| aka123 |
04-10-2015 02:50 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
(Post 20445134)
i'm referring to the system/policy level, not the priority at the time level. of course cops have to prioritize, jtfc. for the 3rd time, it makes no sense to be in here arguing that cops need to be more accountable to the laws and at the same time argue that they don't have to hold up the ones some of you think are silly. like turn signaling. someone thinks turn signals are not important, someone else here thinks license plates lights are not important.
do you see where this is going? it's going off the deep end, everyone will have their particular law they think the cops should not enforce, driving 65, no open container or texting? fuck that i can drive better than most with an open coor's light in my hand texting the g/f re: what shirt i'm wearing to the party saturday.
|
Police has always to decide within policy level/ time level.
I haven't said that police shouldn't enforce something, I am saying that police shouldn't enforce all things equally. As the laws for starters don't treat things equally, why should police? Police prioritizes. Especially, as I have already said; police is public service job, not some law enforcing robot. "Robocop in duty; burned license plate light detected. Maximum force authorized! Execute."
And as this discussion is related to bad cops killing people, assaulting people with various ways, etc., I don't think that being accountable for enforcing license plate lights has that much to do with the previous issues. Even if they don't care a shit worth about license plate lights (and we don't care a shit worth about that), they are still accountable for killing people. |
