GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Now I know why Obama is pushing a $10 min wage (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1139391)

blackmonsters 04-28-2014 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arock10 (Post 20066630)
Let's just bring back slavery

Get real, Cliven Bundy's ranch ain't that big.

:1orglaugh

2MuchMark 04-28-2014 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20066536)
Have you ever heard him give a speech and hear how under his administration last month 25,000 jobs were created?

I don't think you've ever listen to one of his speeches.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20066536)
I'm calling him on it! They are all low wage earning jobs to replace all the good paying jobs that have been lost.

"Dey terk er Jerbbs!"

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20066536)
I call bullshit.

We get it! Republicans hate black people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20066536)
Socialism and big government have nothing to do with it

Back to Kenya!

crockett 04-28-2014 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20066626)
Be careful, the people in this thread that are supporting Obama are happy with their jobs at burger king. Because this doesn't effect them, I should have known!

At least they are working and earning their $7 dollars a hour, unlike you whom collects unemployment while bitching about free loaders.

Tofu 04-28-2014 04:45 PM

I miss Clinton...



:(

signupdamnit 04-28-2014 04:51 PM

I didn't know the president owned the fast food joints and all the other companies?

People are silly. The president isn't responsible for jobs. Employers decide that and indirectly so do consumers ultimately. The president has some sway in directing policy but it's maybe 10% in comparison to congress and the results are usually delayed years.

I mean you may as well blame the pope....

blackmonsters 04-28-2014 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JA$ON (Post 20066336)
Why make it $10? Thats by any standard low....why not $20? Wait, why not $30? Because...

There shouldn't be ANY min wage!!!!

Only 5% of people are paid MW in this country anyway so its really not a huge factor in solving any macro poverty issue. And guess what, people who are worth more...get paid more :) They demand it or they can take their skills elsewhere.

Eliminating it all together would get more entry level people in the workforce. Someone with NO skill adds very little value to an employer, so if the min wage is more than the employer can afford to pay that person to be around....guess what....THEY DONT HIRE THAT PERSON, lol. Eliminating the MW lets people with no skill get in the door. Maybe at $5 an hour, maybe $3. A VERY small % of those who started a job at min wage still made min wage 2 yrs later. The worker has the choice to not accept the job, but it opens the door to get skilled and work their way up, make more etc etc.
Forcing someone to adhere to a MW will just have employers evaluating their books and having to either let people go or not hire new ones , expand and so on. OR if its a business that uses a lot of unskilled grunt workers (Cashiers etc) and they can't let people go....they just raise prices.
And $1 or $2 per hour more does NOTHING to help lift people out of poverty. Its a way for politicians to throw their hands in the air scream "look at all Ive done".


Guess what,

people going into business now already have to figure out if they can afford to pay employees before they ever start.

If they can't afford it then they can get the fuck out.

Great if McDonalds closes because then the former employees will just open hot dog stands and make $40 per hour themselves.

You know what, fuck it, raise them minimum wage to $40 per hour and let the cheap mother fuckers die out of business so "mom and pop" can open back up and give me the service I'm used to.

Low minimum wage is exactly why we have the franchise industry, fuck the franchise.
They don't pay shit, they serve shit and it's too much of that shit.

Disclaimer : Fake anger added for dramatic affect.

:1orglaugh

trevesty 04-28-2014 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20066623)
You really can't read can you?

Peoples wages are going down and he is saying it's a good thing! Now he wants to correct it by giving those people he put in lower paying jobs a little pay raise.

No, that's you not understanding at all what he said. Employment numbers increasing is overall a great thing, regardless of the market. Him wanting to increase the minimum wage to a respectable dollar amount is indicative of him understanding the economy(well, his advisors anyways).

He didn't put anyone in any jobs other than those he personally appointed to be his advisors(SecDef, etc). Nice try, though. Wanna show everyone again how much you don't understand public policy? It's pretty funny to read.

Sly 04-28-2014 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20066669)
No, that's you not understanding at all what he said. Employment numbers increasing is overall a great thing, regardless of the market. Him wanting to increase the minimum wage to a respectable dollar amount is indicative of him understanding the economy(well, his advisors anyways).

He didn't put anyone in any jobs other than those he personally appointed to be his advisors(SecDef, etc). Nice try, though. Wanna show everyone again how much you don't understand public policy? It's pretty funny to read.

1.83 million mid-level/high-level jobs were lost, 1.85 million low-level jobs were gained

That's a victory?

If his understanding of public policy credits him for the 1.85 million low-level jobs gained, surely his understanding of public policy also credits him for the 1.83 million mid-level/high level jobs lost.

Go Obama!

directfiesta 04-28-2014 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 20066533)
no doubt about that - just that in one case it's fine and in the other case it's not. and vice versa - depends on who reports

funny

stop using logic !!!!

( same applies to Ukraine or '' The '' Ukraine : protesters are freedom fighters while burning buildings in Kiev , but in Ea stern Ukraine , far less damaging behavior by '' separatists '' are deemed terrorism .. go figure ... ? )

directfiesta 04-28-2014 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20066569)
I'll let you know when we stop spending money on Iraq and sending drones to Pakistan

How the fuck can you compare the two? Are you going to call me a racist next?

Seriously, what the fuck do the two have to do with each other?


... and 5 billion in '' the '' Ukraine ...

Note: our gov is no better on that topic .. :2 cents:

kronic 04-28-2014 05:28 PM

50 people pissed off because the president wants to give them a raise??? :helpme

signupdamnit 04-28-2014 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone (Post 20066622)
At least there are those jobs. Romney and friends would have found a way to outsource most of those jobs too. The person asking you if you want to super size your meal will be asking you from the Philippines as machines box up your meal.

Where did all the mid level paying jobs go? Call tech support and ask them.

The thing is they will do that regardless of what the the minimum wage is. It's funny that business owners don't understand that. You may as well set the minimum wage high (within reason) as the scare tactics are mostly bullshit. The profit margins and revenue versus wages show it.

directfiesta 04-28-2014 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tofu (Post 20066641)
I miss Clinton...



:(

He was amazing .... USA was respected and loved worldwide ( well, maybe a few places not so much ) and there was a feeling of progress ...

Now, the USA is in ruins and the only feeling is of internal war :2 cents:

signupdamnit 04-28-2014 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 20066693)
He was amazing .... USA was respected and loved worldwide ( well, maybe a few places not so much ) and there was a feeling of progress ...

Now, the USA is in ruins and the only feeling is of internal war :2 cents:

Well there was internal war back then. They had the militia groups in the 90s too. The only difference is back then the Republicans didn't all support the militia and "patriot" movements. Now basically the Republicans have turned into the patriot movement with few exceptions. :upsidedow The Republicans today are what they used to call "right wing extremists" twenty years ago - extremely pro-gun, extremely right wing, conspiracy theorists, and sadly often with at least some degree of racism.

Barry-xlovecam 04-28-2014 05:46 PM

Code:

YEAR        1 PERSON FEDERAL POVERTY          MINIMUM WAGE          *2000 HOURS WORKED        % OF POVERTY LEVEL
1982        $4,901.00          $3.35          $6,700.00        137%
1991        $6,932.00          $4.25          $8,500.00        123%
1996        $7,995.00          $4.75          $9,500.00        119%
1997        $8,183.00          $5.15          $10,300.00        126%
2007        $10,590.00          $5.85          $11,700.00        110%
2008        $10,991.00          $6.55          $13,100.00        119%
2009        $10,956.00          $7.25          $14,500.00        132%
2014        $11,490.00          $7.25          $14,500.00        126%
AVG Min Wage        $11,490.00          $7.11          $14,215.41        124%
2014 proposed        $11,490.00          $10.00          $20,000.00        174%

Historically, there is no need for a minimum wage rate increase, this year and maybe a small amount in the near future.
This is about increasing net wages for the lowest paid, and least skilled workers.
So, it is either political or humanitarian depending on how you view things but historically and economically the raise in the minimum wage is not justified.

https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/threshld/
http://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/chart.htm
^the numbers I used are here



AmeliaG 04-28-2014 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by signupdamnit (Post 20066649)
I didn't know the president owned the fast food joints and all the other companies?

People are silly. The president isn't responsible for jobs. Employers decide that and indirectly so do consumers ultimately. The president has some sway in directing policy but it's maybe 10% in comparison to congress and the results are usually delayed years.

I mean you may as well blame the pope....

Here are President Obama's top stock holdings from when he got into office (I believe these go into a blind trust once a president is in office):

JP Morgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500)
Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500)
Google (GOOG, Fortune 500)
Intel (INTC, Fortune 500)
Qualcomm (QCOM, Fortune 500)
McDonald's (MCD, Fortune 500)
Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500)
Amgen (AMGN, Fortune 500)
CVS Caremark (CVS, Fortune 500)
Gilead (GILD, Fortune 500)

trevesty 04-28-2014 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20066678)
1.83 million mid-level/high-level jobs were lost, 1.85 million low-level jobs were gained

That's a victory?

If his understanding of public policy credits him for the 1.85 million low-level jobs gained, surely his understanding of public policy also credits him for the 1.83 million mid-level/high level jobs lost.

Go Obama!

I was talking about Vendzilla's understanding of public policy. All in all, the economy is definitely recovering, though your point is absolutely valid in a sense. I don't put the blame(or credit) at the POTUS' feet either way personally. He hasn't been able to do much of anything since 2010.

Stock market is hitting record highs, though. Doubt anyone's making any money from that except fast food workers. :winkwink:

2MuchMark 04-28-2014 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20066830)
I was talking about Vendzilla's understanding of public policy.


2MuchMark 04-28-2014 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20066537)
sorry that was your buddy reagan. Those cards were dealt a long time ago. Wages have been flat for 30 yrs.

Sorry. That's "Jesus Regan" to you know who. Respect the Ronald and bury the truth, otherwise you know who will get in a tizzy.


Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20066553)
At what point in the future from today will the US total of food stamps paid out equal that spent on the Iraq war?

Just curious how the number stack up.

Believe it or not, Food stamps are good for the economy, they don't hurt and they actually don't cost anything when you consider the long term. This was one of the few good things that George W Bush actually helped along. (This, and he declared a big chunk of the pacific ocean a park. Thats about it). $1.00 of food stamps generates $1.84 in Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

But of course, Republicans now hate it because Obama is for it. (Why? Because he's black.). They coined the term "Food Stamp President" and managed to cut $4.5 Billion over the next few years. You can read more about this at http://www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...stamps/260015/

Quote:

Originally Posted by kronic (Post 20066688)
50 people pissed off because the president wants to give them a raise??? :helpme

I'm not pissed off. I'm happy because its a great idea. Paying people more will help reduce poverty and give people a real chance. It will also boost the economy thanks to more people being able to buy more things (like porn)

Vendzilla 04-29-2014 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20066830)
I was talking about Vendzilla's understanding of public policy. All in all, the economy is definitely recovering, though your point is absolutely valid in a sense. I don't put the blame(or credit) at the POTUS' feet either way personally. He hasn't been able to do much of anything since 2010.

Stock market is hitting record highs, though. Doubt anyone's making any money from that except fast food workers. :winkwink:

How can you say the economy is recovering when 1.85 million people lost their middle class jobs? The median wage has gone down 8% . Fucking moron!

Stock market is hitting record highs because of the government propping it up by giving the banks 85 billion dollars a month.
http://www.npr.org/2013/12/17/251796...llion-question

Vendzilla 04-29-2014 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 20066687)
... and 5 billion in '' the '' Ukraine ...

Note: our gov is no better on that topic .. :2 cents:

It's the 85 billion a month they are giving the banks that pisses me off, when the banks are not loaning the money out.

Sly 04-29-2014 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20066830)
I was talking about Vendzilla's understanding of public policy. All in all, the economy is definitely recovering, though your point is absolutely valid in a sense. I don't put the blame(or credit) at the POTUS' feet either way personally. He hasn't been able to do much of anything since 2010.

Stock market is hitting record highs, though. Doubt anyone's making any money from that except fast food workers. :winkwink:

A few other times when the stock market saw record highs?

Dot Com Bomb
Housing Crises

Tech investors are predicting a tech bubble again and the housing crisis hasn't seemed to taught anybody anything. Could get pretty nasty if both popped again at the same time.

Vendzilla 04-29-2014 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20066869)
Sorry. That's "Jesus Regan" to you know who. Respect the Ronald and bury the truth, otherwise you know who will get in a tizzy.

Please tell me what truth you are talking about
Quote:

Believe it or not, Food stamps are good for the economy, they don't hurt and they actually don't cost anything when you consider the long term. This was one of the few good things that George W Bush actually helped along. (This, and he declared a big chunk of the pacific ocean a park. Thats about it). $1.00 of food stamps generates $1.84 in Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

But of course, Republicans now hate it because Obama is for it. (Why? Because he's black.). They coined the term "Food Stamp President" and managed to cut $4.5 Billion over the next few years. You can read more about this at http://www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...stamps/260015/
Hey dip shit, it's not a good thing that so many people have to be on them, does your article talk about how the US government was sending people to Mexico to help them understand how to better use our food stamp system after crossing the border?

Quote:

I'm not pissed off. I'm happy because its a great idea. Paying people more will help reduce poverty and give people a real chance. It will also boost the economy thanks to more people being able to buy more things (like porn)
Wow are you delusional. You think people are going to buy porn with food stamps?

arock10 04-29-2014 07:46 AM

This thread is painful to read. Dang obummer

MaDalton 04-29-2014 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067242)
Hey dip shit,.....

i might remind you of this the next time you complain that people resort to name calling when addressing you...

trevesty 04-29-2014 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20067227)
A few other times when the stock market saw record highs?

Dot Com Bomb
Housing Crises

Tech investors are predicting a tech bubble again and the housing crisis hasn't seemed to taught anybody anything. Could get pretty nasty if both popped again at the same time.

I agree. A friend of mine who writes predictive analytics software for a lot of the big firms on Wall Street is cautioning about that also. I'm also sure the federal reserve helps also, but not to the point that Vendzilla thinks.

Sly 04-29-2014 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20067312)
I agree. A friend of mine who writes predictive analytics software for a lot of the big firms on Wall Street is cautioning about that also. I'm also sure the federal reserve helps also, but not to the point that Vendzilla thinks.

Vend and ********** are both trolling. Not sure why anyone (me included) even reads their threads anymore, but it makes banner views!

Tom_PM 04-29-2014 08:21 AM

Of course it would be bad it the minimum wage were increased. First of all, a Democrat would get credit for it. Second of all, Obama would get credit for it. Finally, because TV told me so.

Vendzilla 04-29-2014 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 20067291)
i might remind you of this the next time you complain that people resort to name calling when addressing you...

You have a point, just sounds stupid what he said

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20067312)
I agree. A friend of mine who writes predictive analytics software for a lot of the big firms on Wall Street is cautioning about that also. I'm also sure the federal reserve helps also, but not to the point that Vendzilla thinks.

So you think that when the fed stops spending 85 billion on a month on the banks, everything will be ok?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20067322)
Vend and ********** are both trolling. Not sure why anyone (me included) even reads their threads anymore, but it makes banner views!

Not trolling, but if you think that all the new jobs are for low income is a good thing, then you have a problem

trevesty 04-29-2014 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067476)



So you think that when the fed stops spending 85 billion on a month on the banks, everything will be ok?

I know that I'm not scared of doom and gloom stuff because I have a set of balls. I also know that the opposite of whatever you "predict" is probably what the reality will be. The Fed is doing it for a reason way above your pay grade. Once the banks feel "safer" about lending again, they'll start to back off of the $85bn / month - so, yes, once the Fed stops, it'll indicate that the banks are back to lending almost as "freely" as they were before the recession.

Vendzilla 04-29-2014 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20067485)
I know that I'm not scared of doom and gloom stuff because I have a set of balls. I also know that the opposite of whatever you "predict" is probably what the reality will be. The Fed is doing it for a reason way above your pay grade. Once the banks feel "safer" about lending again, they'll start to back off of the $85bn / month - so, yes, once the Fed stops, it'll indicate that the banks are back to lending almost as "freely" as they were before the recession.

What do you think giving the banks 85 billion a MONTH is doing to the value of the US dollar?

You have no clear idea what more money in the system does to the value of our currency do you?

The op was about the US having the strongest middle class in the world, until the last 5 years. Obama's Administration fixed that

Vendzilla 04-29-2014 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 20067291)
i might remind you of this the next time you complain that people resort to name calling when addressing you...

Let me ask you this, what would you say to a person that believes that 75 billion spent on food stamps is good for the economy?

Wouldn't you think it would be better if people were working and not needing those food stamps?

Sly 04-29-2014 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067525)
Let me ask you this, what would you say to a person that believes that 75 billion spent on food stamps is good for the economy?

Wouldn't you think it would be better if people were working and not needing those food stamps?

See this is one of those points where you are either trolling or just stupid. I'll let you decide which.

You bitch and moan about people calling names. Then you call names. Then you change the topic when you get called out on it.

I called you two names. Troll, stupid. Now I'm going to change the subject. I could really go for pizza!

Vendzilla 04-29-2014 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20067535)
See this is one of those points where you are either trolling or just stupid. I'll let you decide which.

You bitch and moan about people calling names. Then you call names. Then you change the topic when you get called out on it.

I called you two names. Troll, stupid. Now I'm going to change the subject. I could really go for pizza!

I addressed the name calling, if you would have bothered to read, I know it's hard

Fucking stupid troll! LOL I answered twice. For fuck sake, get that pizza, you must be low on carbs or something

arock10 04-29-2014 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067512)
What do you think giving the banks 85 billion a MONTH is doing to the value of the US dollar?

You have no clear idea what more money in the system does to the value of our currency do you?

The op was about the US having the strongest middle class in the world, until the last 5 years. Obama's Administration fixed that

Uh you mean the recession that started under Bush caused it and it would've been much worse if Obama didn't take steps like bailing out the auto industry, financial industry etc... Including the fed printing $85bn a month.
These lower jncome jobs are appearing due to deregulation brought on by conservatives. Min wages have declined since the 70s, the purchasing power of the min wage was $10.50 then, so the least that can be done here is raise the min wage to $10
People being paid min wage spend all their money, it's a great investment.

Vendzilla 04-29-2014 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arock10 (Post 20067815)
Uh you mean the recession that started under Bush caused it and it would've been much worse if Obama didn't take steps like bailing out the auto industry, financial industry etc... Including the fed printing $85bn a month.
These lower jncome jobs are appearing due to deregulation brought on by conservatives. Min wages have declined since the 70s, the purchasing power of the min wage was $10.50 then, so the least that can be done here is raise the min wage to $10
People being paid min wage spend all their money, it's a great investment.


You don't read much do you?

Bush did the auto bail out, Obama added to it.

Saying it's bad but would have been worse if Obama didn't do what he did? Ok, Prove it!
You can't!

The OP wasn't about minimum wages, it is about people forced into minimum wage jobs when they had middle class jobs, all under the watch of the Obama Administration.

1.85 million people got moved into a lower class in the last 5 years.

Obama owns the economy, he spent a lot of money in the stimulus to fix it and that didn't work.

If you think the economy is better, why is the median wage 8% lower, what has your glorious leader done to fix that?

The recession started 17 months after the democrats got control of the house and the senate, leaving Bush as a lame duck president, how is he responsible for the recession?

You'll say it was the deregulation of the banks that caused it and Obama fixed the problems with the banks? Then why does the fed print up 85 billion a month and give it to the banks, they are having record earnings because of it. If you need 85 billion a month to keep the stock market to do well and the banks to do well, then you have a problem, try to see that!

arock10 04-29-2014 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067835)
You don't read much do you?

Bush did the auto bail out, Obama added to it.

Saying it's bad but would have been worse if Obama didn't do what he did? Ok, Prove it!
You can't!

The OP wasn't about minimum wages, it is about people forced into minimum wage jobs when they had middle class jobs, all under the watch of the Obama Administration.

1.85 million people got moved into a lower class in the last 5 years.

Obama owns the economy, he spent a lot of money in the stimulus to fix it and that didn't work.

If you think the economy is better, why is the median wage 8% lower, what has your glorious leader done to fix that?

The recession started 17 months after the democrats got control of the house and the senate, leaving Bush as a lame duck president, how is he responsible for the recession?

You'll say it was the deregulation of the banks that caused it and Obama fixed the problems with the banks? Then why does the fed print up 85 billion a month and give it to the banks, they are having record earnings because of it. If you need 85 billion a month to keep the stock market to do well and the banks to do well, then you have a problem, try to see that!

Geeze you are a broken record of the same stuff over and over. I'm sorry but economy and the makeup of jobs is way the fuck bigger then one man. But I know you love to blame Obama. For anything. For everything.

No matter who was in office there would've been growth in lower income jobs compared to middle class jobs. McCain would've crashed us into the ocean years ago, Romney would've just outsourced us all, any tea party/libertarian whacko would've pretty much immediately destroyed the economy.

BFT3K 04-29-2014 02:42 PM



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDEfhS-r_68



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjKlnXzE-Dk

2MuchMark 04-29-2014 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067242)
Please tell me what truth you are talking about

Hmm.. huge tax breaks to the rich / called it "Trickle Down Economics", but it destroyed the middle class. Iran / Contra.. Tax breaks to companies to move out of the US, fired all of the air traffic controllers.. hey, Reagan Worshipers don't like to hear about that kind of stuff. Feel free to keep calling him Saint Regan like your pals on Fox.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067242)
Hey dip shit, it's not a good thing that so many people have to be on them

Thats right. It was GW Bush that created this mess. Since Obama's been elected, he's fixing it. Oh wait, he's black. Republicans won't believe he actually accomplished anything.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067242)
Wow are you delusional. You think people are going to buy porn with food stamps?

Lol. You should start a right wing talk show. I didn't say people would buy food stamps with porn. I said raising the minimum wage will encourage people to spend more. But please don't let facts get in the way of your beliefs.


Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 20067291)
i might remind you of this the next time you complain that people resort to name calling when addressing you...

The man can't help himself, but don't worry I understand. When reality starts to sneak its way in and challenge someone's hardcore beliefs, reacting with name calling is to be expected.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20067322)
Vend and ********** are both trolling. Not sure why anyone (me included) even reads their threads anymore, but it makes banner views!


http://www.jrbooksonline.com/images/Pdvd_056_40p.jpg


Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067525)
Let me ask you this, what would you say to a person that believes that 75 billion spent on food stamps is good for the economy?

Wouldn't you think it would be better if people were working and not needing those food stamps?

See? Typical republican bullshit. Get educated:

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...nomic-benefits
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...stamps/260015/
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/29/news...ulus_analysis/
http://prospect.org/article/five-rea...work-just-fine


Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20067542)
Fucking stupid troll! LOL I answered twice. For fuck sake, get that pizza, you must be low on carbs or something

Now now, take it easy! Here - stare at this picture for a few minutes. It will make you feel better.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_t0460ltTUO...0/saintRon.jpg

There ya go big fella. Have a nap.

arock10 04-29-2014 02:46 PM

Reagan would be too liberal for conservatives these days


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc