![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
by medz or by surgery, i dont really care. |
DamianJ is going to be SO offended and insulted by this thread and discussion.
|
Quote:
|
What about the pedo island for Californians:
http://www.aolnews.com/2010/05/21/ca...sex-offenders/ http://la.curbed.com/archives/2010/0...ile_island.php https://youtube.com/watch?v=Lh_dxnqde-A Britain got one already, the Pitcairn Island: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/31/wo...=pitcairn&_r=0 About islands, Mangaia seems abetter destination for them, however: http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cultu...s_in_sexuality There's also the gay islands: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etoro_people |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
End of the day, no matter what the individual predisposition is, if its morally wrong to do so - then just don't do it!
Personal weakness is unfortunately thriving in today's society, with less and less people taking accountability for their personal urges and obsessions. Some can successfully handle things and kudos to them, but others are just too weak to be able to act accordingly to stop themselves from acting out. A pedo who is desperate to not do any harm always has chemical castration or some other 'severe' solution. I would personally love to use my extensive military skills in a vigilante sense to dole out justice to those who have very obviously fallen through the cracks of the justice system through some technicality (think Dexter), but I can't. I get enraged at some things (such as at molesters of toddlers and babies!!), and have to physically stop myself from acting out. That person undoubtedly has friends or family that have some form of connection with him/her, and so my actions would affect more than just what is thought immediately. That is why the justice system was created, and a system of norms and ethics put in place. One unfortunately just has to adhere! |
Quote:
How could you possibly know that??? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:helpme:helpme:helpme I'M OUT! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
A really interesting article that poses a dilemma for modern Western society. We have become custom to creating paths of acceptance for things which as a result of our genetic makeup. Which is the right thing to do because in most cases we have become a more educated society and understand that differences in skin color, gender and most sexuality has no major impact on who an individual person is beyond that trait. Somebody being gay or straight (both genetic traits) doesn't really impact anybody but that individual.
Pedophila on the other hand by its very nature suggests a potential victim to us. So, what do we do with our instinct to find a path of acceptance for something we know can not be accepted? Many of us fight saying that any 'natural' state is wrong because we know that as soon as that is uttered what has taken place in this thread happens. Comparisons between pedophila and homosexuality are made by those who can't see that actually it makes a stronger case of putting hetero and homosexuality more closely together as naturally occurring and usually victimless sexualities. As to how it may have been passed genetically, remember that the age of females placed into marriage used to be much younger. The child brides of the past had men attracted enough to them to produce families. |
I'm on the lookout for dumb short left handed creeps now.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is troublesome.
I want to point out one false assumption that many seem to be making (perhaps its more comforting). If you accept "born this way" as an explanation, and then say "well they don't control themselves... that makes them different from we/us/me" one is making a pretty big logical error. The rest of us have way more outlets to fulfill our BIOLOGICAL IMPERATIVES than these guys do. Or at least, to get close enough to fulfill those biological needs. Saying that they should just control themselves is stupid. I mean, of course they should, but the underlying assumption is an unspoken "just like I do in other areas because I dont XYZ". The thing is, nobody here who is anything resembling normal knows what its like to fight a biological imperative. What if there was no porn and having sex with women was illegal and monstrous, and there was literally no legal channel to fulfill this need? Adjust appropriately for homosexual persons. What would be the end result? In a lifetime would it be excuseable to convince yourself that 20 year old hottie wanted it and convince her too and slip once? I'm not saying it can't be done or its an excuse to do horrible things to other people, but what I am saying is dismissing it as a simple failure of willpower is fucking stupid. That's not to say that there can't be successful strategies of course. But to suggest its only a moral failing is pretty naive. The real problem with our society is we think we're human and on top of the world, when we're actually just fucking meat with a little self control grafted on top that thinks its in charge. And we're actively fighting improvement by how we limit evolution. Kill them, lock them up because they are different, accept right now there isn't really another better solution that protects everyone else, do whatever you want, but at least realize what we're dealing with. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123