GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Texas Wants to Execute Man Who Killed Home Intruder Who Turned Out to Be SWAT Member (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1150368)

mikesouth 09-19-2014 01:57 PM

the problem isnt stand your ground the problem is no knock warrants

its been like that for ages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathryn_Johnston_shooting

brassmonkey 09-19-2014 02:05 PM

good news free food and rent. :thumbsup bad news is lights out :Oh crap

Seth Manson 09-19-2014 02:07 PM

Oh boy... Rochard is posting his crazy shit that doesnt apply to anything again.

pornguy 09-19-2014 02:40 PM

Florida has a law called " Knock and Announce " after many court hearings it has been determined that the announce can go with the knock of the door hammer or Frame splitter.

If they DONT Announce they violated the State law. I believe there have actually been arrests of officers for this.

vdbucks 09-19-2014 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 20230349)
Shouldn't an obvious question be "how was it that he had a gun loaded and ready and aimed at the door" if he's being charged with murder it's because the state can prove he knew they were police, he knew they were coming, he grabbed a gun and waited for them and then opened fire.

They came in through his window, which probably made noise, which the guy probably heard, at which time he probably grabbed his gun, then opened fire at the moron breaking into his house through a window.

Moral of the story... the cops should have used the damn door and announced themselves, instead of creeping into the guys house through a window at 5:30am.

420 09-19-2014 05:33 PM

They should throw more tear gas or real grenades.

Matt 26z 09-19-2014 07:32 PM

If I was on the jury I'd want to know exactly what this guy was seeing and hearing as the officer was coming through the window.


Quote:

Originally Posted by MK Ultra (Post 20230352)
It sounds to me like State Law is being followed.

They were executing a warrant based on hearsay. They obtained info from a third party that there was a little cocaine in the house and decided to raid. I'm assuming this is legal, but should it be?

IMO they should have to know as a 100% fact that the illegal material is (or believe it to still be) in the house.

420 09-19-2014 07:57 PM

Agreed they should have to stakeout or bust several buyers from the house before they can raid it. Then they should knock and announce themselves before busting in the door and windows. It sounds too simple to be a proper solution. They'd rather pay confidential informants for questionable information.

SuckOnThis 09-19-2014 08:28 PM

Shocking that anyone supports cops busting peoples door down over drugs. Whether they exist or not.

420 09-19-2014 08:31 PM

Well, it's illegal to have drugs in the house and cops don't like waiting until you're gone. They have all that fancy equipment and they like using it.

SuckOnThis 09-19-2014 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 420 (Post 20230585)
Well, it's illegal to have drugs in the house and cops don't like waiting until you're gone. They have all that fancy equipment and they like using it.


Fucking your woman in the ass is also illegal in some states. You support cops busting doors down in those cases too?

420 09-19-2014 08:35 PM

I suppose if they have a search warrant they can bust the door down if I don't open it. I'm not sure butt fucking is a felony charge though.

kane 09-19-2014 08:47 PM

This is an excellent example of why all drugs should be legal.

420 09-19-2014 08:49 PM

Back to the point. If they thought there was a lot of drugs in the house why would they climb through a window like a burglar? It seems justified by texas law.

DAMNMAN 09-19-2014 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom_PM (Post 20229943)
Luckily there is a line in the sand and it's always been there. The constitution of the united states, and rules for police on how to serve a warrant. The cops fucked up, one of them died, and now they're making a mockery of law by prosecuting the shooter who by all appearances, broke NO laws.


Well said!

DAMNMAN 09-19-2014 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20230281)
Coming in unannounced also means they are geared up to shoot your house pets that will naturally act aggressively to a stranger loudly breaking in the house. At that point I'd shoot the fucker cop or not.

.

Yes.. and they shoot dogs summarily as a matter of course upon entering. It's SOP.
Fucking Police States of America!!!

DAMNMAN 09-19-2014 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 20230349)
Shouldn't an obvious question be "how was it that he had a gun loaded and ready and aimed at the door" if he's being charged with murder it's because the state can prove he knew they were police, he knew they were coming, he grabbed a gun and waited for them and then opened fire.

The state is not going to attempt a very public, multi million dollar capital murder case unless the evidence is overwhelming... or unless you're a conspiracy nut.

You seriously do not understand the fact that guns that are not loaded are fancy hammers!!! (There is no time to load, when seconds count)
Guns in the house for protection should be loaded unless there are reasons to keep them unloaded. (kids etc....) in which case they should be kept safely yet accessible for defense.
He is legally allowed to have a loaded gun, Your reasoning sucks.

DAMNMAN 09-19-2014 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20230359)
the "home invasion" is a paranoid fantasy of gun nuts who are dying to shoot someone and be a big hero. They're more likely to shoot a loved one or themselves, than some roving band of marauders.

and I'm someone who also loves guns.

Home invasions happen all the time, good reason to shoot somebody.
Home invaders are smart enough to yell "Police" when the come through the door.

DAMNMAN 09-19-2014 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis (Post 20230583)
Shocking that anyone supports cops busting peoples door down over drugs. Whether they exist or not.

Yes this!!!

Rochard 09-20-2014 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20229990)
There's zero reason the police needed to enter through a window at 5 AM. Hell, they could wait for him to leave and serve the warrant, collect their evidence then quietly arrest him while he's at work.

Fuck the police.

They were serving a search warrant, not an arrest warrant.

They go in at 5am in the morning because they are expecting problems and want everyone to be sleeping so they are disoriented when they enter, do not put up active resistance, and do not flush their stash down the crapper. Obviously he was not disoriented when they entered.

MrBottomTooth 09-20-2014 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20230786)
They were serving a search warrant, not an arrest warrant.

They go in at 5am in the morning because they are expecting problems and want everyone to be sleeping so they are disoriented when they enter, do not put up active resistance, and do not flush their stash down the crapper. Obviously he was not disoriented when they entered.

I know, that's why i said they could wait for him to leave, then take their time searching the house. If they found drugs or whatever in their search they could arrest him at their leisure in a safe environment, like while he's at work or when he returns home.

Unless there is something saying the person has to be home for them to perform the search. I dont see why that would be the case.

Rochard 09-20-2014 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20230793)
I know, that's why i said they could wait for him to leave, then take their time searching the house. If they found drugs or whatever in their search they could arrest him at their leisure in a safe environment, like while he's at work or when he returns home.

Unless there is something saying the person has to be home for them to perform the search. I dont see why that would be the case.

You are missing multiple issues here....

First is they want to catch him with the drugs, not find the drugs at his house when the main suspect is at 7-11 getting a slurpee.

Second, even if he leaves the house they still have to serve the search warrant, and they still go in gun blazing expecting issues.

Third, you are also assuming they could "arrest him later in a safe environment". When you say "safe environment" do you mean when they attempt to serve an arrest warrant at his work place when he is armed? Or do you mean when he shows up to find his front door busted open and six people going through this stuff?

I'm sorry, but when police are expecting problems, resistance, or gun play they go in at 5am with flash bangs hoping to surprise everyone and catch them off guard. When you have two armed parties going into a confrontation sometimes the shit is going to hit the fan.

The police did nothing wrong, they were serving a legal warrant. At the same, the man shot a police officer who was doing his job.

just a punk 09-20-2014 06:03 AM

http://www.darwinawards.com/

MrBottomTooth 09-20-2014 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20230799)
You are missing multiple issues here....

First is they want to catch him with the drugs, not find the drugs at his house when the main suspect is at 7-11 getting a slurpee.

Why? If the drugs are in his house he is responsible. Unless there is some strange law that says the suspect has to be home when the search is performed. I don't see why that would be the case.

Quote:

Second, even if he leaves the house they still have to serve the search warrant, and they still go in gun blazing expecting issues.

Ya, but I think there will not be as many issues when there is no one home. lol. Do you think they can't do some surveillance on the place or investigate a little to determine who is in the house?

Quote:

Third, you are also assuming they could "arrest him later in a safe environment". When you say "safe environment" do you mean when they attempt to serve an arrest warrant at his work place when he is armed? Or do you mean when he shows up to find his front door busted open and six people going through this stuff?
I mean just about any situation that doesn't involve busting through a window like a burglar. Hell, a regular traffic stop would do the trick. Wait for him to get in his vehicle at his parking lot at work then box him in and draw down on him with their guns. Just about any scenario I could think of is safer than crawling through a window at 5 am. That's why there's a dead cop and 3 others shot. Do you really think this guy was just some insane cop killer that would kill any cop who farted in his general direction? Or do you think maybe he thought he was being robbed?


Quote:

I'm sorry, but when police are expecting problems, resistance, or gun play they go in at 5am with flash bangs hoping to surprise everyone and catch them off guard.
That seems to be working out great for them.

Tom_PM 09-20-2014 09:47 AM

Stunning (well kind of) that some people (well 1 or 2) seem to think that if cops break into your house, it means you ARE guilty of something. Also that if you disagree, you are a conspiracy theorist.

I guess we'll be getting the announcement soon that the US no longer needs a Judicial system at all.

Silk at ChimpoutTraffic 09-20-2014 09:59 AM

They was after black folks again

just a punk 09-20-2014 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom_PM (Post 20230906)
I guess we'll be getting the announcement soon that the US no longer needs a Judicial system at all.

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/...e_dredd_01.png

Socks 09-20-2014 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20230799)
You are missing multiple issues here....

First is they want to catch him with the drugs, not find the drugs at his house when the main suspect is at 7-11 getting a slurpee.

Second, even if he leaves the house they still have to serve the search warrant, and they still go in gun blazing expecting issues.

Third, you are also assuming they could "arrest him later in a safe environment". When you say "safe environment" do you mean when they attempt to serve an arrest warrant at his work place when he is armed? Or do you mean when he shows up to find his front door busted open and six people going through this stuff?

I'm sorry, but when police are expecting problems, resistance, or gun play they go in at 5am with flash bangs hoping to surprise everyone and catch them off guard. When you have two armed parties going into a confrontation sometimes the shit is going to hit the fan.

The police did nothing wrong, they were serving a legal warrant. At the same, the man shot a police officer who was doing his job.

How about arresting him while he's getting into his car on his driveway. Voila.

The truth is they just don't want to wait. It's inconvenient to wait for the right time.

They can think about that at the closed casket funeral I guess.

crockett 09-20-2014 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20229880)
You have the right to defend your home, but you do not have the right to shot and kill police officers legally serving a search warrant.

How do you know the difference between a robber breaking in and a group of police officers serving a warrant? You really can't. But if you live by the sword, there is a good chance you will die by the sword. If you don't like your options, don't live by the sword - Don't sell drugs and you don't have to carry firearms to protect yourself.

I understand that some people feel the need to be able to protect their house with firearms, but I just don't feel the same way. I am forty-six years old (and well armed with multiple assault rifles) yet I've never known ANYONE who has been the victim of a home invasion or even confronting an armed robber in their house.

Ummm your live by the sword die by the sword can be applied to the SWAT team members as well... Don't want to get shot in the face? Well don't execute a no knock warrant in the middle of the night by climbing through someone's window...

Sly 09-20-2014 11:26 AM

Let's go wild here and say that he did have cocaine in his house. Maybe he did the day before, who knows.

Is using a SWAT team at 5:30 AM in the morning, running the risk of someone getting killed (police, animals, children, target, neighbor, ANY ONE) as Rochard pointed out with his defense argument, really worth the reward of busting a guy with cocaine? Really?

I run my risk vs reward analysis different than the Killeen Police Department. Wasted resources, wasted life, and wasted goodwill.

420 09-20-2014 11:30 AM

nice email [email protected]

The swat guys want to keep their jobs. They'll be downsized if they run out of doors to bust down. Also, we can't have our kids replacing their adderall with cocaine.

clickity click 09-20-2014 11:38 AM

Y'all should get rid of guns off the streets completely like the UK, fucking loonies.

DWB 09-20-2014 12:16 PM

Knock on my door and you live. Come in through my window, and you die. Zero hesitation.

Damn the consequences, police or no police.

blackmonsters 09-20-2014 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickity click (Post 20230979)
Y'all should get rid of guns off the streets completely like the UK, fucking loonies.

Or stupid motherfuckers could just stop climbing through the window.

:2 cents:

dyna mo 09-20-2014 12:28 PM

this is a good excuse for the cops to continue their militarization. prolly get some drones to handle this sort of no knock warrant execution. It will go through the window no probs, take out the dogs with some drone weapon and zap the big bad doper.

WDF 09-20-2014 02:04 PM

Someone entering my home without identifying themselves as a LEO with a warrant first or being invited in is going to be met with deadly force as I will be in fear for my life and I am hard of hearing also. Prove I wasn't in fear or I could hear them announce themselves.

Home Invasions happen all the time in this area and it is not the Police usually. Sometimes the victims are injured, there have been a couple fatalities in the last few years. Sometimes the perpetrators are caught, shot, or even killed.

Rochard 09-20-2014 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20230814)
Why? If the drugs are in his house he is responsible. Unless there is some strange law that says the suspect has to be home when the search is performed. I don't see why that would be the case.

Because his attorney will argue he was no at home and had no knowledge of any illegal wrong doing found in his house when he wasn't there. It might be a long shot, but it forms the bases of doubt.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20230814)
Ya, but I think there will not be as many issues when there is no one home. lol. Do you think they can't do some surveillance on the place or investigate a little to determine who is in the house?

They most likely did so some surveillance.

I'm not sure about you, but I don't want my local PD blowing through $40k of overtime in a single week just to they can have five officers at at time watching the house 24/7 for a week.

No matter what, no matter how long they watch the house, if they have reason to suspect firearms in the house they are going to go in hot and heavy. It's standard practice for law enforcement.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20230814)
I mean just about any situation that doesn't involve busting through a window like a burglar. Hell, a regular traffic stop would do the trick. Wait for him to get in his vehicle at his parking lot at work then box him in and draw down on him with their guns. Just about any scenario I could think of is safer than crawling through a window at 5 am. That's why there's a dead cop and 3 others shot. Do you really think this guy was just some insane cop killer that would kill any cop who farted in his general direction? Or do you think maybe he thought he was being robbed?

The search warrant was for the house, not the car.

You are saying a "regular traffic stop" would have done the trick, but that is not the case at all. Police most likely knew he was armed, and forcing a full felony stop in public with guns drawn on a suspect they already know is armed should be a last resort in the interests of public safety. I don't want gun battles on my street. Hit 'em fast and catch them off guard.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20230814)
That seems to be working out great for them.

In fact, it is working out great. How many warrants are served a year nationwide, and how many incidents do we have? I have no clue - how many warrants are served a year? Ten thousand? One hundred thousand? Then compare how many issues we've had - I can only think of two in the past year, this one and the baby.

Rochard 09-20-2014 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20230974)
Let's go wild here and say that he did have cocaine in his house. Maybe he did the day before, who knows.

Is using a SWAT team at 5:30 AM in the morning, running the risk of someone getting killed (police, animals, children, target, neighbor, ANY ONE) as Rochard pointed out with his defense argument, really worth the reward of busting a guy with cocaine? Really?

I run my risk vs reward analysis different than the Killeen Police Department. Wasted resources, wasted life, and wasted goodwill.

If the mother fucker has a long and violent criminal record and is believed to be armed with an AR15, then yes.

Rochard 09-20-2014 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WDF (Post 20231050)
Home Invasions happen all the time in this area and it is not the Police usually. Sometimes the victims are injured, there have been a couple fatalities in the last few years. Sometimes the perpetrators are caught, shot, or even killed.

Then you fucking move.

Common sense tells you that you need to live in a place with a low crime rate. (And when you get older, you look into local schools too.) When I first moved to California to live with my girlfriend in 1989, she wanted to live in the Castro Valley / Hayward area. Some quick research told me that twenty miles away over the hill had a much lower crime rate. Same thing when I moved back to California - I had to move to a certain area for Playboy and picked the safest one.

If you have a choice between arming yourself because you live in a high crime area or living in nice a neighborhood where that shit isn't common... And you pick to live in the crappy area.... Well, you toss the dice, you arm yourself, and pray that you aren't shooting a police officer, your neighbor, or even worse - your kid who sneaked out - when someone crawls through the window.

Better yet, get an alarm system.

Sly 09-20-2014 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20231109)
If the mother fucker has a long and violent criminal record and is believed to be armed with an AR15, then yes.

There is no evidence of that anywhere.

Next.

For those of you not familiar with Texas, a very high percentage of the population has guns in their home. Even the women. Women love guns just as much as men. This guy having a 9 mm close to his bed is no different than having a glass of water next to your bed.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123