people want to hear opinions they agree with. what the real facts are don't matter. you can tell which way each poster in this threads leans by their view of certain networks. none of them contain much truth.

You're totally right; I was completely caught off guard. Bill was initially supposed to be interviewing me but at the last moment he had to run out of town on some other assignment and she was his stand-in. Bill had mentioned me a few days earlier on his show and didn't have anything bad to say, amazingly. He basically said, "look, the girls are over 18, this guy's not doing anything illegal, and the girls need to be responsible for their actions."

I would have loved to have gone off on Malkin but in the end I think biting my tongue made me appear to be the bigger person. I was honestly floored by how many kind e-mails I received after it aired. People couldn't get over how mean she was, which was ironic considering I was supposed to be the evil porn guy. Instead I started the segment with a compliment, remained rather civil, and maintained my composure. She came off like a complete lunatic and destroyed the point she was trying to make. It not only made me look good, but it helped people see that not everyone in the adult business is a total creep. I considered it a very small victory for the entire industry.

Lets let Stacy answer.
Bitch shut the fuck up, Stacy won't be answering shit.


I watched the video, what an ass hole..


"There's a Google result of you on almost every page.."
"Yea that's right, it's fraudulent, you gonna use it for your site?"
You should.

I watched it, you acted very mature. You were obviously the bigger man and everyone sees that.

The way she ended it to

"I'm not going to say thank you, but good bye."

Honestly what a prick. You acted very polite, she treated you like shit. Nice job keeping it cool up there.
I salute you.

between you and her, you probably helped a lot of people with their choices of career

much respect for doing it, and keeping cool when it hit the fan :2 cents:

You handled that as well as it could have been handled - civil, took the abuse until she made herself look like an ass, then succinctly lowered the boom in a final gesture (and summed up what 99% of watchers are thinking). I'd be proud of that moment!

Your answer should have been: "Do you want me to?"

She of course would have responded with "No"

You: "Then no, I won't be using them on my site. Because that's not how I do things. The girls depicted on my site are all consenting adults. Period."

Is there even any actual sex on your site or is it just nude posing? If so this Malkin idiot really should get out more and do some surfing to see what the community standard of tolerance is these days. Simple nudity is nothing. But she would already know that if she were less opinionated and more informed.

I don't think the body in the first pic is the same one as the bikini pic. The boobs are rounded and fuller on their own and the body more petite. However, the 2nd pic appears to be as flat chested as the bikini pic and if you blow them up they appear to have a mole/freckle in the same place, on the left side, to the left of the boob about halfway between boob and belly button.

http://comicsagogo.files.wordpress.c...lkin.jpg?w=352

Google Rachel Maddow fast and furious.

She went on and on about 90% of the guns in the Mexican cartels hands being supplied by gun shops in the US, when it was the US government that was running the Fast and Furious program. And the actual amount was around 25%

I listened to her, she's a hater thru and thru

Where?

Most people look at what I post and put up a funny picture, well because they have no reply, so here's your chance, where is it over the top?

I think people want to hear what's going on in the world. Not what hair style Hilton is sporting these days.

MSNBC stays away from things that are negative to the President, I want to hear those things, you don't?

Angry?
I just laughed out loud when I watched.
Michelle Malkin is ridiculously hilarious. I just can't take her seriously.
Even Some Guy's girlfriend couldn't really answer without shahahahahahaing a bit.

Some Guy, you handled it very well. Kudos.:thumbsup

Love how you pick what to reply to.

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2013/...store-shelves/
I went to a Big 5 sports goods on a wed morning when the ammo comes in, it was sold out an hour after delivery

And I know this is above your level, so let me make it clear, our rights are being taken away from us, we have lost the right to privacy, If you don't give a fuck, your're a moron.

Instead you come on this forum working in the adult forum wanting to take down Fox news, that's censorship

So take some time and relax, burn some books in your back yard. Hook up spell check on your laptop

You realize these are not the news but rather the TV equivalent to the editorial page of a newspaper, right?

they just moved to crazy? this is new?

You're kidding, right? FOX News is just tons of lies, and endless, endless, endless errors and mistakes that they just never apologize for or own up to. Everyone at Fox, especially Hannity, are fucked in the head. And that prick Huckaby, playing guitar with Ted Nugent? If there was any doubt what fox believes in it was answer that night.

And let's not forget who their regular contributors are:

http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/u...11-300x181.jpg

http://nextamericanpresident.us/uplo...ap4njbzorb.jpg

etc....

Got a list?

http://www.examiner.com/article/jon-...l-errors-video

Not a complete list but a good start.

How can you tell a Fox News talking head is lying?
His/her lips are moving.:upsidedow

Seriously dude, Fox went to court to claim the the right to lie... and won, and have been even more wildly exercising that right ever since.

I get my political information from well balanced liberals on gfy, grantmercury and a few others. Seems no one is more hateful than a well balanced, informed, tolerant, liberal. :)


.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:disgust

The Constitution isn't under attack; Nothing has changed.

Every four years they say the same thing: "Oh, they are going to take our guns away". After twenty years of the same shit it gets old.

Can I still own an assault rifle? Yes.
Do they still search me when I get on an airplane? Yes.
Can I still travel from state to state without having to ask permission? Yes.
Can I still say anything I want about the government? Yes.

You only think it is.

Should have gone for the fact that the only reason she feels that 20 is young because she is so old at 42 and should know as she works in a youth oriented industry herself, that not have worn the hat indoors.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...erican/276276/

check out the 'shoe bomber mastermind'

:disgust

I'm confused at what you are getting at here... Because a sixteen year old kid died?

Did the US target a sixteen year old kid? Nope. In fact, the only reason the drone strike took place was because they believed the kid was at another location. This was a military strike on an enemy combatant that had collateral damage.

I'm not gonna loose any sleep over this.

That number was put out by both the Mexican government AND the US ATF. Although it's since been backtracked and debated as to tracable guns the Mexican government actually turned over the best estimates according to unbiased fact check sources put it at least twice the numbers Fox claimed. The smaller numbers are arrived at by not considering any of the non-tracable guns as originating in the US.

1. Removing serial numbers is simple.

2. Look up where most guns are manufactured and compare their proximity to Mexico AND the ease of purchase/transport.

I've listened to Rachel Maddow long before she transisitioned from radio to MSNBC. If she HATES anything it is misinformation. I fact check all of the shows I listen to and would put the average knowledge from just one of her shows against an average month of Fox.

no. the original story was they attacked #2, and the kid was 'collateral'

it's now out that this kid was killed, specifically, in a separate attack two weeks later

the justification for this was he was the one masterminding the shoe bombings

you know, the bombings that started 2002, when the kid was 6

Maybe you're right. And maybe that's why she ignores the major news stories when it doesn't fit her agenda.
I like to switch between MSNBC, CNN, and FOX to get their reactions to stuff happening. And yeah, Maddow was right there with every story on Romney having his dog on the roof of his car during the election.

But she has yet to cross any "t's" or dot any "i's" on any of the biggest newstories happening the last few weeks (the IRS, the NSA, Benghazi, etc.) She simply ignores the stories.

Weird.

Also...keep in mind that neither Maddow or any anchor at Fox News or MSNBC are doing any actual "fact checking" themselves.
They all have teams of people working for them and then they come in and read what's written.

If any of these people were real reporters there would be no need for "fact checking" because they would be finding things out themselves instead of reading press releases from politicians and press releases from "think tanks", etc.

It's pretty sad.

I don't find any redeeming quality to Maddow's show or any of the other "opinion" shows on MSNBC or Fox News or CNN other than entertainment value.

And Maddow is simply not very entertaining...which is why she loses the ratings on her time spot to Hannity of all people.
Why?
Because Hannity is an entertainer and brings on people with opposing viewpoints to debate with. That is simply good t.v.

Maddow needs to stop bringing on people who agree 100% with her and doing all that smirking on her show. It makes her look like an elitist.
If she would bring on some ultra-conservative "guests" and debate whatever the topics are she is pushing that day it would be a LOT better.

That kinda seems to be the main problem with all Liberal oriented shows. They seem to be afraid to debate ideas with the opposing viewpoint. But it just isn't very compelling to watch a host with 3 or 4 other people all agreeing with each other and smirking.
That is boring as hell. :(

That's sadly the truth.

These guys calling themselves "liberals" are definitely NOT what was always "liberal" before.

Liberals USED to be the guys protesting Democrat Pres. Lyndon Johnson so hard over the Vietnam War that he declined to run for another term.

Liberals USED to be anti-govt. pro-freedom, etc.

In other words...what Libertarians are today.

Today's "liberals" are basically the same kind of people that real liberals used to call "squares" back in the 1960's.

Today's liberals LOVE the govt. Ask to be taxed more so more money can be spent on the military.
And they never saw a law or a cop that they didn't love. They practically beg to bow down before authority.

:(

Saw their newest contributor last night: James Carville on Bill O'Reilly

Surprise! Fox actually does have liberals on the air. That's what makes their shows get the big ratings that MSNBC doesn't get.

You throw O'Reilly and Carville together and it's fireworks.

I don't agree with what either one of them have to say. But I watched the whole segment because it was entertaining. 2 giant egos with opposing viewpoints...

there is no news: only heavily opinioned agendas :2 cents:

there is no left or right, just a big room filled with shouting poor people.

He was collateral damage in a drone attack. I've read nothing where he was targeted.

wow ... she was out for blood ....

yeah that Michelle Malkin is one of the most hate-filled people I've ever seen.

They stopped having her on OReilly. I'm guessing because she is just insane with anger and hatred.

Kind of the conservative and female version of GrantMercury here on GFY :1orglaugh

She's doing a segment on NSA right now with a guy from wired.com.
She's done many segments on IRS and Benghazi but unlike Fox she tends to fill her hour with info on latest events rather than rehash stories when there is nothing new to report.

What? Liberals want to cut money being spent on military and they hate cops. Its the conservatives that want more military spending and are cop lovers.

If you say so. I watch a bit of her show everyday and she seems to always avoid any stories that are critical of the President. And if she does cover them she doesn't really investigate what the administration is doing...instead she goes after whomever is accusing him of it.

I understand if you are a fan of hers. I'm not. Her show is boring to me. I'm just saying that she is not even on the same level as a real reporter. She's just the opposite (but less entertaining) version of her 9 p.m. airtime on Fox (Hannity)

And when I say that I mean she is nothing more than an entertainer with an opinion show. But she's just not that good of an entertainer.

Edward R Murrow is rolling in his grave over her, Hannity, Al Sharpton, Piers Morgan and the rest all pretending to be news "reporters". :(

But Robbie doesn't know that ....

It is well know that W has a problem remembering peoples name, so he would give them nicknames :

Family

Poppy, 41, Old Man ? George H. W. Bush[3]
Bushie ? Laura Bush (this is a mutual nickname)[4]

Foreign leaders

Dino (short for Dinosaur) ? Jean Chrétien, Prime Minister of Canada[5]
Pootie-Poot, Ostrich Legs ? Vladimir Putin, President[6][7][8] and former Prime Minister of Russia
Bandar Bush ? Bandar bin Sultan, ambassador to the United States from Saudi Arabia[9]
Landslide ? Tony Blair, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom[10]
Man of Steel ? John Howard, Prime Minister of Australia[11]
Shoes ? Silvio Berlusconi, Prime Minister of Italy

Staff

Big Time, Vice ? Dick Cheney, Vice President of the United States of America[7]
Rummy - Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense[8]
Izzy, Altoid Boy ? Special Assistant Israel Hernandez (for his role as provider of breath mints to the President on the campaign trail)[12][13]
Boy Genius, Turd Blossom ? Senior Advisor Karl Rove[7][14]
Condy, Guru ? Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice[7]
The World's Greatest Hero ? Secretary of State Colin Powell[15]
Big O (current), Pablo (former) ? Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill[16]
Fredo ? Attorney General Alberto Gonzales[7][17]
Danny Boy, Dan the Man ? Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Bartlett[12]
Ari-Bob ? White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer[18]
High Prophet, Hurricane Karen - Karen Hughes, Special Advisor; Director of Communications under Texas Governor George W. Bush[19]
The Blade, My Man Mitch - Office of Management and Budget Director Mitch Daniels[20]
Big Country ? Federal Emergency Management Agency Director Joe Allbaugh[21]
Brownie ? Federal Emergency Management Agency Director Michael D. Brown[22]
Brother George ? CIA Director George Tenet
Tree Man ? Bush's unnamed Forest Services official [23]
La Margarita - Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings[24]
Tangent Man ? White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card[25]
Tiny ? Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage[26]
Light Bulb ? National Energy Policy Development Group Executive Director Andrew D. Lundquist[27]
Horny ? White House Speechwriter Jonathan Horn[28]
Bullets - Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman[29]

Politicians

Bama, Rock, Hussein ? Barack Obama, former Democratic Senator, Illinois, Bush's successor as President of the United States[30][dubious ? discuss]
Boner ? John Boehner, former Republican Majority Leader, current Speaker of the House [31]
Big Boy - Chris Christie, former United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, current Governor of New Jersey [32]
Pablo ? Paul Wellstone, Democratic Senator, Minnesota[33]
Pedro ? Peter King, Republican Congressman from New York[10]
Hogan[34] ? John McCain, Republican Senator, Arizona[10]
Big George ? George Miller, Democratic Congressman, California[3]
Freddy Boy, Freddo ? Fred Upton, Republican Congressman from Michigan[3]
Congressman Kickass ? John Sweeney, Republican Congressman, New York[35]
Nellie (former), Benney (former), Benator (current) ? Ben Nelson, Democratic Senator, Nebraska[36] (Daily Show, 02/28/05)
Ellis ? Charles Ellis "Chuck" Schumer, Democratic Senator, New York[37]
Ali ? Barbara Boxer, Democratic Senator, California[10]
Frazier ? Dianne Feinstein, Democratic Senator, California[10]
Sabertooth ? Barney Frank, Democratic Congressman, Massachusetts[38]
Red ? Adam Putnam, Republican Congressman, Florida[39]

Journalists

The Cobra ? Maureen Dowd[40]
Stretch/Little Stretch ? David Gregory, NBC[41][42][43]
Stretch ? Dick Keil, Bloomberg News[43]
Super Stretch ? Bill Sammon, then of The Washington Times, now of The Washington Examiner[43]
Mikey ? Mike Emanuel, Fox News [44]
Shades ? Peter Wallsten, blind reporter for the Los Angeles Times[45]
Panchito ? Frank Bruni, reporter who covered Bush campaign in 2000 for the New York Times [46]

Others

Kenny Boy ? Kenneth Lay [47]
Weadie, Weadnik ? author Doug Wead [48]
The Englishman ? Peter McMahon, husband of Dana Perino [49]
Flies on the Eyeballs Guy ? Director of the CIA Counterterrorist Center Cofer Black [50]
Rosey ? appointee Jack Rosen[51]


Highlight of Karl Rove ..... : Turrd Blossom, Boy Genius ...

Just remember " Scooter " .....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...George_W._Bush

It is funny to see how americans don't even know their urban legends... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Not from what I read right here on GFY.

Read some of the threads from guys like GrantMercury.
He is pro-authority all the way.

And as far as spending money on the military...Obama is in his 5th year. Spending just keeps going UP. And he is on a regular killing spree with drones and bombing people.

I see no difference there.

You're right though...conservatives are just as bad. I'm just pointing out that they don't claim to be "liberal" ...Democrats do, and then do the same exact shit as Republicans.

That's why I registered as a Libertarian in 2012. I was a Democrat (though I never agreed with them fiscally)

Why would I care or know about that?

I was just shocked when I saw Ed Shulz (supposedly a news anchor) saying that on the air.

I'm guessing that I'm not the only one who has no clue what Bush's nicknames for his friends are. Why would or should that be general knowledge?

And since it isn't...then why did Ed Shulz use it?
Just bad "news" "reporting" and bad television all around.

His show would have been GREAT if he would man up and bring Rove on the air to debate him face to face.
Now that would be entertaining.

A fat guy calling another fat guy a "turd blossom" and then smirking with a bunch of other old fat guys who agree with everything he says is just not compelling t.v.

Which is why the ratings are in the toilet. :(

Kind of funny (not really) how Obama went from the left to being Bush II in a lot of areas, one thing I was really hoping with him was to end to the war on drugs. I think these clowns just get drunk on power and stop giving a fuck about common people.

Agreed 100%

I'm a big fan of the band The Who...and all I can think now is the song "Won't Get Fooled Again"

"The parting on the left, is now the parting on the right"
"Meet the new boss, the same as the old boss"

Thanks for the kind words, you guys.

If I had a time machine, when she asked me if I was going to use the picture on my site I would have said, "no, because I want my site to actually make money."

:winkwink:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3141688.html

You seem to only want to hear the negative. You certainly won't get anything remotely balanced watching Fox.

I like my news reported unbiased. If an opinion must be given at least make it an unbiased one by playing some devil's advocate and also seeing it from the other side. Doing that at least gives viewers more insight and allows them to better make up their own minds.

When they do interviews such as this one being discussed in this thread, I like to see the interviewer giving a guy like Some Guy the benefit of the doubt. You could tell from the intro she gave that she had attitude and was going into it with a pre-concieved bias and disdain for him and what he does for a living. It could just as easily been me up there at one time. I've never ran a user-submitted content sight of any kind but I did do my fair share of model recruiting, photographing and promoting. Many of my models were between 18 and 20. Many did nude shoots. (oh the shock, the horror!) Most were average girls, amateurs and first-timers.

I have no use for that kind of shock news reporting/interviewing etc. To me the Ann Colters of the world, and now this idiot Malkin, need to find themselves another line of work, because they seem to see nothing but 'scum' everywhere they look, they purport themselves as being above it all while casting aspersions down on their prey. Meanwhile they completely fail to realize that it is their very brand of trash news that is some of the worst scum content going on TV right now.

They do it for one reason and one reason only. To further their own careers.

Moved? They were retard from the very beginning. As I remember they have claimed that they never been news at all, but just a"show". What could the one expect from this bunch of motherfuckers?

they didn't claim it, they made it legal in a court case

it's an 'entertainment channel'

well i don't watch any of these cable news shows. sure people want to hear whats going on in the world but the also want to hear it from a view that is similar to theirs, despite what the real situation might be. this goes for both "sides".