GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Executive Order for Gun Control (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1095764)

tony286 01-09-2013 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19417772)
That's just not true.

Serial killers almost NEVER use a gun. Jeffrey Dahmer didn't. Ted Bundy didn't. The list goes on and on.

A lunatic gets his hands on a gun every once in a while and starts shooting. It's insane, but it's a dangerous world.

I'd like to be able to stop it too. But taking away the rights granted to us as U.S. citizens isn't really the way to do that in my opinion.

As I said earlier...big daddy govt. can't control EVERYTHING (even though they try to).

You simply can not stop a crazed person from doing what these people did. Even if you don't accept that they would have simply used a different method (remember what Timothy McVeigh did in Oklahoma City), you still have to understand that if they REALLY wanted to only use a gun...then they would simply steal one or get one off the black market.

Criminals and homicidal maniacs don't obey the law. And to guys like that, nothing will stop them from doing what they are hell-bent (literally) on doing.

I dont think the movie theater killer or the sandy hook killer could of bought guns on the street they were meek and not correct. Chances are they would of got their money stolen and the asses kicked if they tried to buy guns on the street.

Robbie 01-09-2013 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19417834)
I dont think the movie theater killer or the sandy hook killer could of bought guns on the street they were meek and not correct. Chances are they would of got their money stolen and the asses kicked if they tried to buy guns on the street.

Maybe...you and I can only guess on that.

Robbie 01-09-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 19417810)
And now you are backtracking and saying: "any non-felon LEGAL citizen they should be able to own firearms WITHOUT any laws that infringe on that in any way."
So I guess you promote the idea of children being able to purchase/own firearms too? You do know that "non-felon LEGAL citizen" includes children born in the USA right?

I didn't communicate what I meant.
I'll say it again so you won't think I'm "backtracking": I meant any citizen who could legally buy a gun. That would not include felons. My bad for not wording it correctly.

Also...you "guess" wrong.
Children can not purchase a fire arm. They are minors. They don't have the full rights of an adult.

As for "owning" fire arms. My daddy gave me a shotgun when I was 6 years old.
There were guns all over the place in my family. My grandparents had rifles in their home and vehicles. So did my dad. We were raised learning to shoot.

In the small town I lived in...everybody had guns. And all my little buddies at school all had rifles as well. We would all go hunting together as kids in my families cattle pastures (thousands of acres of woods). It was considered normal. Nobody blinked an eye about it (and there wasn't much crime either lol)

Not sure if I'd want to hand TODAYS children a gun or not. lol
Those little bastards spend way too much time killing thousands of people on video games. A few of them might think it's cool to do it in real life too.

Vendzilla 01-10-2013 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GFED (Post 19417731)
You want to ban certain guns for the way they look, and for certain evil features such as a bayonet lug.

I never understood this, when you run out of bullets, your knife on the end of your gun they want to make illegal? So they are going after knives now?

BlackCrayon 01-10-2013 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 19417775)
The guy that shot up the Sikh temple in Milwaukee last summer was an Army Vet.

but he was a loser who was kicked out and also a white supremacist.

BlackCrayon 01-10-2013 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19417834)
I dont think the movie theater killer or the sandy hook killer could of bought guns on the street they were meek and not correct. Chances are they would of got their money stolen and the asses kicked if they tried to buy guns on the street.

If someone like Holmes had to buy guns at a gun shop rather than online, he might never of been served. All it took was listening to his voice mail message from a run range to determine he was nuts and not allow him into their gun club. why people are allowed to buy any kind of firearms is beyond me. at the very least that should be stopped.

JP-pornshooter 01-10-2013 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19417772)
That's just not true.

Serial killers almost NEVER use a gun. Jeffrey Dahmer didn't. Ted Bundy didn't. The list goes on and on.

A lunatic gets his hands on a gun every once in a while and starts shooting. It's insane, but it's a dangerous world.

I'd like to be able to stop it too. But taking away the rights granted to us as U.S. citizens isn't really the way to do that in my opinion.

As I said earlier...big daddy govt. can't control EVERYTHING (even though they try to).

You simply can not stop a crazed person from doing what these people did. Even if you don't accept that they would have simply used a different method (remember what Timothy McVeigh did in Oklahoma City), you still have to understand that if they REALLY wanted to only use a gun...then they would simply steal one or get one off the black market.

Criminals and homicidal maniacs don't obey the law. And to guys like that, nothing will stop them from doing what they are hell-bent (literally) on doing.

Robbie, I like and respect your opinion and we share many of those views.
In this case we are talking apples and oranges..

Serial killers, school-mass shooters and terrorists are not classified in one group.
They are three distinct different groups of murderers, for the purpose of this discussion really we need not include serial killers or terrorists.
Terrorists are a big threat but not typically someone with a single gun taking down random victims. Usually like McVeigh they target something big and usually very targeted.
Serial killers are also motivated by certain acts or victim targets, these killers are seriously psycho deranged but they dont have a death wish and do not want to get caught.

Mass shooters (columbine / colorado movie theater and recent school shootings) typically want to go out as a cowboy, they all use firearms (guns)
refer to this list from wiki which clearly shows all these incidents were carried out using firearms, not poison or piano string etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...llers#Americas

Robbie 01-10-2013 12:24 PM

JP I know what you're saying.

I'm just pointing out that there are a lot of crazy people out there who kill in a lot of different ways. And yeah...these "copycat" school shootings (thank you CNN for running these stories 24 hours a day/ 7 days a week) are guys who plan them with guns.

And if I could wave a magic wand and make guns non-existent, I would.

Having said that...the only true way to do this is to repeal the 2nd amendment. And then give it a few decades for guns to get old and the supply to be down to a manageable level as cops take them from captured criminals, they get old and uncared for (except by gun collectors), and ammunition begins to dwindle.

And even then...there will still be a random mass shooting here and there. :(

crockett 01-10-2013 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdbucks (Post 19416996)
That depends on how you look at it...

The people can't exactly stand up against a tyrannical government armed with only pistols...

I dunno we saw several countries in the middle east stand up to their tyrannical govt's with just numbers in the streets & protesting. What are the odds that a single gun nut will leave his house and actually protest anything out side of being a forum warrior.

:1orglaugh

Occupy Wall Street was the first real movement of that type in the US since the 60's. Americans by far are very out spoken about our rights but very few actually do anything to protect them. The govt could ban guns and 99% of the pro gun people would likely just try to hide what they could and do nothing but talk about it on the internet.

Rochard 01-10-2013 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19417772)
Serial killers almost NEVER use a gun. Jeffrey Dahmer didn't. Ted Bundy didn't. The list goes on and on.

But don't you see the difference?

Jeffrey Dahmer killed 17 people over a long period of time. The shooter in CT killed two dozen school kids in two or three minutes....

Rochard 01-10-2013 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 19417775)
The guy that shot up the Sikh temple in Milwaukee last summer was an Army Vet.

And your point is? Army vets go off their rocker too.

The shooter in CT fits the profile - weak, loner, wanted to be "part of the club" so badly that he surrounded himself with dozens of military posters and pictures of hardware, but had no chance of making it.

vdbucks 01-10-2013 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19419058)
But don't you see the difference?

Jeffrey Dahmer killed 17 people over a long period of time. The shooter in CT killed two dozen school kids in two or three minutes....

So again, you don't care about people getting killed.. just so long as they aren't killed by guns?

That's about the only thing that you've said throughout this entire debate...

PornoMonster 01-10-2013 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdbucks (Post 19419068)
So again, you don't care about people getting killed.. just so long as they aren't killed by guns?

That's about the only thing that you've said throughout this entire debate...

Ding Ding Ding We have a winner.

If they are spread out, no big deal.
Wonder what ones suffered more pain? Not sure about this guy and his killings but BTK guy, wow, I think I would want an AR-15 to kill me not the BTK guy.

JP-pornshooter 01-10-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdbucks (Post 19419068)
So again, you don't care about people getting killed.. just so long as they aren't killed by guns?

That's about the only thing that you've said throughout this entire debate...

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoMonster (Post 19419081)
Ding Ding Ding We have a winner.

If they are spread out, no big deal.
Wonder what ones suffered more pain? Not sure about this guy and his killings but BTK guy, wow, I think I would want an AR-15 to kill me not the BTK guy.

really?
we are talking about gun control so it seems to make sense to discuss the incidents related to gun violence.

Rochard 01-10-2013 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdbucks (Post 19419068)
So again, you don't care about people getting killed.. just so long as they aren't killed by guns?

That's about the only thing that you've said throughout this entire debate...

Not so much. This less about guns and gun control for me as it is a health care issue.

The guy who shot the firemen killed his grandmother with a hammer, why was he ever released from prison? The kid in CT was a loner who locked himself in the basement of a million dollar house and surrounded himself with posters of military hardware while playing violent video games.

Putting security guards in school is already too late - dozens of steps should be taken before then to ensure that this never happens. The very first step is understanding why these people "slip through the system" in the first place.

Jeffrey Dahmer too fell through the cracks.

The problem is more people are having mental issues combined with the ready availability of firearms.

But in the mean time, more guns that shoot more bullets more faster is not the solution.

Robbie 01-10-2013 06:01 PM

Rochard... if our society ever allows the govt. to forcibly incarcerate everyone who "acts crazy"...you, me, and 90% of the people would be detained. lol

People like Jeffrey Dahmer didn't "slip through the cracks". He never did anything to "slip through". He was a smart guy and normal in every way...except he secretly wanted to kill and eat young gay guys.

WTF are we supposed to do...read people's minds? We can't. And we can't let the govt. start hauling people off because they MIGHT do something crazy.

That sounds like the Nazi's or The Soviet Union Secret Police.

As far as numbers of people killed and time it took to kill them...what the fuck difference does that make in the discussion? Dead is dead.

And if you INSIST on that kind of wrong-headed reasoning...then realize this: Timothy McVeigh killed 19 children under the age of SIX YEAR OLD in Oklahoma City in about a split second. He did NOT use a gun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing

Rochard 01-10-2013 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19419336)
Rochard... if our society ever allows the govt. to forcibly incarcerate everyone who "acts crazy"...you, me, and 90% of the people would be detained. lol

People like Jeffrey Dahmer didn't "slip through the cracks". He never did anything to "slip through". He was a smart guy and normal in every way...except he secretly wanted to kill and eat young gay guys.

WTF are we supposed to do...read people's minds? We can't. And we can't let the govt. start hauling people off because they MIGHT do something crazy.

That sounds like the Nazi's or The Soviet Union Secret Police.

As far as numbers of people killed and time it took to kill them...what the fuck difference does that make in the discussion? Dead is dead.

And if you INSIST on that kind of wrong-headed reasoning...then realize this: Timothy McVeigh killed 19 children under the age of SIX YEAR OLD in Oklahoma City in about a split second. He did NOT use a gun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing

They slip through the cracks every day. The guy who shot the firemen killed his grand mother with a hammer. The kid in CT was a loner who locked himself up in the basemen of a million dollar house and surrounded himself by posters of military hardware while playing violent video games.

And again, this isn't about guns. Don't say "He did NOT use a gun". You are talking about guns, and I'm talking about mental health here.

Timothy McVeigh didn't kill with a gun, but no one thought he was odd? He brought firearms to school to impress his friends.

But the solution here isn't more guns. More guns isn't going to protect us. All it does is give mentally ill people easier access to guns, be it legally or illegally.

Yet again today, in Taft California, there was another school shooting - a student brought a shotgun into school and shot a classmate. Armed guards aren't the answer; The school pays $50k a year for an armed guard who just happened to call in sick the day he was needed the most. Then again, chances are he would have been too late and the kid would have gotten shot anyhow.

We have a massive crisis here - people are walking into schools and churches and malls and theatres and just fucking shooting people. The fucking NRA, the only organization who can help us here, the only solution they have is "more guns".

The NRA is going to cost us the 2nd amendment.

Robbie 01-10-2013 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19419411)
They slip through the cracks every day. The guy who shot the firemen killed his grand mother with a hammer. The kid in CT was a loner who locked himself up in the basemen of a million dollar house and surrounded himself by posters of military hardware while playing violent video games.

Yet again today, in Taft California, there was another school shooting - a student brought a shotgun into school and shot a classmate.

No, you SPECIFICALLY said Jeffrey Dahmer "slipped through the cracks". I pointed out that "no", he didn't. Neither did Ted Bundy. Or a person like Susan Smith. The list goes on and on and on.

An yes, a guy who committed murder with a hammer on his grandmother should never be let out of prison. But the prisons are very overcrowded at the moment because of the insane "war on drugs".

As far as your description of the MAN in CT. who shot those kids...you just described millions of guys in the U.S. (minus the million dollar house you claim).

The Taft shooting is looking to be a kid getting bullied by another kid and snapping.

All I'm saying is...repeal the fucking Second Amendment before Obama starts acting like Bush with these "Executive Orders" and we get closer and closer to having a "king" instead of a third branch of govt. that is supposed to be equal to the other two.

All your pondering on "mental health" is useless. Nobody (especially the federal govt.) has the money to institutionalize all of those people even IF they volunteered to be put away.

tony286 01-10-2013 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19419467)
No, you SPECIFICALLY said Jeffrey Dahmer "slipped through the cracks". I pointed out that "no", he didn't. Neither did Ted Bundy. Or a person like Susan Smith. The list goes on and on and on.

An yes, a guy who committed murder with a hammer on his grandmother should never be let out of prison. But the prisons are very overcrowded at the moment because of the insane "war on drugs".

As far as your description of the MAN in CT. who shot those kids...you just described millions of guys in the U.S. (minus the million dollar house you claim).

The Taft shooting is looking to be a kid getting bullied by another kid and snapping.

All I'm saying is...repeal the fucking Second Amendment before Obama starts acting like Bush with these "Executive Orders" and we get closer and closer to having a "king" instead of a third branch of govt. that is supposed to be equal to the other two.

All your pondering on "mental health" is useless. Nobody (especially the federal govt.) has the money to institutionalize all of those people even IF they volunteered to be put away.

Old Jeff was showing odd behavior as a kid
Pre-Teen Years
http://crime.about.com/od/serial/a/dahmer.htm
In 1966, the Dahmers moved to Bath, Ohio. Dahmer's insecurities grew after the move and his shyness kept him from having many friends. While his peers were busy listening to the latest songs, Dahmer was busy collecting road kill and stripping the animal carcasses and saving the bones.

DTK 01-10-2013 08:25 PM

Sorry to interrupt any 'Count Chocula is coming for all your guns' hysteria with a quick reality check

The 2nd Amendment (which i strongly believe in) DOES NOT guarantee the right of any US citizen to own ANY weapon they choose.

and btw, polls show that rank and file NRA members are in favor of sensible gun laws (ie re-instate the assault weapons ban, no guns for people with history of mental problems and/or violence). NRA leadership ignores that because they are paid whores for the gun manufacturers.

PornoMonster 01-10-2013 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 19419192)
really?
we are talking about gun control so it seems to make sense to discuss the incidents related to gun violence.

Right, and it is the bandwagon of BS.

Jump on...

Let's not look at the real issues..

GrantMercury 01-10-2013 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdbucks (Post 19416996)
That depends on how you look at it...

The people can't exactly stand up against a tyrannical government armed with only pistols...

Give up this fucking Rambo fantasy. Grow the fuck up.

1. The government isn't coming for you.

2. If they were, your rat-a-tat-tat wouldn't stop them anyway.

3. See #1.

GrantMercury 01-10-2013 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTK (Post 19419512)
Sorry to interrupt any 'Count Chocula is coming for all your guns' hysteria...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Robbie 01-10-2013 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19419472)
Old Jeff was showing odd behavior as a kid
Pre-Teen Years

In 1966, the Dahmers moved to Bath, Ohio. Dahmer's insecurities grew after the move and his shyness kept him from having many friends. While his peers were busy listening to the latest songs, Dahmer was busy collecting road kill and stripping the animal carcasses and saving the bones.

Again, that just described a LOT of goth-acting kids.

Using that logic, people would have said that me and my buddies were probably going to kill people because we were the long haired, cigarette smoking, druggie, Pink Floyd-listening group of shy outsiders while our "peers" "were busy listening" to KC and The Sunshine Band in the 1970's.

Just because teenagers act out trying to be rebellious and original doesn't mean that it's a "sign" that they are going to grow up and eat young gay guys they pick up at the club.

As I understand it...all of Dahmer's neighbors were shocked at what happened because he was such nice guy.

Barry-xlovecam 01-10-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER (No. 07-290) 478 F. 3d 370

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html
Excerpted:

Held:

1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2?53.

3. The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment .
Read the decision.

The Disneyland drama can continue but the US Supreme Court rarely reverses its decisions.

If they want to regulate mass murderers in some way fine but it is after the fact and will not prevent mass murders from occurring.

An AR15 assault rifle might not pass muster as "unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home." Its unrestricted sale might be regulated. However, "connected with service in a militia" in its broadest sense in connection with national defense might be argued.

The NFA banned machineguns and other gangster weapons in 1934. So all gangster killings ended then (not). There are over 100 million serviceable firearms in the possession of the US population. There were 11,101 homicides attributed to firearms -- that is a pretty small percentage of the operable firearms in circulation.

Treating the "disease" of criminal behavior with firearms is going to be more effective than treating the "symptoms" of misuse of firearms by a very small percentage of people.

adult-help 01-10-2013 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19419599)
Give up this fucking Rambo fantasy. Grow the fuck up.

1. The government isn't coming for you.

2. If they were, your rat-a-tat-tat wouldn't stop them anyway.

3. See #1.

exactly! cant believe how paranoid some people are.

vdbucks 01-11-2013 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 19419192)
really?
we are talking about gun control so it seems to make sense to discuss the incidents related to gun violence.

In a proper debate, people compare various sets of facts and statistics that further strengthens whichever side of the debate they're on.

Faux debates on the other hand, such as this one, are when people completely ignore the facts and focus purely on fantasy and speculation in order to make their argument seem valid.

So, it's up to you to decide how you'd like to carry on the debate. I choose to consider all the facts and statistics from related scenarios as opposed to blindly picking a side because the mainstream media is feeding me bullshit.

For example, not one of you has properly addressed the simple fact that automobiles lead to more than twice as many injuries and deaths than all firearm related incidents combined. But because automobile related incidents aren't force fed every day by the mainstream media, then you people don't really care. All you care about is latching on to whatever the 'hot topic' on the "news" is, and are are completely ignorant to any and everything else around you.

So it doesn't matter whether your false notions are based around all guns, handguns, assault rifles, shotguns, or whatever; the facts remain the same. But again, not one of you "anti gun" supporters seem to actually care about the facts; nor do you seem to care whether or not people die, or how many, so long as the death wasn't caused by a firearm. And this is quite simply, absolute nonsense.

WuTang 01-11-2013 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19419599)
1. The government isn't coming for you.

Prove it. Otherwise, suck a dick. WHEN they do come, I'll be sure to mistake you for one of them.

:ak47:

vdbucks 01-11-2013 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19419411)
We have a massive crisis here - people are walking into schools and churches and malls and theatres and just fucking shooting people.

The truly sad part is how none of you "anti gun" advocates seem to realize that the sudden increase of mass shootings is just a little too convenient... like all of a sudden the mainstream media and political figureheads start talking about banning guns and then all of a sudden, mass shootings increase tenfold...

But no.. we mustn't talk about those things less the mainstream media and their faithful followers start calling us "conspiracy theorists".

WuTang 01-11-2013 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdbucks (Post 19419813)
The truly sad part is how none of you "anti gun" advocates seem to realize that the sudden increase of mass shootings is just a little too convenient... like all of a sudden the mainstream media and political figureheads start talking about banning guns and then all of a sudden, mass shootings increase tenfold...

But no.. we mustn't talk about those things less the mainstream media and their faithful followers start calling us "conspiracy theorists".

Quoted for truth.

Theories at least have a base in logic.

vdbucks 01-11-2013 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19419599)
Give up this fucking Rambo fantasy. Grow the fuck up.

1. The government isn't coming for you.

2. If they were, your rat-a-tat-tat wouldn't stop them anyway.

3. See #1.

It's a little ironic for you to tell me to "grow the fuck up" when guys like you form your arguments and "beliefs" based on fantasy, speculation and what you see on mainstream media; while completely ignoring the actual facts and statistics.

xenigo 01-11-2013 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdbucks (Post 19419813)
The truly sad part is how none of you "anti gun" advocates seem to realize that the sudden increase of mass shootings is just a little too convenient... like all of a sudden the mainstream media and political figureheads start talking about banning guns and then all of a sudden, mass shootings increase tenfold...

But no.. we mustn't talk about those things less the mainstream media and their faithful followers start calling us "conspiracy theorists".

This phenomenon has been well documented. Where is the confusion?

Quote:

4. Why do you think the epidemic example is so relevant for other kinds of change? Is it just that it's an unusual and interesting way to think about the world?

No. I think it's much more than that, because once you start to understand this pattern you start to see it everywhere. I'm convinced that ideas and behaviors and new products move through a population very much like a disease does. This isn't just a metaphor, in other words. I'm talking about a very literal analogy. One of the things I explore in the book is that ideas can be contagious in exactly the same way that a virus is. One chapter, for example, deals with the very strange epidemic of teenage suicide in the South Pacific islands of Micronesia. In the 1970's and 1980's, Micronesia had teen suicide rates ten times higher than anywhere else in the world. Teenagers were literally being infected with the suicide bug, and one after another they were killing themselves in exactly the same way under exactly the same circumstances. We like to use words like contagiousness and infectiousness just to apply to the medical realm. But I assure you that after you read about what happened in Micronesia you'll be convinced that behavior can be transmitted from one person to another as easily as the flu or the measles can. In fact, I don't think you have to go to Micronesia to see this pattern in action. Isn't this the explanation for the current epidemic of teen smoking in this country? And what about the rash of mass shootings we're facing at the moment--from Columbine through the Atlanta stockbroker through the neo-Nazi in Los Angeles?
http://www.gladwell.com/tippingpoint/

vdbucks 01-11-2013 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xenigo (Post 19419822)
This phenomenon has been well documented. Where is the confusion?



http://www.gladwell.com/tippingpoint/

I'm not confused. Trying to relate the "tipping point" to the sudden influx of mass shootings is akin to grasping at straws; because these mass shootings haven't simply been happening all this time without people realizing it...

WuTang 01-11-2013 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xenigo (Post 19419822)
This phenomenon has been well documented. Where is the confusion?



http://www.gladwell.com/tippingpoint/

:disgust:upsidedow

You seem to be confused. Your response was irrelevant to the topic you quoted. A Tipping Point has nothing to do with the coincidence that more school shootings have been being reported since the gun-control issue went on the docket. Obviously they weren't an issue prior because we would have heard about them. So what gives? This "Tipping Point" sounds like more liberal hog-wash to try and justify that their position in life believing that their Government is looking out for them, cares about them and would never do anything to harm them.

xenigo 01-11-2013 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WuTang (Post 19419828)
:disgust:upsidedow

You seem to be confused. Your response was irrelevant to the topic you quoted. A Tipping Point has nothing to do with the coincidence that more school shootings have been being reported since the gun-control issue went on the docket. Obviously they weren't an issue prior because we would have heard about them. So what gives? This "Tipping Point" sounds like more liberal hog-wash to try and justify that their position in life believing that their Government is looking out for them, cares about them and would never do anything to harm them.

Yeah, it's some liberal hogwash. You're a fucking dipshit.

The book is firmly grounded in reality and backed by science, not agenda. I know most Republicans don't believe in stuff like that... but give it a try sometime and the world might actually make sense.

Until then...

Pull your head out of your ass.

Robbie 01-11-2013 03:02 AM

How do pro-gun control advocates explain the city of Chicago?

Some of the toughest gun laws in the U.S. and the number one city for gun deaths. :(

1.You have to get a state permit to purchase a gun.

2.The city of Chicago requires registration of firearms. Residents must complete a firearm safety course, pass a background check including fingerprinting, and pay a $100 permit fee which is renewed every three years. Registration of any handgun assumes an additional one time fee of $15.

3.Owner license required

4. Automatic firearms, short-barreled shotguns, short-barreled rifles, and silencers prohibited. AOW (Any Other Weapon) and large-bore DD (Destructive Device) allowed with proper approval and tax stamp from ATF. Historically accurate short-barreled rifles possessed for the purpose of historical reenactment allowed by bona fide members of a nationally-recognized military reenactment organization.

5.Illinois residents must have a Firearm Owner's Identification (FOID) card, which is issued by the Illinois State Police

I'm thinking that criminals just don't give a damn about all those laws. All the gun laws have done is disarm law abiding citizens.

Can one of you folks who think that "tougher" gun laws will stop crime please explain Chicago to me? Obama of all people should know that it doesn't work, since that's his home town.

xenigo 01-11-2013 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19419855)
Can one of you folks who think that "tougher" gun laws will stop crime please explain Chicago to me? Obama of all people should know that it doesn't work, since that's his home town.

How does it work in the UK and Canada? Seems to be pretty effective over there. Something in the water?

WuTang 01-11-2013 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xenigo (Post 19419850)
Yeah, it's some liberal hogwash. You're a fucking dipshit.

The book is firmly grounded in reality and backed by science, not agenda. I know most Republicans don't believe in stuff like that... but give it a try sometime and the world might actually make sense.

Until then...

Pull your head out of your ass.

Ok, so let me get this straight. I try to get you to address the topic that you were clearly dodging, and I have my head in my ass. I see.

Nobody gives a fuck about your "How to be a Hogwash Man Loving Liberal" book.

"The book is firmly grounded in reality and backed by science"... This statement is firmly grounded in your opinion. I don't give a fuck about your opinions.

By the way I'm not a Republican. The gun control topic has nothing to do with politics. It has everything to do with our civil rights. Republican and Democrat alike. So, let's cut to the chase sausage-lover... Say "I am a democrat and do not want all of my civil liberties any longer." and let's go ahead and get that on record.

Bag of dicks... Go suck it.

tony286 01-11-2013 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19419649)
Again, that just described a LOT of goth-acting kids.

Using that logic, people would have said that me and my buddies were probably going to kill people because we were the long haired, cigarette smoking, druggie, Pink Floyd-listening group of shy outsiders while our "peers" "were busy listening" to KC and The Sunshine Band in the 1970's.

Just because teenagers act out trying to be rebellious and original doesn't mean that it's a "sign" that they are going to grow up and eat young gay guys they pick up at the club.

As I understand it...all of Dahmer's neighbors were shocked at what happened because he was such nice guy.

Goth kids collect road kill and play with it? Do you have such a need to be right that you have to see that behavior as normal?Actually he was quiet not nice.

tony286 01-11-2013 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19419855)
How do pro-gun control advocates explain the city of Chicago?

Some of the toughest gun laws in the U.S. and the number one city for gun deaths. :(

1.You have to get a state permit to purchase a gun.

2.The city of Chicago requires registration of firearms. Residents must complete a firearm safety course, pass a background check including fingerprinting, and pay a $100 permit fee which is renewed every three years. Registration of any handgun assumes an additional one time fee of $15.

3.Owner license required

4. Automatic firearms, short-barreled shotguns, short-barreled rifles, and silencers prohibited. AOW (Any Other Weapon) and large-bore DD (Destructive Device) allowed with proper approval and tax stamp from ATF. Historically accurate short-barreled rifles possessed for the purpose of historical reenactment allowed by bona fide members of a nationally-recognized military reenactment organization.

5.Illinois residents must have a Firearm Owner's Identification (FOID) card, which is issued by the Illinois State Police

I'm thinking that criminals just don't give a damn about all those laws. All the gun laws have done is disarm law abiding citizens.

Can one of you folks who think that "tougher" gun laws will stop crime please explain Chicago to me? Obama of all people should know that it doesn't work, since that's his home town.

Unless u put tough gun laws everywhere one city doesnt work.because they can go to the state or town.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc