More shit: Im getting tired of reading PM posts

No shame in that thread Paul but seems that people liked your more humble persona in those days.

I'm afraid I do react very badly to some of the idiots who post here.

Here's the truth about content and the idiot trolls.

Most of them couldn't tell a good shot from a bad one. Beyond the definition they have little clue of the little touches it take to transform a shot into a good porn shot. I proved this recently on B&B by putting up a selection of shooters work and the idiots couldn't tell the difference. Even though some were from top shooters.

TLC has just posted some shots of a girl that apart from pixels and hairstyle are very dated. Everyone's praising him. If I had put up the same shots, everyone would be flaming me.

No memberships are sold on the GFY Bro rating of the shooter.

Members areas today are about videos. The porn photo market that was worth money, died with magazines. Yet how many people showing off their abilities or content on their site, put up videos?

Yet this is the product we all sell. It's the only thing that makes cock rise and gets a membership bought.

Incidently, the style we shot was determined by the market we sold to. I could of turned out content for TeenDream, Karups, Lightspeed, Sapphic Erotica, Karups, ATK and a host of other top teen sites.

The magazines wanted what we shot and we were happy to supply it, then resell it via the stores and the paysites. Which were a small part of the business. There was nothing we did that was unusual, fantastic, amazing or evidence we're good shooters. Anyone could of done the same. They didn't. There loss.

How long has your friend been shooting?

About 3 days from the look of that portfolio

About 20 years. One of the top UK magazine shooters and can adapt his styles to fit his clients.

yes , but here we are:1orglaugh:thumbsup

Top shooter = magazine shooter = top shooter

sorry but that is where you are wrong. magazine porn was never good photography, it was banal repetitive photography, the same set up, just change the girl. Like passport photography or police crime scene, good for the job.

You think that wedding photography is a step up !

This is not to blame you, you have had no training, you admit you are no photographer. But please stop the begging for attention and lame attempts to show that you are an "expert" when all you reveal is your ignorance. Try not mentioning magazines for say a month.

This expert shooter of yours, has he an qualifications?
Has he had any photographic exhibitions, book credits? has he won any prizes? or is he from the same "no book learning" no school of yours?

Have you tried changing lenses on the digital camera yet?

OUCH!!!


But way on point.

Not to mention, recommendations from the source that posted the thread would be falling on deaf ears.