That pretty much sums it up. Before Fox, there was no one out there pushing for the conservatives. Now there is, if people want to really know what's going on, they have to listen to both sides. Idiots that sit here and bash fox, I guess they aren't listening to Fox? Then they are listening to just one side of it. Sheeple

I can't listen to Maddow on MSNBC. Way too one sided

No one is denying that MSNBC is liberal...but they're just smarter over there. Anyone with half a brain can tell that Maddow is more intelligent than anyone at FoX news. There's just dumb horseshit flowing from Fox every minute, and they're bad at fact checking also -- and even worse they don't correct themselves on the numerous occasions they're just plain wrong. Have you ever watched The Five? I can't believe those mentally handicapped twits are allowed to say things on TV.

Republicans give MSBC plenty of material because their politicians are either trying to block people from voting, or killing a bill that might help people or just saying something retarded. The Republican congress has spent most of its time lately trying to hang the coon in their precious White House, instead of passing immigration reform or doing any other part of their job. It's easy to complain about them.

As for Fox, it's fine to be the conservative media mouthpiece, but go about it with some intelligence instead of wild speculation and propaganda.

Turn off the fox news man quit falling for all the fear mongering.. No one is taking your guns or your motorcycles away.

Obama is in his second term already and no one has come to your door yet to insert tracking microchips and take your guns away. It's OK just step away from the TV you will be OK,...

I actually rarely watch either. There are plenty of political news shows out there slanted one way or the other, the major news networks don't need to be dipping into that well except to bolster their own ratings. In my opinion news should be just that; NEWS. No rife with opinion, not biased and stacked to lean right or left politically, just tell me what happened, what the known facts are, and let me the viewer decide for myself.

Why Fox has to be so obviously right-leaning and the other network so ridiculously left is beyond me. Report the damn news and leave the bias to shows like Limbaugh and Jon Stewart.

By the way I do very much enjoy the Daily Show, speaking of Jon Stewart. Liberal-leaning yes, but he's definitely not afraid to take a pot shot or two at the libs, Obama, Clinton, etc, which I like. Ridiculous is ridiculous no matter who's doing it.

The polarizing effect that networks like Fox and MSNBC are having on the American society is absolutely dumbfounding. If you're going to call yourself a news network then be one. They don't say 'opinionate the news' they say 'REPORT the news'. Both stations need to try reporting for a change.

Oh my god,

I would ask her if she ever had sex without having to rape somebody with this attitude.

:1orglaugh

"Turd Blossom" was GW Bush's nickname for Rove back when Karl was his political advisor, this is common knowledge not some random news anchor insult.

It was originally meant as sort of a vulgar compliment or term of affection - Rove had the ability to politically spin shit into flowers during Bush's campaigns & presidential runs.

There is a big difference between MSNBC and CNN/Fox and that is that they do not have NEWS in their title. They have always been primarily a talk and opinion channel, in fact before the Microsoft/NBC partnership the channel was called, "America's Talking". That's where I first became acquainted with my early tech guru, Leo Laporte on a show called, "The Site".

Rachel Maddow is the best talk show on the "news" channels. Nobody connects the dots, dots the Is, crosses the Ts and sources their facts more thoroughly and meticulously than her. And unlike the hosts on Fox, she will come back with a correction or clarification even on small things on the rare occasion she got something wrong. And it IS rare because she puts major reasearch and prep time into getting it right.

You can REALLY see the difference between progressive and conservative shows on radio. Where Rush takes carefully screened calls mostly from dittoheads and a rare "liberal" that they feel isn't articulate enough to get too much in during a brief bully pulpit slam, Stephanie Miller and Randi Rhodes have it as policy that if you disagree with them you get bumped to the front of the caller line. Thom Hartman regularly has fair give and take discussions with conservative guests. Randi says quite often, "Don't take my word for it, go look it up for yourself".

As far as "Turdblossom", that was George W. Bush's pet name for Karl Rove, because of his ability to take a pile of shit and spin it to make it smell like a rose. Ed was not making up a name to call him.

Really, you should seek put so e friends and have some real discussions as the above is way over the top.

[QUOTE=Scott McD;19666834]Like i said, watching that video made me angry.

Do you wish you said more to her though? I know she cut you off a few times, but for me, i'd just have ruined the interview and talked over her anywayQUOTE]

They would have just cut him off. He handled himself well, and the bird at the end was more than justified:upsidedow

Can you tell me one lie or distortion she's made?

I think in your "can't listen to" her you perhaps haven't really listened to her.

people want to hear opinions they agree with. what the real facts are don't matter. you can tell which way each poster in this threads leans by their view of certain networks. none of them contain much truth.

You're totally right; I was completely caught off guard. Bill was initially supposed to be interviewing me but at the last moment he had to run out of town on some other assignment and she was his stand-in. Bill had mentioned me a few days earlier on his show and didn't have anything bad to say, amazingly. He basically said, "look, the girls are over 18, this guy's not doing anything illegal, and the girls need to be responsible for their actions."

I would have loved to have gone off on Malkin but in the end I think biting my tongue made me appear to be the bigger person. I was honestly floored by how many kind e-mails I received after it aired. People couldn't get over how mean she was, which was ironic considering I was supposed to be the evil porn guy. Instead I started the segment with a compliment, remained rather civil, and maintained my composure. She came off like a complete lunatic and destroyed the point she was trying to make. It not only made me look good, but it helped people see that not everyone in the adult business is a total creep. I considered it a very small victory for the entire industry.

Lets let Stacy answer.
Bitch shut the fuck up, Stacy won't be answering shit.


I watched the video, what an ass hole..


"There's a Google result of you on almost every page.."
"Yea that's right, it's fraudulent, you gonna use it for your site?"
You should.

I watched it, you acted very mature. You were obviously the bigger man and everyone sees that.

The way she ended it to

"I'm not going to say thank you, but good bye."

Honestly what a prick. You acted very polite, she treated you like shit. Nice job keeping it cool up there.
I salute you.

between you and her, you probably helped a lot of people with their choices of career

much respect for doing it, and keeping cool when it hit the fan :2 cents:

You handled that as well as it could have been handled - civil, took the abuse until she made herself look like an ass, then succinctly lowered the boom in a final gesture (and summed up what 99% of watchers are thinking). I'd be proud of that moment!

Your answer should have been: "Do you want me to?"

She of course would have responded with "No"

You: "Then no, I won't be using them on my site. Because that's not how I do things. The girls depicted on my site are all consenting adults. Period."

Is there even any actual sex on your site or is it just nude posing? If so this Malkin idiot really should get out more and do some surfing to see what the community standard of tolerance is these days. Simple nudity is nothing. But she would already know that if she were less opinionated and more informed.

I don't think the body in the first pic is the same one as the bikini pic. The boobs are rounded and fuller on their own and the body more petite. However, the 2nd pic appears to be as flat chested as the bikini pic and if you blow them up they appear to have a mole/freckle in the same place, on the left side, to the left of the boob about halfway between boob and belly button.

http://comicsagogo.files.wordpress.c...lkin.jpg?w=352

Google Rachel Maddow fast and furious.

She went on and on about 90% of the guns in the Mexican cartels hands being supplied by gun shops in the US, when it was the US government that was running the Fast and Furious program. And the actual amount was around 25%

I listened to her, she's a hater thru and thru

Where?

Most people look at what I post and put up a funny picture, well because they have no reply, so here's your chance, where is it over the top?

I think people want to hear what's going on in the world. Not what hair style Hilton is sporting these days.

MSNBC stays away from things that are negative to the President, I want to hear those things, you don't?

Angry?
I just laughed out loud when I watched.
Michelle Malkin is ridiculously hilarious. I just can't take her seriously.
Even Some Guy's girlfriend couldn't really answer without shahahahahahaing a bit.

Some Guy, you handled it very well. Kudos.:thumbsup

Love how you pick what to reply to.

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2013/...store-shelves/
I went to a Big 5 sports goods on a wed morning when the ammo comes in, it was sold out an hour after delivery

And I know this is above your level, so let me make it clear, our rights are being taken away from us, we have lost the right to privacy, If you don't give a fuck, your're a moron.

Instead you come on this forum working in the adult forum wanting to take down Fox news, that's censorship

So take some time and relax, burn some books in your back yard. Hook up spell check on your laptop

You realize these are not the news but rather the TV equivalent to the editorial page of a newspaper, right?

they just moved to crazy? this is new?

You're kidding, right? FOX News is just tons of lies, and endless, endless, endless errors and mistakes that they just never apologize for or own up to. Everyone at Fox, especially Hannity, are fucked in the head. And that prick Huckaby, playing guitar with Ted Nugent? If there was any doubt what fox believes in it was answer that night.

And let's not forget who their regular contributors are:

http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/u...11-300x181.jpg

http://nextamericanpresident.us/uplo...ap4njbzorb.jpg

etc....

Got a list?

http://www.examiner.com/article/jon-...l-errors-video

Not a complete list but a good start.

How can you tell a Fox News talking head is lying?
His/her lips are moving.:upsidedow

Seriously dude, Fox went to court to claim the the right to lie... and won, and have been even more wildly exercising that right ever since.

I get my political information from well balanced liberals on gfy, grantmercury and a few others. Seems no one is more hateful than a well balanced, informed, tolerant, liberal. :)


.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:disgust

The Constitution isn't under attack; Nothing has changed.

Every four years they say the same thing: "Oh, they are going to take our guns away". After twenty years of the same shit it gets old.

Can I still own an assault rifle? Yes.
Do they still search me when I get on an airplane? Yes.
Can I still travel from state to state without having to ask permission? Yes.
Can I still say anything I want about the government? Yes.

You only think it is.

Should have gone for the fact that the only reason she feels that 20 is young because she is so old at 42 and should know as she works in a youth oriented industry herself, that not have worn the hat indoors.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...erican/276276/

check out the 'shoe bomber mastermind'

:disgust

I'm confused at what you are getting at here... Because a sixteen year old kid died?

Did the US target a sixteen year old kid? Nope. In fact, the only reason the drone strike took place was because they believed the kid was at another location. This was a military strike on an enemy combatant that had collateral damage.

I'm not gonna loose any sleep over this.

That number was put out by both the Mexican government AND the US ATF. Although it's since been backtracked and debated as to tracable guns the Mexican government actually turned over the best estimates according to unbiased fact check sources put it at least twice the numbers Fox claimed. The smaller numbers are arrived at by not considering any of the non-tracable guns as originating in the US.

1. Removing serial numbers is simple.

2. Look up where most guns are manufactured and compare their proximity to Mexico AND the ease of purchase/transport.

I've listened to Rachel Maddow long before she transisitioned from radio to MSNBC. If she HATES anything it is misinformation. I fact check all of the shows I listen to and would put the average knowledge from just one of her shows against an average month of Fox.

no. the original story was they attacked #2, and the kid was 'collateral'

it's now out that this kid was killed, specifically, in a separate attack two weeks later

the justification for this was he was the one masterminding the shoe bombings

you know, the bombings that started 2002, when the kid was 6

Maybe you're right. And maybe that's why she ignores the major news stories when it doesn't fit her agenda.
I like to switch between MSNBC, CNN, and FOX to get their reactions to stuff happening. And yeah, Maddow was right there with every story on Romney having his dog on the roof of his car during the election.

But she has yet to cross any "t's" or dot any "i's" on any of the biggest newstories happening the last few weeks (the IRS, the NSA, Benghazi, etc.) She simply ignores the stories.

Weird.

Also...keep in mind that neither Maddow or any anchor at Fox News or MSNBC are doing any actual "fact checking" themselves.
They all have teams of people working for them and then they come in and read what's written.

If any of these people were real reporters there would be no need for "fact checking" because they would be finding things out themselves instead of reading press releases from politicians and press releases from "think tanks", etc.

It's pretty sad.

I don't find any redeeming quality to Maddow's show or any of the other "opinion" shows on MSNBC or Fox News or CNN other than entertainment value.

And Maddow is simply not very entertaining...which is why she loses the ratings on her time spot to Hannity of all people.
Why?
Because Hannity is an entertainer and brings on people with opposing viewpoints to debate with. That is simply good t.v.

Maddow needs to stop bringing on people who agree 100% with her and doing all that smirking on her show. It makes her look like an elitist.
If she would bring on some ultra-conservative "guests" and debate whatever the topics are she is pushing that day it would be a LOT better.

That kinda seems to be the main problem with all Liberal oriented shows. They seem to be afraid to debate ideas with the opposing viewpoint. But it just isn't very compelling to watch a host with 3 or 4 other people all agreeing with each other and smirking.
That is boring as hell. :(

That's sadly the truth.

These guys calling themselves "liberals" are definitely NOT what was always "liberal" before.

Liberals USED to be the guys protesting Democrat Pres. Lyndon Johnson so hard over the Vietnam War that he declined to run for another term.

Liberals USED to be anti-govt. pro-freedom, etc.

In other words...what Libertarians are today.

Today's "liberals" are basically the same kind of people that real liberals used to call "squares" back in the 1960's.

Today's liberals LOVE the govt. Ask to be taxed more so more money can be spent on the military.
And they never saw a law or a cop that they didn't love. They practically beg to bow down before authority.

:(

Saw their newest contributor last night: James Carville on Bill O'Reilly

Surprise! Fox actually does have liberals on the air. That's what makes their shows get the big ratings that MSNBC doesn't get.

You throw O'Reilly and Carville together and it's fireworks.

I don't agree with what either one of them have to say. But I watched the whole segment because it was entertaining. 2 giant egos with opposing viewpoints...