It's what they do: Deny, deny, deny, then change the topic, then quote themselves, forever and ever.

we all know that you guess at everything. and we all know that you always guess wrong, just like this time.

try to lie? knock it off. if you hadn't jumped on the Benghazi topic, neither would I. IN FACT, I couldn't have because I replied to YOU.

mark prince, usually people like you realize by now they are trying to chat with the big boys and can't, they are in over their heads. but you're even more dumb than the usual libtard. you have absolutely no clue you are in over your head.


dumbfucking canaduhian.

I didn't jump on the Benghazi topic.. I just replied to his post with a question.. You brought up Benghazi and whined about liberals.. Also you did not reply to me.. You replied to Dvae about Benghazi..

you apologized for Obama and Hillary's State Department abject failure in Benghazi and I commented on that.

I've already commented on the OP and that is sounds just like a soprano episode with a bunch of fat jersey mob fuckwads.

come on!

I didn't apologize for anyone. I asked why is it that Benghazi is so important but a war and 13 other attacks get no notice.

Again.. the question still stands but all you do is try to avoid it and talk in circles..

you are trying to answer a factual comment with a rhetorical question.


Moreover, your rhetorical question is fundamentally flawed, because if you think that the attacks on USA and the wars under Bush's watch have gone unscrutinized, you're only kidding yourself, and that dumbfuck mark prince prolly.

Bullshit.. Republicans did everything possible to try and stop investigation into the Iraq war.. They activity blocked oversight committees and investigation panels even fired a fellow Republican lawyer whom uncovered fraud within the war contracts..

The Right has done everything possible to stop investigations on Iraq.. Meanwhile Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!!!

House blocks Democrats' resolution on Iraq war - The Boston Globe

The Raw Story | Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman rebuffs attempts to interview Administration officials in pre-war Iraq probe

House Blocks Democrats' Iraq Resolution

Chairmen Hunter, Goss Block Probes of Torture

Bush Used the IRS, FBI, CIA and Secret Service to Go After Opponents -- Where Was the Fox and GOP Outrage? | Alternet



No GOP or GFY Right Winger outrage over any of this!!! Dat diffrant!!

crockett. look. you know me. you know i'm the guy that came up with the crockett science moniker. so i know you know i'm smarter than this. 10 year old links? please. i live on Earth, in America, i update my self on pertinent topics.

so, come on, knock it the fuck off. !

umm how long ago do you think the Iraq war started? I'm pointing out that as usual you right wingers claim "liberals this", "liberals that" yet time and time again you guys are the ones whom play party politics above all else. You complain or blow it off if investigations are launched against Republicans but beat a dead horse like Benghazi where nothing of note has ever turned up as far as wrong doing. Yet you guys go on and on.. and completely ignore any wrong doing on your team..

I mean serious look at all the wasted money during the Clinton years with Kenneth Star.. it was investigation and investigation until they scored with the BJ scandal. Bush comes to office "no investigations" you are anti American if you don't support this war.. ect..ect.. Obama's in office investigation, investigation, investigation..

You guys do nothing but play party politics and constantly drag the entire country into the mud for your own political gain.

Just today.. a Republican House member states "if we can't impeach Obama we can block everything"

GOP Congressman: Since We Can't Impeach Obama, We're Not Going To Confirm Anyone - BuzzFeed News

This is the mentality of the Right Wing.. tear everything down if they can't win..

The teabillies in action.....

https://scontent-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hp...a5&oe=55C7B353

you keep proofing my OP, which was it's bizarre to me how liberals can simply hand-wave off Benghazi for whatever reasons you can dream up, this time it's on account of, you know, Bush/republicans bad, see here's a bad republican link.

again, none of that has anything to do with the fact that Benghazi was an attack on USA and Americans were killed. Obviously, you don't care about that and trying to do better by examining it and learning from it, obviously neither does BO or Hillary, but many of us do.

Dynamo, people aren't "simply" waiving off Bengazzi. There have been investigations and many many hearings by whatshisname. It has been very thoughly looked at by your republican party as I'm sure you would agree, and nothing was found.

Wow that's just sad...

Can you imagine being the President and having to put up with this kind of nonsense?

you missed the link i posted earlier showing plenty was found and the attack could have been prevented.

you also missed crockett blowing off Benghazi in this very thread as well as plenty of liberals that do the same here and elsewhere.

also, you're forgetting about the email from BO's gang to the WH press secretary at the time listing talking points to distract from the attack.

You keep going on and only about liberal "hand-waving Benghazi" yet I answered you what I thought about Benghazi.. Added to this you are being a hypocrite because I have asked you a half dozen times now why is Benghazi so special compared to the Iraq war or the 13 attacks before Benghazi..

So why is it Dyna-Mo "hand-waves" those 13 other attacks and the lies which sent us to Iraq? Why do they mean nothing to you? Why do you just make excuses and ignore what I've asked you several times and then go on to complain about Benghazi?

That's like common day talking points for the average tea bagger right wing extremist. Go read some of the commits on articles at places like CBS News.. it's insane what goes through the minds of some of these guys.

The only person blowing shit off is you. Why are you a hypocrite?

This was my answer to you about Benghazi a page and a half ago..

Yet a page and a half later you still dodge it every time I ask you why you care nothing about the deaths of Americans killed in Iraq due to lies or the 13 attacks prior to Benghazi.

See the difference is just like with Global Warming.. you are un willing to accept a answer which doesn't fit your preconceived ideas. It's the same with Benghazi the same with Global Warming and everything thing else you can turn into a left vs right argument. It doesn't matter what science says or what the investigations say you will always claim Obama & Hillary caused Benghazi and that Global Warming is a Hoax to make Al Gore rich. That solar energy is useless ect..ect.. Anything that is turned into a right vs left argument, you always side with the right no matter what the evidence shows.

The worst part is, you are actually kind of tame in this mentally. There are other right wing GFYers whom are far worse, but this aditude is pretty much the norm for all conservatives. It would be a rare fucking unicorn to see any conservative whom doesn't believe the same shit.

wrong as per usual. i'm unwilling to accept YOUR answer over the official conclusions of investigations that state the attack could have been prevented but both BO WH and HIllary's State Department were asleep at the wheel then tried to spin the story into some Muslim bullshit.

but again, I get it, attacks on USA are not important to you, i'm not trying to convince you they are, I'm pointing out the fact you don't care.

as for you're little temper tantrum you are throwing here, exclaiming i turn pollution into a political argument and that solar is worthless is what a child does when some other kids trumps him in the playground, making shit up to try and find something to insult.

the simple fact is i have much more experience, knowledge and expertise in both curbing pollution and solar power than both you and mark prince combined x 500.

keep squirming.

New Documents Blow Lid Off Obama/Clinton Benghazi Scandal - Breitbart


rather than admitting that they caused an Islamist conflagration in Libya by ousting and killing Gadhafi – Obama/Clinton preferred to ignore pleas for increased security from Ambassador Stevens; to abandon him and his colleagues to rampaging terrorists; refused to follow up with force against those who attacked us; and to lie to the American people about the nature of the attack.

Rather than admit that it was a planned attack by a terrorist group in league with al Qaeda, the Obama/Clinton machine knowingly put out the lie that the killings were the result of a spontaneous demonstration in response to an obscure Internet video supposedly offensive to radical Islamists. The message: don’t blame us – blame those who offend Islamists (conservatives, Republicans, etc.). Indeed, rather than sending our military to eliminate the enemy in Libya, the Obama administration arrested the poor sap who made the offending video.

State Department Benghazi Ops Alert FOIA - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch recently struck smoking-gun gold in another cache of documents we forced out of the State Department. The documents show that top aides for then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, including her then-chief of staff Cheryl Mills, knew from the outset that the Benghazi mission compound was under attack by armed assailants tied to a terrorist group. The documents we’ve extracted from the Obama administration only through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01511)).

Again.. Why are you squirming and avoiding the same question I've asked you over half a dozen times? You go on and on rambling like a lunatic. Why do you blow off the lies told about Iraq and why are the 13 previous attacks on embassies not targeted for the same scrutiny which you place on Benghazi..

Seriously this is going to be my only reply to you in this topic. I will just repete the same question over and over until you quit squirming and trying to hide behind Benghazi.

You are just like Dave., he claimed Obama, Obama, Obama.. So I asked him what could Obama have done diffrent.. He has yet to answer.. I assume he's just staring in the mirror dumbfounded.

I didn't ignore Iraq and such. When those evants happened, you know, over a decade ago and with an entirely different adminstration, I involved myself.

But, hey, I get it, you need to cling to the past in order to ignore the current.

It's the same thing and I bet you can't show us posts where you critiqued the Bush admin over the 13 attacks prior to Benghazi nor of the lies he and his admin told about Iraq.

Also, the Benghazi attack was Sept 11, 2011 if 10 years ago is in the past.. Why do you keep complaining about 4 years ago? What is the cut off point when you no longer care? Was it when Obama got elected.. Ie you only care because of Obama...

So this thread is about........... benghazi. Awesome. Lets get Benghazi to the top of search results for bridgegate!

Chris Christie, such a Gay name

Everything is about Benghazi.. They have nothing positive to point at from their own team. Their team has done nothing in the past 6 or 7 years (however long Obana has been in office). They can't point to any real leadership, they can't even point to Geoge Bush's leadership. All they have is Benghazi and Ronnald Reagan.. And even he sucked at running the country.

I mean really the hero of the GOP.. Let a military Officer go to jail because he himself (Reagan) wouldn't own up to his actions as commander in chief.. Kinda like Christe and letting his aides take the fall for him..

Meanwhile they were outraged that Clinton lied about getting a BJ.. There really is no figuring out the logic of the consertive mind. It's all for the team or nothing it seems..

Chris Christie, such a Gay name

mu join date is 2008 and i have 25k posts, get real. Besides, i have zero need to prove to you above and beyond what i just wrote right in this thread- that I criticized that administration while it was in charge just like i do this one. That right there was in fact pointing out that, wait for it, I was critical of the Bush adminstration. In other words, I was critical of the Bush adminstration. To make it even more clear, when Bush was in charge, I was critical of Bush. To rephrase for you, crockett, I criticized the Bush White House. Finally, I criticized the Bush Admin.

And Benghazi investigations are still happening. IN fact, the FBI as yet to wrap its investigation. Combined with Hillary seriously running for office, Benghazi is very much a current event, if you think realistically evaluating the current admin and potential PUSA is complaining,
then you are not American. which I've suspected for a while now.
that explains why you don't care about attacks on America and Americans being killed in those attacks.

been to NJ often, but never knew Benghazi was there :warning

this thread would have died a long time ago if i hadn't spiced it up by quoting crockett's post about Obama not being able to make a difference re: attacks on America.

You're feisty and that's sexy keep it up!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

with crockett and mark prince, it's a full-time gig!

So now you admit to changing the subject.. How are we ever to belive a word you say, when one min you deny then the next you take credit..

Chris Christie, such a Gay name

i already pointed that out. i also posted that I commented on the thread topic, remember? i stated it seems like a Soprano's episode full of fat mob guys in stretch slacks. and I also mentioned that I quoted YOUR post apologizing for BO's being more concerned with politics instead of protecting Americans in Benghazi. so i've never denied pointing the thread in a different direction, i quoted your comment to do that.


it's all a matter of record right here in this thread. but hey, if you want to take credit for derailing your own thread, have at it.

Ex-CIA official says GOP politicized Benghazi, distorted agency's analysis of events

Published May 04, 2015Associated Press


WASHINGTON ? A former CIA deputy director writes in a new book that Republicans have repeatedly distorted the agency's analysis of the Benghazi attack in 2012. Michael Morell says the events were distorted about the attack that killed the American ambassador to Libya.

That's according to The New York Times. Morell dismissed the notion that CIA officers and the military "were ordered to stand down" and not come to the aid of their comrades in Benghazi, Libya. And he says in the book there's no evidence the Central Intelligence Agency conspired with the White House to spin the Benghazi story to protect then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But he also wrote that the White House embellished some of the talking points provided by the CIA about the Benghazi attack.

Ex-CIA official says GOP politicized Benghazi, distorted agency's analysis of events | Fox News


OK, let's switch to the IRS ....

gay thread...too many f:1orglaughacts.

I know you're gay for me.

He learned this from the republican playbook. When pushed against the wall with irrefutable facts, deflect!