Well strictly speaking not necessarily. Most people think that word just means an attraction to children, but it's more specific that that. It refers to an attraction to prepubescent children. It's entirely possible a 14 year old has gone through puberty these days.

In any case, and by any label though it's pretty sick.

I guess no matter how hard he prayed Jesus wouldn't take his evil urges away.

it doesn't surprise me. its no doubt the girl he was taking care of. religious people and their demons...its always the same story.

I didn't know what a Ramney Warrant was until you mentioned it. It seems to be a more serious warrant - meaning someone is a threat to society and bypass the district attorney and get an order from a judge to arrest someone.

If I recall correctly, this isn't the first time Donny has been charged with this? Seems like there was an ongoing investigation about these charges.

Totally, but the statute was probably instituted as a means to differentiate between a young adult and child.

Not much you can do about girls hitting puberty earlier. That's from them all wearing disposable diapers. :winkwink:

He's always come across as a creepy fuck, this doesn't surprise me at all.

So you happened to be talking to your neighbor yesterday and asked him if a Donny Pauling had recently been arrested?

He was taking care of a girl?

If any of this is true his career as traveling xxx jesus is over. Whats next?

I think you'll find most of the info here:

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...m-reading.html

If not, there are some other threads linked within that thread that will shed more light on the past charges.

Thats why he became a priest. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh


This is a bad rap to go to jail under.


Just Dave

Something to keep in mind with regards to Ramey Warrant's

This warrant is typically requested when a police officer feels that he may not have enough evidence for the district attorney to actually file the charges. He doesn’t want to take the chance that the district attorney will reject the case. So, if he can get a judge to issue a Ramey Warrant, he can then arrest the person and question them with the hope of obtaining enough information and sufficient evidence to present it to the District Attorney for filing. Basically, the officer’s hope is that, once they have the individual in their possession, they will get what they need to make their case and end up with the sufficient evidence needed to get the case filed.

So, the judge felt there was probable cause, but the police may not actually have all the evidence they need yet to file charges.


Now the charges:


The California Penal Code for Lewd Act on a Child under the age of 14 is 288a. Identifies and stipulates alleged victim is under 14 years old. No bail = No good.


(a) Except as provided in subdivision (i), any person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or lascivious act, including any of the acts constituting other crimes provided for in Part 1, upon or with the body, or any part or member thereof, of a child who is under the age of 14 years, with the intent of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or sexual desires of that person or the child, is guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three, six, or eight years.

The charge for oral copulation:

(c) (1) Any person who commits an act described in subdivision (a) with the intent described in that subdivision, and the victim is a child of 14 or 15 years, and that person is at least 10 years older than the child, is guilty of a public offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for one, two, or three years, or by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year. In determining whether the person is at least 10 years older than the child, the difference in age shall be measured from the birth date of the person to the birth date of the child.


Unlawful Sexual Intercourse Charge:

261.5. (a) Unlawful sexual intercourse is an act of sexual
intercourse accomplished with a person who is not the spouse of the
perpetrator, if the person is a minor. For the purposes of this
section, a "minor" is a person under the age of 18 years and an
"adult" is a person who is at least 18 years of age.

(b) Any person who engages in an act of unlawful sexual
intercourse with a minor who is not more than three years older or
three years younger than the perpetrator, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

(c) Any person who engages in an act of unlawful sexual
intercourse with a minor who is more than three years younger than
the perpetrator is guilty of either a misdemeanor or a felony, and
shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one
year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.

(d) Any person 21 years of age or older who engages in an act of
unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor who is under 16 years of age
is guilty of either a misdemeanor or a felony, and shall be punished
by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by
imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two,
three, or four years.

(e) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, an
adult who engages in an act of sexual intercourse with a minor in
violation of this section may be liable for civil penalties in the
following amounts:

(A) An adult who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse
with a minor less than two years younger than the adult is liable for
a civil penalty not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000).

(B) An adult who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse
with a minor at least two years younger than the adult is liable for
a civil penalty not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000).

(C) An adult who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse
with a minor at least three years younger than the adult is liable
for a civil penalty not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).

(D) An adult over the age of 21 years who engages in an act of
unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor under 16 years of age is
liable for a civil penalty not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars
($25,000).

(2) The district attorney may bring actions to recover civil
penalties pursuant to this subdivision. From the amounts collected
for each case, an amount equal to the costs of pursuing the action
shall be deposited with the treasurer of the county in which the
judgment was entered, and the remainder shall be deposited in the
Underage Pregnancy Prevention Fund, which is hereby created in the
State Treasury. Amounts deposited in the Underage Pregnancy
Prevention Fund may be used only for the purpose of preventing
underage pregnancy upon appropriation by the Legislature.

(3) In addition to any punishment imposed under this section, the
judge may assess a fine not to exceed seventy dollars ($70) against
any person who violates this section with the proceeds of this fine
to be used in accordance with Section 1463.23. The court shall,
however, take into consideration the defendant's ability to pay, and
no defendant shall be denied probation because of his or her
inability to pay the fine permitted under this subdivision.



Very ugly charges listed there on that Sutter County Sheriff's booking site.


Although Donny has been a pain in the ass to people here on GFY, I'd encourage folks to not jump to conclusions until the system and due process have their chance to play out.



:)

if its true, I would now be shocked

wow........

My wife and I were walking the dog this morning and we ran into him and talked for a bit. I sort of knew he was a cop but thought he was a K9 officer and I asked him about it, and he told me he was a Sheriff in Yuba City. My wife mentioned we used to know someone in Yuba City named Donny and that he was "real creepy" and.... He mentioned they had just arrested someone named Donny. When I mentioned his last name my neighbor quickly shut me down telling me he couldn't discuss arrests.

I put two and two together and.... Bingo.

At a certain point in time doesn't the term "past charges" indicate a "pattern"?

That's totally how the Internet, and this board in particular, works.

Every time I see that sig, I chuckle a little. :thumbsup


If anything, it makes him MORE credible as a religious zealot.

In Donny's defense, if he really did it, Satan probably made him.

fat all as a target

He has been arrested multiple times on these charges.... Seems to be a pattern.

Walks like a duck....

What a fucking shame. I truly respect people who chose theological path and stand what they believe even when I disagry with the, But these fucks need ti get stiffer penalties because of how they prey on victims and farce they use. Fuck him and every other pedo priest.

As much as I detest these phony Christians (people who capitalize momentarily on how gullible many Christians are) I have to say that these charges mean absolutely nothing the current climate where a female's simple accusation is enough for men to be arrested and prosecuted and even found guilty. Donny may in fact be the victim in this case. Let's wait until more info comes out to judge him. Again, I am not defending him I am saying that men often get their lives ruined by false allegations and just because you do not like someone is not a good reason to pile on and say "see I told you so".

HAVE LUCK! :1orglaugh

Aryan Brotherhood: This is the story of the deadliest gang in American History - a homicidal organization that unflinchingly kills rival gang members, blacks, homosexuals, Jews, and

I spelled it wrong, it's Ramey.

The cop really has to sell it hard to a judge I believe

It's tough not to jump to conclusions, knowing Donny's unstable history, his creepy persona and these specific charges, LEWD ACT CHILD U14 Oral Copulation U14 Unlawful Intercourse.

Nice find Rochard.

I bet he does. Spin City.

Because he gets involved with some real cunts, convinced he can save them!

Drugged/drunk parent of kid Donny is trying to help causing a fuss because he wouldn't give her what she wanted. That's what happened last time no?

This is one that really has to wait for the courts, rather than assuming the worst.

I agree. Sort of sucked.

The plot thickens. (This will be entertaining.)

Let's just assume you aren't a fake nick and let's pretend we all know who you are and what you do in the industry, and let's ignore the fact that you signed up to GFY long after Donny left the industry and you could not possibly know him.... WTF are you talking about?

It is used when they are thin in evidence and feel the DA won't file charges.

I agree 100%.

Let's not hang him just yet. Let's wait until he gets a fair trial and then we can hang him :thumbsup

.

While numbers vary, the actual percentage of false accusations for sexual assault is PROBABLY somewhere in the 2-10% range. It's also very hard to get a conviction based on ONLY a woman's testimony. It is POSSIBLE to be convicted, and I'm sure it happens, based on only one witness (the victim) and nothing else but it's certainly not the norm. More often than not there's some physical evidence, prior history, etc.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that you must have been accused of something you didn't do because you seem very personally invested in this point of view. This isn't the first time you've said something along these lines.

it's all here on GFY - just some people have a better memory/pay more attention

I thought it was just the opposite - Police believe someone is both a threat to society AND there is enough evidence to justify it. If the police believe the district attorney will not have the evidence to get a conviction they would not waste their time with it.

when do we scalp him?

Oh the irony - what could be more surprising than this coming from a fake born-again Christian crowd manipulating phony wannabe Bigot.

Anyway, let's not jump to conclusions, I'm a bit surprised this is available as a public record, considering the charges may not have been pressed yet.

Manfap has been on contract with us as our designer/developer for 4-5 years now so yes - he is real.

Once again you assume/insinuate things and come off looking like a dumb cunt. Congrats!:thumbsup

oh damn :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup

And who exactly are you?

I vaguely remember something about it... I honestly don't recall the details.

Enlighten me.