![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Another reason. It tells affiliates they're not fighting a losing battle promoting their sites. The file lockers will keep taking from those who don't have balls. The way to hit them is via the money. Hit the funding and you shoot down lots. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
bottom line not many attorneys know how do this & are retarded when it comes to finding out what corbin did. Hopefully I'll be next in line with a lawsuit.
ds |
What you'd *like* to do, and what you have to settle for doing (which is sometimes nothing at all) are often very different things. Surprised that with all the intelligence on here, that isn't obvious.
|
Quote:
Sounds like Corbin has himself a much better attorney than most of the pack. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd LIKE to do a lot of things. Unfortunately, I can not do them without serious legal recourse, so I have to resort to things I can actual do, which is not much. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think a list of affliaites NOT promoted by pirate sites would be short or simply no entries. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
looks like Mark Randazza's firm and Chad Belleville who practices alone don't believe this horseshit that the DMCA law gives thieves safe harbor protection. Corbin Fisher's lawsuit is based for the most part on Oron's failure to comply with the DMCA which requires a service provider to have a DMCA agent in place. They also include the rest of what we bitch about here, that Oron runs an affiliate program which encourages people to upload the most popular content and software they can. Without the failure of Oron to have a DMCA agent i'm not sure Corbin Fisher would have filed the suit.
I'm hoping that one of these companies do take a lawsuit the distance and a judge finally finds that file sharing sites the way they are currently run are not protected by the DMCA. If Corbin Fisher wins because of the lack of a DMCA agent and gets justly awards big damages, great for Corbin Fisher but doesn't mean much - unless you find another file host stupid enough not to have a DMCA agent. We can't get rid of file sharing hosts, they'll get smarter in how they set themselves up, move to countries beyond the arm of US law BUT if we can get Paypal and other well known processors to cut off their processing it would push file hosting to the fringes - Paypal is the worst offender, the file sharing industry would not have grown so large without Paypal. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123