GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   We're never figuring this out! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1162378)

just a punk 03-09-2015 07:58 AM

Just a small fix:

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20413769)
IAre you really that dumb or just kidding on me (I'm still can't believe it's for real)? Einstein said it clear: E = m/c^2

Course I've meant E = mc^2, as it's explained in the same post.

aka123 03-09-2015 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20413769)
It's the same one (laterally: absolutely the same formula) - just believe me. What's wrong with you, man? Yet another victim of Finnish education? :helpme

*facepalm smile here*. Are you really that dumb or just kidding on me (I'm still can't believe it's for real)? Einstein said it clear: E = m/c^2 - the energy of explosive will be equal to the mass (Google for "critical mass" in case of nuclear reaction) multiplied by the speed of light in square. I can't believe you didn't learn it in the school... And you were talking something about education level here and there? OMFG :disgust

Maybe the same formula, but it is first time I see it written that way.

You said something about proving that equation in school. So did you make nuke tests to prove it or not? It doesn't work the other way around, as I already said.

By the way, I haven't said anything about Russian education. Surely you have superior school system. You are so smart people-> knowledge increases pain->thus you drink so much to relieve all that pain. It makes sense.

dyna mo 03-09-2015 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20413783)
I haven't asked you for any abstractions. I've just asked you to show me the math. I'm not aka123 and I can read/evaluate formulas(I don't need the explanations etc). So please just go ahead and shoot it here.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

what a bullshit way to bail out of your shitass comment about where I studied the maths.

https://41.media.tumblr.com/f861f8cc...vw65o1_400.jpg

just a punk 03-09-2015 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20413863)
what a bullshit way to bail out of your shitass comment about where I studied the maths

Forget it. Just post your math calculations please.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20413831)
Maybe the same formula, but it is first time I see it written that way.

Hint: it can be written in 3 different ways ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20413831)
You said something about proving that equation in school.

No, I didn't :) I did't even sent a single sputnik to the outer space to prove the Lagrange's formula and I've never tested a single submarine to prove that Archimedes was right ;)

just a punk 03-09-2015 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20413831)
You are so smart people-> knowledge increases pain->thus you drink so much to relieve all that pain. It makes sense.

Sure thing :winkwink:

http://www.stat.fi/til/ksyyt/2013/ks...004_en_001.gif

Source: Statistics Finland - 4. Deaths from alcohol-related causes almost unchanged

The graph doesn't look good ;)

dyna mo 03-09-2015 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20413880)
Forget it. Just post your math calculations please.



Hint: it can be written in 3 different ways ;)



No, I didn't :) I did't even sent a single sputnik to the outer space to prove the Lagrange's formula and I've never tested a single submarine to prove that Archimedes was right ;)

they're not MY calculations, i stated THE math shows that the galaxy can be colonized in x million years, and also supplied several mathematicians work on the subject, you can't comprehend that, I get it. Instead of embracing their math, you'd rather dodge and deflect with some silly nonsense about it all being my math.

you can talk about the subject or make it about me. you choose to make it about me, I'm trying to keep to the topic.

if you want to keep to the topic too, then read the shit I posted and comment on the results they reveal and don't act like a dick about where I learned math all while you act like you have some sort of superior math comprehension.

just a punk 03-09-2015 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20413945)
they're not MY calculations

Not a problem, please post math calculations performed by others. I'm really excited to look at them.

Thank you in advance!

dyna mo 03-09-2015 10:02 AM

jesus fucking christ you didn't even read the articles I linked, why would I waste energy on digging up more shit you won't read or comprehend.

it's not like you're interested in the topic, you're just interested in trying to gotcha me.

gofuckyourself.

just a punk 03-09-2015 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20413958)
it's not like you're interested in the topic, you're just interested in trying to gotcha me.

Don't be that ambitious. It's not about you. I've just asked you to post the math calculations (not yours - ok with that). No need it all those useless posts with so many words. And not a Finnish guy, so I can read raw formulas w/o problems.

dyna mo 03-09-2015 10:28 AM

do your own research. based on your posts I'd have to include proofing 2+2=4 to you.

just a punk 03-09-2015 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20413987)
do your own research. based on your posts I'd have to include proofing 2+2=4 to you.

So you will not post any math calculations to prove your own post? Ok, I see now.

P.S. Even 2+2 is not always 4 (hint: complex numbers) ;)

dyna mo 03-09-2015 10:35 AM

again, making it about me. while you claim you are so intently interested in the topic yet completely lack any interest or desire to investigate it on your own all while pointing your finger at me.

riiiiiiiiight. ruskie logic right there.

just a punk 03-09-2015 10:43 AM

So there will be no math calculations? Ok, it was expected.

mineistaken 03-09-2015 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20410709)
Maybe once they figure out another great mystery of the world. This is the one where in 2000 the adult industry had the perfect business model of giving away very little which resulted in signup ratios that were through the roof and money basically falling from the sky, but still they insisted on seeing who could give away the most free content and turn the industry into a battle for scraps.

Somebody said - stupidity is endless. When you have a large group of people you can count on somebody being stupid enough to fuck things up for everybody. Sometimes for personal short term gain.

dyna mo 03-09-2015 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20414029)
So there will be no math calculations? Ok, it was expected.

as if you were going to actually go through the calculations and verify the maths. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

i hope you don't think I'd fall for that bullshit.

Drake 03-09-2015 01:56 PM

I'm at a loss. Do we have to go back to bible thumping now?

aka123 03-09-2015 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drake (Post 20414296)
I'm at a loss. Do we have to go back to bible thumping now?

Not yet, we are still waiting CyberSEO to confirm this equation: G=G≥G, that proves the existence of the God (G).

noshit 03-09-2015 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 20413536)
Well there ya go, noshit has figured it all out.

You bet... Thanks..! :thumbsup

420 03-09-2015 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon (Post 20413647)

Quote:

The Sun is a typical star, and relatively young. There are billions of stars in the galaxy that are billions of years older.
With high probability, some of these stars will have Earth-like planets.[2] Assuming the Earth is typical, some of these planets may develop intelligent life.
Some of these civilizations may develop interstellar travel, a technology Earth is investigating even now (such as the 100 Year Starship).
Even at the slow pace of currently envisioned interstellar travel, the galaxy can be completely colonized in a few tens of millions of years.
Fermi based his paradox on assumptions. First he assumes Earth is typical. Next he assumes interstellar travel is possible/cost effect. And he assumes there would be reason to colonize/explore everything and that it happened in the past 200,000 during human existence. Last he assumes millions of years is short time frame for an advanced species to survive and remain advanced.


------------------------

I don't think humans are typical. I think there was spark required to make life then a separate spark to make human life. Maybe we are the only lifeforms that can travel to space. Maybe others came here and brought dinosaurs home as pets. Maybe their stealth is so advanced they're undetectable.

We just learned to fly about 50 or 60 years before we left the atmosphere. But, for at least 200,000 years before that we humans, the most advanced of all species (in our own minds) didn't know much about flight or space flight. That doesn't mean intelligent advanced life didn't exist on Earth. We just hadn't figured out how to fly yet. Now we've known how to for about 0.1% of the estimated time of our existence.

pornmasta 03-09-2015 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz (Post 20413541)

hit satrap
Satrap - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

just a punk 03-10-2015 12:18 AM

100 heretics.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drake (Post 20414296)
I'm at a loss. Do we have to go back to bible thumping now?

Unfortunately Bible has the same problem. There are no answers on who has created their God and what was before him. So it's a pretty useless book :winkwink:

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20414332)
Not yet, we are still waiting CyberSEO to confirm this equation: G=G≥G, that proves the existence of the God (G).

Sorry but I can't prove it because there is no God :)

420 03-10-2015 02:54 PM

How does a system of mathematics created by the human mind explain the universe in which we live?


Quote:

How can it be that mathematics, being after all a product of human thought which is independent of experience, is so admirably appropriate to the objects of reality? Is human reason, then, without experience, merely by taking thought, able to fathom the properties of real things?
In my opinion the answer to this question is, briefly, this: as far as the propositions of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. It seems to me that complete clarity as to this state of things became common property only through that trend in mathematics, which is known by the name of "axiomatics."

Einstein, Geometry and Experience

aka123 03-10-2015 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 420 (Post 20415236)
How does a system of mathematics created by the human mind explain the universe in which we live?

At the end; mathematics is a language. So, I would say that it doesn't explain universe, we explain universe with it. Or just using common language; like I am doing right now.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc