Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 20336866)

Merry Christmas

Originally Posted by hadden (Post 20337709)

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20349942)

We need an update on this hilarious situation. I still don't think it's real.

Originally Posted by Markul (Post 20350680)

He's currently negotiation with ManWin on buying them out :pimp

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20349942)

We need an update on this hilarious situation. I still don't think it's real.

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351367)

Hi, I saw your post and your code and I noticed that you know how to connect one database.

http://www.premium-sponsor.com/script.txt

Is this too complicated for you?

Regarding the sql to be honest it makes me laugh but I guess you might capable of doing complex sql rules I'd write...

That's not even basic, it's rudimental ...

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20351538)

Holy fuck, I hope you didn't pay someone to write that mess of junior-level horseshit.

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351554)

OOLALA ... junior-level horseshit is what you wrote ... the script I provided is too basic but if you can't understand it fast and give few examples of how it could be used -> I don't want to listen what you've to say ...

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20351558)

I wrote clean object-oriented code using PDO to access the database in order to demonstrate my skill to anyone who knows what they're looking at. You wrote a tangled mess of procedural bullshit that is going to be difficult to maintain, monstrous to scale, and painful to refactor.

I'm sorry, but you're tremendously out of your depth and league here.

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351566)

Ok, next ... get real and grow up kid ...

Don't make me laugh!

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20351570)

You've just demonstrated why no programmer worth their salt would ever work with you. You don't even know what you're looking at, but you feel qualified to judge code. You need to understand what you know, and what you do not.

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351584)

Kid go to school and graduate, gian experience, become wiser&inteligent -> the connect to one database and do one query is certainly (not) the most difficult task you'd have ...

Like I wrote, don't make me laugh ...

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20351594)

I finished my undergraduate degree in 2001, and my advanced degrees in 2004 and 2009. Thank you for your support, though.

The code you've written does not follow a recognized design pattern, is not capable of being properly unit tested, will not play well in an Agile house, and needlessly over-uses a lot of memory (and so will not scale). If that's your idea of production code, your technical skills are even more suspect than your business skills.

My coding sample demonstrates my ability, and as you have noted, is easily deciphered by a non-senior-level programmer. This is the point.

Resorting to insults obviously means you have nothing substantive to say.

Originally Posted by pornopete (Post 20351598)

i notice you have the much flux in you're is code :

Do you must pass this flux array through a flux capacitor api to make it more understandingable?

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351600)

Regarding what you wrote, I'm glad I don't have anything else to say, everything is clear at my eyes, you certainly can do what is need to be donne, inbthe complexity required, in the optmizal usage of memory,etc with one connect and one query ...

Are my words clear to you?

Originally Posted by pornopete (Post 20351598)

i notice you have the much flux in you're is code :



Do you must pass this flux array through a flux capacitor api to make it more understandingable?

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351600)

Regarding what you wrote, I'm glad I don't have anything else to say, everything is clear at my eyes, you certainly can do what is need to be donne, inbthe complexity required, in the optmizal usage of memory,etc with one connect and one query ...

Are my words clear to you?

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20351603)

Yes, I understand you. What you're saying is that because my code demonstration -- which is likely read by business people and not techies -- only demonstrates a clean database class, and another class interacting with it, that this is the extent of my abilities.

Makes perfect sense. Maybe you should Google before you end up putting your foot further into your mouth.

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351605)

It's only one example to see if your brain is ready to interpret processes in a multi-ambiance enviroment no matter the complexity of ...

What will be donne uses one api to manage the server side of cache(level of sql, processes, web services, sessions,etc) and there's is cache in the clients side too ...

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20351611)

What you've done is "solved" a series of simple problems with increasingly-complex spaghetti code. Object-oriented methods that address specific functionality are maintainable, testable, and scalable. You've used no design pattern at all, have fumbled memory allocation to hell and back, and have ensured that no one but a bad programmer would want to work in that mess .... And the worst part is that you don't even see it.

How far along is your project? Ready for Barcelona? Making millions yet?

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351607)

You're hilarious you won't participate in my projects ...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351617)

If you could see what I see, you'd think and I think to achieve it with perfection!

How far are my projects? I 'did' already millions in my life, I'm not one beginner in that issue either ...

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20351624)

You didn't make "millions" in adult. Those of us who legitimately have done so are in a totally different stratosphere from you.

Back when I finished this project, in about 2005, it became boring. I called it "adult empire builder" at the time, and licensed it to a select few companies. It's not viable today. I was on the team that created the programming language Google was written in, and I was a very early Google'er as well. I can tell you that your understanding of search engine fundamentals is flawed.

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20334897)

Hi,

Conclusion : (try to leave my last posts and focus in this one)

1) account.premium-sponsor.com

2) porn.premium-sponsor.com

3) Carlos Dias - Google+

I'm looking for 3 experienced webmasters with programming skills. Once I accept them to work with(...) and develop the client api ,etc you'll be sooner or later capable of using it too.

From my side I've to prepare 4 dedicated servers (one for mysql, one for cache of mysql, one for images and one for domains) to start ...

After start recovering millions of thumbs per day in one database with n millions of records where each record has an average of 20 thumbs .. ready to start importing million of thumbs per day, ready for client apis, etc ... ready for search engine indexation ... ready for scalability ... ready for IT architecture ... ready for analytics ... ready to add more sources as often as possible ... ready to give each webmaster the possibility of using their own IDs in the usage of sources ... ready to let them implement their favorite trade system, etc ...

As soon as 3 webmasters contact me and we start organizing what must be organized we'll have Barcelona in sight, because it will be where this will be implemented as soon as possible ...

-> Those who are intelligent enough capable of actually being clever enough, who can contribute with something logic and interesting, the opportunity of meeting me will exist, will depend on my acceptance and availability ... because I've a lof of things to do and organize and the brains must be at the same level to not loose productivity, etc...

While you are all here, you should contact/find 3 webmasters that you consider experienced enough ... they will prepare the entrance later for all the webmasters interested ...

I understand, especially if english is your maternal language. I wrote that in english and english is not my maternal language ...

If you don't understand my english->I tried to resume the main points as much as I could in 3 links ... the rest is natural I'd write ... if one webmaster has one or more client api, starts accepting accounts of registed users and define the member zone ,etc ... from this point the issues are countless ...

PLEASE->Replies related with the issue are welcome, it's important to avoid not related replies.

This post is one fast copy/past with several basic issues I'd write ...

Best regards,
Carlos

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20334907)

If there is any webmaster who did not like something I wrote in that mess and would like to participate and is not feeling well because of that ,etc ... come on, get real, that has no importance and you're welcome ...

You will certanly learn a lot of things ... and you can even work with your own client apis, etc ...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20334998)

I guess you're trying to ask me how instead of where ...

Where -> in the sources ...

How -> with cronjobs that can recover n millions of thumbs per day ...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20335403)

I'm currently watching search engines in the process of indexation of search string(level of concatenation without limits in it's depth) and I must confess that it's one scary 'movie' ...

(...)

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20335442)

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20335469)

It's scary especially if you consider that the number of client apis it's ilimited in it's range and the personalization is present ... and it must return 8000 records per call, because less makes no sense, it increases the number of hits and acess to 'disk/etc' exponencially ...

Got it?

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20335487)

Hi,

"You want people to submit galleries to you"
-> No, it won't follow the conventional logic ... in the limit it imports content(galleries,I'll name it images with teasers/videos associated too) from sponsors with the 'sight' to process member zones internally , etc ... it will even process the payments internally to not loose any advanced features of tracking ,etc ...

"Are looking for programmers to do a joint venture with?"
-> Yes and No I'd write, I need 3 programmers to work better the client api and include new features because at the same time we must also develop the solution of advertisement towards the search string, concept of creation of member zones, concept of zones of registed users, etc ... if you look at account.premium-sponsor.com (section browse), you'll find out naturally that there are a lof of things to do and the adult is one main section among several main sections ...

If the joint venture is one possibility and from this point it becomes one reality, the facts are->we'll meet and move to Barcelona to create whatever related with to step forward ... asap ...

Programmers will be allowed to use their own client apis too, develop their own business I'd write and somehow prepare the extension of, etc (...)

There are a lot of things to do ...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20335593)

I hope I've clarified all the reasonable doubts ...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20335599)

...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20336622)

I'm just watching the indexation of search engines increasing ... and I'm just thinking about the fact we'll face, returning millions of queries per day with 8000 records each, where one level of personalization per client api will naturally exist.

This included with analytics, webservices, logs of(...), sessions, etc . Masters of perfection in the system of avanced cache (management).

What I'm waiting from you (3 webmasters with technical skills), it's obviously the following->you assimilate as soon as possible the technical ambiance where you'll be, the technical delicacy, the detail of management of information with perfection and you organize between you(3) the development of the client api(client side, server side ) and interfaces(...) ... and later the management of ...

Features will succeed ... you'll be naturally entering systems of analytics integrated with the webservices,etc ...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20336634)

With your replies ...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20336672)

I'd say that the issue of thumbnails is interesting, especially because sooner or later we'll have to import thumbs from the server side of the api to client apis(domains) to be executed locally and not remotely in the homepage, etc ...

If we (like we should/must do) set the focus in returning 8000 records per call(search string), then we must set the focus in the thumbnails too sooner or later, especially where we detect that pages are more visited ...

Things to think about ... I've the system ready to import million(n) of thumbs per day to the server side of the api and even this is sensible because client apis will place the 'img src' pointing there ...
not counting with the headaches that few sources might have, but I guess it's not a bid deal, are avoided later(...)

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20336712)

I'd say because I'm writting, If we know the pages more visited we can set rules to place images that are naturally more seen "remotely", everything is related(...) -> :pimp

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20336725)

...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20336857)

Well, I don't understand your concerns but if you find images that are yours (copyright), I'll send you directly to sources, where the images come from ...

I'm not understanding your point, it seems that you're writting about things you don't understand ...

Wanna hear sugar ray ' someday' and justify what you're writting?



...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20336873)

Thanks I wish you Merry Christmas too ...

Regarding this issue of copyright, the sources will delete your images and after will be deleted as far as I'm concerned and in all the client apis using it ...

I'm providing one search engine I'd write and will have billions of images ...

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351337)

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351629)

"Sure", therefore our conversations ends here, you don't know what you're talking about ...
Do I consider relevant people in google doing what they do? Is that the question? Like I wrote grow up kid ... programming like that ... with that brain ..with such a concept in business and projects ... with such a technical architecture pumping from your brain ... you cannot not even find the needle in the haystack easily and I WANT IT FAST!

You called me Junior, I call you kid!

Originally Posted by carlosxxx (Post 20351367)

Hi, I saw your post and your code and I noticed that you know how to connect one database.

http://www.premium-sponsor.com/script.txt

Is this too complicated for you?

Originally Posted by Zyber (Post 20351645)

Very good, young Padawan, but you still have much to learn.

Don't worry though, we have all been beginners at some stage. It looks like you are still at the spaghetti code level.

This will take you to the next level in the fascinating world of procedural programming:
PHP: User-defined functions - Manual

Once you master these necessary concepts, and perhaps a few other, you might some day reach the world of OOP.

Good luck on your journey :winkwink:

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20351649)

Originally Posted by hadden (Post 20336635)

Don't forget the part where I tell you Kurt cobain was a big pussy.

Originally Posted by carlosxxx

When I place this video it means that people will endup feeling ridiculus in the end? Wanna swallow it more than you did already pseudo programmer know it all who can't find one needle in the haystack when we need to find it fast?

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 20351779)

The only person who is going to feel ridiculous is you. Is your project ready for Barcelona? Making millions yet? I've got two decades of for-profit programming experience. I've contributed code to dozens of companies you've heard of. How about you, pseudo-businessman?

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 20351793)

I still believe this guy cannot be older than mid-teens. No point in arguing with him.