GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   California lung cancer drops by 1/2, Alabama doubles (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1072678)

BlackCrayon 06-26-2012 10:12 AM

with the amount of weed smoked in cali, its more proof that it doesn't cause lung cancer. smoking cigarettes is just dumb, it does nothing for you. might as well at least catch a buzz if you're gonna inhale smoke.

DamianJ 06-26-2012 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 19024990)

This effectively makes your stats a crock of shit.

Also, his "stats" start in 1933. I don't believe the CA smoking laws came into effect then...

Tijuana_Tom 06-26-2012 10:22 AM

This thread is hilarious.

Alabama is the Opposite living style of California.

This stat is extremely good news for California and Cancer research btw.

Brujah 06-26-2012 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19025194)
Did you read my post? Taxpayers should NOT have to pay for it. One of the ways that government uses to justify control, is to confiscate money from everyone to pay for others. It's all part of the same big problem that takes away personal choice. That's my point.

Please re-read my post again, perhaps more carefully?
.:)

You're right, taxpayers should not have to pay for smoking related illnesses, ie. lung cancer, oral cancers, etc...

blackmonsters 06-26-2012 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tijuana_Tom (Post 19025303)
This thread is hilarious.

Alabama is the Opposite living style of California.

This stat is extremely good news for California and Cancer research btw.

California smokers are killed in drive by shootings before they get cancer.

:1orglaugh

Vendzilla 06-26-2012 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 19025374)
California smokers are killed in drive by shootings before they get cancer.

:1orglaugh

Most of US shoot back now

blackmonsters 06-26-2012 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 19025623)
Most of US shoot back now

Get a grip.

The only thing you shoot off is your mouth and with extreme inaccuracy.

:1orglaugh

IllTestYourGirls 06-27-2012 01:42 PM

FYI Cali has always had a lower lung cancer rate/smoking rate than the rest of the country. Way before ban smoking in bars (1994) etc.

Clearly I have better research skills than the people at NPR. I found this info within 30 seconds of reading the article. :thumbsup

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4947a4.htm

Quote:

During 1988--1997, per capita cigarette smoking in California declined more than twice as rapidly compared with the rest of the country (2).

IllTestYourGirls 06-27-2012 01:59 PM

Not to mention about ZERO coal was mined in Cali where in Alabama they employ around 100k people in the coal industry. So since 1933 millions of people have worked in coal mines in Alabama?

Not saying smoking is good for you, just saying it is not the laws that have helped. Because as stated above Cali had a lower rate even before all the laws/taxes.

HomerSimpson 06-27-2012 03:45 PM

would like to see weights and heart diseases comparison too.. :)

Half man, Half Amazing 06-27-2012 03:53 PM

I've been to Alabama *shudder*

If you'd rather leave California so you can smoke a carton a day in Alabama...then you deserve lung cancer.

mikesouth 06-27-2012 04:08 PM

I read through this and I am amused

To draw a single correlation between CA and AL and say thats why AL has more cancer is pretty much retarded.

As a Libertarian I am with Sperbonzo here. It's my property and If I want to make my bar smoke free or smoking mandatory I have that right just as you have the right not to patronize it, plain and simple.

I dont need or want the government to protect me from myself.

In most states suicide is illegal that's the dumbest thing I have ever heard of what are they going to do incarcerate my dead body?

Id bet skin cancer rates are much higher in CA than they are in ME does that mean that the Maine legislature should take credit for having fewer citizens with skin cancer than CA?

This whole thing makes no sense

Bryan G 06-27-2012 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19025017)
Now if the government would just ban cars, traffic fatalities would go WAY down.
Ban pools and drownings drop quite a bit.
Ban alcohol and liver problems are cut by half.
Ban walking outside without sunscreen and skin cancer goes down.
Ban showers that don't have safety harnesses and slip and fall injuries decrease.
Ban skiing and injures on the slopes will disappear.
Ban skateboards and a ton of teenage trauma wounds would stop.
Ban any food with fat and there will be fewer strokes and less heart desease.
Ban large speakers and people won't hurt their hearing.
Ban.......




Lets just take away all choice and everyone will live to be a healthy 100 years old!



WOOOOOOHOOOOOO!!!!!!





.

Cigs are not banned, just from public places. I don't care if someone smokes just don't do it around me. You make the same stupid argument that people do about guns.

campimp 06-27-2012 06:52 PM

i wish the governement had banned them before i developed my habit many years ago... on the e-cig now and feeling great, but the damage has been done...

i dont believe the government should intervene and tell us what to do, but with something so obvious as cigarettes, i cant understand how they are legal to sell

blackmonsters 06-27-2012 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by campimp (Post 19028143)
i dont believe the government should intervene and tell us what to do, but with something so obvious as cigarettes, i cant understand how they are legal to sell

Now go make a Maitai and drink it in the tanning booth while munching on some
trans fat chips.

:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123