![]() |
|
Quote:
NOBODY is saying get rid of "National Parks". I'm saying that the Federal Govt. has no business owning all of the other property they own. 28% of the United States land mass. And most of it they sell leasing rights out to companies and make money off of it. :( That should be CITIZENS owning all that extra property and CITIZENS being able to make that money. Get it? Not the Govt. Not bureaucrats. But the PEOPLE themselves. Again...NOT talking about Yosemite Fucking National Park. I'm talking about all of that other property that isn't open to the public but is "owned" by the Feds. I don't think anyone has a problem with the govt. having National Parks for people to view. And by the way...the OP's (crockett) original title was a lie. National Parks were NEVER in that proposal. Just some of the OTHER land (the land the govt. shouldn't have in my opinion) was being proposed to sell off. And in my opinion the Federal Govt. has no right to "sell" that land to it's own citizens. It should be GIVEN BACK to the people of the state the land is in. |
Quote:
This is what the topic is about that YES THEY ARE TRYING to do away with many of the categories of what are considered National Parks.. IE National Forests, National wildlife preserves.. ect..ect.. It's also not a fucking lie.. quit being so fucking dense..Open your eyes and read the damn information I spoon fed you. |
Quote:
In other words...NONE. Just billions of acres of property that you and I are not ALLOWED to go on. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123