![]() |
Quote:
I've already stated that "for me" outsourcing to a place like SES is economical, it may not be for everyone. However, I don't know many pay sites who will send out more than 2-3 million emails a month. This would work out to $200-300 using SES. For me this is totally worth it. I would pay more to purchase my own hardware, house it, get it loadbalanced. A self hosted setup may be cheaper for you where you host. You're making assumptions that people don't know they have to be compliant. Being compliant has nothing to do with whether you send using a service or send via your in-house setup. At the end of the day, I'm not saying your way is wrong, I'm just stating that going the route of a service could, for some people, be a better option. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
With that being said, unless you know about both ESP and hosting your own mail solutions, you do not know what you're talking about. However, if something like Amazon has worked out well for Razorharpe and the little newsletter he sends, that's great!! However, as I said, it is not a fit for everyone and there are other options available out there. Both hosted, and otherwise. :2 cents: |
Quote:
Or have they changed that policy? |
Quote:
I'm your average user on GFY, my suggestions were aimed at the average user. Not more than a handful of users on this forum are sending any more than 500K to a million emails a month so it made sense (to me) to provide practical, usable, tested suggestions. Like most average users, I'm not a mailing guru. I want software that doesn't cost me an arm and a leg and that is basically point and click to handle my mailings. Why would I want to get into the nuts and bolts of setting up and configuring some overly complicated MTA that has all the bells and whistles for my "little newsletter"? So far in this thread I've offered verifiable suggestions that have worked for me. Is it for everyone? Maybe not. All you've done is try to insult people and try to prove that you're the dog's bollocks when it comes it mailing. What use is telling someone to do something like mailing in-house without offering any suggestions on how he/she could achieve this. So sorry, you're not "simply trying to help the O.P. in looking at all solutions available so they can pick what is best for them" .... I'll leave you to make your inevitable reply, as far as I'm concerned this has just become a thread with a lot of dick swinging and I don't really want any part of it. I need to get back to trying to make my "little newsletter" a "little" bigger .... |
Quote:
:pimp |
In this thread: information beyond the scope of most people's understanding being ignored by people too inept to make use of it anyway.
|
Quote:
|
Thanks for the Sendy.co link, whoever posted it. In the process of moving a few lists and getting that set up.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://aws.amazon.com/aup/ |
Quote:
"information beyond the scope of most people's understanding" - I totally agree which is why I feel an in-house solution isn't for everyone. It would be like letting a kid loose in a NASCAR competition the first day he passed his driving test. Mailing does require a LOT of know-how like you've pointed out. To do this in-house one could: teach themselves (would take forever), they could hire someone, or they could just wing it and see what happens. Another option is to out source it to services like SMTP, etc. My sole intention in this thread was to make people aware that there just isn't one way to tackle this. Why would I learn to design when I could outsource to any number of designers? Why learn to code when I can outsource to any number of coders. Why learn to rear chickens when I can buy then at a supermarket? People shouldn't feel restricted or think that something isn't possible just because they don't have the skills to achieve it. At the end of the day they need to weigh up what it would cost, see what the pros and cons are and make a decision on what works for them in terms of using a service or doing something in-house. It doesn't bother me one iota that someone on the internet thinks I'm wrong (I'm not talking about you) because I'll continue to do what works for me. I just find it absurd that people would tout "in-house" as being the only way to go simply because they apparently have a massive list(s). Most people DON'T have massive lists and even if they did, a service may yet be what is right for them simply because it would cost more to gain the expertise to do it in-house. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The person I'm mainly talking about I won't name, as I like some of his colleagues and don't want to cause them harm .. but generally everyone in this thread is clueless, with the exception of BF, when it comes to larger-volume .. and wouldn't NEED the knowledge even if they had it. The volumes people in adult mail, for the most part, are laughable to any of us that do serious mailing ... which is why they don't have the knowledge, but also why they don't need it. :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In addition to taking everything personal, you also apparently can't read, so I can completely understand why you would be frustrated. More over, you take me citing that you have a small list as some sort of personal insult, which again, is on you as it was not meant as an insult if you actually read the context of my comments between an ESP solution and an in-house based on needs. In short, you're getting all bent out of shape either because you can't read helpful remarks in context, or you have tender internet feelings. :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc