GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   11 years after 9/11 there are still morons who think that Boeing crashed into the Pentagon (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1081011)

Dirty F 09-10-2012 07:33 PM

The truther:

Pictures of big pieces of plane debris all over the Pentagon? Not important. You are a sheep.
Planes dissapearing, shot down over the ocean, tons of people involved, missiles fired instead into the pentagon? Yes, very likely.

These people are so ridiculously fucking stupid i'm not sure if i should cry or laugh.

alcstrategy 09-10-2012 07:34 PM

This thread really reaches a new low.

If you were anywhere close to the towers you wouldn't be saying any of this shit.

London Banker 09-10-2012 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19181530)
What does this have to do with pictures of plane debris inside the Pentagon??? It has nothing to do with believing or not. There were fucking huge pieces of plane debris in the Pentagon! Which is a fact.

There were not.

You just posted some close up photos of unidentified plane debris god knows where from. It proves nothing.

Flow 09-10-2012 07:35 PM

http://www.911review.org/images/photorotor.jpg


vs.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/perspec...80650/sizes/z/

A tad small don't you think?

Dirty F 09-10-2012 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alcstrategy (Post 19181535)
This thread really reaches a new low.

If you were anywhere close to the towers you wouldn't be saying any of this shit.

Truthers are pissing on the graves of those who died there that day.

London Banker 09-10-2012 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alcstrategy (Post 19181535)
This thread really reaches a new low.

If you were anywhere close to the towers you wouldn't be saying any of this shit.

What does this have to do with anything, asshole? Yes the buildings collapsed. US government planned the whole thing.

Dirty F 09-10-2012 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flow (Post 19181539)

For what exactly?

Don't bother answering. I just know this is gonna be one of those brain cell killing theories again.

Goodbye idiots. I'm out of this thread.

helterskelter808 09-10-2012 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181468)
- How could an amateur pilot fly a commercial plane in a complicated maneuver, crash it into the Pentagon, 78 minutes after the first report of a possible hijack and leave no trace?

Because he had training of course. And obviously if you're going to attempt the biggest, most sophisticated terrorist attack on the US in history, you don't learn to fly a plane outside the US, before entering the US at the last possible minute. No, you go the US and spend as long as you can in the country, learning to fly right under the noses of the FBI.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19181474)
The truther:

A group of men with knives hijacking a plane? IMPOSSSSIIIBLEE!!!!!

The American goverment with the help of 1000's of people (including pilots, random people in planes, their families, traffic controlers, police, military etc etc etc) flew into their own towers and then thanks to the bombs they placed there those towers were brought down? Yes, that's the only likely truth and if you don't believe it you are sheep.

So, you're able to delude yourself that a tiny group of foreign terrorists could do it, armed only with knives, but you think if the Government wanted to do it, it would somehow suddenly require 1000s of people? :error

Make your mind up, does it require 19 people to carry out a vast, sophisticated attack on the most powerful country on earth, or 1000s?

BFT3K 09-10-2012 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19181540)
Truthers are pissing on the graves of those who died there that day.

What an idiotic thing to say.

keysync 09-10-2012 07:40 PM

http://imagend.com/images/2012/09/11/0lBg4.jpg

Minte 09-10-2012 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181541)
What does this have to do with anything, asshole? Yes the buildings collapsed. US government planned the whole thing.

And after 11 years and a switch to a complete democratic government for the first 2 years of Obama, not a single arrest, grand jury investigation or indictment.

Yes, of course the government was behind it. The entire congress and their full staffs can keep a secret.

2MuchMark 09-10-2012 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by london banker (Post 19181157)
and it's not like someone is putting a gun to their head and forcing them to believe this bullshit.
They are doing it themselves.

.
.
.
.
F u c k
.
.
.
.
.

Minte 09-10-2012 07:48 PM

Bill Clinton gets a blowjob in the oval office. It hits the news within weeks and he is impeached.

Richard Nixon, gets caught lieing about a 3rd rate burglary and he is forced to resign office.

George W. Bush plans and pulls off the worst terrorist attack in the history of our country, and retires to a life of a gentlemen with all the perks of a former president.

London Banker 09-10-2012 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 19181554)
And after 11 years and a switch to a complete democratic government for the first 2 years of Obama, not a single arrest, grand jury investigation or indictment.

Yes, of course the government was behind it. The entire congress and their full staffs can keep a secret.

http://ionenewsone.files.wordpress.c...ma2023jul8.jpg

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bvwejohScL...PAC%2B2008.jpg

http://c491792.r92.cf0.rackcdn.com/O...hite_House.jpg

Minte 09-10-2012 07:55 PM

Is there a point?

dgraves 09-10-2012 07:55 PM

Other countries don't hate the US because of our way of life, they hate the US because we do shit like this, blame it on someone else, and get away with it...

London Banker 09-10-2012 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 19181564)
George W. Bush plans and pulls off the worst terrorist attack in the history of our country, and retires to a life of a gentlemen with all the perks of a former president.

http://firstlightforum.files.wordpre...te-house1.jpeg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6EJtIRoV_R...orm-756361.JPG

helterskelter808 09-10-2012 08:00 PM

The people who swallow wholesale the Government bullshit about 9/11 are too scared to face the truth. Genuinely too scared. Because it turns their cosy little world of ponies and rainbows upside down.

Somehow they conveniently forget November 22 1963, or that it's a matter of historical fact that the Government/military planned to kill Americans in 'false flag' operations.

Or that the Government has shown time and time again it will kill American citizens if it feels it needs to.

There are no conclusive images at all, let alone video, of a plane hitting the Pentagon. None. Not one.

Anyone who can just ignore that, or accept it happily, is the epitome of a useful idiot.

helterskelter808 09-10-2012 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 19181554)
And after 11 years and a switch to a complete democratic government for the first 2 years of Obama, not a single arrest, grand jury investigation or indictment.

Yes, of course the government was behind it. The entire congress and their full staffs can keep a secret.

Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.

London Banker 09-10-2012 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 19181574)
Is there a point?

Yes. The Mossad helped organize and cover it up.

HardlinkSells 09-10-2012 08:25 PM

Sallyrand?

martinsc 09-10-2012 08:49 PM

:Oh crap :Oh crap

Axel_Crak 09-10-2012 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19181498)
WHAT is unclear? Jesus man, just fucking read and look it up yourself.
What is unclear about a piece of the landing gear in the Pentagon after the plane hit it?

http://rense.com/general32/landinggear002.jpg

Please explain to me what part of this is unclear to you?


Your pics are fine, i saw few more already, but what a was asking is different videos of the plane/crash... like i said, i saw many from the tower, and what was unclear for me is where are those Pentagone videos, thats it thats all..

Matt 26z 09-10-2012 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181240)
Look at the CGI projection photo above. If a Boeing hit the building, the hole would have been 3-4 times larger.

It was a missile or a predator drone.

The damage photos we are all familiar with were taken after the roof collapsed. This is what the damage looked like prior to collapse:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/im.../911_90_08.jpg

All estimates have the hole at just 15 feet wide. This is the smoking gun that few like to talk about.

Matt 26z 09-10-2012 09:04 PM

A jumbo jet went through this hole:

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pentagonhole.jpg

DTK 09-10-2012 09:13 PM

re: wtc

~1510ºC (2750ºF) - melting point of typical structural steel
~825ºC (1517ºF) - maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or pre-heating (premixed fuel and air - blue flame)
Diffuse flames burn far cooler.
Oxygen-starved diffuse flames are cooler yet.

The fires in the towers were diffuse -- well below 800ºC.
Their dark smoke showed they were oxygen-starved -- particularly in the South Tower.

BFT3K 09-10-2012 10:08 PM

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...63411727_n.jpg

Robertwm 09-10-2012 10:15 PM

horrible, but dark smoke so strange in this issue...

Rochard 09-11-2012 01:10 AM

Are we really going to hash this out every September?

Quote:

Originally Posted by papill0n (Post 19181225)
in http://i.imgur.com/nMiIJ.jpgshot you can see how the plane has hit the building - wings have sheared off and the body of the plan has continued through the inside of the pentagon as indicated by the burnt roof above where the plane continued

its interesting to see that vertical shear at the front of the impact site. i cant explain why all the upper levels would have sheared away like that without anything to cut through them. the plane was at ground level so yeah cant explain that

all the fuel onboard - if the roof was burnt like we can see it is but the fire was limited to the path of the plane and immediately surrounding it then i guess we can only assume they have a killer sprinkler system at the pentagon. maybe the building is built from super flame resistant shit. probably. that combined with good sprinklers limited the spread of the fire

i see b3t3k's thread about the missing money - no idea about that - its probably true

This is some of the dumbest dribble I've read in a long time. This plane crash was unlike any other plane crash in history, and it crashed into one of the biggest buildings in the world. It's not one building, but rings of buildings. It was massive.

Vertical shear? A fucking 200 ton airplane smashed into a large concrete building and instantly fucking exploded. Don't look at it as a thirty foot wide body that should leave a neat and tidy hole; It fucking exploded and destroyed floors above the impact. And just because the plane crashed at "ground level" doesn't mean it stayed level at the moment of impact. My guess was that the plane the building and instantly aimed up - not down.

Rochard 09-11-2012 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19181492)
Look, right after the Pentagon was hit by a missile they quickly placed all kinds of plane debris in and outside the building. Including landing gear.

http://www.allmystery.de/i/tt5iQtD_g...sMontageco.jpg

Clearly that's exactly what happened. As the entire world shifted it's attention from NYC to the Pentagon, they just pulled up in trucks and dropped airplane parts.

Rochard 09-11-2012 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181397)
There is a shitload of videos of the planes that hit WTC, but there is not a single photo of the plane that supposedly hit pentagon. Wonder why?

It's because the plane never made it there, it was shot down over the Atlantic ocean.

I love people with fake nicks. For all GFY knows, your fake nick is really my fake nick and I'm just debating with myself.

I swear to god you fucking idiots ate lead paint when you were kids. Use some common fucking sense here. Why the fuck do you think there is videos of the WTC but none of the Pentagon?

How many tourists pointed their video cameras at the WTC before they fell vs how many tourists go to the Pentagon?

Rochard 09-11-2012 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19181371)
I don't have a clue what happened, nor will I ever know. However, the following things make my scratch my head:

1) The Pentagon
2) Building 7
3) How these guys could hijack multiple planes with box cutters

Allow me to help.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19181371)
1) The Pentagon

A fucking airplane hit it. What in the world makes you think it was anything else? Don't give me stories about angles and vertical shear and the hole wasn't big enough. Obviously the plane could have hit at any angle, we don't need to discuss vertical shear because a plane hit the building and exploded taking out the roof, and the hole was plenty big enough - but when you look at a picture of the damage in the huge building from a distance it makes the damage look small.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19181371)
2) Building 7

When the towers fell, the ground shook to the point that it registered as an earthquake. Two towers nearly fell on a building that had already suffered damage and was on fire for hours. Most likely the entire building was moved completely off it's foundation.

You shouldn't be surprised that Building 7 fell. Instead you should be stunned that more buildings didn't fall.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19181371)
3) How these guys could hijack multiple planes with box cutters

Because clearly all airline pilots former US Marines who are locked, cocked, and ready to do battle in the cockpit. Airline pilots make hundreds of routine flights a year. When people suddenly stormed the cockpit they didn't have a chance. Use some common sense here - two pilots strapped in flying an airplane were quickly and suddenly attacked from behind. Box cutters or not, they never had a chance. Chances are they were knocked out or beat a pulp before they even knew what was happening.

kane 09-11-2012 01:32 AM

The thing I can never seem to get a straight answer from any truther on is is the question why. Why would the government do this? Assume Bush and his people masterminded this entire thing and pulled it off. To what gains? Money? They have tons of money. If you say "They made more by using this attack to send us to war" I'm sure there are a ton of ways they could have used various government contracts to make just as much money without risking being put to death if they are caught.

Power? Bush, like any US president, was already the most powerful person in the world. Short of world dictator there is no more powerful position to hold.

So they could pass things like the Patriot Act and control the people? Why? What good does that control give them?

Somebody please explain to me what Bush, or whoever did this, stood to gain from it.

When you look at it from a sheer logical risk vs reward point of view there is no reward worth this risk.

Rochard 09-11-2012 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181468)
- Why did the world's most powerful airforce fail to intercept any of the hijacked planes?

The US military was poised to fight external threats, not internal threats. Prior to 9/11 no one gave much thought to our own commerical planes being used against us.

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181468)
- Why did the Twin Towers collapse so quickly, imploding without damaging surrounding buildings, after short fires on a few floors?

Each tower took nearly thirty to forty seconds to fall. Keep in mind you saw the top fall. The rest of the building was covered in dust and we never saw it fall.

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181468)
- How could an amateur pilot fly a commercial plane in a complicated maneuver, crash it into the Pentagon, 78 minutes after the first report of a possible hijack and leave no trace?

Landing is complicated. Flying a plane into a large tower is pretty easy really. Even more so when you've had flight training.

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181468)
- How could the World Trade Centre 7 building, which was not hit by a plane, collapse so quickly (2.25 seconds) and symmetrically, when no other steel-framed skyscraper has collapsed because of fire?

You can't compare the fire with Building 7 to any other building unless two large towers fell nearly on top of it, acting like a earthquake, with debris taking out part of the building and perhaps moving it off it's foundation. Add in it was on fire for hours completely unattended, and presto, you have a building that falls.

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181468)
-Why is it, that we have the Pentagon, that has more security cameras on it than any building in the whole world, yet there is not one shot / photo of a 747 flying into it?

Simple.

You don't focus security cameras on the buildings themselves, but instead at the points where people pass through. In fact, the one camera that did catch the plane hitting wasn't focused on the building itself but rather an entry point.

Rochard 09-11-2012 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 19181900)
The thing I can never seem to get a straight answer from any truther on is is the question why. Why would the government do this? Assume Bush and his people masterminded this entire thing and pulled it off. To what gains? Money? They have tons of money. If you say "They made more by using this attack to send us to war" I'm sure there are a ton of ways they could have used various government contracts to make just as much money without risking being put to death if they are caught.

Power? Bush, like any US president, was already the most powerful person in the world. Short of world dictator there is no more powerful position to hold.

So they could pass things like the Patriot Act and control the people? Why? What good does that control give them?

Somebody please explain to me what Bush, or whoever did this, stood to gain from it.

When you look at it from a sheer logical risk vs reward point of view there is no reward worth this risk.

They'll tell you it was because they wanted to invade Afghanistan - which makes no fucking sense what so ever. You can point out there is nothing of value in Afghanistan and they'll tell you a story about a pipeline.... Well, 9/11 happened and this imaginary pipeline STILL hasn't been built. In fact, Afghanistan is a lot less stable than now than it was before 9/11.

Anyone think Bush wanted to pass the Patriot Act? Really? Do you honestly believe that the President wanted to pass the Patriot Act to protect the US against terrorism by staging the largest terrorist attack ever?

Who did this? The CIA? The US military? You really think someone gathered up hundreds of people to pull this off and not one person since talked? It put all of the explosives in place, who killed the hundreds of people on the airplanes....

We have eye witness reports of people seeing hijackers taking over airplanes. What the fuck more proof do we need?

Rochard 09-11-2012 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 19181644)
The damage photos we are all familiar with were taken after the roof collapsed. This is what the damage looked like prior to collapse:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/im.../911_90_08.jpg

All estimates have the hole at just 15 feet wide. This is the smoking gun that few like to talk about.

Yeah, that's proof of.... A fire. And nothing else.

Gozarian 09-11-2012 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19181896)
I swear to god you fucking idiots ate lead paint when you were kids. Use some common fucking sense here.

:thumbsup:thumbsup

wehateporn 09-11-2012 04:02 AM

Now that the dark art of 'False Flag Terror' is too well known, the Elite are having to focus on creating false flag revolutions and civil wars, like in Libya and Syria.

Gozarian 09-11-2012 06:06 AM

This message is hidden because wehateporn is on your ignore list.

moonbats - too much windowpane or clearlight

NewNick 09-11-2012 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by London Banker (Post 19181471)
keep watching the Jew-box (i.e. TV)


Bye Bye.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc