GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Moon Landing Conspiracy idiots. refute this video. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1096806)

Phoenix69 01-19-2013 02:49 AM

"Did people go to the moon in 1969?
I'm not totally sure, I wasn't on the moon then.

Some of you question this piece of logic ? ! ?
How can you you not understand that this is sarcasm ???
OMFG

( I understand that sarcasm does not translate well
into other languages and IQ plays a part in comprehending - but even with your ability to string some words of English together you should be able to understand it is fucking sarcasm ! )

Fucking HELL !!!

PS Great video.

EddyTheDog 01-19-2013 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monotony (Post 19432665)
The ship would need to have been lead to traverse it. Lead is too heavy to fly, especially in the 60s.

Lead got lighter in the 60/70's?

That's 'critical' thinking for you.

With 'critical' thinking like that its a wonder we ever got off the ground...

wehateporn 01-19-2013 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Si (Post 19432445)
But it is also the same logic that would mean you are wrong aswell.

Was you on the moon in 1969? If not, how do you know they didn't land there?

Better still, did you see any of the "movie sets" for yourself?

You've missed the point here, I've proved that the guy is lying and not giving his true thoughts. :2 cents:

wehateporn 01-19-2013 04:08 AM

He said that the guys talking about the photos knew nothing about photography, anyone who's looked into this conspiracy in detail will have seen a video of a member of the Royal Photographic Society calling BS on this.

NASA have clearly paid this guy's company to create this BS video which is aimed at those with little knowledge on the topic. :2 cents:

Phoenix69 01-19-2013 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19432792)

NASA have clearly paid this guy's company to create this BS video which is aimed at those with little knowledge on the topic. :2 cents:

You can't be serious. This has to be trolling. Nobody can be this dull.
Go on about secret societies, the probability of other intergalactic "intelligent" life forms but LEAVE the moon landing alone - you will embarrass yourself.

I swear to God, if you ever make so much money that you pay to freeze and store your body when you pass on, thousands of years from now, evolved life on Earth may look at your left testicle and go - that was his brain !

AdultPornMasta 01-19-2013 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 19432012)
Its a 13 min video and I made it to 13 seconds before considering suicide as a valid alternative.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE 01-19-2013 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 19432727)
Lead got lighter in the 60/70's?

That's 'critical' thinking for you.

With 'critical' thinking like that its a wonder we ever got off the ground...

Technological advances and stronger engines was the implication of time.

wehateporn 01-19-2013 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix69 (Post 19432803)
You can't be serious. This has to be trolling. Nobody can be this dull.

You don't believe that companies pay Colin to create videos? From the front page of his website

"Collins creates media to help people and companies tell their stories."

EddyTheDog 01-19-2013 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19432792)
He said that the guys talking about the photos knew nothing about photography, anyone who's looked into this conspiracy in detail will have seen a video of a member of the Royal Photographic Society calling BS on this.

NASA have clearly paid this guy's company to create this BS video which is aimed at those with little knowledge on the topic. :2 cents:

"Royal Photographic Society" - He was royal - That changes everything...

Phoenix69 01-19-2013 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19432810)
You don't believe that companies pay Colin to create videos? From the front page of his website

"Collins creates media to help people and companies tell their stories."

Mate I do apologise, I will wait for Putin to pay him to tell the world that Laika, the Soviet space dog that became the first animal to orbit the Earth, was actually a fucking cat !

devilspost 01-19-2013 09:48 AM

50 idiots

devilspost 01-19-2013 09:51 AM

Just like 911 the "serious" people can't question this bullshit because they will get locked out.

The Porn Nerd 01-19-2013 10:14 AM

Awesome video but I'm not sure the actual MOON is even real. It keeps coming and going, and every time I look at it it's a differant size. Heck, sometimes I can't see it at all!

Let's clear this up first, okay? IS there a moon?

And what's Pink Floyd's role in all this?

xNetworx 01-19-2013 10:47 AM

Dudes face looks like a scrotum

EonBlue 01-19-2013 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monotony (Post 19432657)
You can't cross the Van Allen radiation belt in a ship made of aluminum. Not with alive occupants.

Sure you can. And they did.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

Quote:

The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners. The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them. The command module's inner structure was an aluminum "sandwich" consisting of a welded aluminium inner skin, a thermally bonded honeycomb core, and a thin aluminium "face sheet". The steel honeycomb core and outer face sheets were thermally bonded to the inner skin.

In fact, the astronauts' overall exposure was dominated by solar particles once outside the earth's magnetic field. The total radiation received by the astronauts varied from mission to mission but was measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads (1.6 and 11.4 mGy), much less than the standard of 5 rem (50 mSv) per year set by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity.[23]

wehateporn 01-19-2013 07:44 PM

Busted! :1orglaugh


Turf 01-20-2013 04:04 AM

funny and well made video..

adult-help 01-20-2013 04:23 AM

so what are those moon hoax supporters say? that all 6 moon landings were faked? or only first one? if only the first one : they usually say technology was not yet ready etc but ll 6 moon landings were between 1969 and 1972.So if only first one was faked then suddenly we had the technology to in 1-3 years? or do they really say that all 6 landings were faked? this is absurd..

candyflip 01-20-2013 06:36 AM

I still think that we landed on the moon, but I also still think that the public was fed a moon landing video.

I don't believe any official story that comes from the US govt.

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE 01-20-2013 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 19433236)

You just try a little expose to radiation sometime.

xholly 01-20-2013 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monotony (Post 19434405)
You just try a little expose to radiation sometime.

you are exposed to small amounts of radiation every day at ground level and the average aircrew or frequent flyer is exposed to far higher amount of radiation every year than any of the apollo astronauts.

xholly 01-20-2013 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19433825)
Busted! :1orglaugh

Neil should have punched that disrespectful twerp in the face just like buzz did.


DBS.US 01-20-2013 09:21 AM

I know it was all real because I watched it on TV.

http://images.zap2it.com/images/tv-E...-jeannie-2.jpg

WarChild 01-20-2013 09:28 AM

You'd think if they faked it they would have not claimed to have left stuff on the moon that is clearly still there. Reflector array can easily be measured with radio telescopes not to mention the latest pictures SHOWING the landing site and equipment left behind taken by the latest space based telescopes.

DBS.US 01-20-2013 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 19434496)
The latest pictures taken by the NASA space based telescopes.

http://neosredpill.com/wp-content/up...moon-ruins.jpg

wehateporn 01-20-2013 03:58 PM


wehateporn 01-20-2013 04:11 PM


wehateporn 01-20-2013 04:25 PM

This video is the smoking gun :pimp






wehateporn 01-20-2013 04:44 PM












Some Guy 01-20-2013 05:24 PM

You have to be a moron to think that we didn't actually go to the moon.


wehateporn 01-20-2013 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Some Guy (Post 19435099)
You have to be a moron to think that we didn't actually go to the moon.



You have to be a moron if you think that 'researching' can be done by solely watching Penn and Teller government propaganda movies :1orglaugh

EonBlue 01-20-2013 09:20 PM

6 Ways to tell if a Conspiracy Theorist posting on the Internet is Mentally Disturbed

helterskelter808 01-20-2013 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19432139)
Tyson's point is brilliant... it would have been EASIER to just land on the moon than to try and fake a moon landing and keep it a secret for 50 years.

Yep, so "easy" that Russia, China, India, Europe or other superpowers with space programs have, for some mysterious reason, never done it. Ever. Not once. Not ever.

So "easy" that the one country that pretends to have done it with tinfoil, string and other primitive 60s technology has, for some mysterious reason, been unable to do it ever 'again', despite astronomical advances in technology, and despite the fact that the technology to do it already exists (according to NASA and whackos who believe them).

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You people who believe it happened have to be trolling, right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by adult-help (Post 19434309)
so what are those moon hoax supporters say? that all 6 moon landings were faked? or only first one? if only the first one : they usually say technology was not yet ready etc but ll 6 moon landings were between 1969 and 1972.So if only first one was faked then suddenly we had the technology to in 1-3 years? or do they really say that all 6 landings were faked? this is absurd..

What's absurd is believing we could land men multiple times with backward 60s hardware then suddenly, for some mysterious reason (when Watergate was unraveling, and the Government was terrified of other dirty little secrets being uncovered) we don't do it ever 'again'.

What's absurd is not recognizing the Apollo missions for what they were: cold war propaganda by an American government that is historically proven to have been monumentally untrustworthy, corrupt and evil.

There isn't a single shred of scientific evidence to support the man on the moon theory, simply Nixon's propaganda images and movies filmed at NASA's 'training' facilities, and all you batshit fruitcakes who believe in that are even more nutzoid than people who believe in ghosts or God or Santa Claus. You choose to believe in Tricky Dicky.

Seriously, you 'men on the moon' crazies need help.

The Porn Nerd 01-20-2013 10:36 PM

I can't see the "Moon" tonight AT ALL! It's fucking GONE!!!!

This happens every 28 days or so and it always makes me wonder WTF is going on?
Are aliens fucking with us?

DBS.US 01-20-2013 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 19435420)
I can't see the "Moon" tonight AT ALL! It's fucking GONE!!!!

This happens every 28 days or so and it always makes me wonder WTF is going on?
Are aliens fucking with us?

The batters go dead every 28 days:2 cents:

baddog 01-20-2013 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19432534)
congratulations, you are actually more fucking stupid than everyone thought.

nah, some of us figured it out long ago.

Some Guy 01-21-2013 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19435153)
You have to be a moron if you think that 'researching' can be done by solely watching Penn and Teller government propaganda movies :1orglaugh

I'm pretty sure Penn and Teller don't make government propaganda movies. They're just two extremely intelligent guys with an uncanny ability to sniff out bullshit.

:)

When we landed on the moon we placed a large mirror on its surface. We did this for several reasons, one of which being so we can bounce lasers off it and track the moon's distance from Earth. It's because of this mirror that we know the moon is slowly spiraling away from Earth. This mirror is still there and is undeniable proof that we did in fact land on the moon.

I've found that most lunar landing conspiracy nuts are merely people who simply don't understand physics and astronomy.

helterskelter808 01-21-2013 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Some Guy (Post 19435488)
When we landed on the moon we placed a large mirror on its surface. We did this for several reasons, one of which being so we can bounce lasers off it and track the moon's distance from Earth. It's because of this mirror that we know the moon is slowly spiraling away from Earth. This mirror is still there and is undeniable proof that we did in fact land on the moon.

I guess we undeniably assembled the Soviet retro-reflectors that are on the moon too.

Quote:

I've found that most lunar landing conspiracy nuts are merely people who simply don't understand physics and astronomy.
I found most 'men on the moon' cranks have barely even a superficial acquaintance with facts and logic and are content to simply repeat nonsense they've seen on TV.

wehateporn 01-21-2013 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Some Guy (Post 19435488)
I'm pretty sure Penn and Teller don't make government propaganda movies. They're just two extremely intelligent guys with an uncanny ability to sniff out bullshit.

Here's how it works:-

1. Penn and Teller identified by the Pentagon as being useful for spreading propaganda among teenagers
2. They are offered a huge contract.
3. They accept.
4. They are told exactly which conclusions they need to draw and which conspiracies they must smear.
5. They use well known propaganda techniques, play the man and not the ball, use selective editing and miss out the most important points from the conspiracy; leaving it looking as a straw man argument.
6. They spend their blood money.

:2 cents:

Some Guy 01-21-2013 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 19435561)
I guess we undeniably assembled the Soviet retro-reflectors that are on the moon too.

The Soviet retroreflector wasn't assembled on the moon, though. It was part of a rover mission.

http://www.technologyreview.com/view...-still-intact/

The retroreflector the US placed on the moon was part of a manned mission. There are photos of it being placed. Its existence was even proven (again) in an episode of Mythbusters in which Adam and Jamie visited an observatory and watched an astronomer bounce a laser off of it. The fact it's there proves we did in fact step foot on the moon.

The thing I find odd is why we haven't stepped foot on the moon since 1972.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc