![]() |
I class Namibia which is above South Africa and borders Angola, Zimbabwe and Botswana as a kind of second home.
I have been multiple times and love the place. I usually travel to the north (Ondangwa, Oshikati region) and above. Here you don't get running water or electricity for the most part but for many it's a chosen way of life. Most big shops have security with a gun on the door and you have to leave bags at the door.. Street kids are a nuisance often... Aside from this though the people are fantastic and friendly and the country is truly amazing. |
By the way. We have "natives vs immigrants" issue. But it is not quite hot issue, as it is not that easy to tell who is the native and who is the immigrant. No demands about getting shipped back yet. :)
http://www.lapinkansa.fi/cs/Satellit...&ssbinary=truehttp://www.voice.fi/files/content_80...f5f0d87e58.jpg |
Quote:
|
it looks like, but ask shimmy :)
Quote:
|
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Quote:
|
sure man..for sure...but did you asked yourself why in XVII, XVIII or XIX century, when white man has long distance ships, guns and pistols, black Africans were living like white men were in stone age ?
was it also a fault of white men ?:winkwink::winkwink::winkwink: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
what did the white man do with his long distance ships, guns and pistols? ENSLAVE the black man :thumbsup it is never ever the white mans fault, nor the white mans systems fault...it can not be so because it is scientifically proven fact that americans can do no wrong :1orglaugh "land of the free" http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...18_634x422.jpg black people and their military escort to school http://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/me.../4e6be55d7.jpg obviously the slavery and military escorts were not the white mans fault :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh somebody will post about some black slave traders and this is all mericans will need to feel not responsible for anything at all :1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
I dont know if I'm not writing in English or you dont understand English, but you didnt answer my question.
which was: but did you asked yourself WHY in XVII, XVIII or XIX century, when white man has long distance ships, guns and pistols, black Africans were living like white men were in stone age ? was it also a fault of white men ? Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Advanced societies need large scale agriculture. No big guns and ships without it, and no large armies. And it is hard to have large scale agriculture in Africa without modern methods, and developing modern methods requires large scale agriculture (so, dead end). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
stone age is a bit of stretch...not having ships for transporting guns and pistols is a crime?...focusing on agriculture is evil?... why are africans supposed to satisfy some westerners standard or idea of how they should live? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh also how africans lived has shit all to do with how they live now in the USA...the whitey brought them there in a whitey system and they, the african people, are not doing well to say the least :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh now go wash your hands from any responsibility its the western thing to do :thumbsup we all know its their fault they got kidnapped and turned in to slaves and centuries later they need to be escorted to school by the military (just 50 years ago in the USA) and this is also the blacks fault for not using some of that "magic success powder" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh ah watching whiteys dance around being responsible for anything at all :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
and your point is ? was africa developed like Europe in XVI or XIX century or it was rather something like visit from Star Trek, when one developed civilisation meets the other one that is undeveloped ?
Quote:
|
i'm sorry, but you wont convince me to support gw bush :winkwink:
he should be charged with war crimes just like his fellows rumsfeld and others Quote:
|
first rule in this world: weak is conquered by stronger, dumb is conquerer by smart...
is it the strong and smart ones' fault that the others were weaker and dumber from the beginning ? Earth is not filled unfortunately wth Buddhists, its filled with carnivores white men civilisation was stronger and better developed in XVI century and in the future. so they conquered the weak and dumb ones. Black people from africa are not good in building civilisation structures at all. they prefered to live in tribes let me know if you will need just one more explanation why Africans were conquered few hundreds years ago, but I'm already tired of explaining it over and over again Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course depends what you think is large army, but real mass armies golden age was from 1900 onwards. For example mighty Rome had about 180 000 men at best. Napoleon about 500 000 (1800-). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Home - Ancient Warfare - Karwansaray Publishers |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In all seriousness though, it's not really his fault. He's an undereducated war refugee with no real chance at life so he's quite bitter. Fair enough I guess. |
Quote:
https://www.google.fi/maps/@3.252457,23.6211706,4z |
Quote:
|
exactly, and the black people were living in....
and first time I hear that Africans were first to invent gunpowder, I've been always thinking it was a China;-):1orglaugh:1orglaugh unless you mean guys from Middle East which is not exactly black Africa :) Quote:
|
anyway, the people who build empires on that and made BIG money, were the white guys....
Quote:
|
Quote:
"before westerners/ and or Asian inventions (like gunpowder)." To be more exact: before westerners and the inventions from Middle-East and Asia. Chickens are from Asia too. |
Quote:
|
the only "empire" worth mentioning from Africa - and not from Middle east or North, Arab Africa- that comes to my mind is the Ethiopian empire.
the rest was just dancing around the fire and fighting with lions :winkwink: anyway, it doesnt matter as none of these african "empires" had any real knowledge, sciene or tech that could be dagerous for European conquers from XV century and upwards. once again - they were in technological shithole Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
For example I don't want blacks in Finland, but I don't want any abuse towards those who already are in here. Despite normal deporting if necessary, as criminal refugees are sometimes deported. It is kinda late to start after centuries; "Get out of here, you don't belong to here." Especially the ones saying that aren't any more natives in US, excluding indians. |
Quote:
vietman= evil evil communists trying to destroy the USA they deserve bombs! korea= evil evil communists trying to destroy the USA they deserve bombs! russians= evil evil communists trying to destroy the USA they deserve bombs! avghanistan= evil evil muslims trying to destroy the USA they deserve bombs! iran=evil evil muslims trying to destroy the USA they deserve bombs! iraq=evil evil muslims trying to destroy the USA they deserve bombs! africa=low IQ barbarians who deserve to be slaves ect ect so in the light of the fact that the USA expects others to live like its corporate government says so, or get bombed, the USA opens itself wide open to criticism...your country is "great" if you are rich...and full of shit if you are not... want others to stop mentioning you in a negative context? then stay the fuck at home, use your own oil, shut the fuck up, and do not make the rest of the world have to arm the fuck up to keep you klingons at home...also you may want to invest in education some more instead of the """""""""""""""""defence budget"""""""""""""""""" Quote:
want objective? ok I think you should do the exact same thing in baltimore as you did in my country...there is obviously violence and trouble in baltimore, waaaaaaaaaaaaay mooooooooooore trouble than my country ever ever had *before the USA gave arms and logistical support to separatists in my country* so in all fairness I think you should arm the black people of baltimore like you armed the separatists in my country :thumbsup you are obviously a troubled troubled country, where people riot in the streets and if this was some other shit hole you would be devastating the local economy with sanctions and blackmailing the shit out of the population with US corporate demands... do as you did in serbia= arm the rioting population the fuck up and give them military and political support :thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
as for "be a man and admit serbs hate croats" well you first have to learn a little history: 1) serbia was not involved in the war at all 2) the bosnian war was basically the whole world against the serb minority in BOSNIA and croatia, this is why it is called the war in BOSNIA and not the war in Serbia 3) we had more peace between serbia and croatia, before the US supported war, than the USA ever ever ever ever had on its own territory... 4) a peace deal was already signed by all 3 sides and then the USA gave military and political support to separatists... 5) american presidents and politics are not very honest, bill clinton "the man who did not have sex with that woman" is basically a good indicator of how desperate US politics have become...so is george "invisibe WMD in iraq" bush... the USA is one political party above a dictatorship...and both parties have the same corporate masters... |
Quote:
I have said publicly before you seem like a smart guy - your English is much better than my Serbian. But you would be more effective if you took a balanced view of your country and mine. |
Quote:
Those are literally the third generation of those morons that I've personally seen. I remember them as the 12 lost tribes of Israel, back in the late 70s, in the middle of Times Square. Same quoting from the bible and yelling at "so called" White people. |
What we can take away from this long rambling thread is that Grapesoda is a fucking fool who lives in Montana and has never actually seen or talked to a black person.
|
Quote:
Covert United States foreign regime change actions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia A Timeline of CIA Atrocities considering the USA is only 5% of the worlds population: https://nelsnewday.files.wordpress.c...pg?w=596&h=326 now taking in to account the above I would say my views, to my great regret, are balanced...you are a 2 party north korea with money....I can bet my nuts that kim jong un will win the next elections in N.korea but a more certain bet would be that the democrats or republicans will win the ones in the USA :1orglaugh:1orglaugh I would like to believe americans do not support their governments foreign policy, but they volunteer in droves to go bomb other countries and keep voting in the same corporate governments over and over again and "thank you for your service" their terrorists when they come home...5% of the world that is the USA does 50% of the military spending, how north korea can you get? I understand that the US economy is a huge bubble and that voting in change, instead of exploiting the world, would mean hard hard times for the USA...for this very reason you will vote democrat or republican for as long as the bubble will hold... I sympathize with the black people in the USA because we in the 3rd world are in a similar position...we were only 20 years under crippling sanctions and I know how hard it is to recover when all the "aid" that comes in is nothing more than loan sharking...exactly like the poor are treated in the USA... as for the white people in the USA, I do not think they are "out to get me"...but I truly believe that if they had the chance of having cheaper gas, at the expense of some 3rd world country getting completely obliterated, they would take the chance and not give it a second thought... |
Quote:
|
2,000 years ago, founded in NORTH AFRICA and it was far from being "Black Empire" as it was founded by white Arab/ Semitian guys
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Quote:
|
Quote:
I will throw a ball back to you. Why didn't the all mighty and superior whiteys establish significant settlements around the equator, especially in the middle parts? Most whiteys live either in North-Africa, or in South-Africa, and even the rest somewhat near the coast. White Africans of European ancestry - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
USA is not Rome - we're lucky if we get to be the Hittites. Rome was the one 1000 year power; half of the shit done today comes from it.
It was also filled with slaves. Maybe democracies and republics don't last, who knows? Kingship appears, in some cases to last longer, but every third king (at best) people suffer, even in stable empires. Socialist die in 30-50 years, totally unstable and easily turns into state terror and torture / mass execution. Greece, US, pre-empire Rome, max 300 years. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc