GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Does the rest of the world understand what a Mormon is? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1088015)

epitome 11-05-2012 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 19296374)
http://www.centralparksunsettours.co...dsJuly2007.jpg



Keep carrying on... :)

Peace and Love,

ADG

That song always puts me in a good place.

scottybuzz 11-05-2012 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19295208)

Met a few of them at the front door, they're rather well brainwashed.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/98/20...0021c26a2e.jpg

dillonaire 11-05-2012 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 19295648)
Buddhism is the only "religion" (even though its not really a religion) i can accept - mostly because it's more a concept of life and doesnt rely on imaginary gods

the rest is just nonsense to me

Agreed. Except for Santa...i still believe in him even though I havent got jack shit in 4 years! Not even coal, but I have a feeling this is my year.

Joe Obenberger 11-05-2012 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 19296704)
Ok, I take that back. Maybe, just maybe, John did write additional 13 verses in chapter 7, still unpublished. We just haven't filed motion of
discovery or called any witnesses to testify for him.

Typo. Chapter 6, v. 66.

Just Alex 11-05-2012 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger (Post 19296832)
Typo. Chapter 6, v. 66.


OK, I'll play. What does v. 63
You really think he's talking about cannibalism? :1orglaugh
You can't be serious.


Quote:

57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.

59 These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.

60 Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?

61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?

62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.

65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

66From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

67 Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away?

68 Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.

69 And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God.

70 Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?

71 He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray him, being one of the twelve.

Just Alex 11-05-2012 11:33 PM

Here, maybe this will help.

http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/john6pt2.htm

Quote:

To believe is to accept, internalize, and absorb--which is what eating is--taking in an outside substance, food inside of you. But unlike physical bread which is eaten and cast out through the digestive system, the spiritual bread, the word of God, is eaten/internalized through belief and never cast out. It remains inside of us. In verse 58, Jesus explains that when we eat him it is "NOT as your fathers did eat manna and are dead". It is not the same kind of eating. It is INTERNALIZING, ACCEPTING, BELIEVING HIM.

Just as we need physical bread to stay alive, we need belief in the Jesus and his sacrifice (spiritual bread) so that we can be born again and live forever. We need him and his flesh is meat indeed because it was broken for us on the cross to pay for our death penalty which we all deserve for our sins--hell and the lake of fire which is eternal death. If we repent and believe in the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ and obey him according to his word, we will not experience spiritual death in the lake of fire. Instead we will be born again and be alive to God and his word and we will go to heaven and have eternal life. Believing/internalizing/eating this fact gives us eternal life. Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. When we believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, he helps us to overcome sin and the world. His grace helps us. After we get saved, even our desires change--and this does not take a long time. It is not contrived, it is natural.

What about the blood? Jesus' blood is lifesaving drink indeed because without the shedding of blood, there is no remission (forgiveness) of sins. We need blood, the blood of Jesus alone. God the Father sent his only begotten Son to die for us and to shed his blood so that we can be saved. The blood of Jesus is the propitiation of our sins. It is the payment. Without the blood of Jesus, we would have no hope. We have sinned and we all deserve the lake of fire, but God is not willing that any should perish. When we believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, the blood of Jesus washes away our sins and we are reconciled to God who becomes our Father and we have a good future in front of us. We become children of God and we read his word and obey it and God helps us through life and when it is time to die, we go to live with God forever. Hebrews 9:22 says that blood is required in order to get forgiveness/remission of sins,

And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.

Once again, if we accept Jesus, internalize him, receive him, yea eat him, we have ETERNAL LIFE. The people were talking about physical life, Jesus was talking about SPIRITUAL life. Look back at the passage--when asked what we have to do to do the works of God, Jesus said,

"He that BELIEVETH on me hath everlasting LIFE."

When we believe on Jesus Christ, he actually lives inside of us, never to be purged like physical bread.

Because I believe, Jesus lives in me. As we continue on in this passage, we will see that the Lord makes clear he is talking spiritually.

JOHN 6 VERSES 52 THROUGH 69

This caused the unbelieving Jews to say, "How can this man give us his flesh to eat?" They are still thinking about physical life and physical bread. Jesus is talking about spiritual life and spiritual bread. He has told them over and over that the work of God is to believe on him and they repeatedly refuse to believe on him and persist in seeking physical bread.

In v. 55, Jesus said, "My flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed." Many people were offended at the thought of this. Because of their unbelief, they were still thinking in the physical realm.

What about the disciples that left him? Was it because they had to literally eat his flesh and drink his blood? No! They left because just like the others they did not believe in the Lord. Because they did not believe, they could not understand what Jesus was saying (see I Cor 2:14).

baddog 11-05-2012 11:39 PM

I have to admit, I find myself conflicted that I have to side with Alex; especially Michael and JD, but they have just blown me away. I hope they are just trolling . . . . please Lord.

Drake 11-05-2012 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19296165)
And I've posted at least three times in this thread that Judiasm has plenty of wacky stuff when seen from the outside.... even from the inside, in my opinion.

Maybe it's time to give it all up rather than promote a 'your religion is so much whackier than my religion' perspective.

Just Alex 11-06-2012 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19296879)
I have to admit, I find myself conflicted that I have to side with Alex; especially Michael and JD, but they have just blown me away. I hope they are just trolling . . . . please Lord.

Another senior moment or basic need to be grumpy asshole?

Joe Obenberger 11-06-2012 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 19296869)
Here, maybe this will help.

http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/john6pt2.htm

Hey Pal, I'm not here to argue the theology of transubstantiation, but it's clear that's what you'd like to do here. No thanks.

Michael has stated the Catholic position more or less accurately and that's my point here: Catholics believe that Christ is bodily present in the Eucharist, that the bread and wine have become his actual body and blood through a miracle, though still appearing to remain bread and wine, their substance has been changed to body and blood. Aha, you observe, but they still look and taste like bread and wine! The Catholic Church teaches that things are not always what they appear to be, and they are "accidents" in the philosophy of Aristotle and the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. That's the essence of transubstantiation, a bitterly contested issue during the Protestant Reformation. Some Protestants went so far as to accept consubstantiation, the idea that the consecrated species in the Eucharist were simultaneously bread and wine but also the body and blood of Christ; but most of the Protestant leaders thought that it was just a symbol. (By the way, Mormons substitute water for the wine because of the teachings in the Word of Wisdom about alcohol, and many of the Bible Thumper sects - the ones who oppose this industry and who join AFA and MIM - substitute grape juice.) If you find it hard to believe that the Catholics really believe this, you can check it out yourself in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 1374-1377. (That same Catechism takes the position that all governments should outlaw pornography, and while it condemns prostitution, it's notably silent about suggesting that prostitution should be outlawed. In this respect, it tracks with the teaching of Aquinas, though it disregards his reasoning that things which protect against sexual predation should not be outlawed.)

Joe Obenberger 11-06-2012 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19296879)
I have to admit, I find myself conflicted that I have to side with Alex; especially Michael and JD, but they have just blown me away. I hope they are just trolling . . . . please Lord.

Baddog, I'm taking no position here except that Michael does accurately understand what Catholics believe. Whether it's true or false, crazy, stupid or wise, is not my concern here, just accuracy.

Slappin Fish 11-06-2012 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 19296441)
Sure, and I talked to Rabbi who was senior Rabbi in Israel. As matter of fact he was a Rabbi to Rabbis and was teaching them how to properly lick penises. The Jewish way, not the gay way. And yes, he confirmed they like penises.


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

hineken 11-06-2012 02:11 AM

I don't give a faq

Phoenix 11-06-2012 02:16 AM

Typically no one wins when you argue religion or politics or anything labelled as a conspiracy.


so...everyone can just back away before it gets personal

MaDalton 11-06-2012 04:47 AM

http://media.nowpublic.net/images//5...d9d0214848.jpg

BlackCrayon 11-06-2012 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19296512)
So you do not know that mormons can have more than one wife? Strange because THIS is the main and usually the only thing that most of the people in the world knows about them.

thats not true anyways. at one time sure, but they stopped that around 1890. the only groups that continued broke off from the mormon church and started their own.

halfpint 11-06-2012 06:44 AM

I just thought they wore funny hats had long beards and many wives ..Do they have gang bangs with all thier wifes together ?

slapass 11-06-2012 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19296170)
.



Bullshit.

Nope, the Catholic Church stance is the host is transformed into the body of Christ. Not ritual but actual cannibalism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euchari...atholic_Church

Just Alex 11-06-2012 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger (Post 19297020)
Hey Pal, I'm not here to argue the theology of transubstantiation, but it's clear that's what you'd like to do here. No thanks.

Michael has stated the Catholic position more or less accurately and that's my point here: Catholics believe that Christ is bodily present in the Eucharist, that the bread and wine have become his actual body and blood through a miracle, though still appearing to remain bread and wine, their substance has been changed to body and blood. Aha, you observe, but they still look and taste like bread and wine! The Catholic Church teaches that things are not always what they appear to be, and they are "accidents" in the philosophy of Aristotle and the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. That's the essence of transubstantiation, a bitterly contested issue during the Protestant Reformation. Some Protestants went so far as to accept consubstantiation, the idea that the consecrated species in the Eucharist were simultaneously bread and wine but also the body and blood of Christ; but most of the Protestant leaders thought that it was just a symbol. (By the way, Mormons substitute water for the wine because of the teachings in the Word of Wisdom about alcohol, and many of the Bible Thumper sects - the ones who oppose this industry and who join AFA and MIM - substitute grape juice.) If you find it hard to believe that the Catholics really believe this, you can check it out yourself in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 1374-1377. (That same Catechism takes the position that all governments should outlaw pornography, and while it condemns prostitution, it's notably silent about suggesting that prostitution should be outlawed. In this respect, it tracks with the teaching of Aquinas, though it disregards his reasoning that things which protect against sexual predation should not be outlawed.)


Bible is nothing but a book of parables with philosophical meaning. Ever read any Hindu books? Now thats some stuff. Want to talk about elephants with 6 arms and reincarnation into a bug?
You really want to take everything literally just because it says so? So let me get this straight, Torah is nothing but book of arguments between Rabbis and shouldn't be taken literally, yet when the bible says take my body and few verses later explains that body means "my words and faith in me", you describe this as cannibalism? Some scholar you are!

slapass 11-06-2012 07:08 AM

This is what Catholics are told to believe. i understand you are not getting this but that is their current teachings/beliefs, not some verse in the bible.

Just Alex 11-06-2012 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 19297337)
This is what Catholics are told to believe. i understand you are not getting this but that is their current teachings/beliefs, not some verse in the bible.

Thank you captain O. Ever thought I could be or used to be one of them and actually studied theology just a little?

slapass 11-06-2012 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 19297359)
Thank you captain O. Ever thought I could be or used to be one of them and actually studied theology just a little?

Yeah it occurred to me but you aren't grasping that this is a Pope down belief so where is the issue? It is an ugly way to describe it but it is not inaccurate.

Just Alex 11-06-2012 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 19297366)
this is a Pope down belief

More news to me.
So Pope down you say? This must be the wrong Pope than. Looks like he explained it pretty damn clear.

To distinguish the Body of Christ in this sense from his physical body, the term "Mystical Body of Christ" is often used. This term was used as the first words, and so as the title, of the encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi of Pope Pius XII. In that document, Pope Pius XII clearly states, "the mystical Body of Christ... is the Catholic Church."

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pi...hristi_en.html

slapass 11-06-2012 08:40 AM

You can't make this shit up. The church really stands behind this. I have not studied it but I did encounter it.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/po...ctrine_en.html

"9. The Lord’s words at the last supper, ‘Take and eat; this is my body’, do not allow us to dissociate the gift of the presence and the act of sacramental eating. The elements are not mere signs; Christ’s body and blood become really present and are really given. But they are really present and given in order that, receiving them, believers may be united in communion with Christ the Lord."

Just Alex 11-06-2012 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 19297497)
You can't make this shit up. The church really stands behind this. I have not studied it but I did encounter it.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/po...ctrine_en.html

"9. The Lord’s words at the last supper, ‘Take and eat; this is my body’, do not allow us to dissociate the gift of the presence and the act of sacramental eating. The elements are not mere signs; Christ’s body and blood become really present and are really given. But they are really present and given in order that, receiving them, believers may be united in communion with Christ the Lord."

Did you read anything I posted? Anything?
Otherwise send email to Vatican and tell them one of their staff members fucked up writing this Mystici Corporis Christi document and they don't know shit.

helterskelter808 11-06-2012 08:49 AM

Funny that all Catholics are cannibals because they eat a wafer (which has to be the most ridiculous, illogical and inane statement I've ever heard anyone try and seriously make, and from two people who seem to consider themselves intelligent :1orglaugh), and all Muslims believe in "72 virgins" and Muhammad is frequently referred to as a pedophile, but when it comes to Jews, whose 'holy' book states that Jews should rape children, as long as they are under 9 years old, as well as cheat, rob and kill anyone who isn't Jewish, that's nothing, no problem, don't worry about it, no Jew really believes that.

But yeah, every Catholic is a "cannibal". :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You k00ks are funny.

slapass 11-06-2012 08:51 AM

Yeah I read your stuff. Did you take a peak at where I got mine? Send them an email they fucked up their Eucharist page. Ever talked to a priest or priests about this? They all stand behind it. It is a pretty well known stance in my neck of the woods. The Eucharist is considered holy Because it is the body of christ. It is not allowed to be left alone, get dirty, etc.

slapass 11-06-2012 08:54 AM

No one should believe any of this stuff. I was pointing out what the Catholic church states. "They think they are cannibals." I think they are uninformed.

baddog 11-06-2012 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger (Post 19297027)
Baddog, I'm taking no position here except that Michael does accurately understand what Catholics believe. Whether it's true or false, crazy, stupid or wise, is not my concern here, just accuracy.

Then explain how they could take Communion on Friday's before they could eat meat. You guys are a funny lot

sarettah 11-06-2012 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 19297497)
"9. The Lord?s words at the last supper, ?Take and eat; this is my body?

That's just what they came up with when they were writing it all down.

Jesus actually looked at his disciples and said:

EAT ME!!

but they couldn't put that in the bible. Nope, wouldn't be prudent.





P.S. Yeah, yeah, I know, I stole it from Sam Kinison, SUE ME!!

.

Joe Obenberger 11-06-2012 11:24 AM

For a long time, the board has looked like the little village in Eastern Europe that conducts the Running of the Jew on a daily basis with Michael as the guest of honor. In a country built on tolerance and respect for the views of others - and especially in an industry that cannot exist without those things, the tone and content of these posts is an embarrassment to professionals in the adult industry.

At least I provided a momentary digression into Catholic bashing for pornographers.

Just Alex 11-06-2012 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 19297525)
Yeah I read your stuff. Did you take a peak at where I got mine? Send them an email they fucked up their Eucharist page. Ever talked to a priest or priests about this? They all stand behind it. It is a pretty well known stance in my neck of the woods. The Eucharist is considered holy Because it is the body of christ. It is not allowed to be left alone, get dirty, etc.

Yep, i read it all. Talks about body of Christ and Eucharist. And the document I provided explains that it does not literally means "the body" but rather catholic Church and faith in God. Pretty self explanatory. BTW, written by none other but Pope himself. You see where you lose me with your arguments.

Shotsie 11-06-2012 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 19297307)
I just thought they wore funny hats had long beards and many wives ..Do they have gang bangs with all thier wifes together ?

I think you're thinking of Amish Mennonites with the hats and beards. Or Hasidic Jews.

The Mormon's do practice polygamy, though. Mitt Romney's grandfather had three wives and thirty children. Check it out: Mitt Romney's Mormon family in Mexico vs. the drug cartels

MaDalton 11-06-2012 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger (Post 19297885)
For a long time, the board has looked like the little village in Eastern Europe that conducts the Running of the Jew on a daily basis with Michael as the guest of honor. In a country built on tolerance and respect for the views of others - and especially in an industry that cannot exist without those things, the tone and content of these posts is an embarrassment to professionals in the adult industry.

At least I provided a momentary digression into Catholic bashing for pornographers.

i always respected you but before you insult others you should have a look around in your own country...

:2 cents:

Just Alex 11-06-2012 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger (Post 19297885)
For a long time, the board has looked like the little village in Eastern Europe that conducts the Running of the Jew on a daily basis with Michael as the guest of honor. In a country built on tolerance and respect for the views of others - and especially in an industry that cannot exist without those things, the tone and content of these posts is an embarrassment to professionals in the adult industry.

At least I provided a momentary digression into Catholic bashing for pornographers.

Running of the Jew happens in Borat's Kazakhstan not Eastern Europe.
Tolerance and respect? Wait a minute again. So when someone says "Jews can marry 3 year olds" its anti-semitism, yet "Catholic practice cannibalism on weekly basic" its a point of view? I know you're lawyer and all but come on!

helterskelter808 11-06-2012 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger (Post 19297885)
For a long time, the board has looked like the little village in Eastern Europe that conducts the Running of the Jew on a daily basis with Michael as the guest of honor. In a country built on tolerance and respect for the views of others - and especially in an industry that cannot exist without those things, the tone and content of these posts is an embarrassment to professionals in the adult industry.

It's free speech/expression the porn industry relies on, and free speech/expression is what you're complaining about here.

And FYI, most racist/religious attacks on this board are against black people and Muslims. Two groups I haven't noticed you showing any particular defense of.

Joe Obenberger 11-06-2012 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 19297922)
Running of the Jew happens in Borat's Kazakhstan not Eastern Europe.
Tolerance and respect? Wait a minute again. So when someone says "Jews can marry 3 year olds" its anti-semitism, yet "Catholic practice cannibalism on weekly basic" its a point of view? I know you're lawyer and all but come on!

It's much broader than this recent exchange; what Michael endures here as the lighting rod for his faith is abysmal and stands in defiance of every value that I treasure as an American. So as you sew, so shall you reap; if you dish out intolerance, you can hardly expect tolerance from a jury judging contemporary community standards.

I've come to know Michael and his wife over most of a decade and he is a class act. Smart, funny, and a gentleman in every sense that I can see. There is an instinct deep within me to protect and defend underdogs - it's why I defend clients in this industry. Whether the village is in Eastern Europe or in the fringes of Asia should not concern you as much as the dangerous dichotomy between the kind of tolerance that you would ask from a jury if you got into trouble and the intolerance and cruelty you show to others.

BlackCrayon 11-06-2012 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shotsie (Post 19297907)
I think you're thinking of Amish Mennonites with the hats and beards. Or Hasidic Jews.

The Mormon's do practice polygamy, though. Mitt Romney's grandfather had three wives and thirty children. Check it out: Mitt Romney's Mormon family in Mexico vs. the drug cartels

actually romney's grandfather and a group of others moved to mexico after the mormon church banned polygamy in 1890. they may have considered themselves 'mormons' but were not a part of the official/original one.

BlackCrayon 11-06-2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger (Post 19297994)
It's much broader than this recent exchange; what Michael endures here as the lighting rod for his faith is abysmal and stands in defiance of every value that I treasure as an American. So as you sew, so shall you reap; if you dish out intolerance, you can hardly expect tolerance from a jury judging contemporary community standards.

I've come to know Michael and his wife over most of a decade and he is a class act. Smart, funny, and a gentleman in every sense that I can see. There is an instinct deep within me to protect and defend underdogs - it's why I defend clients in this industry. Whether the village is in Eastern Europe or in the fringes of Asia should not concern you as much as the dangerous dichotomy between the kind of tolerance that you would ask from a jury if you got into trouble and the intolerance and cruelty you show to others.

its very easy to insult any religion. there is so much retarded crap in all of them.

slapass 11-06-2012 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 19297904)
Yep, i read it all. Talks about body of Christ and Eucharist. And the document I provided explains that it does not literally means "the body" but rather catholic Church and faith in God. Pretty self explanatory. BTW, written by none other but Pope himself. You see where you lose me with your arguments.

So they are eating the church also. Yeah the whole thing loses me. I could never get the triune god thing either. Ask your local priest, I bet you get my explanation with hand wringing.

Edit: I think you are being confused by the word Mystical. He is defining the church and then makes the remarks that the body or people in this case need to help the head, Christ/clergy. The guy rights as clear as mud but being as he probalby extremely educated and is writing on a well, tricky topic, you have to give him leeway.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc