So you want to say that our immune system don't respond to non-enveloped viruses (the ones w/o protein markers, like adenoviruses)? For real?

P.S. To the believers. The human can have only one DNA. This is a simple explanation on why a female can not have a DNA of her male partners. Her DNA will be her for life.

I never said that, but since you really want to push it:

Adenoviruses don't have the lipid bilayer envelope, but their capsid is still comprised of proteins that make it recognizable to our immune system.
Adenoviridae - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Virus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As to just one DNA, that is also false. There is nuclear DNA (the DNA within the cells nucleus that make up our chromosomes, which is typically what we are referring to when we speak of DNA) and extrachromosomal DNA found outside of the nucleus which includes, but is not limited to, mDNA (mitochondrial DNA within the mitochondria, obviously). Nuclear DNA gets inherited reliably (ie each daughter cell gets one complete copy) but extracellular DNA is less exact and it is possible, but not likely, for one daughter cell to get all or none of the cytoplasmic materials.
Extrachromosomal DNA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Take notice of the part where it says "In addition to DNA found outside of the nucleus in cells, infection of viral genomes also provides an example of extrachromosomal DNA."

As long as I'm dropping wikipedia links, here's one on gene therapy which is all about mediating the effects of defective genes by the in vivo introduction of functional genes. If the introduction of foreign DNA caused an automatic immune response targeting the host cell, there would be no such thing.

Just thought of another example where blood cells would contain another person's DNA: Bone marrow transplants. The marrow produces the erythrocytes (white blood cells, which contain DNA) of the donor.

Women are simply programmed to be sperm receptacles.

Those sluts have countless men's DNA inside them and then even take the time to tattoo the names of the same sperm donors on their well used(up) bodies! Pathetic

Misogynist much?

don't worry, he's a shit stabber. thank fuck he won't be passing his dna anywhere. like I've said before, he gives AIDS a good name.

All transplants have it. That's why people with transplanted organs have to take immunosuppressant drugs for life. Anyways, the foreign DNA will remain in that transplanted organ only and won't mix with yours. I mean if you do a blood test, there there will be your DNA only. Once again, it's something what can be easily proven in any clinic. There is 21th century and DNA tests are usual routine. Course if you don't live in caves :2 cents:

By the way, the link to the study isn't working.

Here, same stuff.. well, different conclusions from the origin, and without some "those damn whores" attitude. Especially regarding health, as that hasn't been yet mentioned.

"the harboring of genetic material and cells that were exchanged between fetus and mother during pregnancy -- have linked the phenomenon to autoimmune diseases and cancer, sometimes for better and other times for worse."

Male DNA commonly found in women’s brains, likely from prior pregnancy with a male fetus -- ScienceDaily

Here, link and quote from that pubmed study:

" CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women. "

"Or sexual in intercourse". It seems that some religious US folks (or something like that) picked up that and made an Youtube video about the dangers of promiscuous life style, especially regarding "casual" partners. Like I already pointed; what about the non-casual partners? Yeah, but that wont fit into their message, so it was left out.

I forgot the link to the study.

Male microchimerism in women without so... - PubMed Mobile - NCBI

50 Spunk monkeys

That's weird!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

How creepy... That's a wicked advertisement for durex imo:1orglaugh