Dutch, 500 years of fleeting influence.

So is that why Shirley Sherrod was forced to resign for something she didn't really say?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resigna...hirley_Sherrod

:1orglaugh


http://ionenewsone.files.wordpress.c...logger-475.jpg

Racenutters

I thought that was the exact statement used to explain that when someone says it, although they think it means they are not racist it shows something else. Meaning that they are in essence deeply rooted in the fact that they sub conciously believe that skin color is a deterministic factor in racism and make decision judgements on it by saying that they ignore it.

i.e the belief that although they are arguing the case in favour of being anti-racist, their premise is that color is actually a factor that needs to be ignored, and that so therefore one color is better than another by stating the fact that they don't care what color a person is. More so when the "white" racial term is included even though only albino's are white skinned.

Perhaps you might be better off with the moral position that you are not a colorist ;)

I don't dig for good apples underneath all the rotten ones at the supermarket.

I always get angry when I see this..

Then I think wait a second.. They are black.

Then I smile and walk away, knowing that a black racist will be limited his whole life.

Yes, post some examples to deny the trend.
Its not even open for discussion, double standards are fact in this matter. You must be blind to deny it.

you right wingers just never get tired of whining like bitches, do you.

being such big crybaby pussies should embarrass you, but it doesn't.

I remember that from my times in Greece

I like how the people who have never been here know how it is.
Look at the big deal they made over a word in a movie but if it was the other way around it would be nothing of the sort. That is ok because I don't care either

50 blacks and 1 franck

I think your mistaken...when he gets into this thread you will find out why :)

The fucker called me a "frijolero" once and then cried to the mods that I was racist and got me banned. TNB, for sure.

Only three groups of people can get away with anything - nigs, jews and gays. Everyone owes them because 300 years, 80 years or 30 years ago someone did something bad and now its the rest of the World's fault.

I think you missed my point. I do see the double standards. I was more on the fact that if a black discriminates against a white, or for example, people who opposed affirmative action, say it's reverse racism against whites. Reverse racism is a term that shouldn't exist. Racism isn't defined as a white hating on a black. It's hating on someone else because they are a different race. So if a black person discriminates against a white, it's simply racism, just like it is if a white person discriminates against a black person.

But I totally understand everything you're saying.

Well if you truly understood what he is saying then you should have realized that it's
just whining.

"Woe is me, the black people made me feel bad".

:1orglaugh

lol, franck's always mad about something...

Pretty much, they're holding themselves down. I worked with a bunch of black people in a factory making the same amount of money. And all they would say is the white man is holding me down.. I said well shit, he must be holding me down too, cause we're making the same amount of money. Unreal

Never ending story. Three generations later they are still living in ghettos and killing each other and occasional bystanders. What a waste of human tissue. Deport them back to Africa. That is what I would do here in England if I could. :mad:

ask a civil rights attorney :2 cents:

rootbeer :thumbsup

Not from a civil rights attorney, but my argument stands. Black racism against whites is simply racism, not "reverse racism."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_racism

interesting thread

I don't understand why anyone would be racist.

never tried it.