it's all in the legalese.

seriously :disgust

I think this is a huge part of the problem. That's like having auto insurance that will gladly come out if you lock yourself out of your car, but if you have a collision you are on your own.

Someone else in another thread said one of the rules of the bill requires "fifty year old women to be covered in the event of a pregnancy". I am stunned that anyone would believe that is a bad thing; My wife is 49, we fuck a few times a week; I wish she would get pregnant. My wife not being covered in the event she gets pregnant is utterly stupid. I also wonder what other items this "rule" includes, as in "women problems". I'm discovering that a lot of women get a hysterectomy, and I am wondering if that is covered under this "rule".

Not covering for Cancer, the leading cause of death, is suicide plain and simple.

Hospitalization is another thing. You can drop at any time and be rushed to the hospital and the bill will put you in debt leading into bankruptcy.

Sorry, I don't give a crap what the President said. Some of these plans aren't really plans at all.

proof or ban!

its pretty risky to have children for women that age, way bigger chances of bad things happening to children and so on. In fact I heard that even after 30+ years old risk of having "damaged" child highly increases.

900 million? Ouch, you're not helping your cause with that number...unless the US's population almost tripled over night.

Yes, this is very true. (And all the more reason why a women who gets knocked up at any age over 40 MUST HAVE this covered.)

My wife and I married late and she is five years older than me, which is why we only had one kid. That might just be my biggest regret - not having more kids.

Or maybe thats why they must not have it covered - so they won't be encouraged to bare child at this age.

lolz, it's the monday after daylight saving time, i don't even know what state i'm in right now.

besides, your point has been proven moot.

regardless of how many there are, op came here to point out his view that every single one of them is retarded because of a sound quip by a senator.

i'm sure you get that.

I get to keep my plan, u mad

you are gonna be even madder when I voluntarily give it up to join obamacare (well once the website works lololol) just to spite you, not to save money or get better healthcare

The issue is that is not what we were promised, we were promised we had a choice.
That choice was taken away based on a lie by the President.

He also promised people they could keep their family doctors. But as we all know, when you change plans, you almost always have to change doctors

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57609224/

Remember this is CBS, big Obama supporter
"I was completely happy with the insurance I had before," Willes said.

So she was surprised when she tried to renew her policy. What did she find out?

"That my insurance was going to be completely different, and they were going to be replaced with 10 new plans that were going to fall under the regulations of the Affordable Care Act," she said.

Her insurer, Kaiser Permanente, is terminating policies for 160,000 people in California and presenting them with new plans that comply with the healthcare law.

"Before I had a plan that I had a $1,500 deductible," she said. "I paid $199 dollars a month. The most similar plan that I would have available to me would be $278 a month. My deductible would be $6,500 dollars, and all of my care after that point would only be covered 70 percent."