GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Anyone really give a fuck about Benghazi? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1086224)

theking 10-22-2012 08:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slappin Fish (Post 19266260)
When the Talibans were linked to the bombings of the USS Cole and the embassy in Kenya that killed 200 people it was ok for the Republicans to invite them over to the US and discuss pipelines... but they point fingers over what is only a choice of words??:1orglaugh:helpme
The Taliban did not have anything to do with the USS Cole event and did not have anything to do with the Kenya Embassy event.

Slappin Fish 10-22-2012 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking (Post 19266788)
The Taliban did not have anything to do with the USS Cole event and did not have anything to do with the Kenya Embassy event.
You mean apart from knowingly harboring and training all the Al Qaeda operatives at the Al Farouk training camp in Afghanistan?

go back to bed old men..

baddog 10-22-2012 08:34 AM
http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...76063827_n.jpg

theking 10-22-2012 08:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slappin Fish (Post 19266828)
You mean apart from knowingly harboring and training all the Al Qaeda operatives at the Al Farouk training camp in Afghanistan?

go back to bed old men..
The Taliban did not train Al Qaeda operatives.

Slappin Fish 10-22-2012 09:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking (Post 19266850)
The Taliban did not train Al Qaeda operatives.
I love these definite statements.. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Absolute truth since you are the only one who ever served ::rolleyes:: and a few years in the Military makes you an expert on all things.

Who do you think provided the military training at the camps around Kandahar including the Al Farouk camp? Let me tell you it wasn't Osama himself.

Anyway, let's pretend for a moment the Talibans only harbored the Al Qaeda camps, you said : "The Taliban had nothing to do..." don't you think that is already having something to do or do you think inviting them to tour Texas was the right thing?




___________

theking 10-22-2012 09:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slappin Fish (Post 19266909)
I love these definite statements.. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Absolute truth since you are the only one who ever served ::rolleyes:: and a few years in the Military makes you an expert on all things.

Who do you think provided the military training at the camps around Kandahar including the Al Farouk camp? Let me tell you it wasn't Osama himself.

Anyway, let's pretend for a moment the Talibans only harbored the Al Qaeda camps, you said : "The Taliban have nothing to do..." don't you think that is already having something to do or do you think inviting them to tour Texas was the right thing?




___________
Al Qaeda trainers did the training. At the time the Taliban was in Texas to potentially do business...they were not overtly hostile to the U.S.

Dvae 10-22-2012 09:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19266313)
Just keep in mind that just like Obama, he's anti-drugs, anti-porn, anti-freedom.
Obama's anti-porn?

That will come as a shock to a lot of people around here. I been reading these boards for several years and all I hear is Obama will not prosecute obscenity.

Dvae 10-22-2012 09:40 AM
This isn't what it looks like, he dropped his contact lens or something.:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19266833)

Slappin Fish 10-22-2012 09:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking (Post 19266926)
Al Qaeda trainers did the training. At the time the Taliban was in Texas to potentially do business...they were not overtly hostile to the U.S.
The same camps were used to train both Al Qaeda operatives, and Taliban fighters. one big happy family. Anyway, discussing business with the Taliban when we already knew of the existing of such camp in Taliban's Afghanistan is indefensible.

Thanks for your service my man but in this instance I think you are being very naive or partisan.

Robbie 10-22-2012 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dvae (Post 19266953)
Obama's anti-porn?
.
What I mean is, he isn't pro-porn. It may not top his agenda, but he's doing nothing to put an end to "obscenity" laws which are censorship of what YOU as a "free" adult can create, write, film, see, etc.

The Libertarian candidate, Gary Johnson, wants to abolish those laws. That is being pro-porn (and pro freedom).

Obama doing nothing either way is pretty much just symptomatic of the problem with the Democrat party. Lots of talk about being socially liberal and allowing people personal freedoms, but not a whole lot of action.

baddog 10-22-2012 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dvae (Post 19266977)
This isn't what it looks like, he dropped his contact lens or something.:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
I think Obama was giving him a manicure.

DudeRick 10-24-2012 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeRick (Post 19266597)
I'm not surprised at all that democrats aren't interested that Obama tried to cover up the fact that there was a terrorist attack on 9-11 that killed 4 Americans while he has adds running on TV with Morgan Freeman telling us that "Our enemies have been brought to justice". :disgust
I'm not surprised at all...
So, evidence keeps coming out that Obama knew about the terrorist attack. He and Biden went on the debate stage and lied about not knowing! But that's OK with you democrats... :disgust

Quote:
White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails
http://reuters.com/article/idUSBRE89...21024?irpc=932

http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o...psfcf706df.jpg

Slappin Fish 10-24-2012 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeRick (Post 19271986)
So, evidence keeps coming out that Obama knew about the terrorist attack. He and Biden went on the debate stage and lied about not knowing! But that's OK with you democrats... :disgust
From the rest of the article :

"but also evidence that the attacks could have erupted spontaneously"

"early that early intelligence reporting about the attack was mixed."

"Intelligence experts caution that initial reports from the scene of any attack or disaster are often inaccurate."



You wanted Obama and Biden to call out the group, at the risk of getting it wrong and making things worst because, as it says in the article, a group had claimed responsibility on FACEBOOK and TWITTER?!? haha... unreal.



_______________


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:28 AM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc