GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Father Of 6-Year Old Murdered At Sandy Hook Is Heckled By Sicko Gun Nuts (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1098037)

GrantMercury 01-30-2013 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19453667)
They don't stand up for constitutional rights , they stand for gun sales. Nothing more nothing less.

Exactly right.

GrantMercury 01-30-2013 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 19453264)
Americans aren't addicted to guns, they are addicted to freedom, and the ability to defend that freedom if necessary.

Americans are addicted to fear.

Mr Pheer 01-30-2013 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheFootMan5 (Post 19453446)
You have a better chance of getting shot by a cop than by a citizen

This is true, unfortunately. The Police are the biggest street gang in the USA.

DTK 01-30-2013 09:32 PM

GrantMercury - You might have better results if you don't make posts that include things like the quotes below.

Quote:

Lick my taint.
Quote:

Dumbass,
Quote:

No, shithead.
Quote:

Fuck you, dude.
Quote:

No, dumbass.
Quote:

Gag on my cock and die.
Quote:

Prick. :321GFY
Also, you might try to identify trolls and not feed them. Not to mention people who mindlessly regurgitate far-right thinking points. You'll never get through to either group.

StickyGreen 01-30-2013 09:34 PM

Grant doesn't appear to be the sharpest knife in the drawer...

DTK 01-30-2013 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19452798)
Actually, if you look back through the thread, you will see that this whole thing is actually untrue. he was interacting with the crowd. There was no heckling, and the premise of this thread is false.

Just FYI

.:2 cents:

And just for fun and factuality, I'll quote this a second time.

Hazlewood 01-30-2013 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman! (Post 19451532)
so having his kid die makes him any less of a douchbag ?

Loser comment buddy

Hazlewood 01-30-2013 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19453667)
They don't stand up for constitutional rights , they stand for gun sales. Nothing more nothing less.

Great point and nothing but the truth

DTK 01-30-2013 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hazlewood (Post 19453843)
Loser comment buddy

+1 That was really shitty

GrantMercury 01-30-2013 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTK (Post 19453832)
GrantMercury - You might have better results if you don't make posts that include things like the quotes below.

I do like to have substantive conversations. I lose patients sometimes, though. Particularly when it comes to meaningful subjects.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTK (Post 19453832)
Also, you might try to identify trolls and not feed them. Not to mention people who mindlessly regurgitate far-right thinking points. You'll never get through to either group.

I think you're spot-on.

Hazlewood 01-30-2013 09:57 PM

was working late till I read this thread and now Im just disappointed with people in general. Sad is the only word to describe this. Life, business, money dont matter without our children and family. This man lost his family and so did many others. Edited or not it's sad and he should not be called a douchebag or an actor as I read all over youtube. Disappointing

GrantMercury 01-30-2013 09:57 PM

It does seem this video, which was the subject of this post, was misleadingly edited. It was very irresponsible journalism. Shameful. :disgust

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/did-the-m...d-by-gun-nuts/

Sorry.

StickyGreen 01-30-2013 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19453855)
It does seem this video, which was the subject of this post, was misleadingly edited. It was very irresponsible journalism. Shameful. :disgust

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/did-the-m...d-by-gun-nuts/

Sorry.

You're surprised? This is the mainstream media we are talking about, the same 3 or 4 corporations control the whole shit and they have an agenda... get a clue already...

DTK 01-30-2013 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 19453862)
You're surprised? This is the mainstream media we are talking about, the same 3 or 4 corporations control the whole shit and they have an agenda...

Word:thumbsup

Robbie 01-30-2013 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19453855)
It does seem this video, which was the subject of this post, was misleadingly edited. It was very irresponsible journalism. Shameful. :disgust

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/did-the-m...d-by-gun-nuts/

Sorry.

Thank you for acknowledging that.
:thumbsup

GrantMercury 01-30-2013 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 19453862)
You're surprised? This is the mainstream media we are talking about, the same 3 or 4 corporations control the whole shit and they have an agenda...

Ok. So, what exactly do you think their "agenda" is?

DTK 01-30-2013 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19453872)
Thank you for acknowledging that.
:thumbsup

Credit to Grant for not doubling down or disappearing when presented with contradictory information. A lot of people on this board and IRL do exactly that.:thumbsup

Robbie 01-30-2013 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTK (Post 19453875)
Credit to Grant for not doubling down or disappearing when presented with contradictory information. A lot of people on this board and IRL do exactly that.:thumbsup

Yep, he showed class.

DTK 01-30-2013 10:30 PM

Going a little further...

On occasion, I've presented Grant with documented contradictory information and he has been willing to accept that info. :thumbsup

I can say that has NEVER happened with the far right-wingers on this board. They just disappear from the discussion or change the subject. It's exactly like trying to have a rational conversation with a religious fundamentalist. No new information has a chance of getting inside that bubble.

Joshua G 01-30-2013 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19453855)
It does seem this video, which was the subject of this post, was misleadingly edited. It was very irresponsible journalism. Shameful. :disgust

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/did-the-m...d-by-gun-nuts/

Sorry.

thats Ok man. yellow journalism dates back to the invention of the printing press. its pretty well known by now that MSNBC is nothing more then the left wing version of fox news. I mean, they gave al sharpton a show for crying out loud.

The greatness of the interwebs is you can now get a variety of sources with different angles. but the progressive mind must be wary of selecting only outlets that conform to ones political persuasions. Both ideologies have deep thinkers if you seek them out.

one of my former friends attacks fox mercilously while he watches endless doses of MSNBC. But he claims he has no more love for dems then repubs. I LOL when he speaks this way.

_Richard_ 01-30-2013 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoshGirls Josh (Post 19453889)
I mean, they gave al sharpton a show for crying out loud.

nooo :Oh crap

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 01-30-2013 10:53 PM

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/ima...en_cropped.JPG

Quote:

A Father's Plea: Make the debate over guns worthy of our son

Wednesday?s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on gun violence is the latest in a series of events following the Dec. 14shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Our 7-year-old son, Daniel, 19 of his first-grade classmates and six educators were killed in the tragedy.

We believe this hearing is an opportunity to rise above the hard-line rhetoric and intransigence that too often lead to inaction and hopelessness, and we hope that our leaders and our nation will start a new conversation with a chance of achieving real change.

Our Daniel was a constant source of laughter and joy. He was intelligent, articulate, incredibly affectionate, fair, thoughtful toward others and unfailingly polite. Daniel believed in holding doors open for strangers. He talked to the person sitting alone. He loved to help clean up a mess, and he made sure there was enough milk for everyone before adding it to his cereal.

His kindergarten teacher recently wrote to us: ?He is the kind of student that should come wrapped in ribbon because he is a gift to his teachers. I can remember leaving notes for our substitute to ?ask Daniel? if she or he needed help with anything.?

Motivated by Daniel?s empathy and kindness, one of our relatives created a Facebook page, ?What Would Daniel Do?,? to inspire others to reach out as our youngest son did.

As lawmakers and others discuss what can be done to curb gun violence, we hope Americans will ask, What would Daniel do?

Daniel would listen and be respectful. Our country needs a new dialogue, one that doesn?t follow the tired script of political squabbling. Any improvement to our laws, no matter how small or reasonable, should not be decried as the forward wave of an attempt to ?ban guns? or ?take away rights.? Even those of us who have lost the most are suggesting no such thing.

Daniel would be honest. We know that there are no easy answers to these multifaceted issues. Anyone who suggests that a single law would ?solve the problem? isn?t telling the truth. But neither is anyone who says that changes in our laws can?t make a difference.

Daniel wouldn?t give up hope. We refuse to accept the status quo. Making our society safer will require sustained, comprehensive action by individuals as well as by communities and government.

As parents, there is nothing more important to us than our relationship with our children. Every parent can start right there, in their own home. On a broader level, it is urgent that we address the gaps in our mental health system and examine school security.

We must have the same open dialogue about gun responsibility and accountability. The parental desire to love and protect our children is common ground for gun owners and non-gun owners alike.

We have joined with other families, neighbors and friends in making the Sandy Hook Promise (www.sandyhookpromise.org). We hope every member of Congress and Americans nationwide will join us in pledging to honor the lives lost last month by coming together to end these violent tragedies.

Our Daniel wanted to be a fireman like his uncles. He played drums in our family band, and he could run like the wind. Until Dec. 14, Daniel?s future was limited only by the size of his dreams.

Our son?s future was stolen from him: There will be no firehouse, no more rock band, no Boston Marathon.

But if our nation uses this moment to make the future brighter for other children, Daniel?s life and the lives of his classmates and educators will have meaning for years to come.

Our nation?s ability to deal with gun violence is limited only by the civility of our discourse, the scope of our ambitions and ? as Daniel would have done ? our willingness to come together and take action.
Some poignant thoughts to ponder...

ADG

BlackCrayon 01-31-2013 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 19453443)
Those types of tragedies barely ever happen. Out of all the millions of people who own guns... how many of them go around shooting innocent children? Like .000000000001% of them. Get real.

"or anyone who is a victim of gun violence"..which happens every single day.

tony286 01-31-2013 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 19453907)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/ima...en_cropped.JPG



Some poignant thoughts to ponder...

ADG

Yep his rights were take away but that's ok to many.

tony286 01-31-2013 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19453750)
Also kinda funny how I always hear the howling about how biased Fox News is.

But this is just one of many videos that NBC has edited and tried to push a liberal agenda with and then had to back down and apologize.

Fox News has NEVER done that!

Why don't liberals complain about NBC?
The answer is because they are hypocrites.

Thank goodness that none of the news channels is a puppet of the Libertarian Party.
My party is clean. You Repubs and especially you Dems are so dirty and hypocritical that it's ridiculous.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tu...rotest-footage
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/01...falsely/192386
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/201...d-by-fox-news/
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2011/09...all-for/181254
yep fox doesnt do that. lol once news became a profit center it all turned to shit

12clicks 01-31-2013 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19454340)
Yep his rights were take away but that's ok to many.

the unintelligent often make laws based on emotion.

please don't expect the intelligent to follow your lead.

SuzzyQ 01-31-2013 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19451503)

Heckled or Not Heckled? MSNBC is Looking into Selective Editing, Other Nets Too

MSNBC is facing criticism today about the editing of a portion of the legislative hearing on guns in Hartford, CT earlier this week. Neil Heslin, the father of a Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting victim, was speaking before a committee at which local citizens, including gun rights advocates, attended. MSNBC portrayed a portion of the clip ? toward the end of Heslin?s 15 minutes of testimony ? as though he was being heckled. The 33-second clip aired on Tamron Hall?s show, Martin Bashir?s show and later on Al Sharpton?s show. Here it is:
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/...ts-too_b164867

SuzzyQ 01-31-2013 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19452798)
Actually, if you look back through the thread, you will see that this whole thing is actually untrue. he was interacting with the crowd. There was no heckling, and the premise of this thread is false.




Just FYI


.:2 cents:

:thumbsup

BVF 01-31-2013 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19453750)
Also kinda funny how I always hear the howling about how biased Fox News is.

But this is just one of many videos that NBC has edited and tried to push a liberal agenda with and then had to back down and apologize.

Fox News has NEVER done that!

Why don't liberals complain about NBC?
The answer is because they are hypocrites.

Thank goodness that none of the news channels is a puppet of the Libertarian Party.
My party is clean. You Repubs and especially you Dems are so dirty and hypocritical that it's ridiculous.

You don't work for FOX nor do you now anybody in a high level that works for FOX so you can't say what they NEVER have done.

However, it is very ridiculous that nbc would doctor footage like that.....I as a liberal think it's wrong.

Robbie 01-31-2013 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF (Post 19454408)
You don't work for FOX nor do you now anybody in a high level that works for FOX so you can't say what they NEVER have done.

However, it is very ridiculous that nbc would doctor footage like that.....I as a liberal think it's wrong.

And I as a very, very far left of the Democrat party social liberal (unless they decide to make prostitution and drugs legal) also think it's not only wrong...but a deliberate attempt to change our country to fit their ideas.

Am I crazy to just want the "news" to report stuff instead of trying to make shit up and create news?

JFK 01-31-2013 01:18 PM

150 sick fucks

_Richard_ 01-31-2013 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 19453907)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/ima...en_cropped.JPG



Some poignant thoughts to ponder...

ADG

your country sells weapons to anyone who will buy them, drug cartels included

maybe your country should lead by example, rather than trying to strip peoples rights away and using the deaths of children to justify doing so

some 'poignant' thoughts to ponder, yes?

Tom_PM 01-31-2013 01:28 PM

Nobody is actually arguing that the issue with a cable news outlet doctoring a story equals nothing should be done on gun control.. are they?

We have had 5 page threads on lots of cable or news companies. Here's examples.

CBS's Dan Rather report where he had some modern copy of orders where George W. Bush missed his training. Remember that whole deal? The story BECAME about the letters on the document being from a modern device rather than a period typewriter (even though the woman said that the type of preferential treatment reported WAS accurate, it was overshadowed by the fake document story).

Then there are the times that FOX was shown to be using doctored images and videos to hype up the number of attendees at various tea party and other rallies.

Also the time(s) the Bush white house used Photoshop to add soldiers into photograph(s) (it was more than once I think? Don't remember. Lets say once where soldiers were repeated in a crowd image)

There was also the TIME magazine (I think) photographs where they were shown to be doctoring images by placing childrens toys in war torn rubble for greater effect, right?

So MSNBC is also among the ranks who doctored a story for a net effect of zero or less on the story, and negative a million on their credibility.

The horse is dead, Jim.

Robbie 01-31-2013 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 19455104)
Then there are the times that FOX was shown to be using doctored images and videos to hype up the number of attendees at various tea party and other rallies..

Wrong. They didn't "doctor" anything. They used stock footage to make it look bigger.

All these damn news channels do that all the time (even local news). It's disgusting.

But it's a GIANT step forward to actually edit video and audio to create a story. Fox wasn't creating that rally. They exaggerated it with stock footage (just like the news organizations shot at a certain angles to make the "Million Man March" look a lot bigger than it was...and just like I shoot certain angles to make Claudia Marie's tits look even bigger lol)

But MSNBC took a press conference and CREATED a controversy that didn't exist.

And when you realize that ALL the news organizations are shaping thought amongst people who don't really pay close attention...then you start to realize what's being done in our country.

All this talk on the news channels about how "Americans want our politicians to come together and move forward" (as long as "forward" is what Pres. Obama wants at any given moment).

And at the same time, those news channels are trying their best to influence events and shape people's opinions so that they can then run a poll and show favorable stats for what the President wants to do.

They did it with Bush too.

I was shocked when every news channel out there kissed Bush's ass so they could get "embedded" with the troops invading Afghanistan and Iraq!

No more critical coverage of war like it USED to be done during Vietnam.

The press is nothing more than a pack of puppy dogs to the Presidency. They are all worried about being in the "inner circle" and getting that invitation to the big Press Dinner every year.

So they toe the line of whatever the President says.

Tom_PM 01-31-2013 01:45 PM

oh, sorry that I misused the term "doctored" then I guess? lol.

The way I intended it was what was obvious. They INTENTIONALLY MISLEAD THEIR AUDIENCE. lmao.

That's not in dispute, is it? Then whats the difference? You really see a difference between using "stock footage" (actually footage shot from a different rally) to lie in your story and editing what was there into a new context? FOX inserted shit that didn't happen, MSNBC removed shit that did happen. Which is worse? Neither IMHO, but I guess it could be a new argument if nobody has work to do.

Tom_PM 01-31-2013 01:48 PM

I tell you what, since I cancelled cable I guess a year ago now, the only news I see is local and whatever I want to look up online, which is almost nothing ever. My homepage is google.com.. nice and clean with no news headlines to muck it up.

Robbie 01-31-2013 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 19455147)
oh, sorry that I misused the term "doctored" then I guess? lol.

The way I intended it was what was obvious. They INTENTIONALLY MISLEAD THEIR AUDIENCE. lmao.

That's not in dispute, is it? Then whats the difference? You really see a difference between using "stock footage" (actually footage shot from a different rally) to lie in your story and editing what was there into a new context? FOX inserted shit that didn't happen, MSNBC removed shit that did happen. Which is worse? Neither IMHO, but I guess it could be a new argument if nobody has work to do.

Yes, as I said...Fox did what NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and your local news channel does all the time...used stock footage they already had to make something more dramatic.

I think that's fucked up.

But MSNBC didn't do that. They EDITED footage to CREATE a story that didn't exist.

That's what I'm saying.

What Fox did is total bullshit. It was using stock footage to send a subtle message to try and convince you to agree with a point of view.

What NBC did was 10 times worse.
They CREATED a situation that simply did not happen at all in order to make people get angry at gun owners. Just like it did to GrantMercury when he saw it and posted this thread originally.

Instead of arguing with me about it...step back a second and see what I'm saying.
Both things are dead wrong for news organizations to do.

But the NBC thing is a pattern of FALSIFYING video and audio footage. Just like they did last year with the audio of the guy who shot Trayvon Martin.
They ended up having to apologize for that too.

Of course, first they were responsible for firing up the black community and almost starting riots and violence with their "cut and paste" of video and audio.

You would think that NBC would have learned their lesson from that last year. But I guess not.

DTK 01-31-2013 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19455134)
I was shocked when every news channel out there kissed Bush's ass so they could get "embedded" with the troops invading Afghanistan and Iraq!

No more critical coverage of war like it USED to be done during Vietnam.

This is key. This is what changed when news divisions had to start being profit centers.

There ceased to be an adversarial relationship between News & Government/Big Business.

It's all been make believe ever since.

That's part of what makes all this dem vs rep, left vs right stuff (and how hard people latch onto it) such a tragic joke. It's all a fucking show, people! Bread & Circuses all over again:disgust

discounts.xxx 01-31-2013 05:30 PM

no good at all....

GrantMercury 01-31-2013 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 19455104)
Nobody is actually arguing that the issue with a cable news outlet doctoring a story equals nothing should be done on gun control.. are they?

We have had 5 page threads on lots of cable or news companies. Here's examples.

CBS's Dan Rather report where he had some modern copy of orders where George W. Bush missed his training. Remember that whole deal? The story BECAME about the letters on the document being from a modern device rather than a period typewriter (even though the woman said that the type of preferential treatment reported WAS accurate, it was overshadowed by the fake document story).

Then there are the times that FOX was shown to be using doctored images and videos to hype up the number of attendees at various tea party and other rallies.

Also the time(s) the Bush white house used Photoshop to add soldiers into photograph(s) (it was more than once I think? Don't remember. Lets say once where soldiers were repeated in a crowd image)

There was also the TIME magazine (I think) photographs where they were shown to be doctoring images by placing childrens toys in war torn rubble for greater effect, right?

So MSNBC is also among the ranks who doctored a story for a net effect of zero or less on the story, and negative a million on their credibility.

The horse is dead, Jim.

I remember almost all of those things. And there are obviously plenty of others we've forgotten about or never knew about.

Fuck Martin Bashir - he's the media whore in this case that pulled this shit.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art..._ 116869.html


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc