![]() |
Quote:
I also know you really wouldn't mind to increase your bottom-line or to be that whale of an affiliate again that you used to be? Give it a try, give me something and work with me here :) |
Quote:
Release the hardcore GFY/AVN investigative journalists. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Our thought processes are diametrically opposed or something. :) |
Quote:
Countries have treaties and working partnerships in many ways in a global economy. |
Quote:
I'm brainstorming here, I don't have a big team of lawyers locked up in my basement though - so no, I can't explain that. But feel free to write down your thoughts, if the person with the big team of lawyers shows up I'm quite sure he will take them into consideration, seriously. |
One question.
What kind of effing moron doesn't have their comments on moderation? This is a sign of "Nathans" disconnection from reality. |
Quote:
I just know there never really was this competition in the German adult market to give away more for free than your competition does... I guess that made a difference - thus I hope less free porn in the US will be mutually beneficial for webmasters, content-providers and program-owners. It's not like we're trying to cure cancer or aids - we should really just all work together to lessen the amount of free porn online, if we as an industry can't work towards that one goal - what the fuck worth are we then anyways? :2 cents: :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You stay covered in shit, or you take a shower and get back to business? :2 cents: |
arent these the same answers to the same Qs that Nathan gets bombarded with once a month when he posts here lol
|
Quote:
There are ways, implicating them would be a nightmare. Banning every free site or tour with more than a nipple from the US and EU would be a great start. How does that fly against the Constitution? Implementing such a ban properly would be very expensive. Unless a computer program can be developed to identify offending images, it needs people to sit and verify then pull the plug on them. Dreaming Governments will do this is pointless. https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1071877 Free porn is here to stay. It will kill sales. The question now is how to adapt, can we adapt and is adaptation going to be profitable. |
Quote:
|
http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/18/tech...face/index.htm
As far as technologically identifying images goes... Facebook doesn't like hardcore adult content, right? How many people use facebook? ~ 901 million as of April this year according to PCmag - who knows maybe they can be bothered to release a developer plugin or cooperate with Manwin to make the Internet a safer place ;-) |
Quote:
So how do we enforce it on a Global basis? |
Quote:
2) Treaties. Get in line or get sanctioned / have your internet shut off. 3) Give the internet to the UN. Not really something I'd like to see, but it is a solution. Get in line or they turn off the internet in your country. You can already fingerprint your videos. Problem is, that really isn't a real solution because once you identify where it is, you are in the same boat as sending a DMCA. Something hardcore has to happen. SOPA v2 or something else. I'm all for it. And I've said it 100 times before, I could do without Facebook, Youtube, Tumblr, or any other site. I had a life before the internet and I'd get along just fine after those sites were gone or regulated. What happens to them, or any site, is not my concern. New laws need to be made and everyone follows them or you lose out. A change in 2257 holding everyone responsible for the models information would be a game changer. And a law that would hold responsible the advertisers of a pirate site would also be a game changer. I'm 100% in support of very harsh laws. I'll live with it. I already live in a country that censors the internet and blocks many websites so it's really not a stretch for me if I lose some more. You'd be surprised how perfectly fine life is without parts of the net. And I'm not a person who supports censorship, but I also see it as the only way that is going to bring the internet under control. It can not continue to be a lawless area where anyone can do anything with little or no consequences. |
DWB, I support your sentiments, however the problem is that on a technical level the net is designed to just route around disruption or censorship. It's built into it's architecture, nothing anyone can do about that now.
You can have all the rules and regulations you like, the net will find a way around them (on a purely technical level). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
.. oh wait :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Internet isn't free. It's a huge business. Show me a truly free site and I'll change that. We do have Usenet and that needs someone technical to tell us about. Still for the rest of the Internet it's about generating income. cut off the money flow and people will sit up and take notice. Now all we need is the US Government to step in. :Oh crap Quote:
|
Quote:
That said, didn't they more or less do a good job of blocking the net in Syria? And as you know, they block a lot of sites here in Thailand. Of course a proxy will get around that, but Joe Public doesn't use a proxy. My point is, if they really wanted to find a way, I have faith they could. |
Quote:
|
Pornographers calling out for government censorship amuses me no end.
|
Quote:
Some good feedback and ideas from DWB and Paul (I knew you still have it in you! :pimp ) Thinking out loud here... Aren't the Root DNS servers under Verisign's control / authority? Maybe Manwin would like to merge with / buy OpenDNS and / or CloudFlare to "accelerate" the Internet (and pick up a nice revenue-stream and tech-companies with a really great teams along the way) and along the way now have control over many, many users DNS querries... You get where I'm going with this? :winkwink: |
Quote:
Just because we make porn for a living doesn't mean why have to disagree rules and regulations being put on the internet. We all have to abide by rules. Only criminals and anarchists want to live in a lawless society. Which one are you? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I've learned anything then that there is always a solution to a problem. :2 cents: It's just the question if you want to be part of the solution, or part of the problem... :) |
Quote:
Also, and more importantly, it's impossible to put rules and regulations on the internet because it is global and there is no global law. Even if there was, people will ALWAYS find a way round them, like TOR for example. Like the second level internet. I believe that the whole money/piracy thing is a red herring anyway. Piracy existed for free a very long time before file lockers came around. And it will continue to exist if file lockers credit card processessing is stopped. Usenet, IRC, private FTP, forums, torrents etc all exist for free. I don't believe the problems the industry are facing are much to do with piracy. More to do with 1) A massive double dip recession that is fucking over EVERYONE 2) Years of treating our customers like cunts (circle jerks, card banging, hidden x sales, dialers, throttling bandwidth, content rotation, spamming, selling email addresses etc etc.) We'll see though. If you all do manage to close all CC processessing for file lockers and then everyone sees a HUGE growth in sales, I will eat my hat and apologise. However, I have a feeling that won't happen. It's nice to have something to blame for a greedy industry's short sighted failures. It is convenient. However, I don't think it's accurate. Time will, as they say, tell. |
Quote:
It's like the war on drugs. Simply impossible to win. I believe if the time and money spent on trying to fight an impossible war were spent on making the product better, we could achieve something. Like iTunes Music Store. Everyone, EVERYONE said the music industry would never recover from Napster/Audio Galaxy days. But all it needed was a better solution. Easy, reasonably priced and elegant to use. And lo, digital legal music sales are through the roof. Think on't. |
Quote:
Yes, I agree - there should be a low inhibition / entry level access to pay-to-enjoy porn, absolutely. No need to give away the "house" for ~ 4.95 though. From my experience, you would not believe (well the numbers are actually in another thread on this board 300.000 usd failure or so) what people are willing to spend if you give them exactly what they want - so keeping this in mind - sure 4.95 or heck even 2.95 can get you "into the door" but if you want the good stuff, it'll cost you some more - like anything in life really - you get what you pay for. It should def. be 100% transparent though, no fucking around with amounts / billing etc. A coin-system is usually fair in that aspect. You load up say 50 bucks worth in coins (virtual currency) and you can spend it on the go for stuff you really choose to consume. If there is a good product people are willing to pay for it, no need to give it away for free or for peanuts :2 cents: // Edit: CCBill / TMM / NATS - what are your thoughts on a coin-system would you be willing to offer something for interested parties? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
People will always pirate and give away content for free. 10TB is uploaded to usenet EVERY DAY. For free! And downloaded for free. Let's look at music. Type any popular artist's name into google and you see pirate downloads. You can still get any music you want for free. Yet people are still buying it via Amazon, itunes, etc. You need to forget about trying to stop free porn, you won't EVER do that. Concentrate on making a better product than the free porn. |
Quote:
Quote:
All it takes is the right people to create the right laws and there is a global solution. One law could change to put the burden on domain registrars and that would be the end of that. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Billions are also wasted on rockets that don't fly. That doesn't mean man can't go to space, it just means some people can't build rockets. |
Quote:
Many programs are floating on what once made themselves successful and consumers have better things to do then being bounded to $29,95 subscription plans. The iTunes Music Store is a great example. Also the modern consumer has more ways to spend their online time (take a look at the # related to social gaming). Virtual goods/social gaming is booming. http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webprone...book-games.jpg |
And now for your viewing pleasure and insight into some GFY tactics...
http://i.imgur.com/h8i5c.jpg Now carry on - I like what we have going here so far, this has serious potential. :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
1) It is private and secret. People do not usually openly share porn info with their real names attached to it. 2) It often carries baggage of shame or guilt. 3) It feeds addiction. 4) For those not single, it is often viewed with others in their household are away or sleeping. This sort of falls under #1. 5) It is impulsive. Music and Hollywood movies are not. Neither is social media or games. When a guy needs to rub one off, he needs to rub one off. 6) The want/need to orgasm trumps all other urges / impulses. It is stronger than wanting to play a game, stronger than to want to listen to music, and stronger than the desire to watch a Hollywood blockbuster. People want to cum and they want to cum now. They want to find the right fantasy or girl and get off. This is the part that separates porn from the music and Hollywood movie industry. People don't need music. They don't need Hollywood. They don't even need games. But they need to cum. I'm sure I could think of several other things that make it different, but you get the point. Porn doesn't need different pricing to make it sell again, however an easier way to sell it would help. Like if Paypal would allow adult again for pay sites. No doubt that would up sales for everyone who used them. Who wants to type in a credit card and give their name to a porn company, especially if they have already been burned? It's 1000x easier and safer to use Paypal. The last thing I want to do while my cock is in my hand is find my CC and type in a bunch of shit on a join form. Make it super easy to join again and sales would rise. This is why so many file lockers use Paypal, it's so easy you're a retard not to join them. Then you have Google who allows the tubes, lockers, and torrents to dominate, so finding it for free is easier and faster than ever. Even if you wanted to pay for it, 2 minutes in Google can change that. I can find my content for free on Google faster than I can find my real site on Google. And every time we work to change that, Google dances and they fuck us again. But given the current way of billing and our history of fucking the consumer, why anyone pays for porn anymore on a paysite is beyond me. I guess it just comes down to impulse and not being able to find THAT GIRL, THAT SCENE, or THAT COLLECTION of content somewhere else. Logically, there is no other reason. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc