i am more concerned with current events, not hi-5ing a bunch of libtards re: what an entirely irrelevant bachmann tweets or facebooks or wtfever it is y'all get boners about.

for the drunk clueless nitwit anti-americans who try to gotcha me over a link:

Country Reports on Terrorism 2013 State Sponsors of Terrorism Overview

it's beyond fucking hilarious to me you fucking nitwits are trying dispute something that has been fact for 30+ fucking years.

State Sponsors: Iran - Council on Foreign Relations

Iran's supreme leader orders fresh terror attacks on West - Telegraph

State Department: Iran Supports Al Qaeda, Taliban | The Weekly Standard

'Iran's support for terrorism highest in decade' - International - Jerusalem Post

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Leb...cilitator.ashx

i could fuckign go on and on and on and on posting links.

fucking nitwits.

Then why argue in a topic, which is about the stupid shit she said?

again, i already explained that more than once. the op described the topic as the entire comment, i've posted my views on multiple angles of that, from the inappropriate analogy, the need for libtards to point their collective finger at a non-entity, as well as my thoughts on the primary part of the quote- her concern that this would lead to a nuclear event in North America.

along the way, i've had to deal with my legions of fans. :1orglaugh




i've contributed substantially to the topic,


you're fucking welcome.

I would say that a lot of the people that dynamo is listing who describe Iran as a "terrorist" state have a vested interest in war-mongering. They make a lot of money for their cronies in the defense contracting industry by making sure we always have a boogeyman that we need to spend so much money on for "defense". And that includes both Democrat and Republican bureaucrats.

I'm not saying that Iran isn't "dangerous" or whatever...but hell, who is more dangerous than the United States?
We actually invade other countries without them attacking us first. We actually USED nuclear weapons on people. We spy on everyone around the world (including our own citizens). And if our govt. gets it's way...we'll have our own version of the "Berlin Wall" across Mexico.

I got a feeling that most countries leaders are far more afraid of the United States than we are of them.

I mean...we spend more than the next ten countries combined on our military. And Iran is nowhere NEAR that league of countries.

And again...just how DO you pretend to be everybody's boss and "stop" them from building a nuclear bomb?
Science is science. This ain't 1945. And there are scientists in every developed country who KNOW how to make them.
Do we kill them all? Do we inject them with something that will erase their memory?

I'm not arguing. Just thinking out loud.

This is not what our country is SUPPOSED to be. We are supposed to be that "beacon of hope" to the world.
Now, if our bureaucrats can actually broker a deal that offers Iran enough incentive (by relaxing the sanctions we've had on them for decades) to not build a weapon...that's great!
But thinking that we are "allowing" them or any other sovereign nation to do anything they want it very egotistical.

the list of random links to news articles i cited re: iran sponsored terrorism that dates back 30+ years? you think random journalists have a vested interest in war-mongering?

or are you speaking to the list of advisors of 1 think tank that a couple of my fans are trying to use to gotcha me on?

either way, i usually don't disagree with you and i don't this time either. i see things some degree different from you and combined with your being able to not be disrespectful in debate, i find that is where good spirited debate lies, not with someone who is steadfastly opposed to me/views and can't think for themselves so they lash out and have lingering butthurt after i reply with authority.

i'm otr here stating that USA should step down from being leader of the western world and pass the baton to Canada, let's those knuckleheads see how hard the job is.

more importantly though, the USA has enemies and that's a fact. and iran is one of those. and their plans of ME domination are well-documented. that's an important enough reason for me to take this accord seriously and critique the living shit out of it.

regardless of what color the president is, red or blue.

I was just turning 18 years old when the Shah of Iran was deposed and the hostages were taken at the U.S. Embassy.

Our govt. had propped up the Shah for decades against the will of the people. And then we gave him refuge when he fled the country.

When all of that happened, I was too young to realize that it was the Govt. in Washington D.C. that CAUSED all of that to happen in the first place by keeping a dictator in power.

Were those people in Iran PISSED at America? Hell yes. And with pretty damn good reason.

Having said that...they brokered a deal with nominee Reagan and released the hostages.

Turned out that despite what we've been told...they were reasonable and able to negotiate. (not like Isis with all the beheadings).

As for "state sponsored terrorism"...does that mean that they arm rebel armies and govt.'s that we don't "Like"?
Maybe so.

So I would guess that using that logic of our govt., WE would be a "state sponsored terrorism" country for arming Israel and other groups that THEY don't "Like".

Just sayin', it's a matter of perspective.

Gen. George Washington was a "terrorist" and a "traitor" to England.
To us, he's a hero and a patriot.

Agreed.

So you would do the right thing because Science says so. That's good. Why can't I do the right thing because Science says so, too? CO2 is proven to be a greenhouse gas, and too much greenhouse gas has proven to warm the planet, and too high an average temperature will cause a lot of changes for the earth, which has also been proven and is even visible. Science is science, truth is truth, and must apply to everyone.


Bingo. Everyone should think critically and seek the truth. You and I are in total agreement.



Loi, easy on the name-calling. You didn't read the post at all. I didn't mock the old lady. I said Rick Santorum "pussied out".

Why are you putting words in my mouth? Why are you taking something and turning it completely into something else just to forward your own opinions? Do you do this all the time and with everything?




Iran has achieved self-sufficiency in the construction of most of its solar power plants, wind farms, geothermal plants, dams, and so on, and they even take on contracts to build some of the same all across the region and even globally in some cases (recent projects in Afghanistan, Iraq, Tajikistan, Armenia, Oman, and Nicaragua). Don't you know anything?

And also, you should really stop using the word "Nukes". This is language that Fox News would use when describing this scenario. What we're talking about are Nuclear reactors for energy, not nuclear bombs.

Here's the facts.

Iran has agreed to only enrich uranium to 3.67%. You can't make a bomb with this. They would have to enrich it to almost 90% to make a bomb.

Iran cuts centrifuges from 19,000 to 6,104, with 5,060 for enrichment. If they were going to be sneaky and try to enrich uranium to the 90% they need to make a bomb, trying to do so with so few centrifuges would take forever, giving them plenty of time to get caught in the act before being able to attack someone with a bomb.

Iran to cut Uranium Stockpiles from 10,000kg to just 300kg (97%). By giving up all this material they cannot possibly create a nuclear bomb anyway.

Finally, with all of that above, IAEA will still inspect Iran?s nuclear facilities. The deal has severely crippled Iran's abilities to make a bomb, and if by some crazy miracle they did make one, the sanctions destroying their country now that are lifted under the deal would be instantly returned.

Dynamo for once in your life, turn off your ultra-paranoid republican hat, and start giving your president a little credit.

This is pretty much what I feel on the subject. The same people whom want us to go into Iran or don't like this deal are the same ones whom want us to send troops into Syria or Ukraine. It's always the same people beating the same war drums no matter whom the target is..

It's all about the billion dollar war industry and creating boogiemen to scare the masses into going along with it. What is worse is that same attitude has come to our own boarders with the building up of the current military police departments and the billion dollar war industry which now drives it as well.

look douchebag, i've spent the last 3 months debating you like an adult, a commitment i made to myself and made public here at teh gfy. your reply to that was for me to go back to fucking my mom. i honored my commitment to kyself regardless of your reply to it. and regardless of your continuing to categorize my 28,000+ posts in a negative light and regardless of your continually making shit personal.

i'm done with that.

priceless :1orglaugh

dumbfuck, you can do a fucking search and stick the results up your ass.

it's all on the fucking record here. the fact i have to point that out to you confirms yet again just how much of a dumbfuck you are.

want to be treated like an adult by me? then act like an adult toward me, otherwise you get treated like the fuckwad child you are.

i've proven in this thread i respond back to people in the same tone they have towards me. but you're too fucking stupid to even see that, let alone figure out you are posting about something you truly have no fucking clue about, i'm not surprised.

i tell ya what i'm going to do. since it's Easter and the topic is a nuke peace accord, i'll extend to you the same truce i offered ********** back in december, you stop with the personal bullshit, including the gotcha attempts and drive-by insults and i'll stop replying to it in kind. i won't be stopping if you don't, unlike what i decided to go forward on with **********, that was back when i gave him the benefit of the doubt of being an OK guy.


this isn't a framework, there are no late-night coffee talks, this is the deal.


it's entirely up to you.

and i'll even take the initiative

i apologize for my personal attacks on you directfiesta.

If you actually looked at the facts of the deal, you'd realize that the deal the US, Europe, Russia and China made with Iran massively reduces their nuclear capability.

:helpme

:1orglaugh

In other threads you have repeatedly posted in a vitriolic tone towards those you disagree with....even when the other person has not attacked you personally.

if you haven't figured out by now i have immersed myself in the "facts" of this deal there is nothing anyone can do to prove otherwise, especially me.

nevertheless, the "facts" you are referring to are spun from the WH and to be perfectly blunt with you, are not "facts".

you are more than welcome to buy the WH version, i couldn't give 1 single shit.

you are not good at english. again, i didn't call ANYONE a name, i called a group a name.

dumbfuck.



that's me calling you a name, dumbfuck. fyi.

bull fucking shit.

prove it.

it's people like you who fail to realize we are on a board called gofuckyourself, yet you get your panties twisted up when someone writes the word fuck.

not to mention you completely waxed over my attempt to make peace with one of my trolls, just a couple posts above your bullshit and i've treated everyone different in this thread, like i do every thread.

checkmate.

you shouldn't go through life so fucking negative. i've got 27000 posts here yet you cherry pick some posts of mine so you can point your finger and make a negative comment about me being negative.

you're over your head here.

If you don't think Michelle Bachmann is worthy of being called a "republitard", then who do you feel is a republitard? When are you going to take that shot? She was a made to order target for the R word if there ever was one and you went the other way. And wtf is that avatar, einstein and monroe? a true clusterfuck.

are you addessing me? i'll go ahead and think so.

first, my avatar is from an MIT science experiment, what you call a true clusterfuck, in reality is called science.

next, don't make assumptions about what i think in spite of what i've wrote about republitards. it only makes you look like you got confused by my avatar.

So.. when did you buy the dyna mo account anyway?

i know what i am doing is working at teh gfy when gfyers get agitated and confused over my fucking avatar.

Robbie you said above that you "DON'T agree that the United States has any power to order other countries around and try to make up "rules" for them to follow", and then in the very next paragraph you said if any other country tries (!) to get a bomb that they should themselves be bombed. Which is it?

No it can't. Who says that the US has the power to bomb other countries without a declaration of war? Why bomb them just because they are thinking of building a bomb? How do you prove it? What you said makes no sense, sorry.


The deal isn't vague at all - its actually pretty detailed. The US and other countries aren't just saying "Don't build a bomb", they are also taking away Iran's ability to make a bomb in exchange for lifting sanctions against them.

Or put another way, the US stopped giving Iran aid. If they want the aid back (which they do), they have to give up their bomb-making abilities. Iran said yes. Iran gets their aid, gets to build safe nuclear power planets, gives up their abilities to make bombs, and now the world sleeps a little better. It's a great deal that Obama should be proud of.


I apologized for insulting your Mom, and since Christmas I have been respectful towards you. You on the other hand have called me and many others here, endless names in multiple threads and agreements, every time you realized your arguments were falling flat.

There's nothing wrong to admitting you're wrong, or have made a mistake, etc. Others here have done that, me especially. The next time you are so pissed off at someone for their opinions, don't trash them. Instead challenge yourself to continue the debate and find the facts. You'll feel better and live longer.


TO DIRECTFIESTA from DYNAMO:

And, just like that, you fail again. Oh well. Enjoy your impending aneurism.




TO DIRECTFIESTA FROM DYNAMO:
Don't take the truce! Dynamo has an itchier trigger finger than John McCain! D'oh!

There are 29 reply on this page of this topic.. (30 if you count this post) Of those 15 are your posts.. I think we all know who is agitated.. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Update: I just saw Dynamo's new rants against TLCGirls.

Dyna - TLCGirls nailed you exactly. He's absolutely right about you. You must have terrible memory, and your rage is out of control.

Here's some Enya for you Dynamo



Chill...chill....

it's like shooting fish in a barrel with you fuckers!


hypocritical finger pointers that need me to agree with y'all.

i've got 27000 posts here dumbfuck. try and use the brain cell you have.

crockett science making more assumptions while overlooking the facts which are i'm taking on about 10 of you nitwits at once, by choice. from the get-go, i've been on the offensive in this thread about you and your libtard bros needing to point fingers and look down your noses at others. turnabout is fair play.

This guys rantings are just not worth paying any attention to anymore. It's a shame as he used to actually have some decent posts, but since he (obviously?) sold his account, it's just the same ramblings in every single post.

Hey GFY mods, there should be disclosure when someone obviously sells their account to a troll who is only here trying to drum up posts. If it's not true then that's fine, but it quacks like a duck etc.
:2 cents:

claims the dumbfuck who told me to go back to fucking my deceased mother when i offered an olive branch.

you're obvious and predictable, just like directfiesta. you want to continue to point your finger and keep with the negative stereotypes, regardless. both of you have proven that.

the truly fucking stupid part of your fucked up comment is you came in here and trolled me, you even added an insult about my avatar. i mean really, you got butthurt over my avatar and lashed out over it then proceed to write this drivel?

you are WAY over your head here.


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Aww my avatar, you mentioned my avatar and said it was weird! Who will tend my butthurt?

you were blinded by the science in my avatar and described it as a true clusterfuck, i corrected you by pointing out it's actual science. i'm not surprised this is your reaction to reality.

if anyone here is actually, you know, interested in learning science instead of lashing out over shit that confuses them, here's the MIT paper on hybrid imaging that goes into details re: the image i'm using for my avatar.

http://cvcl.mit.edu/hybrid/OlivaTorr...Siggraph06.pdf

Have you found a job yet? :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh


:thumbsup That ranks right up there with "We're gonna need a bigger boat." :1orglaugh

xcllnt analogy and a solid pop-culture reference. well played. :1orglaugh

..and that is your argument against what exactly?


Your olive branch had no apology to all of the previous insults you threw at me. And I already told you, I don't want your business, I don't want to be your friend. I can never be friends with anyone who thinks that animals made to suffer are "ok". I look over the fact that you think animal cruelty is nothing important to debate facts with you, but you take every possible opportunity to insult me and everyone else on GFY. In the end, you're just a waste of time.

They only thing I can say about stereotypes is that I enjoy the jokes. Otherwise I never consider stereottypical behaviour in anyone regardless of race, background, etc. Michelle Bachman is not typical, or a stereotype. She says outrageous dangerous things that should get her fired, while somehow managing not to get fired. You obviously love her which is why you stand up for her & Palin.


Congratulations for catching up on a subject that everyone else has know about for years now. Oh and by the way you are distributing copyright material (read the copyright, and send them the $5.00 or else change your handle to thief).

speaking of bat shit crazy.

You can't argue. You have no factual points to make. Your kung foo is not strong. You lose.

really?

all i've done the entire thread is argue and make factual points.



dumbfuck.

Tell you what I'm going to do. Since it's Easter/renewal Monday and the topic is about a peace accord, I'm going to extend the olive branch to you again. You can either go forward with it or continue attempting to insult me with personal attacks.

However, since you replied to my last attempt for us to knock it off by telling me to go fuck my deceased mother, i can't extend to you the same deal terms i did with the earlier poster who was incapable of accepting my offer and apology.



so here's your deal, this is not a framework, this is the deal:

you stop with the personal insults and apologize for all of your personal attacks and comments on me and I will do the same. this is not an attempt to be friends, that will never happen.

this is simply a cease-fire agreement.

take it or leave it.

God damn do you ever get tired of spewing out total shit.

Your like a cartoon on loop.. Liquid shit flying out of your mouth then followed by.. "Im right I'm right im right".

Then repeat. Every day. Spending God knows how much time over and over.

Perhaps your time would be better spent blowing your roomie. Talk about a complete lack of personal awareness.

Oh look, another one of my obsessed fans waxing right past several of my posts just to spew hypocritical shit.

Gofuckyouself dumbfuck.

hey douchebag dumbfuck, here's why you're a douchebag dumbfuck,

on your last drive-by rant at me here:


but you just overlooked several of my posts where i did in fact display humility, and calm offers of stopping trolling combined with a valid concern based on what we know about the framework.

+ your characterizing 27000 posts in a negative spin. stop having such a negative outlook on your life and your environment.

checkmate dumbfuck.