GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Guess what's missing in the 1000s of Boston conspiracy posts all over the web (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1107205)

JFK 04-22-2013 09:46 AM

fitty conspiracies:pimp

Supz 04-22-2013 09:53 AM

[QUOTE=DWB;19591097]I don't know if they did it or not. However...

1) Where is the video of the police chase and them throwing bombs at the police? EVERY police car in the USA has dash cams now.

Not EVERY car in the USA has this. Most in NYC don't.

DWB 04-22-2013 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19591157)
the police chase was brief, a watertown local security squad car came across the brothers, who were in separate vehicles, they almost immediately stopped and began the shootout, only another handful of cops showed up, current reports say 6, then it was over. in the mean time, there are many many tweets and social network comments from people that live on that block that write about bomb(s) going off right out their window.

there is video of the younger brother setting the bag down, according to current news sources, it has not been released, i believe because it is actual evidence.

Just this morning I watched an official from Boston say there was no bomb. They said the older brother ran out of ammo while shooting at the police so they tackled him, then the younger brother got ran over.

There are eye witnesses on the street saying no bomb. Yet there is an alleged burn mark on the street, and some officials still saying no bomb. On the other hand some people say they heard a bomb. I don't know how this is even open for debate, as a bomb blast is something you either hear or you don't.

Confusing?

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 19591173)
Pigshit...you are not being asked to support anything. Twelve people will be shown evidence of guilt in a court of law...and will be asked to decide if it is "proof" of guilt...beyond a reasonable doubt. You will not be asked to be one of the twelve.

Of course I'm not going to be part of his trial you jack ass. My comment was for PEOPLE. If THEY want PEOPLE to believe a story, there should be more proof. I want to form my own opinion on this and I need more facts to do it. Unlike yourself who is not capable of thinking for himself and needs others to tell him what to think.

Please, and I mean this with all of my heart, the next time you're thinking about putting your gun to your head, do it. Pull the trigger. You won't be missed. Maybe you'll come back in another life as another nick. You know you think about it, so just get it over with.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19591233)
Dont they publish their evidence at a trial ?

Or do you all want in right now ? On a website so you can all debunk it ?

What's there to debunk? I would just like to have more information about it.

They have tons of evidence showing they had backpacks on. Why can't they release a few without the backpacks? Or any evidence that backs up their story of a car chase?

What is astonishing is how many people just believe everything they are told if it comes from their TV or an authority figure. That is seriously disturbing on many levels. Some of us just want a little more than hearsay when trying to process information.

scottybuzz 04-22-2013 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19591255)
Just this morning I watched an official from Boston say there was no bomb. They said the older brother ran out of ammo while shooting at the police so they tackled him, then the younger brother got ran over.

There are eye witnesses on the street saying no bomb. Yet there is an alleged burn mark on the street, and some officials still saying no bomb. On the other hand some people say they heard a bomb. I don't know how this is even open for debate, as a bomb blast is something you either hear or you don't.

Confusing?



Of course I'm not going to be part of his trial you jack ass. My comment was for PEOPLE. If THEY want PEOPLE to believe a story, there should be more proof. I want to form my own opinion on this and I need more facts to do it. Unlike yourself who is not capable of thinking for himself and needs others to tell him what to think.

Please, and I mean this with all of my heart, the next time you're thinking about putting your gun to your head, do it. Pull the trigger. You won't be missed. Maybe you'll come back in another life as another nick. You know you think about it, so just get it over with.



What's there to debunk? I would just like to have more information about it.

They have tons of evidence showing they had backpacks on. Why can't they release a few without the backpacks? Or any evidence that backs up their story of a car chase?

What is astonishing is how many people just believe everything they are told if it comes from their TV or an authority figure. That is seriously disturbing on many levels. Some of us just want a little more than hearsay when trying to process information.

very cool post. :thumbsup

instead of saying outright there is a conspiracy you are asking for more information.

Why can't other people do this?

dyna mo 04-22-2013 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19591255)

What is astonishing is how many people just believe everything they are told if it comes from their TV or an authority figure. That is seriously disturbing on many levels. Some of us just want a little more than hearsay when trying to process information.

i trust you are not referring to me with this comment.

healthy skepticism is required for daily living imo and certainly a part of my makeup.

BlackCrayon 04-22-2013 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19591176)
He had been told he was doing a drug drop :2 cents:

this is just as made up as anything the media could report. i really don't know why you think its any more credible.

dyna mo 04-22-2013 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz (Post 19591276)
very cool post. :thumbsup

instead of saying outright there is a conspiracy you are asking for more information.

Why can't other people do this?

did you see the eyewitness photographs and comments? people that where there and you skip over that to highlight an opinion from across the internet.

dyna mo 04-22-2013 10:10 AM

we are witnessing gfy going full-retard. full.

i mean photographs taken by citizens are not enough in a thread about how conspiracy theories lack proof.


full.

theking 04-22-2013 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19591255)
Just this morning I watched an official from Boston say there was no bomb. They said the older brother ran out of ammo while shooting at the police so they tackled him, then the younger brother got ran over.

There are eye witnesses on the street saying no bomb. Yet there is an alleged burn mark on the street, and some officials still saying no bomb. On the other hand some people say they heard a bomb. I don't know how this is even open for debate, as a bomb blast is something you either hear or you don't.

Confusing?



Of course I'm not going to be part of his trial you jack ass. My comment was for PEOPLE. If THEY want PEOPLE to believe a story, there should be more proof. I want to form my own opinion on this and I need more facts to do it. Unlike yourself who is not capable of thinking for himself and needs others to tell him what to think.

Please, and I mean this with all of my heart, the next time you're thinking about putting your gun to your head, do it. Pull the trigger. You won't be missed. Maybe you'll come back in another life as another nick. You know you think about it, so just get it over with.



What's there to debunk? I would just like to have more information about it.

They have tons of evidence showing they had backpacks on. Why can't they release a few without the backpacks? Or any evidence that backs up their story of a car chase?

What is astonishing is how many people just believe everything they are told if it comes from their TV or an authority figure. That is seriously disturbing on many levels. Some of us just want a little more than hearsay when trying to process information.

Instead of trying to "process information"...you should stick to sucking a tranny's cock...you may be better at that.

Rochard 04-22-2013 10:11 AM

Why would anyone set up two unknown people in a crime? Before you have a conspiracy theory, you need to have a reason for one.

scottybuzz 04-22-2013 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19591281)
did you see the eyewitness photographs and comments? people that where there and you skip over that to highlight an opinion from across the internet.

instead of this particular argument I was more praising DWB for the fact of not jumping to conclusions to any specific theory.

to answer your question, not I have not looked into this fully at all.

dyna mo 04-22-2013 10:14 AM

i don't see anybody in this thread jumping to conclusions.

scottybuzz 04-22-2013 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19591295)
i don't see anybody in this thread jumping to conclusions.

wtf you on about?

again i said talking "in general"

can you comprehend or do i have to explain a third time?

DWB 04-22-2013 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz (Post 19591276)
very cool post. :thumbsup

instead of saying outright there is a conspiracy you are asking for more information.

Why can't other people do this?

That's the only logical way to approach it. It's just impossible to know without seeing all the information.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19591277)
i trust you are not referring to me with this comment.

healthy skepticism is required for daily living imo and certainly a part of my makeup.

I wasn't. It was a general comment that addresses the world wide view of the situation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 19591284)
Instead of trying to "process information"...you should stick to sucking a tranny's cock...you may be better at that.

A tranny cock comment. How original. You got me good, Hoss.

dyna mo 04-22-2013 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz (Post 19591301)
wtf you on about?

again i said talking "in general"

can you comprehend or do i have to explain a third time?

you want to make this about me mother fucker?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc