Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19591176)

He had been told he was doing a drug drop :2 cents:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19591157)

the police chase was brief, a watertown local security squad car came across the brothers, who were in separate vehicles, they almost immediately stopped and began the shootout, only another handful of cops showed up, current reports say 6, then it was over. in the mean time, there are many many tweets and social network comments from people that live on that block that write about bomb(s) going off right out their window.

there is video of the younger brother setting the bag down, according to current news sources, it has not been released, i believe because it is actual evidence.

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 19590813)

And how do you know they had the bombs during the chase? Did you see them?

Nope, you just eat whatever you are fed. Much like a baby. Unable to figure things out for yourself, you have to rely on someone else to inform you.

Sorry man, I have children...I'm not one.

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19591097)

I don't know if they did it or not. However...

1) Where is the video of the police chase and them throwing bombs at the police? EVERY police car in the USA has dash cams now. Until such a video surfaces, there is no proof unless you were there and saw it with your own eyes. The police also can't seem to get their stories together on what happened. Some say a bomb went off, some say it didn't. The same for eye witnesses in the neighbor hood who seem / heard it. A pressure cooker bomb isn't something that slips by so fast and quietly that you're not sure if you saw it explode or not.

2) Where is the actual video of both brothers putting the bombs down? There is no shortage of images with them walking with the bags, there is even a video. But without the bags, there is ONE image that isn't really conclusive as it only shows one side, yet his arm is in a carry position. This is not enough proof to convict someone of such a crime.

Of course the brother may admit he did it, be it a forced admission or not like they do with the prisoners in Gitmo, but there isn't solid proof in either direction. There is plenty of evidence to make them suspects, but I've yet to see solid proof of anything. We have select images and eye witness accounts from various people that don't all match up. That's it. There must be shots of both them somewhere, clear shots, walking away without the backpacks. Without those, I simply can't believe what the government or media says for the sake of wanting it to be true. Both have a long record of lying and distorting the truth

Solid proof isn't too much to ask for if you're supposed to support a lynching.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19591157)

the police chase was brief, a watertown local security squad car came across the brothers, who were in separate vehicles, they almost immediately stopped and began the shootout, only another handful of cops showed up, current reports say 6, then it was over. in the mean time, there are many many tweets and social network comments from people that live on that block that write about bomb(s) going off right out their window.

there is video of the younger brother setting the bag down, according to current news sources, it has not been released, i believe because it is actual evidence.

Originally Posted by theking (Post 19591173)

Pigshit...you are not being asked to support anything. Twelve people will be shown evidence of guilt in a court of law...and will be asked to decide if it is "proof" of guilt...beyond a reasonable doubt. You will not be asked to be one of the twelve.

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19591233)

Dont they publish their evidence at a trial ?

Or do you all want in right now ? On a website so you can all debunk it ?

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19591255)

Just this morning I watched an official from Boston say there was no bomb. They said the older brother ran out of ammo while shooting at the police so they tackled him, then the younger brother got ran over.

There are eye witnesses on the street saying no bomb. Yet there is an alleged burn mark on the street, and some officials still saying no bomb. On the other hand some people say they heard a bomb. I don't know how this is even open for debate, as a bomb blast is something you either hear or you don't.

Confusing?



Of course I'm not going to be part of his trial you jack ass. My comment was for PEOPLE. If THEY want PEOPLE to believe a story, there should be more proof. I want to form my own opinion on this and I need more facts to do it. Unlike yourself who is not capable of thinking for himself and needs others to tell him what to think.

Please, and I mean this with all of my heart, the next time you're thinking about putting your gun to your head, do it. Pull the trigger. You won't be missed. Maybe you'll come back in another life as another nick. You know you think about it, so just get it over with.



What's there to debunk? I would just like to have more information about it.

They have tons of evidence showing they had backpacks on. Why can't they release a few without the backpacks? Or any evidence that backs up their story of a car chase?

What is astonishing is how many people just believe everything they are told if it comes from their TV or an authority figure. That is seriously disturbing on many levels. Some of us just want a little more than hearsay when trying to process information.

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19591255)

What is astonishing is how many people just believe everything they are told if it comes from their TV or an authority figure. That is seriously disturbing on many levels. Some of us just want a little more than hearsay when trying to process information.

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19591176)

He had been told he was doing a drug drop :2 cents:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz (Post 19591276)

very cool post. :thumbsup

instead of saying outright there is a conspiracy you are asking for more information.

Why can't other people do this?

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19591255)

Just this morning I watched an official from Boston say there was no bomb. They said the older brother ran out of ammo while shooting at the police so they tackled him, then the younger brother got ran over.

There are eye witnesses on the street saying no bomb. Yet there is an alleged burn mark on the street, and some officials still saying no bomb. On the other hand some people say they heard a bomb. I don't know how this is even open for debate, as a bomb blast is something you either hear or you don't.

Confusing?



Of course I'm not going to be part of his trial you jack ass. My comment was for PEOPLE. If THEY want PEOPLE to believe a story, there should be more proof. I want to form my own opinion on this and I need more facts to do it. Unlike yourself who is not capable of thinking for himself and needs others to tell him what to think.

Please, and I mean this with all of my heart, the next time you're thinking about putting your gun to your head, do it. Pull the trigger. You won't be missed. Maybe you'll come back in another life as another nick. You know you think about it, so just get it over with.



What's there to debunk? I would just like to have more information about it.

They have tons of evidence showing they had backpacks on. Why can't they release a few without the backpacks? Or any evidence that backs up their story of a car chase?

What is astonishing is how many people just believe everything they are told if it comes from their TV or an authority figure. That is seriously disturbing on many levels. Some of us just want a little more than hearsay when trying to process information.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19591281)

did you see the eyewitness photographs and comments? people that where there and you skip over that to highlight an opinion from across the internet.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19591295)

i don't see anybody in this thread jumping to conclusions.

Originally Posted by scottybuzz (Post 19591276)

very cool post. :thumbsup

instead of saying outright there is a conspiracy you are asking for more information.

Why can't other people do this?

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19591277)

i trust you are not referring to me with this comment.

healthy skepticism is required for daily living imo and certainly a part of my makeup.

Originally Posted by theking (Post 19591284)

Instead of trying to "process information"...you should stick to sucking a tranny's cock...you may be better at that.

Originally Posted by scottybuzz (Post 19591301)

wtf you on about?

again i said talking "in general"

can you comprehend or do i have to explain a third time?