, won't you come home to me?"

Brown-eyed women and red grenadine
The bottle was dusty but the liquor was clean
Sound of the thunder with the rain pourin' down
And it looks like the old man's gettin' on

1920 when he stepped to the bar
Drank to the dregs of the whiskey jar
1930 when the wall caved in
He made his way sellin' red-eyed gin

Brown-eyed women and red grenadine
The bottle was dusty but the liquor was clean
Sound of the thunder with the rain pourin' down
And it looks like the old man's gettin' on

Delilah Jones was the mother of twins
Two times over and the rest were sins
Raised eight boys, only I turned bad
Didn't get the lickin's that the other ones had

Brown-eyed women and red grenadine
The bottle was dusty but the liquor was clean
Sound of the thunder with the rain pourin' down
And it looks like the old man's gettin' on

Tumble down shack in Bigfoot County
Snowed so hard that the roof caved in
Delilah Jones went to meet her God
And the old man never was the same again

Daddy made whiskey and he made it well
Cost two dollars and it burnt like hell
I cut hickory just to fire the still
Drink down a bottle and ready to kill

Brown-eyed women and red grenadine
The bottle was dusty but the liquor was clean
Sound of the thunder with the rain pourin' down
And it looks like the old man's gettin' on

Gone are the days when the ox fall down
Take up the yoke and plow the fields around
Gone are the days when the ladies said, "Please
Gentle Jack Jones, won't you come home to me?"

Brown-eyed women and red grenadine
The bottle was dusty but the liquor was clean
Sound of the thunder with the rain pourin' down
And it looks like the old man's gettin' on
And it looks like the old man's gettin' on

DWB 06-18-2012 03:45 PM

Someone got banned for posting Fabians home address?

Jeeze. Looks like someone asked how high to jump when they were told to do so.

mikesouth 06-18-2012 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19012333)
Someone got banned for posting Fabians home address?

Jeeze. Looks like someone asked how high to jump when they were told to do so.

Imagine that....

Far-L 06-18-2012 04:31 PM

That is a bannable offense and I think anyone here should expect the same consideration regardless of where they stand on any issue on this board.

mikesouth 06-18-2012 04:38 PM

I thought it was only bannable if it wasnt public info...that addy is easily found as public info on google...

Barefootsies 06-18-2012 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19012398)
I thought it was only bannable if it wasnt public info...that addy is easily found as public info on google...


Far-L 06-18-2012 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19012398)
I thought it was only bannable if it wasnt public info...that addy is easily found as public info on google...

Dig hard enough and you can find most people's addresses and even a picture from space of where people live but that doesn't make it ok to post on a forum so splitting hairs when the rule is the rule is beside the point.

How would you like it if someone did the same to you and gave your info to the suitcase pimp bf and all his homies of the stripper you allegedly assaulted in Florida?

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE 06-18-2012 05:47 PM

Woodsheds

Brujah 06-18-2012 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19012398)
I thought it was only bannable if it wasnt public info...that addy is easily found as public info on google...

I think that was meant for "WHOIS" lookups, and not skip-trace or investigative efforts.

mikesouth 06-18-2012 09:39 PM

hell my addy is right on my site and finding my phone number aint hard either.....who'd wanna stalk me?

Paul Markham 06-18-2012 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 19012143)
Nathan why not do the right thing on the tubes Manwin owns and close off user submissions completely? You haven't made enough?

Show some leadership and use that war chest to launch lawsuits against the file sharing sites that reward affiliates for stealing and uploading Manwin content along with the rest of ours?

It's not in Manwin's long term interests either to keep teaching an entire generation of porn consumers that porn is free and paying for it is for old geezers and losers.

And then all the surfers looking at the free full length scenes on Manwin's Tubes, move to another Tube.

Online porn was teaching surfers not to pay for porn a long time before Tubes. It wasn't in anyone's long term issues to keep teaching an entire generation of porn consumers that porn is free and paying for it is for old geezers and losers.

As SZNY says attack him on real issues.

bean-aid 06-18-2012 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19012736)
And then all the surfers looking at the free full length scenes on Manwin's Tubes, move to another Tube.

Online porn was teaching surfers not to pay for porn a long time before Tubes. It wasn't in anyone's long term issues to keep teaching an entire generation of porn consumers that porn is free and paying for it is for old geezers and losers.

As SZNY says attack him on real issues.

send your traffic to something like that. fart, hol' 1 sec... plfff.... ahhh, I just farted

JOKER 06-18-2012 11:05 PM

Oh please stop trolling already Paul, it's getting old.

Think a little harder, who other than Manwin is in any kind of position to shut down most of the free porn out there today? Anyone?

If Manwin would make the move to the pay-to-enjoy porn model and throw it's full weight behind it including lobbying to get laws changed and making use of their vast amount of legal resources it's perfectly do-able.

And that would make them respectable in my eyes. I would go so far as to say that would give them a real shot at becoming the Google & Facebook combined of the Adult Industry.

I used to be against a monopoly in adult for obvious reasons - until someone gave me this to read.

A "do no harm" clean Manwin with an honest affiliate-segment and content-provider-segment, making them the technology providing company they want to be, could actually bring this industry back on it's feet - well to that what is left after the Gold-Rush but still.

Give it some real thought, you'll see the appeal if you can wrap your head around it. :2 cents:

Paul Markham 06-18-2012 11:06 PM

This business never ceases to amaze me with the level of logic, common sense and business skills it has.

Major Tubes are major Tubes because of content. They need user uploads to keep traffic coming, to can sell it to advertisers. It's a fact of life so stop whining about it because nothing will change if PH stops user uploads.

If you want to attack someone, attack Far-L for uploading his scenes to get scraps off the floor.

The online free porn trend started with Newsgroups and since then sponsors have been forced to leap frog each other to keep affiliates happy in their task of giving away free porn.

Remember when you gloated about crippling the magazine, DVD industry and the industry of content providers? Well why should MW give a fuck about others when you didn't give a fuck while you were stepping over others. No you just pointed fun at us offline guys.

Beaner's reply tells us all we need to know about this industry.

JOKER 06-18-2012 11:11 PM

O.o

I don't mean this in a bad way, but please have a coffee, take your meds if you need to take any - because quite frankly you sound off. I've never even talked about the "magazine, DVD industry and the industry of content providers" much less have I gloated about "crippling them" - do you even know who you are talking to?

I hope you're ok, honestly. Because you sound kind of delusional with your last post - anyone knowing me realizes that I never "gloat" period.

Paul Markham 06-18-2012 11:17 PM

Joker, stop posting nonsense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKER | JOKEREMPIRE Inc. (Post 19012757)
Oh please stop trolling already Paul, it's getting old.

Think a little harder, who other than Manwin is in any kind of position to shut down most of the free porn out there today? Anyone?

If Manwin would make the move to the pay-to-enjoy porn model and throw it's full weight behind it including lobbying to get laws changed and making use of their vast amount of legal resources it's perfectly do-able.

And that would make them respectable in my eyes. I would go so far as to say that would give them a real shot at becoming the Google & Facebook combined of the Adult Industry.

I used to be against a monopoly in adult for obvious reasons - until someone gave me this to read.

A "do no harm" clean Manwin with an honest affiliate-segment and content-provider-segment, making them the technology providing company they want to be, could actually bring this industry back on it's feet - well to that what is left after the Gold-Rush but still.

Give it some real thought, you'll see the appeal if you can wrap your head around it. :2 cents:

Why should they and what will make every other company in online porn join them?

Yes a change of the Law to stop free porn would be great. It would need to get past the US Constitution first. Maybe a law like the UK ATVOD rules or maybe a law to take all porn off the Internet.

Give it a lot more thought before you post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKER | JOKEREMPIRE Inc. (Post 19012763)
O.o

I don't mean this in a bad way, but please have a coffee, take your meds if you need to take any - because quite frankly you sound off. I've never even talked about the "magazine, DVD industry and the industry of content providers" much less have I gloated about "crippling them" - do you even know who you are talking to?

I hope you're ok, honestly. Because you sound kind of delusional with your last post - anyone knowing me realizes that I never "gloat" period.

I never said you personally.

Stop throwing insults and think about the "stopping free porn" debate deeper.

bean-aid 06-18-2012 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKER | JOKEREMPIRE Inc. (Post 19012757)
Oh please stop trolling already Paul, it's getting old.

Think a little harder, who other than Manwin is in any kind of position to shut down most of the free porn out there today? Anyone?

If Manwin would make the move to the pay-to-enjoy porn model and throw it's full weight behind it including lobbying to get laws changed and making use of their vast amount of legal resources it's perfectly do-able.

And that would make them respectable in my eyes. I would go so far as to say that would give them a real shot at becoming the Google & Facebook combined of the Adult Industry.

I used to be against a monopoly in adult for obvious reasons - until someone gave me this to read.

A "do no harm" clean Manwin with an honest affiliate-segment and content-provider-segment, making them the technology providing company they want to be, could actually bring this industry back on it's feet - well to that what is left after the Gold-Rush but still.

Give it some real thought, you'll see the appeal if you can wrap your head around it. :2 cents:

the problem is that if they did give up the traffic... somebody else would snatch it up. You can send a message that means this: "fuck with me and I will fuck with you 10X worse.." That can, or can not mean biz... I don't know

JOKER 06-18-2012 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19012772)
Joker, stop posting nonsense.

Do I ever? Please don't stoop to the level of lashing out because you can't see a vision others can - you used to be better than that, at least in person.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19012772)
Why should they and what will make every other company in online porn join them?

You wouldn't need to ask if you took a close look at their website alone - does anything on there scream "Yeah we wanna be labeled as porn thiefs / pirates" - or does it not rather scream: We want to be respectable, we want what Google / Facebook is in mainstream to be in the adult entertainment industry - heck, later maybe even be direct competitors to Google / Facebook, MW / FT is already investing in mainstream in Germany.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19012772)
Yes a change of the Law to stop free porn would be great. It would need to get past the US Constitution first. Maybe a law like the UK ATVOD rules or maybe a law to take all porn off the Internet.

A law requiring anyone uploading adult-content to have the proper licenses / copyright / releases to do so would be all that it takes, no need for ATVOD or any of that.
You can't prove that you own the content that you are about to upload? Well you risk getting sued - upload process needs to point that out of course.

But changing to the pay-to-enjoy porn model weeds out much of that anyway, because who in his right mind pays (and provides his financial data) to upload stolen content and risks getting sued?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19012772)
Give it a lot more thought before you post.

Thanks but I generally think before I post.

JOKER 06-18-2012 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19012772)

I never said you personally.

Stop throwing insults and think about the "stopping free porn" debate deeper.

Like I said, I didn't mean it in a bad way - it's early in the morning for you, I was concerned and honestly thought maybe you are not fully awake yet or maybe need to take medicine - is taking meds an insult these days?

Anyways, I apologize if it came across too harsh and since you did not mean me personally, I apologize for taking it personally.

Paul Markham 06-18-2012 11:37 PM

This is the problem today for those who need to see it for what it is.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071730

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071816

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071822

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071565

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071565

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071565

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071847

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071847

Online porn was always ruled by free porn. We now know the only thing keeping it in check was the cost of BW. Remember when the only problem of a gallery on The Hun was the cost of BW?

We developed affiliates to ask and expect everything they needed, to help them give away free porn. Now BW has crashed the business has changed. Consumers are less likely to buy anything than ever before, they don't have to. We will keep feeding it to them.

Today Tubes rule, like TGPs did. The downside is less people need to buy off a Tube than they did off a TGP site. Wishing for the removal of free porn online is like me wishing for the return of magazines and $3,000 a set. :winkwink:

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKER | JOKEREMPIRE Inc. (Post 19012786)
A law requiring anyone uploading adult-content to have the proper licenses / copyright / releases to do so would be all that it takes, no need for ATVOD or any of that.
You can't prove that you own the content that you are about to upload? Well you risk getting sued - upload process needs to point that out of course.

And you think this will kill off Tubes and the free porn model? So we can all return to the days of 1998.

JOKER 06-18-2012 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 19012777)
the problem is that if they did give up the traffic... somebody else would snatch it up. You can send a message that means this: "fuck with me and I will fuck with you 10X worse.." That can, or can not mean biz... I don't know

Thus I've mentioned lobbying to get proper laws in place to reduce free porn / stolen content online.

Of course there will always be some that will try, Manwin has enough resources to deal with that I think.

Plus who would spread more free porn - if you don't need to anymore? If people pay for porn (again) why throw it at them for free? But then again I could never wrap my head fully around this in the US market.

JOKER 06-18-2012 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19012793)
This is the problem today for those who need to see it for what it is.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071730

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071816

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071822

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071565

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071847

Online porn was always ruled by free porn. We now know the only thing keeping it in check was the cost of BW. Remember when the only problem of a gallery on The Hun was the cost of BW?

We developed affiliates to ask and expect everything they needed, to help them give away free porn. Now BW has crashed the business has changed. Consumers are less likely to buy anything than ever before, they don't have to. We will keep feeding it to them.

Today Tubes rule, like TGPs did. The downside is less people need to buy off a Tube than they did off a TGP site. Wishing for the removal of free porn online is like me wishing for the return of magazines and $3,000 a set. :winkwink:

Why is this not a phenomenon on the German-speaking market for example?
There this "free porn" snowball never developed as much as it has in the US market, food for thought?

Robbie 06-18-2012 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKER | JOKEREMPIRE Inc. (Post 19012798)
Why is this not a phenomenon on the German-speaking market for example?

Dude there are two types of people who are from another planet as far as what they are thinking..
Japanese and Germans.

:1orglaugh

JOKER 06-18-2012 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19012793)
And you think this will kill off Tubes and the free porn model? So we can all return to the days of 1998.

Nah, the days of 1998 are over, read my link that I've posted before...

The Gold-Rush is over, but that doesn't mean the adult-industry can't still be very profitable.

And regarding demanding affiliates - supply and demand rules apply. You want to be an affiliate - you have to do some work for that - again. So less supply of the demands = less affiliates but in return higher quality ones that don't mind to work.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc