GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   SoCal police officer goes on shooting spree? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1099076)

TrashyGirl 02-08-2013 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19470315)
They're talking about this crazy bastard right now on the radio. The manhunt will continue through the night. Hope they catch him.

Yes, absolutely. This was in the email from my designer friend before she decided to get some sleep.

"I think as of night time they are doing more covert searching ... heard they were coming our way door to door. saw lights on my outside window ... looked over there and definitely they were flashlights ... went downstairs and opened the front door (toward the street) ... and you could see, kinda hidden ... cop cars parked out of view and cops walking around with flashlights."

"Big Bear not so easy to do door to door searching. many seasonal rentals empty ... some skiers and snowboarders only come up on the weekend anyway."

article w/ daylight pics of door to door searches etc

http://www.vvdailypress.com/sections...b=vvdailypress

crockett 02-08-2013 04:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 19469365)
anti gun people say only cops should have guns. Yeah right, anyone can go mental

Why do you "pro gun" people always try to lump "all" so called "anti gun" people in to one group which is at the very extreme end of the argument.

I have heard not a single person advocate that only cops or military should have guns. In fact most so called anti gun people, that I've seen talk about guns, are in-fact not "anti-gun" as you claim, but rather "pro-regulation".

People want to make it harder for criminals & the mentally ill to get their hands on guns. It's called forcing gun owners to be responsible. You know that word that the far right has forgotten about.

crockett 02-08-2013 04:32 AM

Btw.. this is a pic of the car the LAPD thought was his and they shot the fuck out of it including the two women whom were inside.. whom were of course not the suspect..

http://i.imgur.com/dHkZjQx.jpg?1

edit.. I just wanted to add that not only did the cops shot at this truck and injured the two people inside it but they also opened fire on a 2nd truck that was not his. Luckily no one was injured in that one. Perhaps it's was a good thing he burned his own truck so the cops would stop shooting at random blue trucks..

PornoMonster 02-08-2013 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19470454)
Why do you "pro gun" people always try to lump "all" so called "anti gun" people in to one group which is at the very extreme end of the argument.

I have heard not a single person advocate that only cops or military should have guns. In fact most so called anti gun people, that I've seen talk about guns, are in-fact not "anti-gun" as you claim, but rather "pro-regulation".

People want to make it harder for criminals & the mentally ill to get their hands on guns. It's called forcing gun owners to be responsible. You know that word that the far right has forgotten about.

It might have something to do with trying to ban assault style weapons and magazines with more than 7-10 rounds of ammo in them...

I think everyone is for what you said, even though it would NOT of stopped anything.

crockett 02-08-2013 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoMonster (Post 19470463)
It might have something to do with trying to ban assault style weapons and magazines with more than 7-10 rounds of ammo in them...

I think everyone is for what you said, even though it would NOT of stopped anything.

The Assault Rifle Ban, is a name and nothing else. Any Gun owner knows this. You simply can't have certain things on certain guns or combinations of specific items. Yet you can still own AK47's & M16s til your heart is content.

They should call it's a anti sporterize your guns bill, because that's far more accurate that calling it a "ban".

iSpyCams 02-08-2013 08:26 AM

One of this guy's motives is he wants more gun control, according to his manifesto.

brassmonkey 02-08-2013 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19470457)
Btw.. this is a pic of the car the LAPD thought was his and they shot the fuck out of it including the two women whom were inside.. whom were of course not the suspect..

http://i.imgur.com/dHkZjQx.jpg?1

edit.. I just wanted to add that not only did the cops shot at this truck and injured the two people inside it but they also opened fire on a 2nd truck that was not his. Luckily no one was injured in that one. Perhaps it's was a good thing he burned his own truck so the cops would stop shooting at random blue trucks..

they should lose their jobs and pay for this shit. its going to cost the city a bunch of money. :2 cents:

Vendzilla 02-08-2013 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 19469433)
He says he has a 50 cal
can you dig it?
(time for mental examinations of all persons possessing arms)

Yeah, being a cop, no idea what he could have.

Mental examines isn't going to work.

_Richard_ 02-08-2013 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19470457)

http://i.imgur.com/dHkZjQx.jpg?1

Perhaps it's was a good thing he burned his own truck so the cops would stop shooting at random blue trucks..

yea interesting that

Marcus Aurelius 02-08-2013 09:50 AM

In the past 24 hours LAPD shot 3 people & destroyed 2 trucks.

Black Rambo shot no civilians unrelated to his cause and cause zero private property damages.

Tom_PM 02-08-2013 09:53 AM

So what's the update on this? GFY is my first source of news on crap like this these days. He's still on the loose? Cops shoot blindly at anything else barely matching a description?

Some Guy 02-08-2013 09:55 AM

He's still on the loose from what I gather.

Phoenix 02-08-2013 09:58 AM

he has probably taken over an empty house...and is sitting down for a day or so...then he will move again

Vendzilla 02-08-2013 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19470454)
Why do you "pro gun" people always try to lump "all" so called "anti gun" people in to one group which is at the very extreme end of the argument.

I have heard not a single person advocate that only cops or military should have guns. In fact most so called anti gun people, that I've seen talk about guns, are in-fact not "anti-gun" as you claim, but rather "pro-regulation".

People want to make it harder for criminals & the mentally ill to get their hands on guns. It's called forcing gun owners to be responsible. You know that word that the far right has forgotten about.

I'm all for sensible regulation, I just haven't heard of any yet.

Making it harder for criminals to get guns by placing regulations on legal ownership is not going to work. prohibition didn't work last time is was tried and our highest crime rates are in the cities with the highest regulations

blackmonsters 02-08-2013 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvvvv (Post 19469763)
"They drew first blood." ~ Rambo

:1orglaugh

Fuck!

It's like the movie for real!

blackmonsters 02-08-2013 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pompousjohn (Post 19470661)
One of this guy's motives is he wants more gun control, according to his manifesto.

Ahhhh, Pesto manifesto!

What do those things really mean anyway?

http://www.kraftrecipes.com/assets/r...esto-57439.jpg
http://www.kraftrecipes.com/recipes/...to-114211.aspx


:1orglaugh

just a punk 02-08-2013 10:59 AM

Is he killed already?

iSpyCams 02-08-2013 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 19470917)
Ahhhh, Pesto manifesto!

What do those things really mean anyway?

http://www.kraftrecipes.com/assets/r...esto-57439.jpg
http://www.kraftrecipes.com/recipes/...to-114211.aspx


:1orglaugh

I actually did get around to reading it finally and its more like a suicide note.

Jman 02-08-2013 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 19470098)
http://a.abcnews.com/images/US/ap_ch..._130207_wg.jpg

Curious that he would abandon his vehicle in the wilderness and light it on fire, unless he wanted to draw attention to it (either as a diversion or as an ambush trap).

If he was trying to hide in a rural area, why draw attention to himself? If he wants to pursue his vendetta, I would think he would remain in the city. Of course, he could have already set off in another vehicle well before the fire was detected, and eventually traced to Dorner.

His actions seem purposeful, although it's not clear how much advance planning has gone into his rampage, or if he is just improvising now.

Crazy stuff... :uhoh

:stoned

ADG

He might have an accomplice. Who knows

Tom_PM 02-08-2013 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 19470900)
I'm all for sensible regulation, I just haven't heard of any yet.

Making it harder for criminals to get guns by placing regulations on legal ownership is not going to work. prohibition didn't work last time is was tried and our highest crime rates are in the cities with the highest regulations

So when someone talks about not allowing the sale of a 30 round ammo clip you're going to say that if a criminal wants one he can get one anyway?

LET the criminal go and find himself a 30 round ammo clip once it's illegal to sell them. LET the criminal go find some assault weapons once it's illegal to sell them. STARVE the beast and the beast eventually DIES. There is not one single person out there laboring under the false belief that a stroke of a pen today will solve all deaths by gun tomorrow. There will be no instant gratification and everybody knows that.


The whole thing about "it didn't work last time" is so ridiculous that it's not worth mentioning beyond stating that because such a statement is unprovable! It's a complete hunk of red meat for people to argue about and waste time on.

By the way, why do you think a ban on large clips and assault weapons is to keep them out of the hands of known criminals? Last I heard, it was to keep them out of the hands of responsible citizens who then go batshit crazy and shoot up schools and movie theaters! What's your idea of a reasonable regulation regarding keeping those things out of the hands of those people who are indistinguishable from your or me or the next guy?

GregE 02-08-2013 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19470457)
Perhaps it's was a good thing he burned his own truck so the cops would stop shooting at random blue trucks..

No shit.

brassmonkey 02-08-2013 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19470926)
Is he killed already?

no way dude the mountain scene should be coming up. :) youve seen rambo??

Christopher Dorner manhunt: Mountain search for ex-LAPD cop accused of killing 3

http://i.imgur.com/agJIP.gif

_Richard_ 02-08-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 19470960)
So when someone talks about not allowing the sale of a 30 round ammo clip you're going to say that if a criminal wants one he can get one anyway?

LET the criminal go and find himself a 30 round ammo clip once it's illegal to sell them. LET the criminal go find some assault weapons once it's illegal to sell them. STARVE the beast and the beast eventually DIES. There is not one single person out there laboring under the false belief that a stroke of a pen today will solve all deaths by gun tomorrow. There will be no instant gratification and everybody knows that.


The whole thing about "it didn't work last time" is so ridiculous that it's not worth mentioning beyond stating that because such a statement is unprovable! It's a complete hunk of red meat for people to argue about and waste time on.

By the way, why do you think a ban on large clips and assault weapons is to keep them out of the hands of known criminals? Last I heard, it was to keep them out of the hands of responsible citizens who then go batshit crazy and shoot up schools and movie theaters! What's your idea of a reasonable regulation regarding keeping those things out of the hands of those people who are indistinguishable from your or me or the next guy?

yes because the safety of the future depends on whether the clip being used is a 15 round magazine vs. a 10 round magazine.

Those 30 round magazine for assualt rifles, even if 50% of all gun crime in the US is done using handguns?

that's the pivotal moment to bringing safety to all!

anyone who stands in the way, who even voices alternate opinion, is a raping, communist, muslim worshipping, terrorist! go ahead.. voice an alternate opinion.

i have spoken!

Yanks_Todd 02-08-2013 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 19470960)

By the way, why do you think a ban on large clips and assault weapons is to keep them out of the hands of known criminals? Last I heard, it was to keep them out of the hands of responsible citizens who then go batshit crazy and shoot up schools and movie theaters! What's your idea of a reasonable regulation regarding keeping those things out of the hands of those people who are indistinguishable from your or me or the next guy?

Great point, the Aurora shooter bought his completely legally.

GregE 02-08-2013 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dev777 (Post 19469447)
cops shoot up the wrong people in 2 separate incidents this morning, for no reason other than that they were driving pickup trucks.

http://laist.com/2013/02/07/police_s...for_dorner.php

can't wait to see the LAPD brush this one under the rug!

If his intent is to make the LAPD look bad, he's doing a damn good job of it.

Yanks_Todd 02-08-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregE (Post 19471001)
If his intent is to make the LAPD look bad, he's doing a damn good job of it.

I would get shot in the hand to be able to sue the LAPD. Those girls probably already have cash in their accounts. No more early AM deliveries for them.

GregE 02-08-2013 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Some Guy (Post 19470829)
He's still on the loose from what I gather.

And the (keystone) cops are still running around like a bunch of wet hens.

If it wasn't for the fact that people have been killed, this would be comedy at it's finest.

crockett 02-08-2013 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 19470900)
I'm all for sensible regulation, I just haven't heard of any yet.

Making it harder for criminals to get guns by placing regulations on legal ownership is not going to work. prohibition didn't work last time is was tried and our highest crime rates are in the cities with the highest regulations

Prohibition was a different animal, same as drugs because anyone with a bit of knowledge can make their own alcohol & or drugs. It doesn't require out of the ordinary machinery and a large set of special skill sets. Most of the stuff needed can be built & prepared by a average person with a bit of knowledge.

Meanwhile there are very few people that would be capable of building their own guns and out of those that could they certainly wouldn't be able to replicate the working quality of an average gunsmith or produce any significant numbers.

It's apples & oranges.. It would be left to smugglers and to be honest it would be a hard job for them to get any sizable amount of illegal guns into this country on a regular basis. We are't some 3rd world country in Africa where you can just drive a truck or plane in with ease across the boarder.

crockett 02-08-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19470926)
Is he killed already?

Not so far he's still on the lose. After reading much of his manifesto I'm pretty sure this guy is going to be hard for them to catch. He is obviously a bit off in the mental dept but not like a crazed idiot. He seems more like someone that has been pushed over the edge of what he could handle, being he in the right or wrong it's not like he's just a regular wacko.

He seems to have a lot of determination and ability to go with it. He doesn't seem like the type that will make a dumb mistake, so I wouldn't be surprised if this guy completely drops of radar for a few weeks or so before he hits again.

This guy doesn't seem like he will be the crazed gunman running around the streets til he gets taken out or caught. Seems he has a pretty good clue as to what he needs to do in order to do what he wants.

DTK 02-08-2013 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19470454)
Why do you "pro gun" people always try to lump "all" so called "anti gun" people in to one group which is at the very extreme end of the argument.
.

Simple-mindedness?

_Richard_ 02-08-2013 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19471224)
Prohibition was a different animal, same as drugs because anyone with a bit of knowledge can make their own alcohol & or drugs. It doesn't require out of the ordinary machinery and a large set of special skill sets. Most of the stuff needed can be built & prepared by a average person with a bit of knowledge.

Meanwhile there are very few people that would be capable of building their own guns and out of those that could they certainly wouldn't be able to replicate the working quality of an average gunsmith or produce any significant numbers.

It's apples & oranges.. It would be left to smugglers and to be honest it would be a hard job for them to get any sizable amount of illegal guns into this country on a regular basis. We are't some 3rd world country in Africa where you can just drive a truck or plane in with ease across the boarder.

do you know anything about manufacturing.. anything?

if one can make drugs or booze, one can make weapons

lezinterracial 02-08-2013 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19471365)
if one can make drugs or booze, one can make weapons

I made an AK from parts off the internet. It was ugly as heck, but it worked.
Used an 80% receiver flat.

I just had to bend the flat with a homemade jig. Would have been alot easier with a 20 ton press. Then attached to the front and rear trunnion with screws, rivets would have been prettier.

I would say an AK receiver is the easiest to make.

Maybe a Sten would be easier. The receiver tube is just a tube. But if you get caught with a homemade open bolt Sten, you go to prison. Making it closed bolt semi-auto looks like a bitch.

_Richard_ 02-08-2013 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19471365)
do you know anything about manufacturing.. anything?

if one can make drugs or booze, one can make weapons

ahh this sounds bitchy as fuck lol

been doing htis for years, and i should have definitely tone checked this :(

lezinterracial 02-08-2013 03:26 PM

BTW: I got 6 uzi parts kits. The receivers are more complex. The best know US company making the receivers are so far behind they aren't taking orders or phone calls.

_Richard_ 02-08-2013 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lezinterracial (Post 19471378)
I made an AK from parts off the internet. It was ugly as heck, but it worked.
Used an 80% receiver flat.

I just had to bend the flat with a homemade jig. Would have been alot easier with a 20 ton press. Then attached to the front and rear trunnion with screws, rivets would have been prettier.

I would say an AK receiver is the easiest to make.

Maybe a Sten would be easier. The receiver tube is just a tube. But if you get caught with a homemade open bolt Sten, you go to prison. Making it closed bolt semi-auto looks like a bitch.

that is some bad ass shit lol

so an 80% receiver flat requires to be 'bent', while a 100% receiver flat is 'already bent'?

damn i can build this lol

crockett 02-08-2013 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19471386)
that is some bad ass shit lol

so an 80% receiver flat requires to be 'bent', while a 100% receiver flat is 'already bent'?

damn i can build this lol

There is a guy on one of the gun forums that built a AK lower receiver out of a shovel. He still had to buy certain parts and also used some manufactured parts.

http://www.damncoolpictures.com/2012...of-shovel.html

The point being is yes if guns were un-attainable legally then there would always be a limited amount of people whom could home build them. However they could in no means mass-manufacturer them. Nothing on the scale of illegal drugs or booze during prohibition, which is why I say it's apples & oranges.

Now on the other hand with advances in 3D printing in the future then it might be much easier and require a very low skill level. One group has already built a AR-15 lower receiver from a home 3d printer but it broke after test firing (however it did work for a short time)

The same group did make a 30 round high cap mag for a AR-15 that did work just fine. The deal here is you couldn't make the barrel out of plastic so you would still need other not so easy things to be made with more than just the home 3d printer.

Rochard 02-08-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19471238)
Not so far he's still on the lose. After reading much of his manifesto I'm pretty sure this guy is going to be hard for them to catch. He is obviously a bit off in the mental dept but not like a crazed idiot. He seems more like someone that has been pushed over the edge of what he could handle, being he in the right or wrong it's not like he's just a regular wacko.

He seems to have a lot of determination and ability to go with it. He doesn't seem like the type that will make a dumb mistake, so I wouldn't be surprised if this guy completely drops of radar for a few weeks or so before he hits again.

This guy doesn't seem like he will be the crazed gunman running around the streets til he gets taken out or caught. Seems he has a pretty good clue as to what he needs to do in order to do what he wants.

While I won't disagree this guy is insane.... Isn't it possible that his truck on fire was throw everyone off his trail? I mean, he has a truck, maybe he had a motorcycle in the back.... Put the motorcycle down on the pavement, move the truck into the snow... Light it on fire and then haul ass down to San Diego on the motorcycle. No one would see him because he has a helmet on, and by the time they figure out it was in fact his truck he would be long gone.....

Just saying....

_Richard_ 02-08-2013 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19471439)
There is a guy on one of the gun forums that built a AK lower receiver out of a shovel. He still had to buy certain parts and also used some manufactured parts.

http://www.damncoolpictures.com/2012...of-shovel.html

The point being is yes if guns were un-attainable legally then there would always be a limited amount of people whom could home build them. However they could in no means mass-manufacturer them.

Nothing on the scale of illegal drugs or booze during prohibition.

Now on the other hand with advances in 3D printing in the future then it might be much easier and require a very low skill level. One group has already built a AR-15 lower receiver from a home 3d printer but it broke after test firing (however it did work for a short time)

The same group did make a 30 round high cap mag for a AR-15 that did work just fine.

not so sure.. found a few forums when i tried to figure out what the hell a '80% receiver' was, and not only did they seem rather informed about it all, there was alternate solutions

crockett 02-08-2013 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19471446)
While I won't disagree this guy is insane.... Isn't it possible that his truck on fire was throw everyone off his trail? I mean, he has a truck, maybe he had a motorcycle in the back.... Put the motorcycle down on the pavement, move the truck into the snow... Light it on fire and then haul ass down to San Diego on the motorcycle. No one would see him because he has a helmet on, and by the time they figure out it was in fact his truck he would be long gone.....

Just saying....

Well what ever he's doing, he certainly has some sort of plan and isn't just acting on the spur of the moment.

maxjohan 02-08-2013 04:41 PM

I had this guy comment on my YouTube page about the thing just a couple minutes ago.

Could it be Christopher Jordan Dorner himself?

I looked at his profile and he posted heavily the last hours the same comment on all YouTube clips:

https://youtube.com/user/snakecharmer2011

Some of you guys in the US may look in to it and report it.

If you want to and feel like it.

Personally, I don't want to create beef with the guy, if it's him.

Plus, I don't live in the US and knows where I should report.

Edit: Here, I guess this is the link: http://www.lapdonline.org/

Guess it wasn't him maybe? This was one of the comments, I just saw it:
Quote:

P.S. Yes, as an Asian guy myself, I am telling this Asian guy here, telling a hero to turn himself in, to suck a dick. You are a disgrace to my race.

You are so out of touch with reality or that you have know clue to the corruption & just rather turn a blind eye & not fight the system. Either way, thanks for making this YT video so I can comment and make you look like an idiot. You believe everything you hear and see - a true product of the New World Order elitist.

PEOPLE STAND UP and RISE!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc