|
Quote:
oh someone else. my bad. i hope they agree with your view point |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
now would the USA put up with saddams warships and planes doing "maneuvers" close to its shores? of course not...what makes the USA think anybody else will tolerate it? ah yes the double standard...its ok when we do it but when others do it we get mad... you made him do an "avghanistan" and then turned your back on your ally...he was your best boy back then... its not like you claim that he had nothing better to do one day and just shot one of your peace planes with flowers and medication.... |
Quote:
you don't consider white phosphorous to be a chemical? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is not known by the Medical world that White Phosphorous causes birth defects. Satisfied...sport. |
Quote:
for depleted uranium, you have that in almost all your ammunition, something that was used all over iraq however, the birth defects issue? seem to be concentrated solely in Basura and Fallujah, the two cities you guys STOMPED with white phosphorus. coincidence? Must be. You CDC seems to think there is 'no research at all' over what this does to children however US history shows you have no problems testing out your new toys on children; so long as they're poor, and preferably black. |
|
Quote:
CD Smith is one of the few Canadians on this board that is a decent...reasonable person with any common sense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
something else to consider is this thread, i think it too is important. just like you posted that picture as shock value to "wake the fuck up" this thread is the same. wake the fuck up. instead of using 9/11 or anti whatever to shock, i used the cover-up of the wikileaks. this isn't an endorsement of bush, war, iraq 1 or 2 or the current government. it's the opposite. i hope you get that. i really do. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's all sickening. If the reality of war was on TV every night for an hour or two, no one would support any wars. But they don't even show the American caskets coming off the planes anymore. Support war and the deaths of "enemy combatants" and "insurgents" but don't have the stomach to see the results of it. Pathetic. People should be at the very least forced to look at all the dead American boys they bring home. Show photos of their hideously maimed bodies on the news every night along with images of all the women and children the US has killed abroad. |
You want to document that picture? |
Quote:
good enough? |
Quote:
All you have to do is look at some of the weapons the insurgents were using to know they came from Iran. Everyone knows Iran was helping after the invasion, they were doing the same thing we did to the Soviets when they were in Afghanistan. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Read the published report. |
1 million dead, no big deal
But 3 losers die at the boston marathon and it's a TRAGEDY!! |
Quote:
i particularly enjoyed the 'dirty a-rab' moment of your response lets wait for this, shall we? http://www.emro.who.int/irq/iraq-inf...ect-study.html |
Quote:
tell me...during the end of your rebuttal ,did you feel compelled to just stay your original and creative self and leave it at just "pigshit", or was the decision to add so much text towards the end an effort to actually make a whole sentence?? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh in any case it was completely unexpected and refreshing... |
Quote:
No I see bullshit for what it is. Learned the hard way ... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
btw, did you know about the genetic bottleneck of history? apparently 3000 breedable pairs outta africa 6k years ago makes us all fairly related, yes? Anyway, seems you esteem the good Iranian doctor so much, that's the end all be all of studies to be found on the internet the one i posted is fresh and now being analyzed. I think ti's funny they'd go to so much effort, money, and political 'umf', over something that is 'not an issue' but hey, i have learned a few things the hard way myself. |
Global Warming Caused this..... HA
|
Quote:
I have been a member of this board for more than ten years and I have grown very tired of "debating" with the ignorant...stupid and "trolls" which dominate this board so my standard response has become simply...pigshit. |
Quote:
One would think the former Bush administration would shouting about this as loud as they can... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
there is more articles/studies/hobbyists around, not finding right now tho |
Quote:
now I see it too :1orglaugh for a moment there you stood at risk of me leaning towards thinking that you are impotent at debate, but I certainly stand corrected now that you have explained that you are actually above responding even though you respond nevertheless...now you are truly showing me what a master of self control you are :1orglaugh oh well theres no debating with such strong arguments...get in to your plane and go bomb something you are right! :thumbsup:1orglaugh |
Quote:
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress....ng-close-to-2/ |
Quote:
|
Atleast we know you're not a shapeshifting reptillian believer _Richard_ :)
Or are you? :upsidedow |
Quote:
|
If you think the justification for going to Iraq was based on chemical and not nuclear weapons you are either:
a.) too young to remember 2002 and now are Googling stories about the Iraq war b.) staying willfully ignorant to justify a terrible, terrible war Stories about chemical weapons in Iraq were reported from day one of the war. It just wasn't a story because anyone with half a fucking brain knows the difference between a nuclear weapon or WMD and chemical weapons. |
again, my post was about the wikileaks, i've mentioned that many many times, and included stating that i do not endorse the war or justification for it.
not sure why people confuse trying to find a factual view of the past with embracing that view. what's that expression *doomed to repeat something or other*,........ |
Quote:
I would guess they planned to go to war because it was a window of opportunity to plant a very large US base on the region. At least I would hope that was the reason. |
Quote:
These cables contained information that everyone knew about. It had be reported over and over that there were chemical weapons in Iraq. Nobody disputed that Iraq was in possession of chemical weapons, so finding this stuff was expected. But the basis to get into Iraq was an imminent threat posed by their nuclear capabilities. And there were no nuclear weapons found. So 7 years after the initial invasion, after finding no nuclear weapons, after all of the money spent, after the massive loss of life, you wanted the media to make a big deal about Iraq having chemical weapons that everyone knew they had? |
Quote:
....er... uhm... I mean George Bush is the problem!!! Canada is the major supplier of Uranium for Nuclear Weapons http://akashmanews.com/2012/12/12/ca...clear-weapons/ |
Quote:
got it. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
hmmmmmmmmmm:::::::::
On May 27, 2003, a secret Defense Intelligence Agency fact-finding mission in Iraq reported unanimously to intelligence officials in Washington that two trailers captured in Iraq by Kurdish troops "had nothing to do with biological weapons." The trailers had been a key part of the argument for the 2003 invasion; Secretary of State Colin Powell had told the United Nations Security Council, "We have firsthand descriptions of biological weapons factories on wheels and on rails. We know what the fermenters look like. We know what the tanks, pumps, compressors and other parts look like." The Pentagon team had been sent to investigate the trailers after the invasion. The team of experts unanimously found "no connection to anything biological"; one of the experts told reporters that they privately called the trailers "the biggest sand toilets in the world." The report was classified, and the next day, the CIA publicly released the assessment of its Washington analysts that the trailers were "mobile biological weapons production." The White House continued to refer to the trailers as mobile biological laboratories throughout the year, and the Pentagon field report remained classified. It is still classified, but a Washington Post report of April 12, 2006 disclosed some of the details of the report. According to the Post: A spokesman for the DIA asserted that the team's findings were neither ignored nor suppressed, but were incorporated in the work of the Iraqi Survey Group, which led the official search for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. The survey group's final report in September 2004 – 15 months after the technical report was written – said the trailers were "impractical" for biological weapons production and were "almost certainly intended" for manufacturing hydrogen for weather balloons.[90] "[No] one in this country probably was more surprised than I when weapons of mass destruction were not used against our troops as they moved toward Baghdad." General Tommy Franks December 2, 2005.[91] |
Quote:
|
Quote:
it's well known Sodamn Insane had chemical weapons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_poison_gas_attack |
hmmmmmmm:::::
In the run up to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq, the main rationale for the Iraq War was Hussein's Iraq failure to transparently and verifiably cease Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD - nuclear, biological and chemical weapons) programs, and to destroy all materials relating thereto, as mandated in United Nations Resolution 1441. In February 2003 the then Secretary of State Colin Powell gave a presentation before the United Nations showing a computer generated view of what the laboratories looked like. He said Iraq had as many as 18 mobile facilities for making anthrax and botulinum toxin. "They can produce enough dry, biological agent in a single month to kill thousands upon thousands of people." Powell based the assertion on accounts of at least four Iraqi defectors, including a chemical engineer who supervised one of the facilities and been present during production runs of a biological agent. [1] Following the invasion of Iraq two trailers were found and initially declared as the alleged mobile labs. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Facilities.jpg Dick Cheney continued to claim trailers were mobile labs September 14, 2003 "Same on biological weapons--we believe he'd developed the capacity to go mobile with his BW production capability because, again, in reaction to what we had done to him in '91. We had intelligence reporting before the war that there were at least seven of these mobile labs that he had gone out and acquired. We've, since the war, found two of them. They're in our possession today, mobile biological facilities that can be used to produce anthrax or smallpox or whatever else you wanted to use during the course of developing the capacity for an attack." Dick Cheney, Meet the Press, NBC. January 22, 2004 "In terms of the question what is there now, we know for example that prior to our going in that he had spent time and effort acquiring mobile biological weapons labs, and we're quite confident he did, in fact, have such a program. We've found a couple of semi trailers at this point which we believe were, in fact, part of that program." Dick Cheney, Morning Edition, NPR. Powell retraction “ I looked at the four [sources] that [the CIA] gave me for [the mobile bio-labs], and they stood behind them, ... Now it appears not to be the case that it was that solid. At the time I was preparing the presentation, it was presented to me as being solid.[21] April 3, 2004 I feel terrible ... [giving the speech] ... It's a blot. I'm the one who presented it on behalf of the United States to the world, and [it] will always be a part of my record. It was painful. It's painful now.[4]" 2005 |
No conspiracy...
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc