GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   BMW will likely phase out internal combustion engines over the next 10 years (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1158645)

seeandsee 01-10-2015 04:03 PM

Electricity price to jump 10x times!

12clicks 01-10-2015 05:10 PM

I'm likely to give up foie gras in 10 years too. :1orglaugh



Stupid kids

H-Tom 01-10-2015 07:44 PM

One word: Hydrogen!

Rochard 01-10-2015 08:15 PM

Electric cars will be the way to go in the future. I'm not sure if it will be in ten years, but we already can see a higher percentage of electric cars.

420 01-10-2015 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20353934)
Electric cars will be the way to go in the future. I'm not sure if it will be in ten years, but we already can see a higher percentage of electric cars.

Phones are training us to charge shit constantly. But I don't have time for that.

How do we get an electric car that requires minimal time and effort to charge? Solar powered once there are stronger panels and batteries. Maybe put a windmill on top to charge the batteries while driving. :winkwink:

clicker 01-11-2015 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20353236)
I'll never say goodbye to gasoline...still driving my '65 Chevy with a 350 that gets 8mpg on a good day ;)

http://lazonaimagery.com/main/truck01.jpg



Really sweet ride! Gas vehicles will end up being more of a weekendender, probably like this one is now.

2MuchMark 01-12-2015 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antonio (Post 20353496)
About 10 years ago I had this idea of hooking up all the gyms to some sort of electric power producing system. Was I too ahead of my time?

Me too. I wonder how much a jogger generates in electricity?

I like this idea:

Go jogging, charge your batteries with Ampy - Hindustan Times

2MuchMark 01-12-2015 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20353501)
No, it's not.


Yes, it is. Burning fossil fuels sends CO2 into the atmosphere. CO2 reflects heat rising from the earth and oceans, keeping it in the atmosphere instead of letting it escape into space, warming the planet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20353501)
Bullshit. The the air and water cleaner are cleaner now than the were 100 years ago.

Daily life in China:
http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/2...3083308864.jpg

Beach life in Florida
http://laymanstermsmediadotcom.files...-pollution.jpg

Silent spills: Study shows oil spills are more common than reported | Layman's Terms Media

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20353501)
If everybody was driving electric cars you would not be able to afford to charge your car. So be careful what you wish for.
.

It takes less energy to move an electric car than a gasoline car. If everyone drove electric, there would be more energy, not less.

2MuchMark 01-12-2015 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 420 (Post 20353939)
Phones are training us to charge shit constantly. But I don't have time for that.

How do we get an electric car that requires minimal time and effort to charge? Solar powered once there are stronger panels and batteries. Maybe put a windmill on top to charge the batteries while driving. :winkwink:


I've got it!!! A windmill made of solar panels!

bronco67 01-12-2015 04:18 AM

It just looks like anyone who wants to be a naysayer about electric cars can just go "ewwwww -- charging!!!"

dyna mo 01-12-2015 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20354855)
It just looks like anyone who wants to be a naysayer about electric cars can just go "ewwwww -- charging!!!"

why does being realistic about challenges get translated by the dense as being naysayer.

y'all have heard about reality right? facing challenges means answering challenges.

welcome to adulthood.

MaDalton 01-12-2015 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20354855)
It just looks like anyone who wants to be a naysayer about electric cars can just go "ewwwww -- charging!!!"

well that's exactly why i would never consider getting an electric car

where I live there is no chance charging it - here's only public and very limited parking space

and i cant throw a cable down from 5th floor

Hydrogen (from renewable sources) makes much more sense when you want to dump gasoline - it's up to the industry to create the infrastructure, the technology exists already and will only get cheaper from here

dyna mo 01-12-2015 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornopete (Post 20355519)
You should right them a letter and let them know right away!

Let who know? BMW? You know they didn't say that right? the article is fluff, you might want to get up to speed on the topic before you try and be a dickhead.

not to mention quite a few other people in this thread feel the same way that BMW has no intentions of dropping the ICE, be sure and quote them all and be a dickhead some more.

MaDalton 01-12-2015 03:38 PM

in case it matters - BMW means "Bayrische Motoren Werke" - like bavarian motor manufacturing (or something like that)

while they indeed try hard with the i3 and i8, their gasoline engines are still for lots of customers the primary reason to buy them

they would lose clients easily in the double digit percentage if they stopped selling them

like 50% or more

EonBlue 01-13-2015 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20354771)
Yes, it is. Burning fossil fuels sends CO2 into the atmosphere. CO2 reflects heat rising from the earth and oceans, keeping it in the atmosphere instead of letting it escape into space, warming the planet.

Wow, that simple huh? Is that the best talking point they gave you in your AGW alarmism manual?

You do realize that the heating potential of CO2 is logarithmic, right? It does not have unlimited potential to heat the earth. Most of the warming caused by CO2 happens in the first 20 ppm. At current levels, and at levels much higher still, the extra heating caused by CO2 is negligible. That's why the earth has never had a runaway greenhouse effect even with CO2 levels as high as 8000 ppm.

http://i.imgur.com/MlWtnCn.png


Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20354771)
Daily life in China:

Yes, there is a lot of pollution there. But that is smog and fine particulate matter. That is not CO2. It is real pollution like SO2 and it is a real problem. CO2 is not pollution.

If you do some research you will find that here in North America and most of Europe the air and waterways are much cleaner than they were 100, or even 25, years ago. For the most part things have been getting better not worse.


Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20354771)
Beach life in Florida

Yes that was a terrible accident. But you cannot reasonably use that as an indication of overall pollution levels or as justification for shutting down civilization as we know it.

Besides that no technology is without its problems or potential negative environmental or health impacts. Not even your beloved electric cars:

Study: Lithium-Ion Batteries Can Impact Environment, Health Negatively

Quote:

The researchers found that batteries using cathodes with nickel and cobalt and solvent-based electrode processing are the highest risks for negative health and environmental impacts. These impacts are a result of the production, processing and use of cobalt and nickel metal compounds. The environmental impacts include resource depletion, global warming, and ecological toxicity while the health impacts are poor respiratory, pulmonary and neurological effects.

Yes, probably true. But you do realize that oil naturally seeps into the environment all of the time, right? In fact oil is a natural product of, and a part of, the environment. Oil extraction should be no more or no less scrutinized than extraction of any other natural resource. We just have to learn to be a little more careful extracting and transporting it.


Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20354771)
It takes less energy to move an electric car than a gasoline car. If everyone drove electric, there would be more energy, not less.

You're not serious are you? Either you need to rephrase that or you need to go back to basic high school physics. If you have such a flawed understanding of something so basic it's no wonder you are so easily fooled into the whole "CO2 is pollution" dogma.




.

dyna mo 01-13-2015 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20354771)

i noticed you didn't post in my today's sunset threads.

life a beach **********, dig it.

beach life in California

http://i.imgur.com/ySpqr9M.jpg

2MuchMark 01-13-2015 03:09 PM

Eon:

Your graph is incomplete.
CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas.
I didn't say China is full of CO2. You said the air is cleaner. I shared that pic.
Oil DOES naturally seep into the ocean - but its the oil companies that cause all the damage.

But besides all of this, are you saying everyone should just ignore what scientists are saying, and go ahead and forget all about pollution controls and energies alternative to carbon?


Dynamo:
If only your pretty California sunsets were representative of the whole world. Unfortunately it is not.

Same question: Are you saying that everything is "ok", and that we should just go ahead and keep burning everything?

georgeyw 01-13-2015 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20354768)
Me too. I wonder how much a jogger generates in electricity?

I like this idea:

Go jogging, charge your batteries with Ampy - Hindustan Times

Not sure how much running you do Mark, carrying a phone / charger / cables is definitely not a great idea at all.

dyna mo 01-13-2015 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20356826)
Eon:

Your graph is incomplete.
CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas.
I didn't say China is full of CO2. You said the air is cleaner. I shared that pic.
Oil DOES naturally seep into the ocean - but its the oil companies that cause all the damage.

But besides all of this, are you saying everyone should just ignore what scientists are saying, and go ahead and forget all about pollution controls and energies alternative to carbon?


Dynamo:
If only your pretty California sunsets were representative of the whole world. Unfortunately it is not.

Same question: Are you saying that everything is "ok", and that we should just go ahead and keep burning everything?


i agree that FLorida beaches are not as beautiful as Cali beaches.

My point is we can address problems, hurdles, road blocks and issues without having to portray doom&gloom on such a dramatic level. IN fact, I think that sort of things gets in the way of progress. You know I agree with you fundamentally on most things, I disagree with your making it all out like there's no joy in the world, you know, on account of global warming. and then you back that up with a crappy picture. L-pink lives in Fl and he posted a FL sunset pic-

http://s21.postimg.org/ypgcqskef/DSC00085.jpg


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc