...that weren't getting traffic anyway, so not resource heavy. And the drop in porn on blogger will be like taking a cup of water out of a bathtub.

Google hates affiliates, end of. They don't see affiliates as being of service to sponsors - they are too utopian and believe affiliates are evil. Offline equivalent is wiping out the entire salesman industry for being 'leeches'. Too many cunts at G now, when they were a SE they were fantastic. Now they are 'insert whatever the fuck they are, because I don't think anyone even knows', they are shit.

How's this for serps, after all the 'great work' they've done over the years, for someone trying to sell a phone in the Ripley area:

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=s...=&as_rig hts=

be more specific with 'sell my phone ripley':
https://www.google.com/search?num=10...rp.rskEH148vQQ

Total and utter shit.

Sooner all their serps are full of shitty off topic results like this, and everyone switches, the better.

I could see a strict firewall being created though. Porn results on one domain or sub-domain and all other results on another. Actually I would welcome it. But it's possible they will try to take advantage of pornographers much like yahoo did with the $600 submission fees for adult sites. Further they might strengthen accountability requirements or things of this nature such as forcing you to register your domain for it to appear and then associating it with a verified GWT account. It's largely acceptable to pick on pornographers, unfortunately. This three day notice is just another example. :(

I wanted to write an essay on this, but I'll try and sum it up in a sentence. Tubes, and free porn in general, offers greater espionage potential.

Suppose a surfer clicks through from a Blogger blog to a paysite, and joins the paysite. At no point in that process has he publically "shared" any personal info about himself. On the other hand, he could create a free profile on Pornhub or Xhamster (or even Blogger) that is a public declaration of his own sexual desires and experiences. If he were a suspicious individual, then the feds could easily cross-check his porn profiles against his mainstream ones, and develop an accurate picture of that individual's public vs private life.

I think that could be the key thing here. Google, Facebook and others are pushing a certain "vision" for the web, that is perhaps linked to the Snowden case and the surveillance society he speaks of.

From Blogger's own terms of service:

I pretty much read that as "tell us shit".

This, I already switched. Fuck them. :321GFY

Even the traffic generated from the jokers registering all the splogs and initially seeding them would be significant. I recall people here and elsewhere speaking of creating thousands of blogs per day from different IPs. Multiply that by a 1,000 every daily for a year and it's pretty crazy. I have a couple sites which feel the effects of that crap too. On one smaller site I get over 8,000 spammers trying to register on it every month. It's a pain in the ass and a huge waste of resources. I can imagine how Google feels. Then they have to index it and deal with it on the search side as well. So they were funding and providing for their own hassles basically.

I totally agree about them hating affiliates. That's been known for years.

To watch a full scene vid on Pornhub can run around 30 minutes.

I can't imagine anyone sitting on a blog reading stuff that long ever. Then as more and more traffic comes to a site like Pornhub (in the millions) it becomes a big self SEO generating monster.

Meanwhile, you're little blog with 100 people looking at it for a few seconds simply won't even register on the needle comparatively no matter how much SEO you do.

I profited off of this very same thing back when TGP's were big. I remember looking at my server stats on Ampland back in 2006 and we were getting around 100,000 uniques a day just from Google. Of course we already had over a million uniques a day of people who had us bookmarked.

Our traffic just grew and grew and grew and our Search Engine placements were at the top. I never did shit for SEO for it...it was just natural (the site was categorized, I wrote original humor text for it everyday, etc.).
Plenty of other sites did all kinds of SEO stuff...but we stayed at the top. Couldn't be beat. Just like the tubes do now.

No porn site holds people for time-on-site like a tube. It's not even close. And the tubes that hit big in the beginning are the ones who stay on top because as I said it becomes a self-perpetuating machine with amount of traffic and time-on-site.

you missed my point, if google drop porn sites down the rankings then many of them will go out of business (which we have all seen and is happening daily since panda), this means that google has less porn sites to scan - less sites they do not make money off taking up bot resourses

if you have an exit link on your site, change that from google to bing.com
Educate your surfers about using Bing instead of google
there is only one way to counter google porn bullshit, get surfers to use Bing vs google

Agree. It seems a weakness in the algorithms. They seem to favor a surfer watching a video with a crappy 30 second pre-roll commercial and then 3 minutes of a crappy video before leaving over a surfer clicking five pages deep on a blog in two minutes to view the photos. Their metrics are fundamentally imperfect (it's not possible to perfect them with current technology) and they appear to overvalue TOS. I know for a fact many people are sick and tired of the porn video content. I know I get sick of searching for a certain fetish and always getting a bunch of pirate tubes, youtube, and daily motion videos on the first couple pages.

Now you said it all. We are looking for information on a new pornstar or web starlet and we just find tubes with videos that sometimes not even have their pornstar on them, then you have to go 2 or 3 pages sometimes to get any info on the personality you are interested in like a biography for example or places where this one worked for, scenes and dvds this one did or an official website. It's outrageous.

rofl

today while freeloaders complain about losing free shit i launched 6 more sites

enjoy the welfare line

:1orglaugh

Are you permanently high/drunk? What paysites are you doing 1:200 with these days btw?

rofl 1:200

id be really high then

ok I'll wait until the next time you do, you won't be able to resist posting in every thread which site it is :thumbsup

a reason to come to amsterdam? :thumbsup:pimp

i got spots to fill :winkwink:

Nothing against the op but I think for some reason that is the regular life cycle for somebody in the industry...at least to me.
I think thats why so many "porn" companies end up going in other directions..ie tubes, cams, software, feeds, dmca services, videogames, consulting....what do you think?

I'm using duck duck go because it isn't tracked: https://duckduckgo.com/ :pimp

I LOVE THAT!

genius

they cant really monetize it with their adsesne etc...

How the fuck does that guy know what everybody thinks. The nerds at google are ugly :1orglaugh

Google has gotten too big for its' cyber-britches bitches.
I LOVE the idea of directing Exit traffic from paysite tours to Bing instead of Google.

For the first time in my GFY history:

LINKS PULLED!!
:)

Good idea. For whatever good it'll do, I just did so :thumbsup

i've been following google for few years now
whenever a search term stopped showing adult results, search volumes tank over time.
THey never go away but they go down quiet a bit.

Now that traffic goes somewhere. Users either try new search terms or they go to bing.
Bing's traffic has been growing ever since they became adult friendly.
I believe on the backs of adult searches bing is picking up tiny bits of market share from google

Don't think for a moment Bing is "adult friendly".

They just haven't gotten around to cleansing the product yet. I believe with the introduction of the XBox One that you will find Bing start leaning toward being a family friendly product.

The fact is that none of the big corporates like adult, they would prefer it wasn't there.

That's a good question that remains un-answered.

Obviously Time on Site is not the answer, but something else we still don't know about.

QFT - :thumbsup - They monitor enough peoples communications and traffic flows. They must have some data to back that up.

Time on Site is not the only answer about the Adult Tubes question.

I have seen some search results for adult terms, where 15 out of the first 30 results in google are PURE Tumblr Blogs... And no.. the other 15 are not all tubes.

SO, how do you explain that? And don't tell me because it's tumblr... We are talking about blogs overtaking tubes for some SERPS...

It's Tumblr. ;) Seriously though TOS obviously isn't the only factor used. I would also hope that TOS and bounce rate is tracked individually per terms or phrase. So a photo blog might have different TOS values for "teen porn" versus "teen porn pics" where with the latter we would expect slightly better numbers. Then you would expect for some terms blogs would rank better than tubes.

Nobody knows for sure what Google does other than Google. But to a degree we can figure some things out by trying to reverse it by looking at the rankings and attempting to put ourselves in Google's shoes while considering how we would solve certain problems they must face.

everytime google makes a change, youtube's traffic goes up.
just look at this shit, this is where a ton of porn traffic from google is now going
https://app.compete.com/website/youtube.com/

Google is now sending a lot of porn traffic to YouTube, in the end the users doesn't get what they want, just shitty videos.

Shared hosting on any major host with unlimited WP installs will run you about $5 a month. If you can't afford that, go back to Macdonalds, bitches.

Why people build up cash driving sources on free platforms is something I'll never really understand.

http://www.wpbeginner.com/wp-tutoria...ogle-rankings/

thats just it its the worthless free host freeloading parasites that fuck over everyone filling 1000000s of spam blogs with plugrush and other shit ads

its time productive value adding people castrate these worthless freeloading free riding parasites for good!

The problem with online porn is that there is so much SPAM and so many shitty sites churned out by bots and scripts. Think about some dude in eastern bumfuck. He doesn't give a FUCK about SHIT cause he's living in dirt with shit and pigs and chickens - and a WiFi connection. LOL So he overloads whatever he can with thousands and thousands of shit sites that earn him a whopping $40 a month BUT he can live like a KING for $40 a month because his neighbors make $2 a year.

Deal with THAT somehow Google!

After reading threads this week I'm convinced that "Google" reads GFY and that's why they hate porn. :winkwink:

not far from the truth. eastern bumfuck rocks

Thy don't care about that, they couldn't give a shit. All they care about is that someone is making money as an affiliate, and they hate that. Primary producer is king. It's such an easy workaround anyway. If you can't use affiliate links, you can use....?

You are so stupid it must hurt :1orglaugh

Well, to be more accurate, Google seems to hate certain KINDS of affiliates. Affiliates like PornHub, XHamster etc they seem to LOVE!

Of course, those videos would be there even if they weren't affiliates so I get your point. It's not right. Fuck, even when you search for a site's NAME it can come up on the 3rd page or worse with tubes and such on top of it. WTF???

yup. End product, and google loves to serve the end product, because it's what the surfer wants. If you could physically give away BMWs, and did, you'd be sitting pretty in the serps for all the car manufacturer words/phrases going.

This.

:2 cents: