So you support the Westboro Church demos then? They are just expressing their opinion...

"Look at me! I'm holding a picture of my dead kid, so if you disagree with me, you'll have a public relations nightmare."

Those idiots, protecting their civil rights. Why don't they just shut up like we did for SOPA.

If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad…Why Does DHS Want to Buy 7,000 of Them for ‘Personal Defense’?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...sonal-defense/

Where was the disrespect The man asked the people in attendance a question. He got an answer he may not have liked.

When one side has to resort to nothing but emotional appeals, you know they're in the wrong. And why are these parents hawking the loss of their children for someone else's political gain.

This man is far too invested in one side of an issue that needs to be discussed rationally without all the emotion his personal situation brings. He shouldn't be advocating anything and if he does, no one should listen to it.

People have calmly tried to and have successfully (if you were watching it) managed to logically explain why any regulations or bans are bullshit.

Then you've had this guy and a couple of women disregard all of the points raised and basically go all "my feelings! how many more sweet children! disarm everyone now!".

And did you know that another parent of a kid from that school valiantly opposed the gun ban? Was that featured on the news?

Or the magnificent Korean immigrant that became an American "by choice" and fucking handed everyone their asses on a silver platter with sheer logic and sound reasoning? Was that featured on the news?

I've watched the whole thing for maybe three hours and I can already say that the media in the US are extremely jaded and spin the truth to fit their agenda.

There should be an outrage over all of this, it's no different than the commie propaganda Europe went through years back. You're being lied to. Hard.

Then by your own account all victim impact statements, which are meant to decide how long a person should be sentenced for, should be removed from every court proceeding?

What about the dead people who lost their rights? I still say dont ban it does nothing but make some real regulations and everyone has to follow them.

You got a point.

They arent but the regs dont give them the respect they should have.

As a Neutral, there is no right or wrong.

When the debate comes down to morality, nothing will change.

IF the guys want to keep their guns, use a VERICHIP. Only you can use it, only you are responsible, only you can pull the trigger.

Anyway.......

N.B. about the verichip: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_Gun

pretty sure this is a complete falsehood correct? seriously wasn't this one of the main points of contention here at GFY, that no assault weapons were used...?

'ban assault weapons like the one Adam Lanza used to murder his child and 25 other people'

.... so have a child murdered give someone the right to tell lies????



what next df... it's all the fault of the jews...?? maybe build a few camps and shit??? some fake train stations???

Obviously a gun taken out of the trunk of the car wasn't used in the shooting. How about go read interviews from the fucking Cops that were there or the medical examiner that took care of the bodies.

Yes there was a Assault Rifle used. It was a .22 cal Ar-15.

This was disappointing - This man just lost his child to a man with a legally purchased assault rifle they feel they have the right to heckle him? Maybe they would feel differently if their child was recently murdered.

It it stunning that anyone wonders why the Department Of Homeland Security purchases assault rifles.

To disrespect the father who has lost a child because you disagree with him is disgusting.

Allow him to speak his piece then stand and offer your own opinion.

If you can't respect someone's right to be heard why should anyone respect that same right for you?

Lanza was certifiable psycho and the guns he used were not legally purchased, they were stolen. He tried to buy the guns at first, couple of days prior to the shooting, but wasn't legally able to obtain any.

His kid was murdered and is opinion is different then yours and you call him a douchbag... unfucking real and sad.

But then again I doubt you'd have the balls to tell him to his face.

The guns were his mother's whom he lived in the same house.. Yes you can say they were "technically" stolen because they weren't his but lets get real here. That's like saying your kid "stole" your car because he used it with out asking and got into a wreck despite in the past, you allowed him to use it with no objections.

Quit trying to "muddy" the water with half truths and BS. It's the same as the idiots whom keep claiming he didn't use an Assault Rifle, which is 100% false and totally made up bullshit


Steven Colbert has a word for that..

Truthiness is a quality characterizing a "truth" that a person claims to know intuitively "from the gut" or because it "feels right" without regard to evidence, logic, intellectual examination, or facts.

He didn't use an assault rifle.

Assault rifles are select fire. They are legally considered machine guns.

Captain Aspie's bushmaster wasn't an assault rifle.

Is it lonely being a pansy in Boston?

From someone that's been to war and handled everything from handguns to leopard 1 tanks, I really don't understand why regular civilians feel the need to own assault rifles.

I must be dumb, but unless you believe that civil war is about to break loose or that your world is about to be invaded by space monkeys or something - why would you need it?

All those kids are dead, and you guys are really going to argue over the definition of an "Assualt" rifle.

Who fucking cares what you call the gun that killed those kids?

Way to miss the point.

Freedom. That's what's at risk and what the statists seem to be determined to take. You may like being a subject of the Federal government but some of us don't.

So you seriously think that if the federal government show up at your door to take your stuff, you can stop them with an assault rifle? :error

i consider 99% of the anti gun nuts to be douchbags has nothing to do with his kid being killed.

why dont you go back to sucking on sleazy's cock.

What kind of idiot motherfucker piece of shit heckles a man who's son was shot?

It's the space monkeys one. Just look at the people in this thread who actually do not believe that the ar-15 was even used in the shooting, when every single bullet was fired from the ar-15 except the suicide bullet. Definitely the space monkeys thing.

How is wanting a ban on large ammo clips and semi automatic weapons "anti-gun" anyway? Am I anti-car if I want nitrous oxide tanks to be illegal?

Also, the second amendment is as antiquated and inapplicable as the third, but I'm still not against it. It simply never has and still does not mean you have a right to bear any kind of killing device and any add-on upgrade ever invented. So get used to being governed or start your own country I guess?

Actually, if you look back through the thread, you will see that this whole thing is actually untrue. he was interacting with the crowd. There was no heckling, and the premise of this thread is false.




Just FYI


.:2 cents:

Yup. As low as it gets to be honest... :disgust:disgust

When it was written the people had bayonets and the governments had cannons and battle ships. I don't think there were limits set since the idea is to be able to protect yourself from and possibly overthrow if needed the tyranical government.

He should be heckled.

You don't take away the rights of others because of something that happened to you. Makes no sense

To have no compassion for the rights of millions is even dumber

The right to bear arms is an important right. Not nearly as important as the ones we've already lost though.

Innocent until proven guilty. Gone.

Right to remain silent. Gone.

Right to privacy. Gone.

Freedom of Speech. Gone.

While you're arguing about guns and what defines an "Assault" rifle, the rest of your freedoms are being stripped away.

I don't think the average citizen every had these "rights" ...just a bullshit piece of paper to control and quell the masses

GrantMercury...do you ever post or discuss the porn business? lol

what about the freedom to not be killed by some nut who was able to get his hands on a gun way too easily?

also thats such a stupid thing to say anyways, assault riles = freedom but tanks, grenades, homemade bombs do not? if you are for "freedom" b your definition, you must be for the legalization of absolutely everything under the sun

Most of the civilized world idea of freedom

http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/lu...n-the-park.jpg


American gun freaks idea of freedom

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV...640_SY294_.jpg

Would Europe be considered the "civilized world"? Nice and peaceful?

Coulda sworn that Europe was war after war after bloody horrible war for the last few thousand years.

Hell, most of the civilized world doesn't NEED to own guns. They are constantly being issued military uniforms and being GIVEN guns to kill the people in the next country over. :1orglaugh