I just didn't read it. I gave you the exact link to the Russian civilian code (not a stupid article but a document). Did you read it? Why don't you answer to my question then?

obviously you dont speak Russian. They beat up a pedophile that was trying to pick up and fuck children.

But then again... why should actual facts matter when its the agenda thats important.

That's the whole point of the thread!!!

He was not a pedophile, he was 'just' gay.....

Read the OP again and think about it...

I am fluent in Russian... I know whats being said in the video. I can read the conversation at the start. He thought he was going to meet a 15 yr old boy for sex.

So who's case are you actually helping? You are defending an adult who wanted to go meet a child for sex.

and by the way... there is a video. You can watch the whole thing. 3-4 guys grabbing this other guy, holding him down and making him explain something on video (in front of witnesses and bystanders). What exactly do you presume is being said or is actually happening?? They were just walking along and all mutually agreed..."This is a random guy who appears to be gay, lets choke him and making him talk into the camera about absolutely nothing"...

Don't bother trying to use reason and logic with most of the people on this board. :1orglaugh

I just come here to have fun and release tension as I have found that is all this place is good for really.

NOW - YOU ALL ENJOY THOSE GAMES! :thumbsup

http://25.media.tumblr.com/1de609eaf...mw0oo1_500.png

Putin doesn't like gays, which means he doesn't like lesbians. And anyone who does't like lesbians is.... Gay.

The intro to the video in Russian says "Occupy Pedophilia".. what do you think the video was about? What were they talking about on the video? What do you think they were making him explain on the video? Why do you think bystanders walked up and tried to intervene and then backed down as they explained what was going on?

What is the "reason" or "logic" here? Its a blatant lie about what was actually happening to support a completely unrelated cause.

They are merely forbidding to spread gay propaganda to underage kids. How is that bad?
They are not forbidding to be gay.

LOL - Can we leave at that - I am going to have a temper tantrum otherwise and nobody wants to see that...

Thank you Rochard.....

50 homosex

Why leave it at that?

You posted a video you absolutely did not understand, thinking it was making your point which was in fact a video of people going to meet a guy who was trying to meet a 15yr old boy for sex. That was the video you used to demonstrate "intolerance" towards homosexuality in Russia.. when in fact it was a video to demonstrate intolerance towards the sexual abuse of minors.

You should apologize.

I posted an article that states -

I am not questioning what you say, I don't speak Russian - I am curious where the victim says he is there to meet a 15 year old boy...

Human beings are sexual period. Homosexuality has been around since man evolved from ape. For the vast majority of males their first choice is a vagina to stick their dicks in, that's in our genetic code, to reproduce. Take away the vagina option for men and many will 'choose' to be homosexual.

It's my theory that all it would take in modern society for homosexuality to become very common amongst men is for it to become trendy, if you had a bunch of cultural icons like superstar rock stars, actors and pro athletes coming out and saying that they go both ways and the media putting a hip spin on it you'd soon see male homosexuality become trendy the same way lesbianism is today. This is already going on today, there are lots of young chicks who are ok with their boyfriends doing other guys and think it's 'cool'. No idea how big a group this is but all it would take to make it large is the right cultural ingredients falling in place.

As for the gays who only have sexual interest in men, who are effeminate - that's a genetic and psychological disorder that for now is poorly understood by science.

I think Eddy's point of reference is Section 28, a similar law we had in the UK which was repealed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_28

It is very similar to Section 28 - I went on a couple of protests against that in London...

Marching down Oxford Street shouting 'We're here, we're queer and we're not going shopping'.....

We hadn't quite got the chanting perfected back in the '80s:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh...

By the end of the protest 10 of us where left - The rest where in John Lewis looking at the sale items - To this day its the reason gay parades are never held in shopping areas...

And that just proves that gay propaganda media twist things to suit their agenda.

lol that's awesome :thumbsup

So he did say he was there to meet a 15 year old?..

By the way how is that video even relevant?
There are those who hates gays everywhere, including United Kingdom.

I think I have covered that - The UK is far from perfect...

So he did say he was there to meet a 15 year old in that video?....

If he did I will comment to the writer of that article - He is doing us no favors at all if that is true...

Lets waut for the squeler to answer that.
But my point - how is that relevant anyway?
It merely proves that there are people who don't like gays and are aggressive towards them in Russia.
How is that relevant to Putin's policy about forbidding to spread gay propaganda to underage people?

So why do the police laugh when a gay person goes to them saying they've been beaten up?

So the people in the Vice report saying they were beaten up and the gay clubs they frequent were raided by gay bashing cunts were lying?

Right.

its about keeping it to themselves. Here in North America, gay/lesbian/bi/trans/etc love to SHOVE it in everyone's faces and crave attention to their orientation in public events. You don't see straight people donning thongs, tassels, chains, leathers etc out in the streets with flags do you? That's all this is about, not promoting it... and I think Russia (as old as their laws may be) are valid. We had these laws here too, and it served well, we never had to have this blasted in our faces all over but many whiners changed that and make it a "good thing" to hold gay parades... it's disgusting. Straight or not.. nobody needs to see a man in a thong walking down main street waving a flag screamig "im gay/straight/tri/trans!!!"

if a straight couple were making out and barely dressed in public, they'd get the same flak as a gay couple.. least it happens less with straight couples and when caught, they feel bad or stop doing it.. gays don't.. they fight the current and want attention while claiming "its because im gay!".. No.. its not.. its because you are gross and have no sense of common decency..

Because half the time, they deserve it for flaunting, prancing, acting super-feminine and annoying, doing stuff for attention or undressing people with their eyes when it clearly makes others uncomfortable. I had a lot of gay friends.. I have nothing to say bad about them but the ones who whined about being beat up.. usually did something to deserve it and after pointing it out, admitted as such.

Ah, so it's only "propaganda" that is illegal? So kids are taught in school that some people are gay and some are straight and that's the way it is and that is cool?

No, they aren't are they?

It is illegal to suggest to a child that homosexuality is normal and acceptable.

And then there are gangs of cunts roaming the streets kicking the shit out of people they think are gay and the police laugh at them when this is reported and there are cunts in this thread defending that?

Fuck me. You are cunts. Fucking cunts. And I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. You should be ashamed.

This is why I like older gay people more often than younger. They are more reserved, respectable and have privacy, themselves.

I don't know. Maybe because said policemen are gay haters?

That would be said propaganda. I assume.

Bottom line:

"We don't have a ban on non-traditional sexual relations" - said Putin.

I love it that you are saying what I want to say, but I am far too polite...

Is 6 fingers on one hand normal?

Still no answer why/how that video is relevant to the OP?
It merely proves that there are some intolerant/aggressive gay haters in Russia.
0 relevance to OP.

lol @ gaymian resorting to swearing, thought he was above all that? ad hominem blah blah etc etc

This bloke has been one of the biggest cunts to you on boards - man up and have fuck all to do with him. Show some self respect. Sorry to come over a bit harsh, but he's a fucking bully, has bullied you, and here you are cosying up to him. Sorry for the hijack, carry on...

The thread moved on, things were said...

That's why we call it a forum.....

I know - You are right - DamianJ is an ass - Is it cosying up if he says something that is right though?..

He is an ass that is right this time.....

Someone with an agenda, posted a video thinking it would further their agenda for the benefit of others with the same agenda who, predictably do the exact same.. No one even stops to ask "wait, what's going on in that video" and frankly, why bother. After all, a guy wrote a blog post about it and on spite of not adressing the content of the video at all, he did suggest it was about something it isn't and that's good enough!!

The amusing thing is the video is "proof" of something yet the content of the video and what was actually happening, what was said etc etc etc isn't even discussed in the article.

Basically the video has the 3d intro animation with the words "occupy pedophilia" starts by showing a comversation between the guy and what the guy believes is a 15 yr old boy. They agreed to meet for sex and the guy is ambushed by the 4 with the video camera.

The rest we know because it's the same conversations that play out on every "to catch a predator" episode. He's eventually saying he's just there to help the boy, to let him know it's not safe to meet people like this and all the usual bullshit that sexual predators say once caught.

But hey, the guy who introduced this lie said he "moved on" from his lie. So I guess that's it. After all why shouldn't adults go fuck children. Apparently that's all fine if it helps make a point, in the minds of some, I guess. Nothing for some to be concerned about if it overlaps their agenda.

It is wrong to suggest to a child that his classmate with 6 fingers is somehow 'bad' - The fact you think different sums it up...

Strange that you are more concerned about his views on a child with six fingers than whether or not you used a "To Catch a Predator" style video to support your cause. Frankly I'd be a bit upset right now until I knew for sure what was in the video I have been ranting about for the past 2 days…