Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 19624554)

Huh? The Soviets have moon rocks too, genius. Even your own image says so. I guess you think that means they put men on the moon too but chose to keep quiet about it. :1orglaugh

Seriously, you "man on the moon" loons are so far gone it's not true. You will grasp at anything, however tenuous, to try and 'prove' your crazy beliefs, even Youtube weirdos in funny hats. Get help.

But please, do carry on with the one about how NASA could get men on the moon multiple times, 40+ years ago (but never since), film those men on the moon, and return those men back to Earth safely... but they were completely stumped at how to simulate slow motion video/film.

Because that one is totally fucking hilarious. :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19623373)

well, that certainly proves they faked apollo 11 but what about the other 5 lunar landings? were the scenes with the apollo 12, 13, 14 ,15, 16 sweaters and corresponding room #s cut from the shining or maybe they are in the director's cut?

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19623378)

i believe that connection is cleverly revealed in "eyes wide shut". it's super cool how they also included these reveals in mainstream movies, just to fuck with us.

it's also pretty impressive that they faked 11+ hours of televised coverage of the first landing with film tech that wasn't even available then.

nothing our government can't accomplish! well, except for going to the moon, of course, duh!

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19623404)

:1orglaugh i was more focused on counting.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19623418)

it seems the clip is from this documentary:::::::

After the box office failure of Barry Lyndon, Stanley Kubrick decided to embark on a project that might have more commercial appeal. The Shining, Stephen King's biggest critical and commercial success yet, seemed like a perfect vehicle. After an arduous production, Kubrick's film received a wide release in the summer of 1980; the reviews were mixed, but the box office, after a slow start, eventually picked up. End of story? Hardly. In the 30 years since the film's release, a considerable cult of Shining devotees has emerged, fans who claim to have decoded the film's secret messages addressing everything from the genocide of Native Americans to a range of government conspiracies. Rodney Ascher's wry and provocative Room 237 fuses fact and fiction through interviews with cultists and scholars, creating a kaleidoscopic deconstruction of Kubrick's still-controversial classic.



it appears the clip is taken out of context as the documentary is an exploration into how people see the same thing differently, using the movie as a platform.

i might have to check itout!

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19623456)

it took an entire nation focused for years to get to the moon, themoon budget took 5% of the entire budget national budget. it was all combined with the race against our nuclear enemy. it was THE goal the government focused the nation on. it was the entire basis around "ask not what your country can do for you but you can do for your country".

spend that mount of resources and government speeches on film tech and they could shoot 11 hours of ~7 second delayed fake moon television shit in 1969.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624018)

mission speech:


astronauts, you have been chosen to go on a dangerous mission, your years of training will not be needed. please report on time to the film studio tomorrow morning, 0500, for your first meeting with the movie director and script read-throughs.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624150)

where'd you come up with this?

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624180)

he's confused, the tech to video record the lunar landings was nothing special. broacasting it to various links around the globe that rebroadcast it on tele was also nothing special.

what would have been special are slow motion cams, amongst other tech.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624395)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_TV_camera

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624399)

the ct's can't account for moon rocks either

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...rock_624in.jpg


moon rocks + lack of video tech


you cter's got some splainin to do!

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624416)

smoking gun!

would kubrick ever shoot handheld? i don't think so, he's a 35mm guy!

http://a2.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/i...d236aedd/l.jpg

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624558)

huh what? it states right on the graphic the soviets gathered moon rocks.

think more for yourself. regurgitate less.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624560)

it's so funny how your sort tries to troll, you completely fail to realize google is a click away, check it out once or twice for yourself,

you might find you will learn something about moon rocks.

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19624565)

troll what now?

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624558)

huh what? it states right on the graphic the soviets gathered moon rocks.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624575)

learn to read, richard, i said

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 19624579)

That's what I said in my post, you pothead. Learn to read a post before replying to it. The very fact that your own fucking image states that the Russians collected moon rocks destroys your argument that moon rocks somehow prove men landed on the moon. And if that's not the point you were trying to make, God knows what you were dribbling about.

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19624580)

which, is hilarious, after 13 responses in just this one thread..

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624590)

i see. perhaps one day you will understand how many pounds of moon rocks we brought back and do the math on your own.

Originally Posted by MiLo (Post 19624619)

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624818)

we didn't go the first time because we didn't go a 2nd time, yeah that makes sense.

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19624821)

You love these threads, are you bored at home all day? LOL.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624824)

what level of participation is ok with you?

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624824)

what level of participation is ok with you?

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19624829)

Don't shoot, I'm a friendly.

Originally Posted by bossku69 (Post 19624871)

I just called Stanely Kubrick. He said he did this intentionally to fuck with you mental midgets :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19624818)

we didn't go the first time because we didn't go a 2nd time, yeah that makes sense.

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 19624890)

We did go a second time (if you believe we went the first time). And a 3rd and a 4th and a 5th and a 6th.

We did it every few months under Nixon, no problem, with relatively backward technology (so backward we apparently couldn't even do slow motion effects).

And yet zero times under any other President, with far more advanced technology at their disposal. More advanced technology that couldn't even even always lift astronauts a few hundred miles above Earth and back safely, let alone the moon.

Yeah, that makes sense.

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 19624890)

We did it every few months under Nixon, no problem, with relatively backward technology (so backward we apparently couldn't even do slow motion effects).

And yet zero times under any other President, with far more advanced technology at their disposal. More advanced technology that just ten years ago couldn't even lift astronauts a few hundred miles above Earth and back safely, let alone the moon.

Yeah, that makes sense.