GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Obama Vetoes Dirty Koch Brothers Canadian Shit Tubes (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1161846)

Mutt 02-25-2015 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20403679)
I'm 50 and my hair is brown. You can look at all presidents before and after.they all aged alot on the job,it's an awful job.

and yet US presidents live long, very long usually - Reagan over 90, Ford over 90, Carter must be close to 90 or over, Bush I same, Nixon over 80

Rochard 02-25-2015 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20403570)
I hear you, but here's the problem. Eminent domain means "the right of a government or its agent to expropriate private property for public use, with payment of compensation." In this case, it is a Private, Foreign, Corporation that is trying to claim Eminent domain.

Not at all. You should read the law, or at least Wikipedia before trying to argue or debate it:

"However, it can be legislatively delegated by the state to municipalities, government subdivisions, or even to private persons or corporations, when they are authorized to exercise the functions of public character."

When building power companies, the company made an offer to lease the land for power lines and other such items. If they refused, they attempted to use eminent domain to take the land. They went to the state government, explained how their power plant benefits the general public, and because the state is always interested in making improvements to the power grid they always backed the power plants.

Not uncommon at all.

You can stick to your argument of eminent domain all you want but it's really not valid. Eminent domain can and will be used. Does it suck for the land owners? Yeah, perhaps. If they were smart they would lease out that land and make a profit off of it for the next one hundred years.

There is just no valid reason not to do this. It will create a fair amount of short term jobs, it will create a few long term jobs, and will benefit everyone. Any discussion about environmental issues is invalid; That oil is going to pass through the US no matter what and this is by far the safest way.

Vendzilla 02-25-2015 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20403528)
So you agree with this one then too? Since now we want mob rule
Quinnipiac University. June 24-30, 2014. N=1,446 registered voters nationwide. Margin of error ± 2.6.


"Do you support or oppose stricter gun control laws in the United States?"


Support Oppose Unsure
% % %

6/24-30/14

50 47 3

9/23-29/13

54 41 5

3/26 - 4/1/13

53 42 4

2/27 - 3/4/13

51 42 7

1/30 - 2/4/13

52 43 5

7/8-13/08

54 40 5

Polls change
In a Pew Research poll released Wednesday, 52 percent are in support of the protection of gun rights and 46 percent support gun control. This is the first time in two decades that Pew has found more support for gun rights than gun control.

Pew poll: Support for gun rights exceeds gun control - Kendall Breitman - POLITICO

TTI-Rich 02-25-2015 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wizzo (Post 20402502)
Woohoo, more awesome train fire destruction in the future!


Fucking Union idiots in his pockets...

Eat a cock you piece of shit cunt.

BFT3K 02-26-2015 12:16 PM

This just came in, via the Canadian pipeline...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMNuUJ7gHs8


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123