my bottom itches... :(

That stuff is on a different tier from kissing. Any actor should be prepared to kiss a guy for a role, and ACT like he likes it. He's an actor and that's what they do.



If he was being asked to penetrate or be penetrated, then he would be in gay porn, not a mainstream movie.

But do you understand that being an actor is a job?

Din't really seem to bother or hurt the careers of those two guys who where in a movie you may have heard of called - Broke Back Mountain.

It is called acting. A real actor can play any part and is not afraid of roles out of his or her comfort zone.

Clearly it hit a bit too close to home for this closet case fairy boy.

If Bruce Willis can do it, then any other actor should be able if he's getting paid what he needs. The thought of kissing a guy is stomach churning to me, but I'd get through it for the right money.

If you are not ok the get fucked in the ass by some random dude, you ARE homophobic

The premise of this entire discussion hinges on the idea that being anti-gay is somehow a bad thing. What's wrong with being anti-gay? Political correctness has warped your minds beyond reason.

What I want to know is:

Is your aunt gay if she kisses your sister but shakes your hand?


If a kiss is truly a sexual thing:

Are you having incest when you kiss a family member or your mother?

Actors and actresses turn down roles that include scenes they're uncomfortable with all the time. This is nothing new.

If you you kiss a family member or your mother like you kiss your girlfriend I'd be more than a little worried.

So an employee should be ready and willing to do anything and employer asks of them even if they are not comfortable doing so?

I might kiss a straight guy but never some flaming queer.

That's right. They can do whatever they want. I'm just saying it makes them not very good at their craft.

You can't equate every job in existence to acting.

The job is playing make believe. Not doing morally unethical things -- which is what I'm assuming you mean by "uncomfortable" requests by an employer.

And I'm just saying that's pure bullshit. Every great actor you can think of has turned down roles for one reason or another. Tons have turned down roles because they aren't willing to do nude scenes, for example. You're saying that makes them "not very good at their craft", but Evil Knevil on a Jet bike couldn't make that leap, I'm not sure why you think you can.

It doesn't wash. Your 'point' is a non-starter. Multi-award winning OSCAR winners have turned down roles because they weren't comfortable with this thing or that. Some don't want their careers to be typecast. Has nothing at all to do with their acting ability, ie: how good they are at their craft.

Get it through your thick head. You're wrong.

You have made me see what an idiot I am. Thanks.

Not sure if serious..

Not at all.

Let's say you work at McDonald's. When you were hired you were told you will work the fry machine, make burgers, run the register, mop, sweep etc. One day you come in and they are putting a new roof on the place. The owner decided to save some money and do the work himself. So when you show up for work they tell you that you are going to be up on the roof tearing up shingles and helping re-roof the building. You aren't comfortable climbing 20 feet in the air and working on the roof. Should you have to? You are a McDonald's employee after all and this is technically doing something for the company.

Another example. You are a pornstar. You get hired to shoot a scene where you will bang some woman on a couch. Great. You accept the gig and show up for the shoot. When you arrive they tell you there has been a change of plans. They have decided to make it a bisexual threeway scene. You are still going to bang the girl, but you are also going to get blown by a guy and you have to jerk the other guy off. Should you still have to do this? Afterall, you are a pornstar. Your job is to fuck. What should it matter who you fuck?

It isn't like this guy sued them or even made a big deal out of the situation. They wanted him to have scenes where he would pretend to be gay and have a gay relationship. He didn't like the idea of that and was uncomfortable with it so he quit. Just like you should be able to quit any job if you are not comfortable with what the employer is asking you to do.

Okay, but porn is actual sex. Mainstream TV show is kissing at the most. It's not the same thing.

If you don't know, then you shouldn't be trying to make points with me.

"it's his/her job so they suck at their job if they don't do something they aren't comfortable with"

l o l :1orglaugh

I'm truly amazed at this line of thinking. They should be getting a round of applause for not just whoring themselves out for the money, and fucking off their own convictions. This is to be lauded, not derided.

hahaha, I knew that was gonna be what it was, but funny as fuck :1orglaugh :thumbsup

scrotum cozy

Okay, let me simplify it for you.

You are a pornstar. You get hired to bang some girl in a scene. You show up for the scene and she smells nasty. She clearly hasn't showered in several days and her pussy smells like a four day old rotten tuna can that a Mariachi band has farted on for a solid week.

Should you have the right to say no, you aren't going to have sex with her even though that is what you were hired to do?

Oh believe me I know. :D

And no one is 'trying to make points with you'. Everyone is however trying to get you to pull your head out of your ass on this one point.

Ka-peesh?

We'll just have to agree to disagree then.

Keep in mind though that this wouldn't have even been an issue had the gay scenes been included in the original script. Anytime you change a job description after you make your hires, you gotta figure shit might happen.

what wrong with being 'anti-gay' ?

homosexuals are disgusting, vile creatures