![]() |
50 people pissed off because the president wants to give them a raise??? :helpme
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now, the USA is in ruins and the only feeling is of internal war :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Code:
YEAR 1 PERSON FEDERAL POVERTY MINIMUM WAGE *2000 HOURS WORKED % OF POVERTY LEVEL Historically, there is no need for a minimum wage rate increase, this year and maybe a small amount in the near future. |
Quote:
JP Morgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) Intel (INTC, Fortune 500) Qualcomm (QCOM, Fortune 500) McDonald's (MCD, Fortune 500) Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) Amgen (AMGN, Fortune 500) CVS Caremark (CVS, Fortune 500) Gilead (GILD, Fortune 500) |
Quote:
Stock market is hitting record highs, though. Doubt anyone's making any money from that except fast food workers. :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
But of course, Republicans now hate it because Obama is for it. (Why? Because he's black.). They coined the term "Food Stamp President" and managed to cut $4.5 Billion over the next few years. You can read more about this at http://www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...stamps/260015/ Quote:
|
Quote:
Stock market is hitting record highs because of the government propping it up by giving the banks 85 billion dollars a month. http://www.npr.org/2013/12/17/251796...llion-question |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dot Com Bomb Housing Crises Tech investors are predicting a tech bubble again and the housing crisis hasn't seemed to taught anybody anything. Could get pretty nasty if both popped again at the same time. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
This thread is painful to read. Dang obummer
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Of course it would be bad it the minimum wage were increased. First of all, a Democrat would get credit for it. Second of all, Obama would get credit for it. Finally, because TV told me so.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You have no clear idea what more money in the system does to the value of our currency do you? The op was about the US having the strongest middle class in the world, until the last 5 years. Obama's Administration fixed that |
Quote:
Wouldn't you think it would be better if people were working and not needing those food stamps? |
Quote:
You bitch and moan about people calling names. Then you call names. Then you change the topic when you get called out on it. I called you two names. Troll, stupid. Now I'm going to change the subject. I could really go for pizza! |
Quote:
Fucking stupid troll! LOL I answered twice. For fuck sake, get that pizza, you must be low on carbs or something |
Quote:
These lower jncome jobs are appearing due to deregulation brought on by conservatives. Min wages have declined since the 70s, the purchasing power of the min wage was $10.50 then, so the least that can be done here is raise the min wage to $10 People being paid min wage spend all their money, it's a great investment. |
Quote:
You don't read much do you? Bush did the auto bail out, Obama added to it. Saying it's bad but would have been worse if Obama didn't do what he did? Ok, Prove it! You can't! The OP wasn't about minimum wages, it is about people forced into minimum wage jobs when they had middle class jobs, all under the watch of the Obama Administration. 1.85 million people got moved into a lower class in the last 5 years. Obama owns the economy, he spent a lot of money in the stimulus to fix it and that didn't work. If you think the economy is better, why is the median wage 8% lower, what has your glorious leader done to fix that? The recession started 17 months after the democrats got control of the house and the senate, leaving Bush as a lame duck president, how is he responsible for the recession? You'll say it was the deregulation of the banks that caused it and Obama fixed the problems with the banks? Then why does the fed print up 85 billion a month and give it to the banks, they are having record earnings because of it. If you need 85 billion a month to keep the stock market to do well and the banks to do well, then you have a problem, try to see that! |
Quote:
No matter who was in office there would've been growth in lower income jobs compared to middle class jobs. McCain would've crashed us into the ocean years ago, Romney would've just outsourced us all, any tea party/libertarian whacko would've pretty much immediately destroyed the economy. |
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/images/Pdvd_056_40p.jpg Quote:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...nomic-benefits http://www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...stamps/260015/ http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/29/news...ulus_analysis/ http://prospect.org/article/five-rea...work-just-fine Quote:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_t0460ltTUO...0/saintRon.jpg There ya go big fella. Have a nap. |
Reagan would be too liberal for conservatives these days
|
Quote:
1.85 million jobs shifted from middle class to lower class, that's not growth |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, we could have had a Republican in office for the past eight years and had the same exact results. However, the way the Republicans are handling all of this is very childish. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterfer...s-and-figures/ Quote:
So fixing it is moving 1.85 million from the middle class to the lower class? Quote:
Quote:
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/images/Pdvd_056_40p.jpg Quote:
Quote:
here's a pic for you http://cdn.motinetwork.net/motifake....1235016914.jpg |
|
Quote:
|
Also your witty Internet pictures are simplistic and off topic, but I know you love your random Obama jabs
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Tell me where I'm wrong, That's in the OP, but you are saying I don't understand, understand what? For fuck sakes, it's the truth |
Quote:
Recession is defined. You can look it up. |
Quote:
I stated how others like to point out about the jobs he created! Fuck, can anyone read anymore? |
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
People on here that continually say Obama is creating jobs and saving the US. The new jobs are low wage jobs, 1.85 million middle wage workers moved to lower class jobs. |
Quote:
|
:upsidedow
And here I thought it was because it's an election year and the dems appear to be on the losing side so the administation created this "cause" to gin-up the liberal base to get them to go out and vote while at the same time buying the poor vote using private sector money. silly me :2 cents: |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc