Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20064658)

way to not get the fact we have a divisive, name-calling president.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

that chip on your shoulder. well........

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20064662)

50 mother fuckers replying in the wrong thread.


Try figuring out the correct thread to post a reply to you fucking idiot.

:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20064666)

negros are usually pretty decent with following along, I'm surprised you can't follow a simple thread like this.

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20064672)

What's America come to when old fat billionaires can't say what they want, when they want? Exercising his first amendment right to be a dick shouldn't cause this much debate.

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20064672)

What's America come to when old fat billionaires can't say what they want, when they want? Exercising his first amendment right to be a dick shouldn't cause this much debate.

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20064251)

Yeah right, most times women are the only ones who show any evidence of humanity.

:helpme

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20064678)

I hear you; but it's not like somebody shot him, the other people are only exercising their free speech rights to counter his opinion.
You act like only one opinion needs to shut up.

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20064674)

Why do you keep referring to my race, I haven't blamed any of your stupidity on being white.


:helpme

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20064688)

because being negro is important to you. Consequently, you see people as white or not, so in deference to you, I am speaking in the lowest common denominator so you can follow along.

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20064692)

Nope, you are just one of those idiots that can't focus on anything else.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20064702)

I never even noticed your nickname around here until you came at me a couple weeks ago so this is not correct. it was then I decided to jump into these race threads.

+ the fact you clearly post with a negro chip on your shoulder, not just in reaction to me, but everyone.

so, no, this isn't about me.

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20064744)

Yep, you're still yapping about race just as I figured.

:2 cents:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20064746)

the thread is about race. again, follow.

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20064686)

Oh no, I'm all in favor of everyone calling him whatever they want in return it's the "he should be penalized" part I disagree with.

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20064686)

Oh no, I'm all in favor of everyone calling him whatever they want in return it's the "he should be penalized" part I disagree with.

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20064749)

You = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection


:2 cents:

Originally Posted by sinclair (Post 20064802)

Sell the Clippers buy a hockey team.
Problem solved.

Originally Posted by sinclair (Post 20064802)

Sell the Clippers buy a hockey team.
Problem solved.

Originally Posted by sinclair (Post 20064802)

Sell the Clippers buy a hockey team.
Problem solved.

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20064827)

It's not that he does not want black spectators, he just does not like his GF appearing with black people.

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 20064833)

one of her parents is black :error :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by sinclair (Post 20064802)

Sell the Clippers buy a hockey team.
Problem solved.

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 20064808)

not nearly as much money

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20064892)

Not nearly as many black's either, lol.


.

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 20064910)

not a sport of physical ability. girls could play on the ice :2 cents:

Originally Posted by kronic (Post 20064931)

Charles Barkley says, "we're a black league."

If Wayne Gretzky said, "we're a white league", all hell would break loose.

Originally Posted by kronic (Post 20064818)

Ok so after all the hubbub I decided to actually LISTEN to the WHOLE recording...

First off, it sounds like she's totally setting the guy up. Some of her questions are just ridiculous and he even sounds incredulous, like why the fuck are you asking me THAT? Then she'll apologize and get him to calm down but start asking similar race related questions AGAIN. That she's recording it only makes her look worse.

And about Magic Johnson...is it possible, just POSSIBLE, that the reason he doesn't want her to PUBLICLY show she's hanging out with him is because he's a LAKER, and he OWNS the CLIPPERS?? Otherwise, people are "calling" him...to maybe ask how he feels about his lady friend hanging out the "enemy"?

Originally Posted by DBS.US (Post 20064149)

California Wiretapping Law

California's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation. See Cal. Penal Code § 632. The statute applies to "confidential communications" -- i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation. See Flanagan v. Flanagan, 41 P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-82 (Cal. 2002). A California appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video cameras to record conversations as well. See California v. Gibbons, 215 Cal. App. 3d 1204 (Cal Ct. App. 1989).

If you are recording someone without their knowledge in a public or semi-public place like a street or restaurant, the person whom you're recording may or may not have "an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation," and the reasonableness of the expectation would depend on the particular factual circumstances. Therefore, you cannot necessarily assume that you are in the clear simply because you are in a public place.

If you are operating in California, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording any conversation that common sense tells you might be "private" or "confidential." In addition to subjecting you to criminal prosecution, violating the California wiretapping law can expose you to a civil lawsuit for damages by an injured party. See Cal. Penal Code § 637.2.

Consult The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press's Can We Tape?: California for more information on California wiretapping law.

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 20064230)

jail house lawyer?? as far as i know they were in person talking. not illegal. wire tapping! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20064954)

NAACP distances itself from Sterling:::::::::


The interim president of the NAACP said Sunday morning that Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling will no longer receive a second lifetime achievement award that its Los Angeles chapter was going to give him next month.


Lorraine Miller made the announcement as a guest on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday morning.

Originally Posted by kronic (Post 20064818)

And about Magic Johnson...is it possible, just POSSIBLE, that the reason he doesn't want her to PUBLICLY show she's hanging out with him is because he's a LAKER, and he OWNS the CLIPPERS?? Otherwise, people are "calling" him...to maybe ask how he feels about his lady friend hanging out the "enemy"?

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 20064910)

not a sport of physical ability. girls could play on the ice :2 cents:

Originally Posted by kronic (Post 20064931)

Charles Barkley says, "we're a black league."

If Wayne Gretzky said, "we're a white league", all hell would break loose.

Originally Posted by fetishwealth (Post 20064974)

didn't listen to it but from exerpt sounds like he's saying don't make me look like a fool by fucking around PUBLICLY when we are seen as a COUPLE PUBLICLY.

but do what you want in private.

who knows...

Originally Posted by RandazzoXXX (Post 20064209)

This guy isn't even really "racist". His girlfriend is black, he hires black coaches, etc... even though he doesn't have to. There are several more examples I could give that go against the actions of someone who would be considered racist.

This guy isn't really your typical racist, he's just CRAZY. An asshole. And weird. He is a crazy person who acts, says, and does crazy and weird shit. Even his comments to his girlfriend were weird.

Sounds like he's just an old insecure guy with a small dick who doesn't want his young beautiful girlfriend taking pictures of herself with other guys.

Originally Posted by Just Alex (Post 20065160)

If this was black dude telling his white hoe not to bring her white friends over no-one would give a shit. But oh my God, we touched the nerve and now every nig in the world claims his feeling waz being hurt by dis old jew :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by American Psycho (Post 20065327)

I call myself a cracker and sometimes. Am in a self racist?

Originally Posted by kronic (Post 20064931)

Charles Barkley says, "we're a black league."

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 20064960)

This.



You really can't read, can you? Or were there too many words for you to concentrate. Let me point out the relevant part:

No one said she was wiretapping.