That's like getting fired but being given an opportunity to submit your resignation. Even if he declined they would have talked about his great 8 years if they weren't such an embarrassment.

They don't talk about Bush for the most part. He was president only 4 yrs ago. If they all thought he did such a good job, they would of been parading him out the whole time but its like those years never happened.

You know how many contradictions are in that post?

Clinton signed the bill but lenders and borrowers took it further than intended. What was supposed to be a few % of loans turned into majority.

But yes more freedoms for biz!

You want government to help small business and make them pay less in taxes. That differs from the individual welfare you are against how?

Blah.

That POS is still breathing our good air?

He served two terms, he retired, he wasn't fired. He knows the Republican party has to move on. :2 cents:


Did you even watch the RNC or Veep debates? Ryan blames Bush almost as must as Obama for the current financials.

I didn't watch either of the conventions, however, the way I understood it was that Bush announced he would not be a part of the convention months before it took place and later on it was said that he was invited and chose not to attend, but there were no details of what type of a role he was offered.

His dad and Dick Cheney also didn't show up, from what I understand. I don't know if they were invited or not.

Not really. The law was abused. And Bush did nothing to stop it, and nothing to prevent this.

And why would the media cover up something? Are they all democratic? Did I miss that memo?

So all companies operating in the US who have more than a thousand people working for them should be tax free? Fucking brilliant. The government would go broke in thirty days.

Over taxed? With all of the loopholes we have? How much more fucking help do small businesses need?

Sounds reasonable. But why hasn't anyone ever put something like that into place?

Why do need less laws? Are the laws we have over bearing? The local police have been to my house twice in eight years, once which was a mistake.

More freedom? More freedom to do what? Do you need papers or permission to drive past city limits? To leave the county? The state? Short of shooting someone I can pretty much do anything I want. I have multiple assault weapons in my house. What more fucking freedoms do you want?

Your telling us to vote for the Republican party and then telling us no one should impose their believes on anyone. Yet the Republican party is trying to tell my wife what she can and cannot do with her own body....

Face reality. The Republican party has failed us with eight years of bush, and then to fix the problem they sent an old man and the governor of Alaska, and then they sent a business man with a 22% failure rate who left office with a 34% approval rating. The Republican party knows it has no hope right now. That's how bad it is.

I'm not saying give small businesses a free ride, I'm saying not to tax them to death.

I'm not against welfare, I'm against the way it is currently handled.

Bush is still standing in front of the national debt clock trying to figure out if the digits mean millions, billions or trillions he racked up.

You pretty much summed it up. These just kind of come across as random thoughts and republican speaking points, though executed somewhat poorly.

So far so good, at least in betting world :-)

Presidential Election Winner Updated at: 10:33 AM, InTrade.com


Barack Obama
73.0%
Today's Change: +4.8
Shares Traded: 3,562,903

Mitt Romney
27.2%
Today's Change: -5.7

Bullshit, Clinton was the cause of it. Bush sure didn't stop it from happening.

Also, you say shit is so good now, you have neighbors now and businesses.

They aren't being taxed to death. If you are feeling like you are being taxed to death that is because you are failing at business.

For the same reason that Gore didn't want Clinton anywhere near him in 2000 (Clinton was still disgraced at the time he left office) and didn't have him as part of the campaign at all.

And the same reason that Carter to this very day is not wanted in campaigning or at the Democrat Convention.

Bush is in the same boat at the moment. He is a negative. Why would Romney want a negative like that?

He doesn't. Just like Clinton WAS a negative in 2000 for Gore, and Carter would be a negative for Obama now.

because Bush was a major factor in why we're in this shit mess ? could that have something to do with it ?

No, Bush is a major factor we went to war for no real reason and have lost so many of our personal freedoms.

This "shit mess" was caused by the housing market collapsing...which was caused by Congressional legislation deregulating it that began when Clinton was still President (and no, Clinton had nothing to do with it either...it was CONGRESS)

LOL... Ok. Fair enough. I capitulate the point.



:)





.

too much negative view

Gore would have won in 2000 had he had Clinton helping him campaign. Well... he won anyway... but... Clinton would have helped for sure.

Clinton didn't cause any problems... the 90s was the most prosperous time in our lifetimes.

I think he made a mistake by not having Clinton with him as well...but that was his call. He decided that he didn't want to be associated with Clinton because of all the sex scandals and the WhiteWater scandal and investigations.

Clinton was a negative at that particular time...but with a few years of retrospective thought, people love him now.

And I think he would have had a positive impact for Gore as well even then.

It's because he voted for Obama. In Fakeland.

http://dailycurrant.com/2012/11/06/g...y-votes-obama/

:1orglaugh

Yup... it was just one misstep after another for Gore, ending with not fighting the supreme court hard enough over the whole Florida debacle. Clinton would have totally had a positive impact IMO. And all Gore had to do was carry his own state and then FL would have been unnecessary.