GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   DOMA struck down (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1113626)

Bladewire 06-26-2013 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 19687731)
you've labeled me nonhuman and foolish on a public forum just for disagreeing with you...... in essence you have decided that my opinion has no value and choose to mock me. really Sarah? how dare I disagree with you? I obviously have no value because you are morally and intellectually superior and made the call? is that how it works? remind you of any other 'group'?

you don't get it do you Sarah? so only gay people have rights? is that the deal? what about religious people, they don't have rights?

what's different about you than them? you are just a bigoted, just as opinioned, just as morally superior and just as much of a bully.

personally don't care what anyone does sexually as long as they are over 18 and there is free will involved... but please leave my dog alone.

be pretty interesting if you would look at 'your' behaviors. you might be very surprised at what you find. :2 cents:


You want to degrade minorities on here, then lash back as a victim when people call you out on it? Be a man and deal with it! That woman has more sense then you've displayed so far :2 cents:

Bladewire 06-26-2013 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 19687572)
Marriage is just a word that describes a legal relationship.

Straight couples can work on a new improved "super marriage" and pass it into law if they want to. Or homosexuals can. Either way.

Well said! :thumbsup

baddog 06-26-2013 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 19688325)
They said prop 8 was unconstitutional, that way they didn't have to rule on the constitutionality of all states recognizing gay marriage. So that's exactly that

No, they did not even address it.

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Wednesday left for dead California's same-sex marriage ban, Proposition 8, but the question of gay and lesbian couples' constitutional right to marry remains very much alive.

By a 5-4 vote, the justices held in Hollingsworth v. Perry that the traditional marriage activists who put Proposition 8 on California ballots in 2008 did not have the constitutional authority, or standing, to defend the law in federal courts after the state refused to appeal its loss at trial.

?We have never before upheld the standing of a private party to defend the constitutionality of a state statute when state officials have chosen not to,? Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. ?We decline to do so for the first time here.?

The judgement of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit was vacated and the case remanded with instructions to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Grapesoda 06-26-2013 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 19688359)
There is plenty of anti-gay sentiment regarding civil unions coming from the right wing. The more moderate of the right wingers have embraced civil unions recently because they didn't want to look like asses. If you don't believe me Google Conservatives against civil unions and you will find plenty of evidence.

As I stated in a different thread anytime you want to force a group of people to refer to themselves by a particular title you open them up to discrimination. That is what they gay marriage advocates are trying to avoid.

By saying that they want their marriage to be called a marriage and to be able to refer to themselves as married is not an attack on conservatives.

I believe what you are saying and honestly I really don't have that much interest in the whole gay situation. I just dropped into the threads to point out similar behaviors, the belief that everyone else is wrong and only 'they' hold the superior knowledge, in both the conservative and the gay lobby.

another point I'll make is I personally haven't heard or read the demeaning slanderous descriptors that the gay lobby uses to label the conservatives, and that certainly is my experience at GFY for having the audacity to disagree or point out another option, used by conservatives. I'm not saying that conservatives aren't doing this, only that I haven't seen the same level negative personality distortion coming from the group.

in my experience only liberals use 'you're stupid, disgusting, a loser, crazy etc.' as intellectual arguments to justify their stance or opinion. and I certainly see much of this at GFY.

however I'm sure since you have just pointed it out to me that if I were to search some low IQ areas of the web I would indeed find this conservative detritus.

being a father, grandfather, friend, business owner, producer, artist, fuck buddy and having a big ass cool dog keeps my pretty busy though. :2 cents:

this is an interesting point you have brought up:

Quote:


As I stated in a different thread anytime you want to force a group of people to refer to themselves by a particular title you open them up to discrimination. That is what they gay marriage advocates are trying to avoid.

seems like 'queer nation', gay pride and other homosexual organizations are working against this. everything I read about homosexuality is "I'm special, look at me" personally I don't believe pride is a personal label. I am proud of my daughter accomplishments, I am grateful for mine.

to me gay pride is a complete self aggrandizing statement with no validity. my feeling is if you are so grateful for being gay why must you always try and prove it to me? I have no dog in the fight... if it's that great go enjoy it in the privacy of your home

Grapesoda 06-26-2013 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirtit (Post 19688600)

You want to degrade minorities on here, then lash back as a victim when people call you out on it? Be a man and deal with it! That woman has more sense then you've displayed so far :2 cents:

here read this out loud until you get it:

I'm sofa king we todd did

that should keep you busy for a while here on the oprah winfey forum :thumbsup

baddog 06-26-2013 09:07 PM

For those unclear on what the CA ruling means, there has been no appeal on the Constitutionality of Prop 8 due to lack of jurisdiction.

PornDiscounts-V 06-26-2013 10:03 PM

DOMA was not struck down. It was shown to not apply only to the couples who filed the suit. Everyone else still cannot get married.

kane 06-26-2013 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 19688693)

this is an interesting point you have brought up:



seems like 'queer nation', gay pride and other homosexual organizations are working against this. everything I read about homosexuality is "I'm special, look at me" personally I don't believe pride is a personal label. I am proud of my daughter accomplishments, I am grateful for mine.

to me gay pride is a complete self aggrandizing statement with no validity. my feeling is if you are so grateful for being gay why must you always try and prove it to me? I have no dog in the fight... if it's that great go enjoy it in the privacy of your home

I agree completely. I never understood ethnic pride. It seems like many different ethnic groups have pride parades, pride days etc. There are only a few things in this life you can't control. Which vagina you come out of is one of them. Like you say, if you are happy you are gay, or white, or black or Italian or Asian or whatever great. I'm not sure why there is a need to hold a parade and tell me about it.

It is a big hangup for some people. My neighbor hates the idea of any interracial couples. She doesn't even like that I am dating an Asian girl. Her argument is that children of mix race couples will have no "cultural base." When she told me this I almost started laughing. I said, "My girlfriend is half Japanese, most of my ethnic background is Swedish. The kid will be a viking samurai. That sounds like a pretty good cultural base to me."

The Porn Nerd 06-26-2013 11:37 PM

I got all excited at first - I thought the thread said "DMCA Struck Down"! LOL

Only people who fucking care about this issue are assholes with no life, worrying about other people's sex lives.

Google Expert 06-27-2013 10:08 AM

So now that DOMA is unconstitutional, how long will it be before age of consent laws are struck down too?

Why is one form of degeneracy acceptable but another isn't?

Grapesoda 06-27-2013 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 19688843)
I got all excited at first - I thought the thread said "DMCA Struck Down"! LOL

Only people who fucking care about this issue are assholes with no life, worrying about other people's sex lives.

ahhh haa ... don't you make a living worry about other peoples sex lives???? :helpme

Grapesoda 06-27-2013 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Getsu (Post 19689391)
So now that DOMA is unconstitutional, how long will it be before age of consent laws are struck down too?

Why is one form of degeneracy acceptable but another isn't?

drug and sex laws are politically motived $.02

The Porn Nerd 06-27-2013 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 19689967)
ahhh haa ... don't you make a living worry about other peoples sex lives???? :helpme

Hmmm....good point I must say.....:D


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123