![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you trusted Bush's admin you have a screw loose. Those fucking fuckers fucked the fucking US of Fucking A over fucking big time. ( >;-)~ ) https://youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=PsuKiUMOwDI Just because we have ipads and HDTV doesn't make us smarter about oppresive rulers than the guys that wrote the Constitution of the United States. They had hands on experience with being ruled by tyranical rulers. I'll side with the Constitution every time. |
Quote:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" I firmly stand behind the founders of the USA that they were aware of the need for firearms and weaponery to keep the people safe from government oppression. As it was then so it is now. Armed citizens = Governed Unarmed Citizens = Ruled WATCH https://youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=PsuKiUMOwDI It ain't about duck hunting or even personal security it's about freedom from the government. It's not on a whim that this is the Second Amendment. It's that important. |
Quote:
I believe they pretend to think the second amendment is for hunters. LOL I feel bad for them if they are really scared of semi autos. I feel bad for people that truly believe you can get rid of 200 million guns so they will feel safer. I wish they would understand that most men that own semi automatic weapons are the good guys. But fears are sometimes irrational. And I think the gun grabbers in government have a different agenda, and know confiscation will not solve the problem. But, you can't wake up someone that is just pretending to be asleep. |
Quote:
Bush passed the Patriot Act and it hasn't affected me at all. |
Quote:
READ: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came... So you think that the patriot act hasn't affected you?:error It has affected us all, we just haven't fully felt it's affect on us yet. Our founding fathers didn't have as much faith in men seeking power as you do, that's why the safeguards are in place. :helpme |
Quote:
People are mezmerized by gadgets and checking their email on ipads, talking on phones way more advanced than startrek ever thought of. Distracted from the reality of things. They think that it could never happen to me. Never happen in the US. Never happen to such a progressive country and to such good people. Never happen as it did in other very progressive countries in the 20th century because we are better than them smarter than they were. That was a long time ago and they were stupid people. But not us (U.S.) because we are to smart to advanced, we are the best and we trust our government completely. I call BULLSHIT!!! IF WE ARE NOT SMART ENOUGH TO KEEP THE FIREARMS THAT STAND BETWEEN FREEDOM AND OPPRESSION AND TO THAT END WE WILL DESERVE WHAT WE GET. The chopping down of the framework that keeps us all free is going on right now under our very noses. If not we wouldn't even be talking about this. |
Quote:
|
You mean the nations founders are nutters? That's why they put it in the constitution. LOL. You thought it was for deer hunters. You guys always talk about how the government has high tech weapons that would quickly destroy anyone with small armaments. Lets use them against the Taliban in Afghanistan then. How many people did Dorner take out before he killed himself. No drones. No tanks. An armed population is a beautiful thing. Founders knew it. Scaredy cats hate it. Sorry bros. we will be keeping them.
|
Quote:
Give up your guns and give up your freedom. |
Quote:
you can do everything the second amendment states with single shot, level, bolt and pump actions shotguns and rifles. you don't need semi auto to satisfy the second amendment. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
speaking of second amendment - anyone ever considered that the SA was a well regulated militia and at some point was considered by the Nazi party and their follwers as the ones to protect them against the german government back then?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung |
Quote:
the Germans were way smarter.... |
Quote:
Oops. Sorry. I thought SleazyDream was American. Canadians have a different viewpoint. I respect whatever you guys decide to do about guns in your country. You guys won't do the same for us? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've been shot at and had a gun pointed at my head. once in the bush - guy didn';t know I was there and bullets wizzed by me really close. He was illegially hunting on my dad's land. and once when I owned a nightclub - someone sneaked a gun in and pointed it at my head. when he moved a guard took it from him. i've never had an issue with extended mags. my issue is with handguns and semi auto. i don't care if a bolt, lever, or pump action gun has 100 rounds or 5. it's about how fast you can pull the trigger and aim at your target or spray |
Sorry someone pointed a gun at your head. I know that must have scared you and scarred you for life. It would me for sure. But are you saying you would have been less dead if it had not been a semi automatic weapon? We live in a dangerous world. It seems like both of these gun stories have the innocent guy unarmed and the criminal is the only one with a gun. That is exactly the situation we want to avoid here in the US. Most of us here like the good guys to have a sporting chance. Almost all of our guns are semi auto. We have 200 million guns. They are not going away so these little arguments are silly. Even if you try confiscation, my gun will have been stolen when you come for it and you won't find it if you look.
|
Quote:
|
I never said pull a gun on a guy who has a gun to your head. If you carry a gun, you do your best to be aware of threats before they happen. If someone sneaks up on you and puts a gun to your head, do what they ask and hope they don't kill you. It worked for Sleazydream.
|
revolvers aren't semi-auto, so americans owning revolvers is ok with canadian op!
|
If someone has a gun on me I would prefer a semi auto. They get jammed. Revolvers don't.
|
Quote:
You have to be a certain type of person to be a copper, and that loving confrontation is just one small part of it. Dunno how it goes over in the US, but you get stopped here and pretty much guaranteed the 1st question is "do you know why I stopped you?". That 'question' is designed to get you on the back foot straightaway, and shift the control to the old bill. They don't like the answer (especially when it's 'wait, don't tell me, let me just guess, I can get this if you give me enough time, or a clue - maybe two of them') and their 2nd question is "waht's with the bad attitude". Yeah, like I'm kicking my fucking heels with joy at being randomly stopped because some cunt is bored. All old bill are control freak power tripping egotists with a superiority complex (yeah I know it's redundant). It's just the nature of what's required to be one. This is the ultimate test of whether a copper is a class A cunt: woman speeding doing 100mph turns out to be the copper's mum. He: a) nicks her anyway, and shows being a jobsworth is more important than ensuring his mum doesn't get a driving ban b) lets it slide, and ignores any oath to uphold the law, deciding he/she is the one to decide who gets punished ^ = you can't be a copper without being a cunt. Fact! Anyway, carry on... |
A guy in a city not that far from me killed a girl with knife in front of a disco club. He said "She deserved it. I would gladly killed all those losers in the club if I had a gun". That's why we have strict gun control in most european countries.
|
Quote:
The other day I was driving down the street and I saw a cop and hit my brakes. And it hit me like a rock - there was no reason for this. I'm no longer 24, not speeding, and the cop isn't going to be harassing me. The truth is cops harass you for a reason - not because they are dicks, but because you a dick. I see it all the time on the freeway - I'm driving 70 to 75, I'm already speeding, but I'm being a "good boy" and staying in my lane, not tailgating, not passing on the left... And then I see some jackass in a hurry changing lanes four times in less than a mile, going faster than everyone else, passing on the left, not using his blinker, and then dive bombing for his exit. And then when he gets pulled over he wonders why the police are picking on him. Someone else here mentioned a while back that they got arrested for smoking in a public park. They were breaking a local law - which was most likely set up because local residents were tiered of gangs of people smoking while they were jogging or playing with their kids or whatever - and when cops approached them instead of saying "sorry" and quickly putting out the smokes they were dicks, refusing to put it out, saying it was their park, they had rights, and then refusing to hand over ID. They hauled into jail for a few hours. Cops just want to do their job and go home without shot. Treat a cop like a dick, and you'll get the same back. Call him sir, put on your big boy pants, admit what you did, and take the punishment already. |
Quote:
there was a story yesterday on NPR, it was related to a chinese immigrant who was at a pro gun rally. He was seriously affected by the tyranny by the police in china, the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 where friends of friends were killed by police. He bailed and came to US, now a strong proponent of the right to own a gun. The argument is that if a suppressor is coming to your home to harass you or worse, IF you have arms, and the suppressor knows you have arms, they will think twice about breaking down that door. Put yourself in the shoes of the soldier, going to someones home who you know is armed, yeah right a lot more balls required compared to going to someones house who has no guns... any suppressor will think twice about picking a fight against someone who fights back. |
Quote:
Fuck man, you nutters live in one fucked up fantasy world. Seriously it's biggest fucking retarded argument i ever heard for owning guns in the US. How do you people get so fucking weird?? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And they wonder why the rest of the world always makes fun of Americans. |
Quote:
No idea what the story about someone else had to do with my quote, or why you're telling me, but I stand by it - all old bill are power tripping fucksticks. Yes, we need them, of course we do, because they are the ones with the tools to do the job of catching criminals, but don't tell me ANY copper is some kind of nice guy - they are all, without exception, the opposite once they put on that uniform, and that goes for my personal friends in the force too. |
Quote:
if you can talk like an adult we can have a conversation. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yes, I'm afraid those people laughing are a little jealous. Losers hate winners. It's a natural law. Most of those laughing are on our payroll too so it is a little pathetic. We don't really care who laughs. Have you noticed? :)
|
Quote:
My friend has been rear ended in his big truck four or five times in two years. He says "They rear ended me which means it's their fault". This was a while ago; He took me out for a drive. He's driving a big pick up truck, driving way too fast, tailgating, and then stopping short. He locked up his brakes twice in twenty minutes, which is more than I've locked my brakes in two years. The law says he's not at fault, but the truth is he's stopping short and when you do that people slam into you. The best part... He doesn't think he's doing anything wrong. I'm not saying I am a better driver than anyone here. I'm not. I am saying we all think we are better drivers than we are. And even when your driving is perfect, chances are you are still speeding. And sometimes it's just your unlucky day. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Again, boring irrelevant story for your 2nd paragraph. I'll admit I have an intense dislike of the old bill, and I'll also admit we need them, for obvious reasons. I'll also admit that I *know* I'm going to get stopped each time I accelerate up to the speed limit quicker than someone in a 1 litre car, and relish the confrontation just as much as the fuckstick pulling me over does. Probably makes me a bit of a dick, but it doesn't lessen them being dicks each and every time either. To use your own example, if I'm (or whoever) is a dick to them, they'll also be one. That goes both ways, and them being in uniform doesn't change the fact they are totally arrogant egotistical dicks to start with, nor does it mean they don't bring attitude and aren't looking for the confrontation more than the person they are stopping (in instances as I've described - sure, break the law and you deserve to get stopped, but even then they UPHOLD the law, they aren't 'the law' and don't need to be holier-than-thou 99% of the time). Bottom line I guess is that you think they're superheros, I think they're a bunch of cunts who for the most part are glorified revenue collectors, so we'll (I'll) leave it at that, just felt like dipping into the thread in between tasks. |
Just to add Rochard, and I don't mean this in a derogatory way at all, iirc you were in the military, and are used to taking orders/subservience. Again, not being derogatory (as I actually think you're a top guy, and enjoy almost all your posts, and agree with many of your viewpoints), but being spoken down to, barked at, or having anyone treat me as an inferior is something I handle very badly, which I'm aware is why my dislike of authority figures is probably deeper than most people's. I just can't stand someone thinking they are 'above' me or anyone else because they are bigger/older/richer/in a uniform/etc :thumbsup
|
It's the question itself that's flawed.
It asks why we "need" to posses these guns. That's just like asking us to prove that we have a "need" to vote, to speak freely, to have the privacy in our homes respected, to practice our own religion. It's not a "Bill of Needs". It's a Bill of Rights. If you don't think much of our right to have firearms, take it up with the Founding Fathers. The American Revolution began on the day when the British Army attempted a gun-grab at Lexington-Concord. That was enough of a threat to their freedom to mean war. And the weapons in question were not just sporting arms, but the military style assault rifles of the age. The concept behind the Second Amendment is broad enough to include self-defense, but it's really grounded on the idea that one of the best ways to keep government tyranny at bay is a well-armed citizenry, capable of revolt, that will keep the lawgivers on their toes. If you don't like that, those Founding Fathers had enough foresight to imagine that changing conditions might require adjustments from time to time and they accommodated that, too. If you can convince 2/3 of both houses of Congress and 3/4 of the states, you can change the Bill of Rights and repeal the Second Amendment. Don't count on that happening any time soon. But hey, go knock yourself out trying. Don't be surprised if others grab your coat tails and try to repeal the First Amendment and the Fifth, Sixth and the Fourtheenth, claiming that all of them only protect criminals. (In fact they protect citizens, every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and when the rights of criminal suspects are taken away, the rights of every citizen go with them.) Until you manage to amend the Constitution, we don't have to prove any need to vote, to speak freely, to worship God, to buy and sell porn - or to own, carry, and use an AR-15. PS - Anyone looking to sell one in nice condition? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Pressure on the government.
My god, you people are fucked up. Goddamn American imbeciles. Unbelievable. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc