i loved those vids :)

Stop pretending to be moralist. This is fucking porn, incest porn is not illegal and it's no less "moral" than gangbang, glory-hole, babysitter, or any other niche.

If you find it creepy don't fucking watch it.

I shoot quite a bit of fantasy / bondage / JOI / fetish roleplay scenes where the direction of the dialog is geared towards portraying step-persons, and I see nothing wrong with it, at all.

Even though within the scenes the girl usually does say "Daddy", that is inevitably said after making clear that it is a step-dad/step-daughter scenario. I mean, no step-kid calls their step-dad, or step-mom "StepDad", or "StepMom".

In fact a couple of months ago< i shot this really hot, "one timer" girl, and as we were going over the kind of scene, she brought up that I could be her stepfather in the scene, and that it'd really turn her on. So, we went in that direction, and it was great.

But, I would say that I wouldn't intentionally make it portrayed as "legit blood relatives".

I just find all this spooky anyway :)

Adam Carolla Sings Taboo 2 Theme Song with Caller?: http://youtu.be/uiSCu8yb0iU

Classic theme song!!!

This only proves that most pornographers have no morals whatsoever.

Incest is incest. Many of these people who shoot the so called "STEP" incest content also shoot actual portrayed incest as well.

Just visit clips4sale and see how well barebackstudios is doing.

I am going to laugh my ass off when the feds book all of you who shoot incest porn.

No.

It proves SOME pornographers have no morals whatsoever. Not MOST.

Personally I find this stuff disgusting and I cannot see how it is not illegal.

I think it probably would be in the UK. (but I may be wrong)

Is that Mark Wahlberg ?:error

http://imgs1.adultempire.com/products/95/1690095h.jpg

If Eddie Powel is producing incest content and you claim that Eddie Powel is a friend of yours, this explains a lot about you and the way you think.

I bet this type of content turns you, doesn't it Dean?

How can content turn someone?

I bet this type of content turns them on :thumbsup

Att: Mutt
I think is interesting that you have a problem with people selling the "incest" fantasy, but you have no problems selling the Teen content, portraying(without words) the teen younger than she is.

Question:
1 - How is "fantasy underage" better than "fantasy incest" ?
2 - As long as its fantasy, what is the problem really?
3 - Should actionmovies be illegal, since its often "fantasy murder"?

So, this niche is not new and goes all the way back to the 80's with the TABOO series. (which did mighty well btw)

Just like parodies, again big in the 80's - There was a gap in the niche so Scott (the owner of NS/DS) not Eddie Powell made a move to fill it and as usual, is doing well with the series.

We are in the business of selling fantasy my friends... Remember?? And for the record, Eddie Powell is my brother (for reals) :upsidedow I'll see if he wants to chime in on this goofy thread.

I was thinking the same thing - Catie Minx pulls off some Hello Kitty well :upsidedow
http://www.catieminx.com/photos.php

While I understand you guys are trying to show its fantasy but to compare college/teen content with incest is a rather ridiculous one.

Also his content is far from pedo bait. Having a teen in short shorts and a ponytail is making her appear some years younger, a child, no. It is clear these are full grown women and even with the cutesy outfits, they still seem very much 18, portraying a 22 year old as 18 is not the same as incest. There is nothing wrong with 18, or even 16 in canada where Mutt lives, btw.

If his models were 45 and he was portraying them as 40 year olds, would it be a big deal? No because they are of age, well his models are of age and hes not making it seem as if theyre anything but 18+ - He even goes out of his way to list the age hes going for on the front page of the tour

While im not going to argue the debate at hand because i think its rather pointless because peoples minds dont change on here, your guys argument about his content and that being the same, is reaching and simply inaccurate

Most girls wear things like dorky glasses, cartoon shirts and hello kitty to appear fun, cute and approachable, not to target pedophiles

If you see underage when you look at catieminx.com - thats absolutely shocking

I'm not trying to "compare" the two niches as the same. I was basically showing that everyone is selling a fantasy. NS/DS also had or has (not sure now) the Fresh Outta Highschool schoolgirl series. No one seemed to mind pushing traffic and sales to that site and DVDs flew off the racks. This isn't just here domestically either. Look at Japan and all their fantasy and micro niches for example. Leroy can chime in on that one :thumbsup

He has not once invited me to a Illuminati masked orgy - This makes me sad :(

Maybe there will be a day when I care what a spineless coward hiding behind a fake nick thinks of me .... but today is not that day. My ignore list is filled with your many fake nicks..... that were all eventually banned. This one was just added to that list. Have a good day Eddie....

I think Mutt is well aware that we're selling a fantasy, doesn't mean that it should be legal or morally right to push any type of fantasy.

You can argue that you should be able to, go ahead ;) But theres no point in bringing up the fantasy he sells into the debate because that niche is not seen as illegal or morally wrong by the vast majority

Not sure why you once again brought up fresh out of highschool as if its some sort of illegal morally wrong thing. LOL theyre still being marketed at 18, which is what, the oldest the law is anywhere, most places its younger

if we're selling fantasy and theres no rules, we should start making 3d child porn and video games where you molest as many kids as you can, lol you can sell fantasy but i can definitely understand why some things are not allowed... you clearly dont.

you bring up totally legal/common practices and compare it to incest , saying you can sell that fantasy, why not incest. LOL just saying, its a bad argument

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

How can you ignore someone when you create threads about that individual you claim to ignore.

Did you not create a Maxim Modeling Law Suite thread there, Dean?

You seem to be a little more than obsessed.