Florida man has the answer to your question, Robbie. :1orglaugh

LOL! That's a cool Twitter profile. "Florida Man" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yes they are. Any other questions? lol When you have little kids shooting themselves,their brother and sisters because they go play with Daddies gun because it was laying around. Or little kids shooting and sometimes killing their parents because the kid doesnt know but the gun was easy to get to. People treat it like just another appliance around the house. So its either required training to get a license or your 3 yrs old kid shoots Mom with your gun ,you go to jail.

Apparently people die everyday for being that god damn stupid or worse yet kill someone else. It's one thing if you grow up in a rural area and have experience with guns at a young age, but most people don't have that and don't learn to respect a gun.

Just like people need to be taught how to drive a car or to ride a bike, they need to be taught how to properly handle a gun. It's a deadly weapon and should be treated as such.

It's not just their lives at risk but yours as well..

Sorry to derail the pointless gun debate but this thread is now, temporarily, about girls with guns.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lr9z3bEEk41qflsds.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SMfInMG6yi...6ii7o1_500.jpg

http://eclecticaerotica.com/wp-conte...1m8zo1_500.jpg

http://41.media.tumblr.com/674230b5c...7h7o1_1280.jpg

http://www.details.com/images/celebr...ybrown_hss.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7AxiSAIKiJ...gun+images.jpg

http://41.media.tumblr.com/e71257261...5w5o1_1280.jpg

http://40.media.tumblr.com/aa91248c0...kr65o1_500.jpg

http://40.media.tumblr.com/cd630fa22...kr65o1_500.jpg

http://handsomecitizens.com/wp-conte...rette.gun_.jpg

http://www.rollogrady.com/wp-content...67130acf_z.jpg

http://40.media.tumblr.com/b494d889f...iguo2_1280.jpg

Arguably, multiplication is not that hard either, but we train our children in that on purpose.

Are people really that stupid? As a matter of fact, yes, they are.

These people cannot understand the concept of basic firearm safety - store your firearm where your children cannot access it. If you carry your firearm in your purse, you cannot put you purse and your child in a shopping cart. If you carry your firearm in your purse, you cannot leave your purse where you child can get it. This should be common sense, but yet accidents happen too often.

That doesn't even begin to address tactics. That poor guy in Wal Mart thought he was going to be a hero. He never gave any thought the fact the gunman had a partner.

It's our constitutional right to own firearms. Common sense is not required.

Movis with violens and guns should not be watched by kids. That can affect this situations.

I bet this little thug finished all the gta games.

Am I supposed to fap to the guns? There is hardly any nudity or erotica in those pics.

He has proven a few times that he does not understand the definition of the word. He obviously is not a crockett scientist.

crazy shit

Actually I understand quite well.. perhaps it is you two whom do not understand it's definition..


armed
ärmd/Submit
adjective
1.
equipped with or carrying a weapon or weapons.
"the security forces are armed with automatic rifles"


The kid had his hands on a gun and shot two people. Despite what you want to pretend, he/she was in fact armed. The kid could not shoot the gun with out being in position of the gun.. Therefore at the time of the shooting the child was armed with a gun..

So the girl violated these rules by not shooting? I guess USA has violated this rule a lot; it has pointed various countries with nukes without shooting. So irresponsible. Same applies to Russia too.

But about shooting, it takes practice. Unless your intent is just to fire the gun and shoot for the "bang".

By the way; in hunting there is a rule that you shouldn't shoot if there might be security issues or wrong specie, etc. Despite of pointing the gun. Same goes in war; you shouldn't shoot own people, even if you are already pointing at them. :)

I'm not sure what you are talking about in your first sentence. :)

The shooting part...yeah, it does take practice if you are wanting to become a great shot and be able to hit targets with great accuracy.

Not sure if that's what gun control people are referring to when they say "training" though.
I don't think their objective is to make people MORE lethal with the weapon. lol

What I meant is...why does it take classes and trainers to "train" people?

A gun is a very, very simplistic weapon. Put bullet in, aim, pull trigger.

Totally uneducated peasants were doing it hundreds of years ago.

And also...for safety issues...Doesn't seem like it should take months of training to be told how to be safe with a gun.

You can do that in a couple of sentences.

Now whether or not people will actually DO what they know they should is another story.

Complacency and familiarity of having the gun for a long time without anything going wrong is what led to this accidental shooting. (just like it does in most accidents in life)

Were the parents carrying skittles?

I was referring to the "point and shoot, or don't point- rule". Seems a tad silly to me.

About the training. It does help with the "butter finger syndrome", and attitude training is also a big part. Although I haven't been in any formal gun training if you don't count army. Anyways, when shooting at local gun club, etc, it is not that uncommon to see folks "trained". Training in here means that they do safety, etc. errors and then they get corrected. Sometimes thrown out of the gun range if they are not fast enough learners. That is how I got trained; apparently it is not enough for fellow shooters that you can shoot with the gun; right direction, etc. is also appreciated. Not that I would have been thrown out of the range or anything similar. :)

Oh, and I started shooting many years before army (as 15 years old).

glad they are ok :2 cents:

How can they be ok? They're going to be terrorized by that kid for another 15 years.

Maybe the father shouldn't have shot, despite of pointing. :)

You're not obligated to masturbate to files you see on the internet just because the file extension is .JPG. ;)

Resist the occupational habit! :1orglaugh

Me like.


EDIT: Another cutie.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mUrdwXQh1B...uns+images.jpg

Really too fucking bad to grow up knowing you killed your parents.

Aside from firearms safety training , reading courses should be provided :2 cents:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

so, just a little ' update ' to get the big ( ugly ) picture here ....

So, in that ' suite ' there was only :

- The man
- The pregnant woman
- The grandmother
- The two kids ( including the shooter )
- The two pit bulls

... hope the pizza delivery guy didn`t intend to crash as well :)

Obviously these are the kind of gun owners the NRA wants more of..

They are living in a "motel room" so this kid doesn't have much hope to begin with.

Sounds more like the kind of people you want to "tax the rich" more to give govt. assistance.

Damn crockett, people crammed into an extended stay motel dirt poor. These are EXACTLY the people you claim to want to "help" by having bigger govt.

And then you immediately show the true colors of "liberals" these days by pretty much dismissing them with a snide remark.

Just who in the hell do you think all the people on govt. assistance are?

Are you thinking that they are all saints and/or wounded vets or kindly old grandma?

They aren't. They are pretty much people just like in this story. People with no real education, no future, no prospects. Just barely getting by.

If anything you (as a card carrying Democrat) should "care" about their plight and be defending them for the lifestyle choices that have been forced on them by the Koch brothers and Fox News.

Instead, you turn up your nose like a typical elitist so-called "liberal" and throw them under the bus.

Hypocrite.

Robbie you always call me a liberal because I disagree with your views. I'm a "realist" not a liberal or a conservative. Of course in your "Robbie's World" it's only you that can be Mr independent while constantly bashing the left and making excuses for the right.

I don't care to help people that don't help themselves. I'm all for giving people help whom try to help themselves, but obviously people living in a motel buying pizza's and guns are not making good decisions to help themselves out of their situation.

I side with the Left on most issues because the Right has gone bat shit crazy, but that doesn't make me a liberal. It just means I understand the right is bat shit crazy and I tend to not agree too much with crazy people..

Also I'm not a card carrying Democrat, I was an independent long before all your Republican buddies thought it was cool to be independent because they were embarrassed to call themselves Republicans. I've been registered as an independent since I started voting.. Edit I take that back, one Election cycle I registered as a Democrat..

:321GFY

You are lying to yourself crockett.

You've never seen a Democrat candidate that you didn't love or a big govt. tax and spend that you didn't embrace.

And the reality is: These are the very people that you claim to want to "help". These ARE the poor people. The ones who get govt. assistance, who use the govt. programs.

Yeah, you talk a lot of shit...but in the end, you are a cold and heartless person.

You can babble on all day long about being an "independent". But you are a typical cliche Democrat. All talk.

When reality comes up in your face (the people in this story for instance)...you don't want to see it. You want to wish it away and start babbling about the NRA.

Newsflash: The vast, vast majority of gun crimes and deaths are not caused by NRA members. They are done by POOR people...just like the ones in this story.

Once you get your eyes open...you will realize that poor people aren't saints and they aren't the great and wonderful innocent people that you imagine they are.

But go ahead crockett. throw this family under the bus. Why do you care? You're a Democrat.
And being a Democrat means that all you have to do is pretend to care and then try to tax people (take OTHER people's money) and throw that money to the winds.

Now you can feel "good" about yourself. And anyone who disagrees with you?
Obviously they are "Republicans" and "evil".

You are such a blind sheep that it's funny to watch you twist and turn.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I believe on that... and I'm not a cop. :pimp
Or was accidental or the kid was planning it for some months...

No animals were harmed in the making of these pictures...

lol Robbie, you have become as delusional as Vendzilla.. You live in your own little world where everything must be as you say it is..

By the way, people eat in many pics and movies. Real massacre actually. That is actually bullshit when they say that "No animals were harmed in the making of this movie."
I bet that the filming and casting crew had plenty of lunches. :)

Hypocrite

"Once you get your eyes open...you will realize that poor people aren't saints and they aren't the great and wonderful innocent people that you imagine they are."

US might not have king, but some sort of nobility thing seems to live deeply.

Poor people in generally isn't some homogenic group. What is poor people anyways? Students are often poor. Are they "poor people", or is "poor people" defined with something else than being poor?

I always thought that "poor people" were homeless people living in shelters and starving.

That isn't the case anymore with what society defines it as. These days...yeah "poor people" could be a person in college (paying expensive tuition), driving a car, owning a cellphone, having cable t.v. , etc. , etc.

My point is...crockett is a hypocrite. He constantly babbles about how the Koch Brothers are behind everything that is "bad" and Republicans don't care about the "poor".

And yet...when confronted with a story concerning a family that is "poor", he berates them.

He insinuates that they are part of the NRA. Even though this family couldn't even afford to pay the dues to be a member.
They ARE the very people whom the govt. "helps" by keeping them in poverty through welfare.

In crockett's fevered brain...we MUST tax people MORE. That way the govt. can "help" the "poor" people.
But then when confronted with real life "poor" people, he dismisses them with a snide remark.

I'm pointing out that being poor isn't a pretty site. And the people who are terminally poor (staying on govt. assistance for years and years) are not going to be the best and brightest in the world.

crockett is a hypocrite plain and simple. He can attack and run his dick-skinners all day long. But at the end of the day...he's a hypocrite who only wants to feel good about himself without ever actually doing anything other than making smartass remarks about the very people he claims to want to help.

http://41.media.tumblr.com/674230b5c...7h7o1_1280.jpg


WHO IS SHE?
u/p for her site please.

The only hypocrite here is you. You always bitch and moan and label people for the exact same shit you do. Yet your shit never stinks..

Just like the last topic you called me a liar several times, then I slam dunked the proof showing you didn't know what the fuck you were talking about.. Then you try to play it off and conventionally disappear and run off to hide and of course never come to terms that you were wrong in calling me a liar and wrong about the subject matter.

as I said you are as delusional as Vendzilla.

when you are so poor you have to live in a motel room - what do you need a gun and 2 pitbulls for?